My recent Euro trip thread

File: DSC00709.jpg (308KB, 1000x676px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1000x676px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC00714.jpg (399KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:22 13:28:13
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	1.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: DSC00734.jpg (495KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 84150004.jpg (1015KB, 1544x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1015KB, 1544x1024px

>>3073865
Post this to zuckbook and kys

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 9.01.001 2008.12.08
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1544
Image Height	1024

File: DSC00740.jpg (377KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC00758.jpg (449KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3073866
I'd crop out the green clock. Other than that, pretty nice

File: DSC00838.jpg (408KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 667x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC00841.jpg (714KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

714KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC00868.jpg (453KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 667x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC00850.jpg (649KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

649KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

Is this all you could find to photograph in Europe?

File: DSC00873.jpg (574KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 1000x667px

>>3074155
No.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC00900.jpg (478KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC00916.jpg (392KB, 1000x630px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1000x630px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC00948.jpg (580KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 667x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 20170510_045346.jpg (4MB, 2982x1836px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2982x1836px

>>3074264
Is this one from Salzburg OP? Reminds me of a fort over there. I really like >>3073871 and >>3074077 a lot keep up the good work.

Here's a picture I took when I was there last summer. Originally, I took it on film but I never got the negatives scanned so here's the shitty quality phone camera version.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SAMSUNG-SGH-I257
Camera Software	I257UCU2BOI4
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:05:10 04:53:46
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.6
Focal Length	3.70 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Light Source	Unknown
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1836
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Saturation	Normal
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	3264
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Comment	User comments
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	78 EV
ISO Speed Rating	50
Exposure Time	1/1064 sec

File: DSC00970.jpg (451KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 667x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC00972.jpg (468KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 667x1000px

>>3074289
No, that's Dubrovnik. Thanks for the feedback and nice photo you took there yourself. Looks like an idyllic setting.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC01080.jpg (609KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3074155
stfu, you twat ...

>>3074301
Probably the best photo here (so far, at least). Now try it in black and white or perhaps another filter to make it old-timey.

File: DSC00972-2.jpg (609KB, 734x1100px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 734x1100px

Had no time the past couple days, will post a few more now.

>>3075954
I don't really do this kind of stuff; usually just try to make the photo look accurate to life. But here's a quick filter I put on that seems to look alright.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC01010.jpg (680KB, 1100x982px) Image search: [Google]

680KB, 1100x982px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: DSC01018.jpg (444KB, 1100x734px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 1100x734px

The End.

Comments/criticisms welcome.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3074284
my favorite one

>>3077459
I'm quite sad this was the best picture you managed to take in Tallinn.

But yeah most pictures are "american dad wearing jorts and a fanny pack" tier

>>3077464
If i was to critique these as art, I would say that they fail to capture any real essence or flavour of the countries you visited. They are compositionally average, and mostly very dull in subject matter. These is no underlying theme or thought that can be inferred from then, or about you.

>>3074301
The lighting in this scene is nice, but it lacks any real subject.

>>3073868
This is already an art piece, which to you credit you have taken the time to compose, but at the end of the day it's just a wall.

However you enjoyed taking them, and by the looks of it you had a great trip to a wealth of countries and travel is always a good thing.

If photography is something which truly interests you please keep shooting and hone the craft and your style.

>>3077758

I really appreciate your response.

This is something that always makes me think a bit, in the theatre of creativity -- what does it mean to have one's own style or theme? I fear that if it had a strong theme, that would mean I was always doing the same thing. Shooting the same subjects, or shooting at the same time of day, or repeating the same gimmick, whatever it may be, in most or all of my photos. And I do think it's lame when I see that, in music or photography or painting. When someone is a one-trick pony.

I don't even think I have one good trick anyway, but if I did, I'd still try to do different things so as not to become one dimensional.

But then, I imagine you have a different conception of what it would mean to have one's own style, or to feature an underlying theme. I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. Thanks.

>>3073865
Sweet! You took a good poster shot of a bar to hang in a bar

>>3073866
IMO better as B&W. try it, i dare u.

>>3073867
Nice shot, just a little boring. Needs something else in the shot; subject-wise. Person, bookbag, anything really.

>>3073868
I like this; would've liked it more as a wider shot.

>>3073871
Open up 2 stops. Also, foreground railing is distracting.

>>3074077
I like this but something bothers me about it. Did you use a tripod? maybe going landscape would've been better, but i wasn't there; maybe it wasn't a good shot in landscape.

>>3074078
This would have been great had that spigot thing not been in the shot OR off to the right of the shot. Take time to frame your shot, /p/rother.

>>3074080
sorry for samefagging. anyway, i like this. I'm a huge fan of B&W shots. I believe color should be used for photos that can only be appreciated in color; flowers, certain landscapes, etc.

>>3074082
my statement on color above can be referenced to this photo. great use of color.

>>3074255
Should have wished for clouds. The boring sky ruined it for you.

>>3074258
cat pic/10

>>3074289
This is good.

>>3074289
comfy as fuck