Which one is most accurate to real life?

>>3072436
The one on the right.

that chart is bullocks, where's the 135mm?

>>3072436
None. Those are made with different distance from camera to face and the distance can be basically any including the last (imaging that you are a chick and you are kissing him).

If this is on a crop sensor, I guess 35mm. You would need to see the guy in person for a true verdict though.

>>3072513
nah, just take a picture of him

>>3072436
left is most accurate to his real life, because nobody would want to become close enough to that cunt for perspective to become the right side.

>>3072492
I think they used different distances because the longer the lens, the more distance you need to acquire focus unless it's a macro lens or has movements. That, and using the nearest focus distance for a given lens helps give any idea of how each focal length treats the subject realistically. For these to have consistent subject distances you would have to use the subject distance of the 85mm and people don't usually take portraits with a subject so far away.

Between 35-50 on full frame but most of the time it's person to person

>>3072436
50mm@FullFrame

>>3072436
8mm

>>3072436
what is real life?
even your eyeballs are relative.
you need a 3d laser scan to get the perfect representation.

>>3072436

8mm

35mm and above are fine.

did you really need to include the last two? is that how you see things?

>>3072520
what are you smoking dude. Its just them moving closer to keep the same framing.

>>3072436
8mm. Don't try to hide your kike nose with "muh telecompression"

>not including 50mm

No.

Stand in front of a mirror and close one eye and move closer to the mirror until your nose is almost touching. See what happens?

I can't decide if 40 on ff or 55-60 on 645 is more like real life

https://vimeo.com/152514220

>>3075695
>only look good from afar

>>3072436
Wierd, I went to school with that guy in OP's pic.

He was a total special snowflake.

File: photo lens headshot guide.jpg (607KB, 1354x1508px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 1354x1508px

Sorry for the goofy smile

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Anna Wu Photography
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	900
Image Height	600
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2011:08:30 22:14:17
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.56 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1354
Image Height	1508
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

Unless you're fucking Beaker from the Muppets - 85mm. Hence why its commonly regarded as a portrait prime.

>>3072436
They are all accurate, just at different distances.

People look uglier the closer they are.

>>3072436
>>3077883

Maybe it's because I'm a filmmakerfag but I've always liked the look of faces more in the 40-60 range

200mm