Rate my portraits?

I typed this up earlier, but you deleted the thread.

The sharpest part of that photo is somewhere around her skirt and the bench. A good portrait should be sharp around the subject's eyes and facial features. That's where we read all the most important information about another person.

That angle of view is okay for a portrait, but I'd prefer to get closer - waist-up or shoulders-up.

Her pose is expressive - it shows her nervousness - but her expression is blank. The photo doesn't engage with her well and I can't get an idea of her personality.

Keep practicing.

File: Mod1-197.jpg (4MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x4928px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Photographer	GAMACESPEDES [email protected]
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	4910
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:16 16:51:26
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Mod1-294.jpg (5MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 3264x4928px

thanks! i'll post some other pics, i'd really appreciate your opinion. actually it's kinda hard for me to focus with a lens like the analog one i use, cuz i use glasses and i don't know if what i'm focusing is right

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Photographer	GAMACESPEDES [email protected]
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	4910
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:16 16:54:16
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	2500
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Mod1-164.jpg (2MB, 4928x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4928x3264px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Photographer	GAMACESPEDES [email protected]
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	4910
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:16 16:15:46
Exposure Time	1/3200 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	640
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3072043
This one is the best so far, even if it's more of a fashion photo than a portrait. It has a lot of visual interest.

What's your camera/lens combo?

>>3072037
Sarnehed is that you

File: Mod1-433.jpg (5MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 3264x4928px

>>3072040
(this was meant for you) >>3072043

Anyone knows a fast and easy way to compress my pics to, for example, 2 or 5 mb? i can do it in lightroom, but i think there must be a fast and easier way without sending them via messenger and makind them look like they were took with a brick

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Photographer	GAMACESPEDES [email protected]
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	4910
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:16 17:18:58
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3072050
Just set up a LR action for them?

File: _MPB9627.jpg (1MB, 4928x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4928x3264px

>>3072048
thanks! i use a Nikon D7000 with a 50mm 1.8 analog lens

>>3072049
wut

>>3072051
yeah, i export my pics to a max of 6mb. but sometimes i want to post here or in another board and i have a limit size for my pics. I don't want to have all my pics saved twice just for the few i'll be posting here

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: _MPB9576.jpg (2MB, 4928x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4928x3264px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

>>3072049
kek

File: viewfinder2.png (481KB, 820x705px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 820x705px

>>3072052
this is another good one. good detail and framing.

read up on using focus confirmation on the D7000 with manual focus. you can set a focus point and then the camera will let you know via some indicator (usually a green dot on Nikon) that your selected point is in focus.

https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/48718/nikon-focus-confirmation-with-manual-lenses

File: _MPB9625.jpg (1MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x4928px

>>3072058
oooh cool! i'll try it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: _MPB9459.jpg (1MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x4928px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

>>3072052
Look up the "batch processing" function in photoshop

File: b (1).jpg (909KB, 1356x2048px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 1356x2048px

>>3072069
nice, thanks!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Photographer	GAMACESPEDES [email protected]
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	WWW.PHOTOGAMAPIXEL.COM GAMA CESPEDES
Image Width	1356
Image Height	2048

Even if you are using a large aperture and blurring the background, pay attention to everything in your photos and use it to frame, compliment, lead the eye to the model if you can.

Also, I can't tell if you are cropping this way, or if this is sooc, but you are always cutting it really close to the feet on these full body shots. I get the feeling you are ignoring the edges of the frame.

You probably shouldn't be using anywhere near so high a shutter speed in this situation- the high iso is making your shots pretty grungy. If she's just sitting there, why are you going above 1/200?

Practice focusing. You can zoom in in live view to check focus if you aren't confident with the viewfinder.

Go /p/ro:
• Please post images that are JPG format, smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side.
• Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it.

Use a leer ISO. You should be able todo shoot with a 1/200 speed or even less depending on your focal length. Use rule of thumbs.
Also most of the pictures are out of Focus ir with the focus missing. For a portrait you should hace the eyes un focus

>>3072037

Hey dude, most of them are OOF snapshits, but since I am not super anal about focus I could get past that.

What I like in your photos:
-trying to shoot film

What i don't like:
-uninteresting low contrast light
-model is stiff and unnatural, if you shoot amateurs don't make them pose coz it will look terrible, try to shoot them when they do sth they normally do instead for much better results

Light tips: when scouting for location I always think about the light first. Shapes and colours in the background second. Even though you shoot film I'd still play some with curves with the scans to get a better picture.

