Film General Thread (final)

File: 1493383607001.jpg (726KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

726KB, 1000x750px

Inb4 film is dead jokez

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	6000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:27 21:05:50
Exposure Time	1.3 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Brightness	-7.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Day White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	750
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

can anyone recommend me a developing tank? preferably for 35mm and medium format

>>3066509
Paterson.

>>3066501
>This thread doesn't really serve a purpose anymore, and I think it should die for awhile
How so?

>>3066519
A size would help

>>3066536
super system 4 is the one I use, can dev two rolls of 35mm at once or one roll of 120

Where do you guys get your color film developed? I've been developing my own B&W for a few months and figured I'd shoot a couple rolls of color I found in my closet. The Darkroom is pretty expensive and while Walmart is cheaper, they keep my negatives. Is there a cheaper service that gives you your property back?

>>3066529
Well, there's at least 7 other film relates threads going right now. So this doesn't do much to contain it all in one thread already. And alot of them are more interesting and have better discussions than the last few fgts.

>>3066536
Get a 650ml, which will let you dev 1 or 2 rolls of 35mm or 1 roll of 120.

>>3066542
This is such a stupid question to ask without posting where you live.

>Hey guys, what's good restaurant you'd recommend? The local steakhouse is too expensive. Olive Garden is cheaper, but it always gives me diarrhea.

>>3066542
>Walmart is cheaper, they keep my negatives
I never understood this when I see people mention it here, why the fuck would they do this? It's not like they have to go out of their way to hand back the fucking negatives

>>3066546
Prob because most Walmarts send out now. Saves them $$ not having to send the negs back.

Unless it's a place that offers 1-hour turnaround. Then yeah, makes no sense and I'd ask for my negatives returned...even if it means getting them back in a long curl in the canister holder. Gotta remember this is 4chin though and lots of posters are autists that would never think to simply ask for negatives back.

>Hurrah muh filmz is ready
>Can't wait for those firumu tonezzzzz
>Muh bohokeh iz gunna tangible
>gets to counter
>here's your out of focus prints and auto-toned, grainy scans anon
>B-but where's the plastic containing the physicality of the sun's cosmic rays that were present the moment I pressed the shutter and thus forever capturing the banality of life depicted by shopping carts in empty parking lots
>oh, we don't return negatives
>O-o-oh, thanks...you too.

>>3066545
Fair point, I live in Corvallis, OR. I was wondering more about online stuff, but I didn't specify so I understand the criticism. I used to use Snapfish when I was in high school but they got bought out by Amazon and don't develop film anymore. Are there any services like that anymore?

Copped a Mamiya c220 and a Zeiss Ikon Nettar 518/16 plus 4 rolls of portra 400 for 80 bucks. Did I done good?

>>3066552
Support local bro. I googled your town and a number of hits came up. Does the Rite-Aid process still? This guy looks promising too:
http://www.wisephotoprinting.com/services.html

>>3066558
did the mamiya come with a lens? they are good cameras. Does the ikon work at all shutter speeds?

>>3066544
>>3066529

fgt has turned more into film gear thread. Lots of questions and answers about basic film hardware, developing and scanning.

Not a bad thing and certainly useful for newbies, but it is just not the same.

>>3066558
price is alright, but i had the nettar and it.. just takes pictures. and ive used my c220 like twice in 3 years. they arent particularly hot cameras (for me).

>>3066559
Thanks a lot man, for some reason I never thought there would be a local place that could do it. I'll check them out sometime this week, after midterms.

>>3066563
Yep, c220 has an 80mm f2.8 on it, and the Zeiss works at all speeds (I haven't tested the exact speeds but the 200th is noticeably quicker than the 100th which is noticeably quicker than the 50th etc

Should i go into 4x5 photography?

im itching to do 4x5 and hopefully sell the prints.

>>3066575

take 4x5 shots of anime figures

>>3066594
Okay senpai. Give me a few hours and I'll have it done for you, not gonna waste some instant film on this.

>>3066558
Pic or it didn't happen

File: snow.jpg (795KB, 1000x1167px) Image search: [Google]

795KB, 1000x1167px

Hi /p/
Im looking to get into LF photography
Im using an rb67 but I want to get into movements
I have done research over the last few months and im pretty sure i want to make the move and im selling off stuff to fund it, but im pretty fucking budget, so whats the cheapest cameras i should be looking at to get into it.
When ever I look around some cameras I find are way more than what people are saying and its really hard to find cause search fuction on ebay is shit and largeformatphotography.info is down.

