/fgt/ - Film General Thread

Any recommendations on good cheap point and shoots?

File: 165012_l.jpg (147KB, 770x647px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 770x647px

>>3077673
>Not even joking.

>>3077674

>27 poses

you better have those 27 poses

File: fujisup025.jpg (1MB, 1378x849px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1378x849px

I feel like there isn't any joy in using digital cameras now

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:07 13:55:38

>>3077674
Second this. I particularly love the Fuji 1600 iso disposable.

>>3077673
Xa2. After shooting a ton of p&s from MJUs, to Klasses, to T4s, the xa2 has been my favorite. Unless you shoot mostly close ups, the xa2 kills it.

>>3077674
>That godtier exposure
>That retinaburning flash
>That no lag shutter action
>That giant viewfinder
>That solid Superia 400 film
>Tiny size
>Lightweight body

If Henri-Cartier Bresson was still alive he would use this camera.

>>3077676
This^ Every since I got film last July I've neglected the fuck out of my DSLR

File: untitled-5.jpg (620KB, 1999x656px) Image search: [Google]

620KB, 1999x656px

>>3077676
>I feel like there isn't any joy in using digital cameras now
I agree with this. However, I see the immense value in digital for commercial and sports photography.

My opinion is that it would be healthy for every other field of photography to work with film. At least to learn to approach photography more slowly. Take your time with each scene.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

I know it's not exactly "film" but is the Fuji Instax line any good as a cool toy to use from time to time when you're with your normie friends?

>>3077711
It is pretty cool, especially if you get the Wide version but the cost per shot is a bit restrictive. And it is film.

>>3077674
The cheapest I've seen these ones online are 12€ a pop. Is it really worth to risk getting one with a grossly expired film? They're discontinued as fuck.

>>3077669
link the new thread in the old thread dummy

>>3077676

When ever i go out shooting with my ricoh gr or a7rii i get excited because i know i got a few good shots. I get back home and edit the photos.. but i kinda lost the connection between me and the pictures i took. Film makes me pre-vizuallize my shots makes me look into more details of the subject or the scene.

Printing and Developing is also another art form that takes a lot of patience and knowledge to just craft what that has been taken with your camera depending on the look and feel of the film you are after.

I mean with digital megapixels feels really artificial than film grains and having to shoot on a medium and large format with even more resolution, sharper images, more details and having the luxury to do movements is something you can never get on a digital camera even when your has 50 or 100 megapixels.

Im sticking to film all the way because that whats separates an artist to a photographer

>>3077722
They are not discontinued.
I bought a pair a few weeks ago and their expiration date was end of 2018.
Also should be about 8 € a pop, 15 € for a double pack.

>>3077732
I'll have to look harder then, thought they were discontinued due to the apparent unavailability. There are some cheaper ones from Kodak and Agfa at 10€ each, but the Fuji ones are particularly expensive...

>>3077674
Totally this, I got them for 8$ Canadian. One of the only cameras with no shutter lag, flash, and actually pocketable. It's a bonus I like soup 400 too.

I decided to get serious with film and start to devellope my own BW, just ordered lab equipment a couple of days ago.But yesterday my Nikon F3 died on me , i bought it used with warranty so i´ll get my money back. I still have ai 35mm f2. Right now i´m thinking about a replacement. Should I get another F3, or should i save some money and get something cheaper like a FE2. I´m also considering selling the lens and buying something completly different like a rangefinder or a MF. There so many options any advice is welcome.

>>3077745

if you're serious about shooting in film i suggest something that can last you abit more. If you're not a poor fag invest on a minolta cle with a voightlander lens. Or else find a mint condition nikon FE2..

but frankly speaking, i would go for an MF camera if i were you and go get a p&s for 35mm so you can bring them everywhere on your daily routine without bringing extra equipment with rhe MF.

im still contemplating if i should get a 4x5 with a 6x17 back so i can get some nice movements but slower process. Thinking of getting the Horseman 45fa with a dayi 6x17 back

or get a fujifilm gx617 which is faster to set up and not really a bitch to carry around but lacks of movements and limited amount of lens.

suggestions?

found a Olympus EE-3 for 10us in some good will, is it worth?

What do do you guys think of the pen f? I like the idea of having 72 shots per film and think it´s the most beatiful camera ever built.
How does it handle? Is it reliable?

Said this in the old thread as it was dying. How far do you think I can push lomo 100?

>>3077727
>Im sticking to film all the way because that whats separates an artist to a photographer

The medium which one use to express ones art does not matter.

>>3077767
B&w or c41?

anyone else unable to upload images?

>>3077765
ohh fuck you, you reminded me i wanted one once. now ill have to get it. its a fine camera, but the neat lenses are fuckall expensive because of the mirrorless turds.

Anon who couldn't find cheap Fuji Quicksnaps online here. I went on a quick brick&mortar trip around my city center and they where nowhere to be found either, all places just had the Kodak FunSaver and it's not like I went to big chains, but indie places too. I decided to get an Ilford b/w and a lomography color disposables to fool around a little bit.