>>3072223
Just noticed you don't shoot film, you only said you use manual focus lens, so scratch off the "what I like" off the list.

File: 080517_1.jpg (3MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x4928px

>>3072158
acutally i rarely crop my pics unless i'm uploading them to instagram. i'll try to put more attention to the feet. The grainy look was on pupose, they were for her instagram and she likes that film look.

>>3072194
i'll be practicing more on my focus

>>3072223
how would you edit it?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 7.0 (Windows)
Photographer	GAMACESPEDES [email protected]
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	840
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:08 21:31:52
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Comment	WWW.PHOTOGAMAPIXEL.COM GAMA CESPEDES
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3072037
>1/1250
>ISO 1600
>grainy as fuck
>face out of focus
>making shitty threads to spam his snapshits and instagram account
I can't say I approve son. Start from the beginning and learn how to use your camera or just give up on photography.

>>3072678

>>3072647
>The grainy look was on pupose, they were for her instagram and she likes that film look.

I can't critique it as a portrait because looks more like snaps... Watch some 'how to portrait' lessons on youtube.

your camera and lens are good for it, but there's a long way to go. keep trying

File: Mod1-28.jpg (2MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x4928px

>>3072685
no, it's not correctly focused. I was using a friend's camera because he was using mine, and he specifically asked not to move the eyepiece focus

>>3072686
i know i have to focus to the eyes, but it's hard with someone else's camera, and an analog lens with a f1.8 aperture
here i focused to the eyes >>3072059

and here i could only focus to one eye because i didn't had time to close to f2.8 or so >>3072052

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Photographer	GAMACESPEDES [email protected]
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	838
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:16 15:47:00
Exposure Time	1/5000 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Comment	WWW.PHOTOGAMAPIXEL.COM GAMA CESPEDES
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3072647
Yeah, I wasn't trying to suggest never ever cut the feet off ever, just that it didn't look at all intentional. the reason people on this board will call these snapshits is that is is obvious that you are not aware of everything that is going into the image.all that shit has to be considered... it is all contributing to the whole composition - color, light, expression, gesture framing, focus, geometry in some cases, the presence of distracting elements - bright spots, colors. if you were painting a portrait, and you didn't want some shit in the background, you wouldn't paint it there, you could take that same attitude to your photos

>>3072040
>The sharpest part of that photo is somewhere around her skirt

I think OP is prioritizing the right parts

File: _MPB9386.jpg (3MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x4928px

>>3072720
lol, you understand me

>>3072743
any advice on how to accurately adjust the eyepiece?

I have these two pics, which one is better? what could i do better?

Pic 1

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: _MPB9387.jpg (4MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x4928px

>>3072750
pic 2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

that's the stuff, lad

>>3072752
puffy

>>3072783
its not that complicated, just look at the exposure readout and use the diopter ring to make that as crisp as possible, jfc.

>>3072803
>manual focus lens only.

>>3072037
Knees are in focus at least

>>3072807
i mean, you dont need to focus at infinity etc to set your diopter correctly, you just look at the exposure readout inside the viewfinder and adjust the diopter until that appears crisp.

>>3072693
not only focusing in the eyes. with patience you can get it. some soft focus portraits are very well welcome to. but it's more about how you compose.

File: 97c85da99ab3dbbccbef26e6409aa2fff3fbfa3.jpg (4KB, 139x107px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 139x107px

>>3072750
>>3072752
we require more shots to continue our assessment of your abilities.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>3072037
nudes?

File: _MPB9374.jpg (5MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 3264x4928px

>>3072967
>>3073047
lol, not here

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

>>3073326
no more hats for her, looks like a man

>>3073326
lol then continue this thread somewhere on the adult board

File: _MPB9377.jpg (5MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 3264x4928px

>>3073334
hats off

>>3073368
nah, it's a photography board, i haven't had a single answer on my question here

>>3072750
>>3072752

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

>>3073373
>hey /p/ i've been doing some portraits, i've been doing photography for a while but i didn't used to take pics of people. Are they decent? what's wrong? what's good? actually the only model i have is my gf, so if i get better in this i'll start shooting some model friends

Aside from what the thread has already answered regarding your 'question', I think you're doing fine with your limited available equipment and knowledge of photography.