Also anyone want an RB67 + 120 back + 180mm C + 50mm
selling for about 280 USD, ship worldwide, comes with 4x HP5, 2x Pan F and a roll of Provia, all new this year and ofc in 120

Thanks

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3201
Image Height	3734
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	240 dpcm
Image Created	2017:04:08 23:10:57
Exposure Time	0.3 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1167
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3066619
M O N O R A I L

>>3066619

keep your RB67.

Use it on your leisurely walk and shoot because its something you can keep in a sling bag and take it out when there is something you wanna quickly capture. You wont get that kind of luxury in taking out your camera and shooting on the go with LF.

Toyo, Horseman, Wista and Graflex Crown are available on Ebay for cheap plus 4x5 backs.. just add in a nikkor copal lens which is i think the cheapest LF lens around and i think and it can be less than a thousand. but take note that these are LF field cameras that does not have a rear rise and fall only swing and tilt.

>>3066641
>didn't even mention to this goyim that longest lens he can use sensibly is a 250mm
What a meanie.

>>3066619

Send me an email anon.
Metamorphisme /at\ Yahoo com

File: 458623560_b13cdabc2a.jpg (33KB, 500x379px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x379px

I got a Rollei B 35 + flash at the end garage sale thinking it was a better model. Did I fuck up?

I could go back and negotiate exchanging with something else.

>>3066641
This.

I get you're budget and are looking to help fund the move to LF, but seriously, keep that RB. There will be times you'll kick yourself for parting with it, especially for what you can save up in a few short weeks. If you really need money go hit up some day labor place or find some research project that needs participants.

File: Bild009_Neg.Nr.8A.jpg (369KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 667x1000px

some

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: Bild008_Neg.Nr.7A-2.jpg (382KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 667x1000px

portra

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3066551
But in your greentext scenario they do ask for the negatives, after you said they are too autistic to ask for them back. Which one is it?

Even if you ask they arent gonna give you them if the store policy is that they dont.

File: article-2556447-1B3B692C00000578-423_634x470.jpg (97KB, 634x470px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 634x470px

>>3066958
>>3066959
These have that early color photo look. Its all so creamy and soft.

File: Bild023_Neg.Nr.22A.jpg (463KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 1000x667px

>>3066968
is that a good thing?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: Bild026_Neg.Nr.25A.jpg (256KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3066974
I think so. Its interesting and makes them look ~vintage~

File: Bild011_Neg.Nr.10A.jpg (276KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 667x1000px

>>3066977
well, it's just ordinary portra 400 exposed more or less at box speed.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:30 20:35:58
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000

I'm a beginner and I'm thinking about developing my own film once that time comes, but I don't have a way to scan and print afterwards.

Would it even be worth developing on my own as far as cost if I have to send the film to get scanned and what not?

>>3066982
no, but you could print.

>>3066609

atta boy, that's the spirit

>>3066594
>>3066609

Make sure to 'hot glue' them first.

>>3066984
I don't have a scanner/dslr, so I should just deal with sending my film in to get developed,scanned,etc?

>>3067019
When you have to send them in to get scans/prints anyway, there's no need to develop them on your own, unless you enjoy doing so. Some scanners are quite cheap, but deliver acceptable quality, if this is an option to you.

>>3066641
I might consider keeping it but I have a lot of cameras, I feel like I only use my rb when ever I would rather use LF, and I carry around 35mm otherwise.

Also I'm looking to get a Fuji gw690 in the future to replace my rb

>>3066652
I know about the bellows extension of a lot of these cameras so I'm a bit clued up on how limited they are

Have any of you ever sent anything suggestive to get developed? Nudes, erotic, transgressive, etc.

Is it ok to send those in or do some labs have policies against this sort of thing?

>>3067121
>Nudes, erotic, transgressive, etc.
yes. nothing happened, labs dont give a fuck about your crappy homemade porn.

>>3067121

They wont know what it is until they develop it.

What are they gonna say? No you can't have your lewd negatives back? Unlikely.

As long as it isn't something illegal you should be fine.


Getting stuff scanned/printed is a different story I'd suspect.

Still, I wouldn't do it because the only person I get to see naked is my wife, and I am not sharing that with random developer.

File: 13263830_1770406503195143_8541067439683832701_n.jpg (86KB, 942x477px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 942x477px

Fuckhuge garage sale of vintage cameras. Ends tomorrow. Anything worth getting /fgt/?

goo gl / 2r7AxI

I'm thinking on the Yashica Electro 35 because I know that's one good camera for cheap. I'm not very knowledgeable on old cameras.

>>3067121
If it's just nudity then you can have it developed np problem, they're used to it.