>>3077782
Yep, upload error in both mobile and PC

File: kent057_DxO.jpg (186KB, 643x1024px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 643x1024px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: IMG_20170517_195924.jpg (249KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1000x750px

>>3077809
Welp. looks like it works again. These two, and the lomography one can be easily reloaded with more film.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Xiaomi
Camera Model	MI 5
Camera Software	gemini-user 7.0 NRD90M V8.2.1.0.NAACNEB release-keys
Sensing Method	Unknown
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4608
Image Height	3456
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:17 19:59:25
Exposure Time	3645687/62500000 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	682
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.55 m
Metering Mode	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.26 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4608
Image Height	3456
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: kent058_DxO.jpg (169KB, 1024x643px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1024x643px

>>3077815
kentmere 400
super cheap, really like the look, but the negatives get scratched so fucking easily

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: R II.jpg (2MB, 2000x2057px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2057px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	15310
Image Height	7206
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:05:13 16:17:50
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2000
Image Height	2057

anyone here having expierence with seagulls? could get one for 60 bucks is it worth it?

File: D3S_7445-1200.jpg (166KB, 1063x428px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1063x428px

which is better? or is there anything different recommended for me? i am new to analog photography. Somebody said buy minolta xd7 but didn't give me a reason

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:17 20:54:15
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1063
Image Height	428

>>3077824
they look cool as fuck, but ive read tons of bad experiences with it. of course there are good units around, but they are mostly in the unreliable and faulty side.

>>3077780
B&w

>>3077836
The AE-1 is a better camera by almost any sane reasoning.
However the Pentax is all metal and all mechanical, meaning it will run just fine without batteries. The caveat is that it's probably 15 years older than the Canon, so is less likely to run properly.
The Canon has a much better viewfinder, much better, smaller and cheaper lenses, is much lighter, and has auto-exposure.

>>3077836
AE1 is cookie-cuter hipster generic safe plastic gears trash. Pentax Spotmatic is 100% mystic all metal KINO.

your choice.

>>3077727
>tfw the nerve gas hits

File: AE1P400NC205.jpg (279KB, 1037x800px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1037x800px

>>3077910
Kek. Post one good photo you've taken with a screw mount Pentax.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:15 09:04:10
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/9.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1037
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Partial
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

File: 200T.jpg (912KB, 1500x994px) Image search: [Google]

912KB, 1500x994px

>>3077913
>550D
>lomo colors
oh its the digicuck scanner with no pp skills.

get good or get cucked, my man.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3199 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3199 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:17 18:39:14
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	994

>>3077820
I got some really nice shots with the Ilford, good choice lad

I'm thinking of selling my Mju ii to help fund a Fuji Natura Classica. Is this a good idea?

>>3077933
yes.

File: IMG_2410.jpg (122KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1200x800px

>>3077927
Well in fairness to me, I did scan and process that two years ago, and it at least has even illumination across the frame, no dust, and it actually looks sharp, unlike your meme.
I'm fine with the colours too, it was a very blue day.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.6
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2015:05:05 00:37:49
Exposure Time	1/90 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

File: IMG_20160916_201949.jpg (174KB, 622x630px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 622x630px

>>3077933
If you want a zoom yeah. If you're just going to keep shooting at roughly 35mm, no.

>>3077894
>>3077896
>>3077897
>>3077899
>>3077904

Can I hear some comments on my first photos please? They're all underexposed that was an accident, most of them are messed up but there's some decent ones.

File: 78720003.jpg (526KB, 1000x760px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 1000x760px

portra 160

I like how these guys are standing

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:17 19:21:24
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3077960
you have to get the technical aspects down before we can judge your composition/choice of subjects

keep shooting

>>3077948
>>3077936
How sharp is the Classica lens?

>>3077933
what´s the deal about the Natura Classica?
I couldn´t find much info about it. Just found some blogs saying it´s good for low light. But no real explanation why it should be better than any other camera, it doesn´t even have such a wide aperture

File: IMG_20170518_110657.jpg (187KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1000x750px

>>3078007
Tbh, not much. There's the NP mode, but the Natura S with its 1.9 lens makes for a much better lowlight argument. I don't see much reason to get the Classica aside from wanting a zoom. And even then not sure if I would choose it over a Contax TVS.

Today's kit. Fuji Fuji fuji

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:05:18 11:06:58
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	3.2 EV
ISO Speed Rating	55
Exposure Time	1/40 sec

>>3078023
Been tempted to get one of these for a long time, so I can jack off and pretend to shoot gravure. You like yours?

>>3078023
How much time a week do you spend taking photos and is it something that ties into your profession?

File: IMG_20170515_074244.jpg (137KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 800x600px

>>3078048
Which one you talking about? The GA is fantastic, it's the perfect camera for me at the moment. Superb portable, aperture priority, and a stellar lens.

