4x5

>but not as good as some of my other work
Or it's just as mediocre as the rest of the shots, but just makes you hungry for KFC.

I mean large format can make dog turds breathtaking. Good exposure and pose but her expression is goofy.

>>3087515
End of thread.

>>3087512
I'm fine with it being mediocre, but I'm curious why I've gotten more responses to this image.

>>3087515
>her

File: 14963504020972.jpg (458KB, 1352x1690px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 1352x1690px

>>3087504
Composition is somewhat off. Out of balance.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1600
Image Height	2000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:01 23:19:18
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1352
Image Height	1690

File: 149635040209722.jpg (457KB, 1352x1690px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 1352x1690px

>>3087520
Even that one is not in harmony.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1600
Image Height	2000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:01 23:22:31
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1352
Image Height	1690

>>3087518
You managed to capture something that is becoming a rarity in the US. A white woman actually cooking.

what kind of hipster is this even, roasting a dead bird corpus? .. geez, you're all such fake.

>>3087522
>woman

File: 1496350402097.jpg (1MB, 1600x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x2000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1600
Image Height	2000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:01 16:36:03
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1600
Image Height	2000

>>3087530
CLUCK CLUCK

>>3087504
This photo is the epitome of "why is there a photo?"
That question becomes even harder to answer satifactorily once you take into account the effort required to make it; if in fact it is TMax at 80 with a monorail and a 150mm wide open and no flash indoors, processed yourself in a $300 tank.
Xhe must have had to hold that retarded pose and grimace for a good second, I guess? Plus the minute or so it took you to set your camera up while xhe's trying to get that child in the oven.
And then after all that, you fucked the exposure and comp, and did this slider-raping abortion of an edit on it.
>why???
It got a "response" because it's a bizarre looking photo of a weirdo fucking crossdresser that you claim is on muh large format.
>although I wouldn't be surprised if it's a 40/2 mounted on a sony with "grain" applied

>>3087504
You should sell your camera and buy some glasses, this photo is fucking trash.

>post photos of your friends on /p/
>watch anons work out their insecurities and tear your friends apart based on appearance

>>3087561
My sides are on orbit, well done.

>>3087504
I don't think it works at all. composition is trash, picture is corny imo, pose is weird, weird face. No style direction, nothing that makes it stand out to me besides a Large snapshit.

Nothing like a large format photo to bring out all of the salty jelly fags who are clambering over each other to tear it apart. It's a time-honored tradition around this dump.

>>3087504
What' the purpose behind this photo? Why did you take it?

Also I'm curious as to what few places you shared this.