If it's illegal, or frowned upon (think subversive political protest in a country with a strong handed government) develop it yourself or shoot digital

>>3067236
That's a stash and a half, but a lot of it looks like mouldy trash, and everything that isn't seems to be priced pretty normally. If you see something you really want I'd suggest making an offer.
Also, you can post fb links to 4chan by shortening the url to fb.com

>>3067091
>to replace my rb
It doesn't, unless you use your rb exclusively for landscape work without filters, or for walkaround snapshits.
No close focus, no ttl viewing, no 50mm, no more than 100mm.

>>3067236
the only thing worthwhile in there is the hassleblad system and the leica cl

File: 0062GEEDgy1ff5tnavutqj33402c0npd.jpg (76KB, 690x518px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 690x518px

I just made my first prints today I am so excited! They are snapshit tier but I am gonna practice more.

>>3066658
emailed

File: screenshot.png (10KB, 602x170px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 602x170px

>>3066658
>>3067267
REEEEEEEE

whats your email

>>3067266
Feels good right? Nice job

>>3067269
Shit works like magic, I like it.

>>3067266
congrats anon
what sort of paper did you use?

>>3067276
Ilford MGIV RC, I got hundreds of those for free. Some old dude was getting rid of his old darkroom stuff so he pretty much gave me everything for free, except for the enlarger.

>>3067255
yea i see what you mean.
I got my RB and i use it as a landscape camera and for snapshits.
For snapshits I prefer a smaller rangefinder and i find a yashica with a 45mm works great except for the film format, thus i want the fuji with the 90

and whenever i use the RB for landscapes I find myself wanting movements, also I find my 50 way to wide but it came with the camera, I actually almost never use it.

you guys are not wrong, I like my RB, but i feel like a camera with movements for landscapes and a fuji MF rangefinder could definitely be a more practical system for me.

Also I should have mentioned I am considering roll film cameras with movements like the horseman VH or 960, because the quality I get from MF film is plenty for me, just I find not having movements a bit sad on a camera that weighs a lot

>>3066939
How much did you pay for it?

>>3067277
and what sort of chemistry?

File: matty-web.jpg (972KB, 994x1500px) Image search: [Google]

972KB, 994x1500px

Pretty annoyed I lined his head up with the trees, but a reasonably nice photo I think

Feel free to hate on me

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

So I have a Canon A1 with the standard 50/1.8 lens that came with it, which is good but anything from 10m-infinite focus is just really, really poor.
Any lens recommendations?

>>3067298
It's shit

>>3067309
constructive criticism you've got there

File: 789.jpg (603KB, 633x950px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 633x950px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM Corporation
Camera Model	FUJIFILM Corporation FEII software
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2624
Image Height	3936
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:01 10:42:58
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	633
Image Height	950

File: 799.jpg (776KB, 633x950px) Image search: [Google]

776KB, 633x950px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM Corporation
Camera Model	FUJIFILM Corporation FEII software
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2624
Image Height	3936
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:01 10:49:23
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	633
Image Height	950

File: 779.jpg (718KB, 587x950px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 587x950px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM Corporation
Camera Model	FUJIFILM Corporation FEII software
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2624
Image Height	3936
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:01 10:50:48
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	587
Image Height	950

>>3067310
It's not level. Black and white looks like shit. I could go on but I won't

>>3067306
Stop down you silly bint.

File: IMG_20170501_191240.jpg (214KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1000x750px

Shot two rolls of film and bought all this for $12. P gud day /p/

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:05:01 19:12:41
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	1.6 EV
ISO Speed Rating	123
Exposure Time	33333/1000000 sec

>>3067324
But I do, stop down is pretty much all I use

File: T70MelbHP500013.jpg (551KB, 1067x800px) Image search: [Google]

551KB, 1067x800px

>>3067326
Post an example then.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Digital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1067
Image Height	800

File: T70MelbHP500001.jpg (657KB, 1350x900px) Image search: [Google]

657KB, 1350x900px

>>3067325
v.gud werk.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Digital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1350
Image Height	900

>>3067285
$100

File: tyRXgPJ_d.jpg (64KB, 640x966px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 640x966px

Tfw I take 7 rolls in fairly low light and all picture perfect and take 10 more in sun and leaks everywhere I'm such a retard. Some people like leaks though.

>>3067298
It's all preference obvs but yeah lining up the trees with is head isn't great and you have a lot of sky, mightve looked a bit better if you didn't crop his legs and instead took from further back since you'd still have got plenty of sky in the frame. Not a bad photo just not my style, bit messy

>>3067375
Fix your light seals mannn

Where do you buy film online?