The Natura S I'm still getting used to. Not sure what I think just yet.

>>3078049
I commute by train and bike everyday, so if thr light is nice I take extra time and shoot. In one mine I maybe spend ~8 hours going out with the sole intention if shooting...but I always have a camera on me and shot quite a bit going to/from work.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:05:15 07:42:45
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	3 EV
ISO Speed Rating	62
Exposure Time	1/40 sec

>>3077968
I like it

I went to the harbor today to shoot, I found it incredibly hard. I'm a new photographer, and trying to find something which could be seen as noteworthy or come out rewarding and fresh was difficult to find.

I have a people phobia so aside from when I'm working down in LA at the homeless shelter I have a hard time going up and taking close up pics of people as well.

Anyone have good examples of harbor photography? I'll get them developed and uploaded in 2-3 days.

File: img018-3.jpg (786KB, 980x1530px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 980x1530px

Tried some fp4+ and I don't know if I dig it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:17 23:16:59
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: img019-2.jpg (835KB, 1383x1084px) Image search: [Google]

835KB, 1383x1084px

>>3078071

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:17 23:16:53
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3078071
im not digging it.

File: img006-2.jpg (591KB, 972x1542px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 972x1542px

>>3078072

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:17 23:19:32
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3078070
Don't shoot homeless its rude and exploitive. The only way you'll get over your fear is to talk to strangers and shoot more street pics. Go to festivals or urban events.

>>3078076

Kek, no no, I work at a homeless shelter, I've worked there for 3 years, it's a mix of druggies/former druggies/people just trying to live their lives/down on their luck people.

I know a lot of them so I find it easy to ask to shoot them. Thanks for the advice anyway.

>>3078077

If people have a story and are fine with you taking pictures of them, do it. Don't listen to anons jelly they don't have the fortitude to mingle with such filth

>>3078087
what was the insta of the guy that did homelesss portraits with a pentax 67? he put some dumb poetry besides the pics, total hit among plebs and women.

>>3078090
>homelesss portraits
fine
>pentax 67
very fine
>poetry
gross, nvm

File: 59810022.jpg (3MB, 3091x2048px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3091x2048px

>>3078087

I get what people mean by exploiting, technically you're exploiting almost anyone the moment you go taking pictures of them without permission.

I actually live in the homeless shelter too half the week, so the people i'm mainly around are homeless, not an opportunity i'm willing to pass up on.

I posted earlier, my photos were messed up, underexposure, had this guy who's a producer throwing up gang signs at me for a photo shoot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 8.01.001 2008.01.15
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3091
Image Height	2048

I've just had my shutter speed on B for a while now. I'm reading a canon manual that says 1,30,60 are ideal for indoor settings, and 125,250 for outdoors depending on cloudy day or sunlight.

Does this sound about right?

Will having it on B mess up your photos? I figured it was an automatic of sorts.

Should i play around with the 2,1 next to B or the 1,2,4,8, if i'm shooting indoors?

>>3078094
??? underexposure you can work with but a blurry mess you cannot. Keep your eye on that shutter speed. I don't know what lens you're using but for handheld never go below1/30. 1/45 really.

>>3078102
Use your meter and learn about exposure.

B stands for 'bulb' which means the shutter stays open for however long your finger is pressing the shutter button. Its meant for long exposures. All your photos will be blurry as hell and super overexposed. If you shot a whole roll this way I'd just throw it in the garbage and learn your lesson. Developing it will be a waste of money.

>>3078104

Oh i'm the guy asking the question, guess it was the fact i had it set on B. I have a canon ae-1 50mm lens.
>>3078105

Ya i'm doing some reading right now. I see, all apart of learning I guess.

>>3078090
undocumentarian

File: Hostel.jpg (627KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 1000x1000px

>>3078106
Learn how to read your camera meter. Study how exposure works. Trust your meter and you'll get well exposed shots. The learning curve is steep in the beginning, but it's also very short. Hope your next roll goes better!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:29 21:27:28
Exposure Time	8 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-7.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Tungsten
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

fucking hell almost all 35mm film on ebay is 24 exp.

this is no longer podracing.

>>3077968
wtf is that camera? film holder is weird
I like the photo

>>3078117

>2017
>buying film on ebay

there are other places that you can purchase 36 exp rolls senpai.

>>3078129
Such as? Of courss there are webshops, but they're expensive

>>3078131

Its almost the same price everywhere.

unless you buy expired films

File: untitled-6.jpg (796KB, 1999x654px) Image search: [Google]

796KB, 1999x654px

>>3078131
>>3078117
http://www.ebay.com/sch/films-festival/m.html?_nkw&_armrs=1&_ipg&_from&rt=nc&LH_BIN=1&_trksid=p2046732.m1684

http://www.ebay.com/sch/Film/4201/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=&_ssn=filmsfestival-au

Free shipping. Been buying from this seller for years.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3078127
Bronica etr

>>3078117
No it's not if you buy good film

I don't think portra, velvia, etc even comes in 24

>>3077745
if you liked the F3 and the lens options, just get a new one? it's generally regarded as excellent.