This is photography of your girl. What you are taking is the way you perceive her beauty or essence. Nobody can really tell you how to do that more right or what is 'wrong'.

Aside from the technical misses once in a while like focus being off, I don't see anything else wrong with this and you should just keep shooting pictures of her to gain more confidence.

File: woods.gif (1MB, 2688x1520px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2688x1520px

>>3073398
thanks bud! you've been the first really good contribution i get. I really appreciate your opinion.

this is an old pic that i took with an improvised ugly watermark. Not cool, but i don't have a lot of pics with less than 5mb

I like trains.

>>3072750
>>3072752

I wasn't expecting my dick to wake up in this thread.

>>3073421
and still not even a single opinion on my pic or my gf. fml

>>3073422
How about I give my opinion after you post MOAR?

File: d00c335.jpg (115KB, 736x1107px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 736x1107px

>>3073422
What 50mm lens you using by the way? Buy a 105mm 2.5 before they become expensive.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	©Steve McCurry/Magnum Photos
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2008:08:19 10:16:04

>>3073424
kik @ yumiyumi69
doing hw rn, so i may not be able to answer atm

>>3073425
i'll try to get one soon

>>3073425
Why would the 105mm 2.5's become more expensive?

>>3073450
Because people are becaming aware of it.

They used to cost 60 bucks just a few years back. I bought mine for 50 because it was non-ai.

File: 1494229353472-Edit.jpg (610KB, 1080x715px) Image search: [Google]

610KB, 1080x715px

>>3072223
>>3072647

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Photographer	GAMACESPEDES [email protected]
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4706
Image Height	3117
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:05:10 12:07:27
Exposure Time	1/3200 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	640
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1080
Image Height	715
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3073456
How did you achieve this look from the original photo, I've been starting to get into photography but I feel my editing really lacks, I'm working my way around photoshop slowly but still a mile to go.

>>3072750
>>3072752
If I were choosing, it'd be a mix between these photos. The first one has the most direct engagement with the camera, but the second one has a better angle. I would step back a bit when framing the second one so her knee is in the picture and make sure her camera is aimed at your camera. Otherwise, technically, they're fine, and they fulfill what you were trying to do in taking them. In that respect they're your best pictures in the thread.

>>3073456
This looks a little underexposed, but I like the rim lighting (one of my favorite techniques) and her expression.

>>3072750
>>3072752
Come on, anon. Don't leave us like that post MOAR.

>>3073518
I think anon did well with those photos, given the response to them

>>3073373
>i haven't had a single answer on my question here
>Are they decent? what's wrong? what's good?

I think quit a few comments were offering some help on what's wrong...

I suggested paying attention to details of the whole composition and framing. Others mentioned light. Those are answers, no?

What do you want to hear? "You're doing great", "Love your pics", "she's so cute"?
I don't know, don't want to discourage you.. think you should go back and try to do even better next time with some of the advice in mind.

>>3073456
nice!

>>3073520
>>3073536
He should do a sexy shooting with his gf next time given the response.

Work on keeping your background clean, get some better comp. Learn to crop.

Better post processing for better color.

>>3073470
All I did was VSCO Kodak gold 400 preset in Lightroom, slightly cropped it to get her more in the center, lower the fade manually on curves, lower the highlights, fix some spots on her face with spot tool, lower the grain a bit. Then in Photoshop I removed some reds from her face by applying "good" colour from her face to red spots with 10% flow and adjusted opacity. Last thing I applied some contrast only to her eyes with curves. Should I want to spend some more time I would also dodge and burn her face a bit to add some exposition to it without loosing the shadows that I like.

I hate post production so I try to keep it as short and simple as I can (max 5 minutes per picture If I don't use liquify)

>>3073678
And don't worry, I won't tell her, im not a fucking faggot

>>3073678
why u gotta do that man, you want to discourage people from posting interesting pictures on here?

>>3073683
I'm just fucking with the guy. I told him that I wasn't going to tell her, and I won't dox her to anyone. But it litterally took my 2 minutes to find out who he was an who she was. Just letting him know to be careful.

>>3073683
There, I deleted it, don't want him to get worried :)

File: You_shouldn't_have_done_that.jpg (55KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 900x900px

>>3073685
I shouldn't have done that before he posted moar.