>>3067375

Sell your camera for 20 times the value to the lomography crowd, they go crazy over this jj abrahams look.

File: 85810012-2.jpg (3MB, 1843x2780px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1843x2780px

Tokyo Skytree

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:30 19:47:07

>>3067400

http://www.freestylephoto.biz/

https://www.macodirect.de/en

also b&h

your welcome

File: 4.jpg (1MB, 1747x1617px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1747x1617px

What does /p/ think of Fuji Superia 400 cross processed in Caffenol-C and fixed with household ammonia?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1199 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1199 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:01 13:03:33
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1747
Image Height	1617

>>3067247
Thanks for the heads up m8. Just ended getting the Electro 35 and a Polaroid, both in prestine working condition. Not too bad.

File: 2017-02-20_09-43-25.jpg (736KB, 1687x1228px) Image search: [Google]

736KB, 1687x1228px

Do you guys like cinestill? It's expensive, but I've gotten some cool results over the years. I'll post some scans. Lemme know what you think.

>>3067375
I bet your friend loved that shit.

File: 2017-02-20_09-44-06.jpg (452KB, 1818x1228px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1818x1228px

2

File: 2016-10-09 11.43.33 1.jpg (806KB, 2048x1358px) Image search: [Google]

806KB, 2048x1358px

3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Image-Specific Properties:

File: 2017-02-04 09.46.45 1.jpg (1MB, 1818x1228px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1818x1228px

4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Image-Specific Properties:

Going to California in July. What film would you recommend?

>>3067430
I think you need to work on your phone/tablet backlighting method, pixel-kun/sama.Hint: depth of field. Caffenol is ultimately more expensiv per rolle than normal devs with extra bother.

File: negs.jpg (95KB, 426x727px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 426x727px

>>3067466
Its actually a film scanner, Canon Pixma MP980.

But you're right, caffenol ends up being expensive, and processing color film in shitty bw chem gives me negs that are basically opaque. Sometimes I like the look, but its always pixelly from the 400% contrast adjustment to make anything visible. Pic of negs attached.

File: ScanImage011.jpg (780KB, 1600x2193px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 1600x2193px

I fell for the half frame meme and finally got myself a half frame camera for the summer.
Olympus Pen-D from ebay listed as "for repair" by a japanese seller. I paid ~25€ including postage and the thing came in 7 days. There's some crap in the lens and the plastic under the winding wheel has broken off but otherwise the camera is in full working condition.
Here's a snapshit from my test roll.

>>3067375
>nosering

Dropped

>>3067297
Polymax T and Ilford Stop & Fixer. I prefer liquid chemicals since they are easier to mix

>>3067458
Anything that's slower than 200 is good. There is almost too much sunshine in California it blinds you, especially in SoCal and the Bay Area. I would recommend Velvia 50 and Ilford F Plus 50.

>>3067386
No shit, I have sent my camera to be refurbished since I also wanted to convert it to be able to use non mercury batteries for the meter (Olympus OM1n)

File: 18033397_1778723575789754_162378885888693257_n.jpg (33KB, 552x562px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 552x562px

>>3067430
jesus did you dry this with sandpaper or something

>>3067325
Wow, where I live it's hard to find cameras at that low of a price. Nice work!

>>3067121
I asked dark room ahead of time and they asked me to not do that.

I didn't ask Dwayne's or Willow Photo Lab first and it was fine. Willow was okay, Dwayne's was great.

>>3067440
>>3067446
>>3067448
>>3067449
Everything looks under exposed?! pictures are all lame too. anon what're you doing

>>3067440
What is that? Light sensitive sandpaper?

>>3067409
too much head space kek

>>3067409

That is not Tokyo Sky Tree, that is the Umeda Sky Building.

File: 1436814445000_1139495.jpg (44KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x500px

How do y'all feel about the rollei infrared film?

>>3067790
Oops

>>3067409
This photo is fuckin great. I don't think it's too much head space. Gives a nice sense of scale and this kind of imposing feeling. What film?

>>3067790
Nah but seriously, I know the others are underexposed because I wasn't exposing for the whole scene, but >>3067448? Wut? That's genuinely how the place looks in person. Is my monitor fucked?

>>3067857
Hell yeah

>>3067687
developed with no darkroom equipment at all. First roll I ever developed, before I even bought a tank. Marks are from agitation since it was just a spool of film in a big glass bowl being agitated with disposable chopsticks. chemistry was all homemade too, as written.