>>3077765
half frame, tons of grain...

File: 8743763371_b6c3dbe0f2_z.jpg (80KB, 640x462px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 640x462px

My old man gave me his N2020. He bought it when I was born and used it until digital cameras became a thing.

I had only used manual cameras before, so this thing is kinda nice. Autofocus, DX codes, auto-winding, etc.

But got damn is it loud.

I know nothing about Nikon lenses though, do you guys have any recommendations?

I assume this thing is too old to use modern F-mount lenses too.

File: IMG_1226.jpg (32KB, 640x559px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x559px

>2017
>Film

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	559
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>browsing local classifieds
>Bentax K1000
>$350 no lowballers

Is this the next meme camera?

>>3078306
it's been a meme camera for over a year now

>>3078269
I'm also using my dad's old N2020. You're right that it's to old to autofocus with newer lenses, and unless they have an aperture ring you're out of luck there, too. I've been using my Rokinon 14mm on it, which is MF anyway, and it's been pretty fun.

>>3078306
Fuck me, I used to have trouble getting rid of them at 15 bucks.

>>3078319
Mind you this is ausfalia. My experience are that sellers are either "here's this old piece of shit camera I found in my closet for fiddy bux" or "hurr this is a rare antique $400 no lowballers"

>>3078266
>half frame, tons of grain...
lies.

>>3078274
Nice bait digicuck

So I grabbed these 2 girls off the street to shoot them and they were too happy when I was posing them, how do you get around this problem

>>3078348
you cite them for a next time. impromptu =/= a proper session.

>>3077674
have yo uever tried the illford disposables? thinking of grabbign a couple to always have in my backpack

File: file.png (195KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 400x400px

Got one of these guys (Nikon Lite Touch 130 ED Zoom) at a thrift store for $9. Needed a new battery but works perfectly well.

Shot my first ever roll with it and i gotta say, i'm liking it. Not only is carrying this thing around so much more mellow than my DSLR (i can actually bring it when I go skating too), it makes me really take time and make sure i'm getting a good shot before i squeeze the trigger. It makes me hold back so much, I can barely shoot all 24 in one day, whereas with my DSLR, i'll shoot off a couple hundred in a few hours.

File: photo (6).jpg (645KB, 663x1000px) Image search: [Google]

645KB, 663x1000px

>>3078354
Here's a couple shots with it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:16 20:48:37
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: photo (15).jpg (770KB, 663x1000px) Image search: [Google]

770KB, 663x1000px

>>3078356
All shot on superia 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:16 21:02:39
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3078354
Nice penis lens.

File: photo.jpg (606KB, 613x1000px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 613x1000px

>>3078357

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:16 20:38:58
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3078353
I grabbed one as babby's first* disposable. With some luck I'll be able to post results in some days. They're cheap enough to warrant at least giving them a try IMHO

*actually not the first, but actually the first analog I ever touch after being stuck on digital since phones started coming with a camera. I actually used regular disposables a lot as a teen.

>>3078356
poor gt convertible

How to get digital look on film?

>>3078389
Ektar, TMAX.

>>3078392
HAHAHAHA

>>3077820
The reloadabilty of the lomo ones seem cool but I haven't seen any examples of one being used yet. The openness of hack/mods also seems cool.

>>3078350

So is anything wrong with grabbing people off the street for a photo?

Is street photography about capturing moments and people from a distance or occasionally going up and shooting a full on portrait? I imagine either work it's just about how you do it. I was told to work on my confidence with taking pics of people so I figure asking Is the best way.

Also, can someone give me a recommendation on a lens? I have a 50mm for my canon ae1 but I wouldn't mind something with better range.

>>3078404
https://shop.lomography.com/en/lomography-simple-use-camera-bundle
Here are some example shots

>>3078407
35mm...

>>3078409

Which model?

>>3078408
I take the examples that get posted to the product page with a grain of salt and tend to go by the images the masses dump to the general gallery pool and last I looked none of the simple use cameras had one yet.

File: 0009865_0009865-R1-017-7.jpg (2MB, 1818x1228px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1818x1228px

>>3078415

File: 0009865_0009865-R1-005-1.jpg (2MB, 1818x1228px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1818x1228px

>>3078415
>>3078416

>>3078315
I've wondered that, are all the Samyang/rokinon MF nikon mount lenses essentially Ai-S spec?

