[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Gradual neutral density filter problems

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 4

File: Capture 1.png (466KB, 500x360px) Image search: [Google]
Capture 1.png
466KB, 500x360px
Could gradual neutral density filter be used to solve the backlighting problems in any of these help i'm trying to get good. :(
>>
File: Capture2.png (371KB, 505x382px) Image search: [Google]
Capture2.png
371KB, 505x382px
>>
File: Capture 3.png (237KB, 501x377px) Image search: [Google]
Capture 3.png
237KB, 501x377px
>>
File: Capture 4.png (169KB, 500x328px) Image search: [Google]
Capture 4.png
169KB, 500x328px
>>
heres another solution
invest on a speedlite
>>
What are you trying to accomplish? A graduated filter would work for the last two pics. The best option for the two portraits would be to just light the subject, else why not just expose for subject and attempt to fix highlights in post?
>>
An ND filter is something that simply blocks light. What those pictures are facing is a dynamic range limitation, which you'll find on every camera you use.

The solution as people have stated above is to use a flash, so that the dark subject is illuminated enough to match the background, therefore shortening the gap between both exposures and making the camera able to capture both.

Long story short: if you try to capture a very dark and a very bright subject at the same time you can only get the bright one correctly exposed and a black spot or the dark one correctly exposed and a white spot.
Illuminate the dark one with a flash and you'll be able to equalize both and capture them with the same settings in a single shot.
>>
>>3067338
No. A neutral density filter would not help in any of your portraits if you don't know how light works.
>>
>>3067338
If you shot raw and at or near base ISO you could easily have recovered those shadows in post.

...unless you have a Canon - then you'd be fucked.
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 4


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.