So I have a mamiya 1000 dtl, and an olympus OM-10. Maybe one of you could help me and tell me which one is the better camera and would be worth experimenting with film photography for the first time? From reviews it seems the mamiya is nicer, but I'd love some input from someone more experienced than me.

>>3067488
Do diptychs with their neighboring half-frame for some hipstery fun.

>>3068381
ok now I'm actually pretty impressed you got something out of it

that's some serious ingenuity

>>3068273

I asked the same question before and got no answer.

I don't think anyone here has actually used it.

>>3068422
I've used the ilford ir film under one of those lizard heat lamps and it was okay. I just got a ir light source that attaches to my hot shoe and I was looking for more film to try out with it.

Recently had 6 rolls of film ruined by going though security x-ray machines with it. Two 400 rolls and the rest were 200.
I thought film under 800 wasn't effected.

File: willett-moon01.jpg (10KB, 314x393px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 314x393px

How do you take a picture of the moon and actually get the details of the moons surface and not have it just a blurry ball of light?

I'm sure zoom amount is part of it but what about aperture and shutter speed?

>>3067458
If you're going to northern California, stock up on some 400+ speed stuff.

>>3067699
The T4 is a bit sketchy, very week sounding film advance. Oh well!

>>3067907
Lololol

>>3068407
That's a p gud idea

>>3068441
Post damage.

>>3068445
1/250th, f11, iso 400 is a decent starting point.

>>3068445
As I'm sure you're aware, the moon moves. So to get the best pictures of the moon you'll need something to correct for that movement of the moon, like an astro rig that slowly moves. So with a shutter speed of say, 30 seconds, the moon will have moved ever so slightly in the night sky, creating a blurry image

Also it's impossible to advise on aperture and shutter speed over the internet since we don't know the amount of light in your particular scene.

File: 2.png (541KB, 1793x1585px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 1793x1585px

>>3068421
I woke up one day and was chilling on the couch with the old man watching MacGyver during an episode when he develops film with orange juice. I shot DSLR at the time and said to my dad "Sure that works!" Googled it, and learned about Caffenol. Went out, bought disposable and washing soda at wally world, already had everything else. Developed it that night.

Thank god for macgyver, that was years ago and I shoot majority film now, as well as owning real steel reels and chem. I occasionally still do caffenol for fun. The only time I use DSLR now is for family events, like when my gf graduated college, didn't want to fuck with manual focus manual aperture T50 to shoot her getting diploma.

Heres one from when I figured it out a little bit more, but still pretty typical of Color film in caffenol.

File: 25.jpg (1MB, 1000x663px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x663px

Super upset that there isn't a film P&S thread active. My photos are shite, but at least they feel at home amongst other shit in P&S threads.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:02 21:04:24

>>3068448
...a 30 second exposure for the moon?

You sure about that friend?

>>3068448
Man, don't comment if you're just talking out of your ass. The light on the moon is very constant. It's reflecting the god damn sun (a very constant, predicable light source). You'll need get need to worry about its movement since your shutter speed will always be quite quick (unless we start talking about 1000mm+ focal lengths or telescopes or something). A full moon needs ~f11 and 1/125th @200 iso give or take a stop.

>>3068446

Did he seriously think Tokyo Sky Tree was in Osaka? Or did he just post the wrong one?

File: Natura1600_002.jpg (377KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 1000x667px

>>3068483
Prob just a Baka gaijin getting confused.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>3068295
I was kidding with the too much headspace hence why I said kek afterwards haha

>>3068468
Was this taken near Cincinnati? I watch the skater on youtube call Andy Schrock and he's filmed there before.

Has anyone tried doing an exposure that is a could days or even weeks long

>>3068637
*couple

>>3068637
Hmm that sounds interesting. You'd need an extremely small aperture and like iso 1 film if that's a thing.

>>3068637
I believe you can do that with a pinhole camera but since I've never done it or read about how to do it I think you might have better luck just googling it or waiting for someone that has some experience to answer your question.

>>3068637
You should read this anon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocity_(photography)

Are there any film photography discords? if not someone should make one

>>3068693
You can do it with photo paper. Exposure time ~ 6 months, no developing required since it will form a residual image on the paper. Then just scan and invert

>>3068406
Honestly, the camera itself usually doesn't matter when it comes to film photography. The film and the glass are what produce the image for the most part. The only thing cameras will give you are different metering capabilities and shutter speeds. I'd say choose whichever one will give you access to the best/most lenses or whichever one you like most.