File: Precisa100001006.jpg (701KB, 900x1350px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 900x1350px

>>3078389
shoot fresh chrome film

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	Digital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2014:04:16 19:35:59
Exposure Time	1 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	900
Image Height	1350
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 37260017-edit.jpg (404KB, 1500x994px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1500x994px

Found some photos from 2013 on a roll of Tri-X I had left in my Mju II.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:18 21:40:02
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	994

File: 37260029.jpg (368KB, 994x1500px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 994x1500px

>>3078444

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:18 21:51:37
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	994
Image Height	1500

File: 37260034-edit-small.jpg (316KB, 1500x994px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1500x994px

>>3078446

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:18 21:52:39
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	994

>>3078444
Isn't it funny how when the mewtwo was only a $5 trashcam, it only took snapshits?
I'm so grateful that it's now become a $100 artists' tool...

>>3078468
Not sure if sarcasm. I bought mine when you could still get them new.

I have an Olympus OM1n SLR and have been shooting for a few months now and am loving it and the experience of shooting film. I'm looking for a good reasonably priced compact rangefinder, any anons have recommendations?

>>3078448
This is really nice anon, I like

>>3078407
you fucking take their picture as close as you can, then wave and say that was a great photo, how about a close up

if your pictures are bad, you're too far away

nut up and watch some bruce gilden videos

>>3078359
>>3078357
hey you autist take pictures of people you're not Ansel Adams

>>3078471
Rangefinders tend to be either old or expensive. Old cameras tend to develop mechanical problems. But check out the Yashica Electro 35, Konica Auto S2, Canon P.

>>3078444
>>3078446
>>3078448
These are nice, post more anon

>>3078473
>>3078505
Thanks!

>>3078315

He gave me a few of his sutofocus lenses at least.

A 24mm and a 70-210mm f4. Both are clean and he even has the box and manuals with them.

He said he will send a 50mm and super zoom (something like 18-200) soon.

I have no idea how he took pictures of his kids with this slow autofocus. I think I am faster now with my manual camera.

Halfway through my first test roll on it, will go get developed today or tomorrow. Hopefully there are no issues. I am not sure the AF is actually working.

File: Screenshot_20170519-120927.png (363KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 1080x1920px

R.I.P.

File: s-l1600.jpg (130KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1600x1066px

>>3078512
Is the 70-210 a sigma? I think I have the some one for mine. I tried it on my D750 for shits and giggles, and it's actually pretty nice for portraits. The autofocus is dreadful though, and worse on the N2020.

On a semi related note, I just bid on this, because I want a film camera that's smaller, simpler and quieter than the nikon.

>>3078589
natura is still gonna be produced, it's superia 1600 thats going away.
superia 1600 was shit anyway, it was just 400 with a 1600 dx code on the canister

File: DSC_0231.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>3078599

Yea, I have an X-500 I use. Love the damn little thing.

And no, the lens is a Nikon. I have yet to try it outdoors in good light, but indoors it is practically unusable.

I went shooting with the 24mm for the first time today actually. It worked pretty good outdoors, but every now and then it would freak out, focus to minimum focus distance and lock up. I'd have to switch to manual focus and bring it back to infinity before it would work again.

I shot it in full auto mode cause thats what my dad always said he did and I was curious to how it would turn out. Headed out to drop the roll off now.

>>3078620

Nope, Natura too from what I read. It is already sold out the three camera shopd I checked here in Japan.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Sony
Camera Model	402SO
Camera Software	32.1.D.0.419_0_f900
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:15 15:12:57
Exposure Time	1/32 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
ISO Speed Rating	250
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.60 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3840
Image Height	2160
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: mju.jpg (24KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 1200x900px

found this dirt about 50 usd, barely functional lcd, broken battery door , beat up exterior, clean lens and here's the catch :

- rarely after turned on, if i want to press the flash button, it's suddenly turn off and on again ( kinda like quick reset ). is it normal?
- after finished my 4th roll, 2 of them are only getting 31 exp, not 36 exp as the other 2, the film advance just stuck , and begin rewinding back to canister.

^ is that 2 problem considered normal or this little one started dying? :(

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	GT-I9500
Camera Software	paint.net 4.0.6
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Horizontal Resolution	28 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	28 dpcm
Image Created	2017:05:19 11:06:38
Exposure Time	1/104 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	3.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.20 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	O13L0SBGJ01

>>3078627
>50 usd, barely functional
>omg must buy
WHY

>>3078631
barely functional "LCD Only" , everything else is good, albeit that's 2 problem i just said (Read moar)

* the mint ones in my country is around 100-120 usd complete with box like new

File: Voigt282_06.jpg (50KB, 802x253px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 802x253px

I have a few m-mount lenses (adapted to my mirrorless) and I want an m-mount body.

Recomendations?

>>3078689
How much do you want to spend?
Are you willing to deal with potential repairs on an old body?

>>3078698

I really don't know. I see Leica M-mount bodies going for the price of a new car on e-bay and I can't even come close to that.

I dont want to spend $10,000, but a couple hundred (~$800?) would be okay.

I wouldn't mind trying to get one repaired (in Japan so lots of repair shops) just would hate to spend a couple hundred on a body only to find repairs are $3,000.

