Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10
File: 34859488965_8d81e205d0_b.jpg (418KB, 1024x838px) Image search:
[Google]
418KB, 1024x838px
So, I wanted to try something new with shooting and limit myself to a specific location. These were all taken near or on my city's waterfront over the course of two days. The long exposure stuff was shot with Acros 100 and everything else was a mix of HP5+ and TMAX 400. Comments and crits are encouraged - rip my work to shit.
>>
File: 34667488282_77a6755f06_b.jpg (318KB, 1024x828px) Image search:
[Google]
318KB, 1024x828px
>>
File: 34790806146_c1f46d3a5d_b.jpg (413KB, 820x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
413KB, 820x1024px
>>
File: 34667494062_598edbd655_b.jpg (320KB, 878x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
320KB, 878x1024px
>>
File: 34667492362_a4ee42881c_b.jpg (339KB, 1024x878px) Image search:
[Google]
339KB, 1024x878px
>>
File: 34698580171_8c790205eb_b.jpg (369KB, 1024x878px) Image search:
[Google]
369KB, 1024x878px
>>
File: 34020683063_a7ff4aeaaa_b.jpg (206KB, 840x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
206KB, 840x1024px
>>
File: 34582543236_87792fe6de_b.jpg (304KB, 1024x812px) Image search:
[Google]
304KB, 1024x812px
>>
File: 34493229561_4e232af297_b.jpg (237KB, 830x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
237KB, 830x1024px
>>
File: 33813843953_4951d0a9cc_b.jpg (209KB, 852x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
209KB, 852x1024px
>>
Some good some meh. You know which ones are silly snapshits. What camera did you use?
>>
>>3082543
An RB67 with a 65mm and 127mm.
>>
fuckit, here's a necro bump
>>
They're all snapshits. There's no cohesiveness to them. There is nothing that ties them together other than they may have been from the same location (which isn't even that apparent). There's no subject being communicated here.
Composition is marginally decent at best.
Think through a plan for your "project" before you set out and work on communicating something through your set of photos vs. just taking random snapshits of "neat" looking things.
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10