File: 000042.jpg (289KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1000x667px

>>3068826

File: 000066.jpg (333KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 1000x562px

>>3068827

File: 000062.jpg (357KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1000x667px

>>3068829

File: 24.jpg (1MB, 1000x663px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x663px

>>3068624
Sadly not near Cincinnati, it would be a really cool spot to skate though, the hills back there would be prime for long-boarding.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:02 21:04:23

>>3068826
>>3068830
I like these

File: Panorama_Wide_Pic_Camera[1].jpg (1MB, 2828x2121px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2828x2121px

Is there a surefire method of recovering a lost leader? Lost one today after only 8 shots as I had to repair the camera on the fly. Tried a couple of methods from YouTube and I'm getting nowhere.

Pic related. Dropped it and heard a horrible thunking noise, just turned out to be a lead weight moving around.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-L10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2012:12:06 21:21:43
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm

>>3068806
Thanks, I'll read more into it.

>>3067430
So what's your full process? I've been thinking about trying Caffenol.

>>3068843
They make proper tools for it, I found a Konica brand one that looks like it's from the 80s on ebay super cheap (no idea when it's actually from, that's just the vibe of the packaging). If you're shooting regularly with a camera that auto-rewinds it's well worth it. I think they're called film pickers or something like that.

>>3068901
Yeah I saw those but wanted to do it ASAP. I actually managed to do it by just sticking another price of film in, idly fiddled the roll back and fourth, decided to just yank it out and out the leader came with. Happy Days.

>>3068406
Mamiya will be harder to use but will force you to learn (or drive you away from film photography for good) om-10 is partially automatic that means it will take most of the hassle away in expense of more advanced control over the exposure. Personally I'd go with olympus cause setting the aperture and shutter speed every time you want to take a pic is painful and once you figure out the basics there is nothing stopping you from getting a fully manual camera.

>>3068843
Get a piece of film about 10cm long. Put a 3cm piece of double sided tape on one end of the film lengthwise, in the middle of the width. Then insert the end with the tape into the roll of film, and keep pushing it in until you feel the reel start to move. Then wind the piece of film a little more in, and then just pull gently to retieve the leader.

Works ever time, I use this when developing film since I reuse the canisters and so I can't break them open

>>3068843
I just take it to my local lab and ask for them to retrieve the leader. Takes them all of 5 seconds.

i wanna shoot dramatic and nostalgic looking pictures with the gf. what can i get? i dont mind if its super shitty as long as it looks hipster or whatever

>>3069102
post examples of what you want

>>3069102
Don't shoot film for that. Use whatever digital device you have (even a smartphone will work) + VSCO.

>>3069106
something like this. sorry its small. i was thinking about those 8mm videos that i see rom the 90s and how you can see much detail and i kind of liked that. i cant find any good examples. something that looks like old home videos. sorry im really clueless ive never shot on film

File: 2.jpg (7KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 320x180px

>>3069124
sorry forgot pic

>>3069126
Are you stuck on using film? Would be way easier to just use one of the 8mm apps on your smartphone.

If you really want to use film to make shitty images like that then maybe a 110 film camera will do it.

Maybe just buy and a cheap point and shoot and a cheap roll of film and take some photos and see how you like it

File: IMG_2077.jpg (50KB, 378x504px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 378x504px

>>3069131
i guess i could just use filters and stuff. last general i posted this. i inherited an old 16mm and i really want to use it because the pictures that come out of it are just what i like. but i dont have any experience with film and i havent found a place to buy loaded cassettes for it. so i guess that is what is making me want to shoot film. i also just found the holga 120n and it seems promising and easy

>>3069143
>holga 120n

Can you not
Go back to instagram with that shit, you're the reason people think film = bad quality

>>3069154
sorry i know im being shitty right now. ill come back later hopefully with real questions

>>3069154
>>3069143
I love my holga. People like it for different reasons. I like the shots I've taken of people. My friend likes the blurry shit where I thought I absolutely failed.

>>3069169
you should probably stop posting.

>>3069169
Do your friends like soy chai lattes, thick rim glasses non-prescription glasses and pens?

>>3069175
*penis

File: Filmy.jpg (3MB, 7127x4800px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 7127x4800px

Acros master race?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Width	7127
Image Height	4800

>>3069192
dafuq. virtually no grain. i want to shoot that.

>>3069192
ye

>>3069222
you should, it's a nice film

>>3069192
anyone have experience with pulling it? acros is often a tad too contrasty for my taste..

File: 33299456975_07253d7213_k.jpg (730KB, 2029x2048px) Image search: [Google]

730KB, 2029x2048px

>>3069192
Acros is god-tier BW film fan, love developing this thing with Xtol

File: IMG_1810.jpg (699KB, 1885x1242px) Image search: [Google]

699KB, 1885x1242px

What the fuck happened here?