>>3078704
Go for an M4-2 or M4-P, from the late 70s/80s, for the most recent, most affordable Leica body. Should be $600-800. M6 has a meter, but runs ~$1k. You can get a modern Zeiss Ikon ZM rangefinder also for $1k. It's M6-like but twenty years younger, and only recently discontinued.

The Bessa series are by Cosina like the Zeiss Ikon, but not up to the same build quality. Very functional, though. They run $400-700 usually.

Repairs on film Leica bodies are usually far under $500 at a time, and repairs costing that much aren't that common if you buy a body in good condition with a known history. When buying an older film body (1980s or earlier), you'll want to have a tech look it over and refresh the lubrication if that hasn't been done by the previous owner, so factor in ~$200 for that.

>>3078707

Thanks for the info.

I would definitely prefer something with a meter, so I might try to talk myself into the M6. Read the manual and it looks really nice. Start at around $1,200 on e-bay, but I will go check some local shops this weekend.

>>3078704
Voigtländer rangefinders could be a line worth looking into for you

Why the fuck my school fellows label me as a hipster gay and make fun of me and my camera(Yashica 124g)? Just because I shoot film?
That's pretty fucked up.

File: IMG_20170518_204502.jpg (119KB, 600x571px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 600x571px

>>3078446
This is cool.

>>3078764
Get used to it bro.

New week, new camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:05:18 20:45:49
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	-0.9 EV
ISO Speed Rating	710
Exposure Time	33333/1000000 sec

>>3078764
i bet those digicucks are shooting sony, don't worry anon deep down they are jealous

File: download.png (302KB, 617x407px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 617x407px

>>3078764

does they look like this?

>>3078764
are you hipster gay?
but on an actual note, i know those feels, but idgaf about it or there shitty digi snaps, just like they shouldnt care about my film snapshits

>>3078764
>>3078775

Same feel here.

Feel bad going out with my film camera unless I am alone.

Try to never take it out with friends, I don't think anyone knows I even have one.

File: ElisabethV9.jpg (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1000px

Any body else try and edit stuff out of their film photos?

to give context, Sakia's the girls name

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3000 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:19 12:34:20
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000

>>3078854
yep

>>3078764
They're jealous and insecure.

File: HIE f-1.jpg (119KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 960x960px

Dis weekend gunna be fun

>travel to Illinois to see parents and siblings for first time in a while
>Get here Thursday night still like 80 out
>Go to bed early to shoot some ektar in the morning
>It's pooring hard as fuck out

>>3078872
you post in NegativeFeedback?

File: 37260028.jpg (647KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 1500x1000px

Few more from that Mju II roll.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:19 14:28:42
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1000

File: 37260027.jpg (607KB, 1500x994px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 1500x994px

>>3078911

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:19 14:36:28
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	994

File: 37260010.jpg (719KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 1500x1000px

>>3078912

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:19 14:34:07
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1000

File: IMG_6332.jpg (188KB, 2048x1154px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 2048x1154px

I want to get into medium format and someone is selling me this camera for $180 with the lens.

I have little knowledge about this and is this a good camera? It's a zenza bronica ETRS

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1154
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3078918
6x4.5 is the smallest medium format negative, but yes, that should be a fine camera.

>>3078933
What do you mean by that? Won't a 120 film work on this camera?

>>3078934
Yes, 120 will work fine, but the ETRS makes negatives that are 6cm by 4.5cm, as opposed to 6x6, 6x7, 6x9, etc, so you won't see quite as large a jump over 35mm. Still worth it, though.

File: DSC_0002.jpg (248KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1000x667px

Is this reel missing something /p/ ? how im supposed to load film in there ?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.20
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.9
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	15198
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	33 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:19 13:54:06
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	22.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
ISO Speed Used	400
Image Quality	FINE
White Balance	AUTO
Focus Mode	MANUAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
ISO Speed Requested	400
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	18.0 - 55.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	7107

>>3078918
I shot this on that >>3077968

It's a fine camera, the bargain of all time because medium format is such a step up from 35

Pe lenses are better, get the prismed finder + pistol grip if you're a retard about exposure, get the waist level finder for street

>>3079039
Oh and you can't shoot vertically with the wlf, obviously

Hey gang, I need some help curing my boredom. I've got an EOS 300V. Now I would never use the crappy flash unironically but since it's been raining for aeons here I've been trying it out inside the house.

Does anyone know if it will actually work properly with a manual lens + converter? It doesn't test fire at half-button press with it but it does when fully pressed.

Also how do I meter for this shit? I understand that in complete darkness the meter just reads "nope, not happening" but do I just set the shutter speed at 1/90 and below, randomly pick a relatively wide f-stop and pray it works?

>>3079010
Look up steel reels, that's all it is. You feed the film into the middle coloum and wind it on. YouTube it senpai

>>3078480
>Only this one photographer can take pictures of things other than people. Everyone else has to take shitty street photos.

What are you even doing here?