>>3073692
He hasn't posted anything in a while. And I don't even think I saw the right person. I thought he was in the US, but I noticed that they're actually in Mexico

What happened? Somebody threatened to dox OP and his gf?

OP, I hope you asked for your gf's consent before you posted her photos here, especially the sexy ones. And I hope she's of age.

>>3073698
No, some anon just said a name, but said that he would keep her identity secret. Then he deleted it so nobody would see the name, then realized he fucked it up anyways, and didn't even get the country right. He didn't threaten to dox though

bump for being a photo thread, get better anon these are gay

>>3073698
Are you a beta nu male? Shut up this is 4chan, a fucking IMAGEBOARD. He's not posting anything illegal.

>>3072037
>Exposure Time 1/1250 sec
>ISO Speed Rating 1600

Why?

File: Mod1-231.jpg (4MB, 3264x4928px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x4928px

>>3073681
>>3073684
>>3073685
>>3073694
>>3073701
>>3073845

OP here, to the guy that thinks that found me, contact me please.

>>3073949
because noise

>>3073536
i was talking about the question of those two pics. "which one is better" not my main question

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	4822
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:16 16:52:05
Exposure Time	1/2000 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3073963
Why do you want me to contact you?

>>3073965
i just have some questions

>>3073971
keep an eye open on your facebook in a few minutes

>>3073979
cool

>>3073980
just sent you a /p/

>>3073845
If we pretend to be photographers around here, it's best we act like professionals and not /b/tards, especially when it comes to photos and consent.

>>3073963
Are you posting moar of her, OP?

>>3073997
Nope, this is not /b/

>>3073997
Think he got spooked

>>3074000
You dun goofed.

>>3073963
>to the guy that thinks that found me

I don't think he found you as much as he saw the thread you made advertising your shitty instagram. >>3072648 dumb beaner

>>3074449
>>>3073963
>>to the guy that thinks that found me
>I don't think he found you as much as he saw the thread you made advertising your shitty instagram. >>3072648 → dumb beaner


Lmao I saw the other thread before, and I was confused as to why OP was surprised he got found out. I follow him on IG too

>>3075506
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6PkDHuaXi8

>>3075506
>>3075649

I wouldn't want to be OP right now.

File: Untitled.jpg (613KB, 1782x922px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 1782x922px

>>3072693
>>3072750
the comments on this pictures
>licht_affen(OP): friends
>patholis: awwwwww I loved that weekend
>bluebonnnet(girl): my hair :(

Same uniform and same background, did OP took these pictures during this weekend of bonding? lol, look at how happy she is. Has no idea her trust is about to be betrayed and violated.

It must suck having what should be a fond memory of your friends and youth be stained like this.
thread theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUFWXpYJKaI

>>3075677
> /p/ - Tijuana Drama Llama

File: DSC_0216+.jpg (692KB, 1496x1000px) Image search: [Google]

692KB, 1496x1000px

>>3075677
you guys are dicks.
Why not make /p/ a super elitist secret board, where you can share your photos without being doxed or exposed?

>pic related, her feets

>>3075747
or, you know, ask for consent before posting intimate photos of somebody, like an adult would

>>3075747
he put his fucking instagram in another thread

>>3075677
Fuck you.

>>3072752
Rubbing her pussy with her foot this photo is hot, I hope you banged her OP

>>3076629
With socks on. Even better.

Kek, even the focus plan is on da puccie.

>>3075677
Nigga the fuck is wrong with you... Dude wanted advice and didn't share anything insane. I hope you get perma banned we could use less cancer around.

>>3075677
Sweet Cindy, Id love to kiss her collarbone

>>3077069
yeah, that's not creepy or anything

I can almost hear your drool dripping on the floor

>>3072071
This is your best one. I've been going over your images for the last few minutes. Not sure why you like having so much grain. Lower that ISO. You don't have to center your subject every time. If you're not comfortable manually focusing yet, then get comfortable. Most of these shots is just slightly off focus. Is that intentional?

they're all utter shit mate

read some blogs about portraits

look at some more portraits

learn to take better portraits

>>3072037
what the fuck is wrong with her legs?
was she in a wheel chair for half her life?

>>3072067
man that's a nice comforter

>>3073963
Thanks, this will be my phone wallpaper.

>>3072037
Hey OP, how did you get that mellow light?