I just got my first roll of FP4 shot through my new Zorki back from dev and in most frames I have at least two of the three major artefacts in this image. I know I loaded the film wrong which probably caused the scratches but the camera was checked for light leaks before I bought it - is there another way this could happen?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Image Width	1885
Image Height	1242

File: yoyogi.jpg (889KB, 1015x1500px) Image search: [Google]

889KB, 1015x1500px

>>3069243
I've pulled it to 80 before. Works well

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: april mai fuji400h 007.jpg (1MB, 809x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 809x1200px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: april mai fuji400h 016.jpg (1019KB, 753x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1019KB, 753x1200px

>>3069278

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: april mai fuji400h 033.jpg (1MB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x1200px

>>3069280

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: mai apx400100.jpg (566KB, 785x1200px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 785x1200px

>>3069282

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: mai apx400099.jpg (525KB, 788x1200px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 788x1200px

>>3069285

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: mai apx400086.jpg (759KB, 758x1200px) Image search: [Google]

759KB, 758x1200px

>>3069287

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: Acros_021.jpg (338KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1000x667px

Sitting on 2 rolls of 35mm and 1 roll of 120 to dev. Shit is cash

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:16 16:57:45
Exposure Time	2 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-5.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3069261
>my new Zorki
Found the problem, anon.
Slavic trashcams are trash.

>>3069293
!
Great shot, mane.

>>3069342

>http://www.yodobashi.com/%E5%AF%8C%E5%A3%AB%E3%83%95%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AB%E3%83%A0-FUJIFILM-135-ACROS100-NP-36EX-3SB-%E9%BB%92%E7%99%BD%E3%83%95%E3%82%A3%E3%83%AB%E3%83%A0-%E3%83%8D%E3%82%AA%E3%83%91%E3%83%B3100ACROS-35mm%E3%82%B5%E3%82%A4%E3%82%BA-36%E6%9E%9A%E6%92%AE%E3%82%8A-3%E6%9C%AC%E3%83%91%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF/pd/100000001001704236/

I might give it a shot.

Never shot black and white before though.

gf got a mju ii, shot a roll and every shot has light leaks.. any guides on replacing mju light leaks yourself?
also she loaded another roll, got 4 shots in before getting her previous roll back to find the light leaks, is the current roll fucked or can I unload it in the dark, keep it somewhere dark, fix the camera and put it back in?

>>3069192
Fuck that's so nice gonna buy a shit load next time I need film

>>3069353
If she already has a roll in the camera I'd recommend putting black tape where the light could get in. The shots she has already taken are likely to already have light leaks so this method will help the rest of the film still in the canister.

File: -2.jpg (2MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1333px

>>3069353
done this a few times before.. just get in a dark room, use something long and tiny, but not sharp, to push the rewind button, quickly open the camera and take out the roll. youll have to be fairly quick, lest the film leader dissapears into the canister.

>>3069356
this works too

as for the light leaks, just watch a utub video or something. its a fairly standard process.

>>3069347
thangkg mate

heres a 6x9 Acros shot, since that seems to be the film of the day.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:04 10:22:58
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: mju-1.jpg (583KB, 1000x1778px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 1000x1778px

>>3069366
>>3069356
got the film out.. didn't rewind so whatever.
anyway can't see any issues with the light seals but don't have a lot of experience

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OnePlus
Camera Model	ONEPLUS A3003
Camera Software	OnePlus3-user 7.1.1 NMF26F 53 dev-keys
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:04 16:54:33
Exposure Time	1/12 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	4000
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.26 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1778
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: mju-2.jpg (610KB, 1000x1778px) Image search: [Google]

610KB, 1000x1778px

>>3069381

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OnePlus
Camera Model	ONEPLUS A3003
Camera Software	OnePlus3-user 7.1.1 NMF26F 53 dev-keys
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:04 16:55:05
Exposure Time	1/12 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	2500
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.26 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1778
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3069383
do you have any examples of the light leaks?

File: light-leak.jpg (514KB, 1000x1778px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 1000x1778px

>>3069390
some are quite severe, others less so.. a lot have this circle that you can see at the bottom of the top left photo.
thinking about just selling it and buying a different p+s.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OnePlus
Camera Model	ONEPLUS A3003
Camera Software	OnePlus3-user 7.1.1 NMF26F 53 dev-keys
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:04 20:18:24
Exposure Time	1/17 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	0 EV
Metering Mode	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.26 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1778
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3067907
lol true

File: 40280019.jpg (1MB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1545x1024px

first time natura 1600 i brought back home from japan

loc: boston, mass

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:03 23:02:29

File: 40280030.jpg (1MB, 1516x1005px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1516x1005px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:03 23:02:33

>>3069034
>>3069048
See
>>3068915

But thanks for the suggestions.