>>3079079
done it already.the ones in youtube have a clip in the middle and thats where they start to wind the film from inside out.mine have nothing.

>>3079070
Lens should work as long as you know how to meter a manual lens. As for the actual metering aspect of shooting, complete darkness will pick nothing up unless you have your shutter opened for an insane amount of time (and even then there's no garuentee).

Now if you're shooting during overcast weather than I'd set it to f/8 so you can have everything in focus with a relatively fast ASA film/shutter. If all else fails use a phone light meter.

>>3078707
You can grab a konica rf pretty cheap.

>>3079099
Did you actually read my post? Like, did you pay attention for even two seconds?

I am specifically talking about the use of the flash. None of the things you said were even close to answering my questions. I know how to use the manual lens and meter for it, I know how to use sunny16 etc etc.

Tell me what you guys think about my short film shot on the BMPCC.

https://youtu.be/F8dy-Yfh2Os

Looking for good ciritiques.

>>3079187
post it in the video thread.

>>3079187

Hard to watch.

Have you tried watching any real movies before?

File: IMG_20170519_210407.jpg (66KB, 450x600px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 450x600px

>>3078901
Yep.

>>3079070
Figure out the guide number for your flash at a given distance and iso.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:05:19 21:04:08
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	0.2 EV
ISO Speed Rating	319
Exposure Time	33333/1000000 sec

>>3078356
nice 'stang

File: original.jpg (19KB, 426x320px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 426x320px

So I found this Ansco Zoom (pic stolen but exactly the same) with autoflash, and motor rewind and I havent been able to find a manual on it or anything, also, I'm just starting to get a grasp of shooting in film, and so far it has been impossible to find developing chemicals where I live

a) you guys know where I can find a manual for it? the autoflash doesnt work for some reason

b) how do you guys develop your film rolls?

>>3079281
What country do you live in?

>>3079282
Mexico, and it isnt that we're backwater or anything, it's that people no longer use film, and there are no dedicated photography stores anymore, it was impossible to find Kodak film roll, and there were only 2

I can buy them online tho, at B&H and pay for shipping and everything, and I even found a book "The Darkroom Cookbook" and it has some recipes on some chemicals but still, I think the only way is going to be through B&H, but I dont like the idea of paying for intl shipping everytime I run out of chemicals

so, how do you develop your film?

or do you have a link on a manual for the camera...?

File: fujisan.jpg (1MB, 5190x3460px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5190x3460px

So I have been developing my film at Yodobashi, but hear good things about BIC.

Has anyone used BIC before? Looks like it is ~1000円 for developing and 24 MP scans Takes five days though.

I don't know if I wanna wait that long. I can just get same day developing and scan myself, but I can never seem to get the colors straight.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3079283
Yeah chemicals are tricky, most online stores have restrictions on shipping chemicals internationally.

B&H is probably your best bet, or if you're close to the border with the US drive over for the day and buy a whole load of shit and bring it back with you.

You could definitely try Caffenol, which is a film developer made from instant coffee, vitamin C and a few other easily found ingredients. You don't really need a stop bath, just use 1 minute of running water. You can also easily make a fixer, which you'll need. The Darkroom Cookbook will definitely tell you how to make fixer. And then you can just use a minute amount of detergent instead of photo flo, but it's really not essential.

So put a bit of research into Caffenol, probably your best bet. There's a whole community around it so finding development times and shit is easy.

Personally I develop with Ilfosol 3, but that's a short-lifed concentrate developer so unlikely to suit your needs

>>3079289
yeah, I do live in a state that's in the border but firstly, I havent renovated my visa, and I dont live *in* the border, I live in the centre of the state and it's roughly 250km/155mi to the border and I don't have time to go there anytime soon

yeah I had read up on Caffenol, but discarded it bc I thought of it as a last resort alternative but I guess I'll have to make-do with it

got some contact info where I can hit you up and ask for advice on my "knowledge travel" on film?

I mean, if it isnt much of a bother of course man, np

>>3079294
The quality of Caffenol will surprise you, it's pretty much just as good as many other developers you can buy.

My email address is spamtastic321 @ gmail . com (without spaces) so just shoot over any questions. If you email me make sure you put the subject line in all caps or make it attention grabbing or something because I get a shitload of emails

>>3079287
The colors in the photo you posted looks good to me. Or was that not an example of "not right" colors?

Doing an auto curves adjustment usually fixes weird colors.

>>3079314

Oh sorry, no it wasn't. That is actually just one of my favorite digital shots.

I will post an example of the colors later tonight for some feedback hopefully. I am going to pick it up now.

File: resize121.jpg (739KB, 1800x635px) Image search: [Google]

739KB, 1800x635px

Put some 35mm through my P67 with the panorama conversion kit, expired Kodak Gold 200 developed as B&W

>>3079322
can i just put one of those stubs for using 35mm rolls into medium format and thats it? should i put it on 220 or 120 mode?

>>3079325
What I did was use the stubs for the 35mm roll and just used a 120 spool to feed the film onto as normal, some people like to use an empty 35mm canister to feed the film into but that seems more difficult. Once you've shot the roll it obviously won't advance any further so you have to cut the film in darkness if you don't want to ruin the last exposure. And yeah change the backing plate to 220 and also the frame counter to 220

>>3079325
>>3079331
Also to load it just feed the film onto the empty spool just enough for it to grab, then you have to do the dry fire trick where you open the back, twist and hold the frame counter with your finger to 2 for eg, then close the back. Then you need to advance twice and you're good to go. I advanced once on this test roll and I only got half and image

>>3079322
what's your development process for Kodak Gold in B&W? I've got a bunch of shitty C41 film that'd I'd love to use like that

>>3079331
coolio. id love to try it with my P67 and the ektachrome motion picture film im getting soon, and some pano grass shots, for some malick action.

>>3079333
I used Ilforsol 3, went on massive dev chart and averaged the dev time between a couple different B&W films of the same speed, which came to 7.45 mins

File: CIELO III.jpg (1MB, 1500x1047px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x1047px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	28712
Image Height	3256
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:05:20 04:27:56
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1047

File: olymju.png (533KB, 601x599px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 601x599px

>>3077669
Just scored myself a free olympus mju ii from my aunt who brought it years ago for a trip to korea and basically never used it after.
minty mint condition, so happy cause i always wanted it but not paying hipster tax for a P&S that i might not even like.
So far im really digging it

>>3078219
ahh righty, love the rendering with that lens

>>3078359
I like this one much better than the others

>>3079348
>minty mint condition
lmao
also
>assembled in china

>>3078401
hes right though.
if you expose ektar correctly, it looks like Oly jpegs.

File: D3S_7445-1200.jpg (399KB, 1055x853px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 1055x853px

I have a Zenit E and its unreliable as fuck so i am looking for new good machines.

my consider list:
Canon AE-1
Pentax Spotmatic F
Minolta X700

i am a student so i m looking for less expensive good quality stuff. What would you recommend for me? x700 and ae1 almost has same price, x700 is a bit less

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:20 14:38:43
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1055
Image Height	853

>>3079386

AE-1 or X-700 I'd say.

Both have some pretty nice lenses. Look up what lenses are available cheaply before you buy the body.

>>3079391
X700 comes with MD Rokkor 1:2 50mm, i have some old m42 lenses such as helios 44-2 58mm and vivitar 28 mm 1:2.8 from my zenit

Ok, stupid noob question. Why are the mju II with prime lens so fucking expensive while the zoom versions are worth peanuts on eBay? Might be due to the the zoom mechanism fucking itself up over time?

>>3079348
Nice one anon! :)

>>3079415
The prime lens has superia image quality compared to the zoom. So better lens = more expensive

>>3079394

Check this guys site, he reviews lots of old Minolta and Canon lenses. Mainly on modern bodies too, so you can know what is good to adapt to a mirrorless if you have one.

>https://phillipreeve.net/

>>3079039
Bronica ETRS guy here. It only has a 220 film holder. Does this mean the 120 film won't fit on this camera. Does that mean I should't buy it anymore?
>>3079041
What do you mean by vertical?

>>3079386
can't say much about canon but i own x-700 and it's a really nice camera.
lens selection is big, both minolta and 3rd party, some are good, some are not, majority are cheap.but i guess same goes for canon.

desu unless you have lenses for a specific mount you might as well choose based on looks or price.

>>3078627
I literally found a MINT Mju II with its first roll ever halfway thru for 3 euros at a flea market, step your game up man. Don't pay more than 10 bucks for one of them, you find them everywhere, the price is way too high online.

For those of you who send in your film to be developed, how much do you typically spend for development and scans per roll?

File: IMG_3486.jpg (16KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 384x384px

Fuck this brand

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	384
Image Height	384
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3079471
I go thought Dwaynes but would like to home develop since the price adds up. $9 + shipping but every additional roll is $0.50.

>>3079483
Why don't people like this film again?

>>3078764
Fuck them, talk to normies who don't know shit about photography, they usually love it

>>3078764
Where I live (netherlands) film is actualy really appreciated by people

>>3079487
>Why don't people like this film again?
because its trash that costs twice the price of a portra roll.

Can I use a thread mount lens hood on a C series TLR instead of the push-on version? And if so, what is the thread size? Much appreciated.

File: Minolta-X-700.jpg (71KB, 460x394px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 460x394px

Any minoltards know if I can swap parts between a xg-m and a x700? I have a XG-M that doesn't work and I wanted to take off some small things like the film speed selector and rewind crank and put them on my working camera.

>>3079431
you cannot turn the camera on its side with a waist level finder, you have to shoot in portrait

120 film works in a 220 back, but you seem like a bit of a noob so I would buy a dedicated 120—loading 120 in a 220 takes some know how

>>3077722
> grossly expired film
lomography, anon