>>3069048
I don't have a lab anywhere locally unfortunately, have to send my films off.

>>3068273
>>3068422
>>3068430
i have a roll and am still waiting to figure out what to do with it

>>3069608
You sure about that? Half the time someone tells me this I find a lab within 30 minutes of where they live.

>>3069611

Go shoot it and tell us how it is.

File: 58300026-2 (1).jpg (1MB, 1005x1516px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1005x1516px

Oylmpus XA-2 & Tri-X.

>>3069633
I need a 58mm filter first

>>3069616
Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland. Go.

File: A008125-R1-17-17.jpg (5MB, 3637x2433px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 3637x2433px

Dumping some recent shots. Ilford 3200 35mm in Detroit MI.

File: A007920-R1-15-15.jpg (5MB, 3637x2433px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 3637x2433px

>>3069658
Ilford 3200 35m Detroit MI.

File: FH020016.jpg (2MB, 3637x2433px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3637x2433px

>>3069660
Not sure on the film here, Detroit MI.

File: FH010014.jpg (2MB, 2433x3637px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2433x3637px

>>3069667
This is me :D shot with my Ricoh made Sears KS-2 by a friend.

File: ilford-fp4-plus.jpg (15KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x400px

Prove to me why FP4+ isn't the best film in the world.
Protip: you can't

>>3069756
it has a bland name.

is there any fresh 220 film available other than ebay fuji 160?

how important are blix and dev concentrations? if I water them down ~5% so that there is no air in my jars will it produce noticeably worse results?


I assume stabilizer is unimportant enough I would have no issue putting that in a 750 instead of 1 liter bottle

File: IMG_20170505_114913.jpg (275KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 1536x2048px

>>3069810
Nope, buy it while you can. I'm kicking myself for not buying it a few weeks ago. It's disappeared in Japan just in time for me wanting to buy 4-5 pro-packs.

Just got this today. Gunna run a test roll quickly and if everything looks good, put in a roll of HIE and super glue a red filter to the front.

>>3069892
fuck me i think i am too stupid to live

i accidentally dumped half my dev down the drain

HP5 is shit!
SHIIIIIIIIIIT!

>>3069898
What is it?

>>3067446
Light on the snow is super cool. nice shot/.

>>3067480
jesus, no wonder your scans are so fucked.

>>3069959
Vivitar Ultrawide and Slim. 22mm lens, fixed 1/125th shutter and f11 aperture.

Anyone owned a canoscan 9000f?
There's one available for $200AU that I was considering. I shoot 35mm and 6x4.5

How long have you had Ilford Rapid Fixer last? I bought a bottle about a year ago, Ilford's specs say it goes bad 6 months after opening but mine still seems to be working fine last time I checked. Wondering if I should just buy a new bottle to be sure or keep using it.

>>3069261
Did you develop it yourself? If so you, there was another problem loading the film onto the spool.

>>3069343
Zorki/Fed don't run as smooth as Leica, but are still cameras capable of producing good results. Don't blame the tool if you don't know how to use it.

>>3069944
I keep reading that, but so far nobody replied to me when I asked why it is shit. Mind to enlighten me?

>>3069982
It's cute, but sounds a pain to use.

>>3070045
My bottle has been opened at least 2 years ago and is still fine.

Anyone here use Ektar? Any thoughts?

File: Gold100_011.jpg (473KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 1000x667px

>>3069898
Got the test roll back. It's a rad lil thing, that's for sure! Pic related.

>>3070060
Pain to use how?

>>3070081
I have, don't like it. Not sure if it's because I shoot a lot of blue/green scenes or what. But I've shot 3-4 rolls of the stuff in a variety of conditions and can't get it to look like. I've seen nice examples online though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:05 20:30:34
Exposure Time	5 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-5.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3070084
Maybe "pain" was the wrong word.. more like challenging. Like a Holga missing a stop. But apparently it delivers quite nice results.

File: 42240006.jpg (178KB, 1000x663px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1000x663px

few shitty photos from my last 2 rolls.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-30
Camera Software	QSS-30 J003
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	663

File: 42240016.jpg (149KB, 663x1000px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 663x1000px

>>3070260

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-30
Camera Software	QSS-30 J003
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	663
Image Height	1000

File: 42240019.jpg (105KB, 1000x663px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1000x663px

>>3070261

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-30
Camera Software	QSS-30 J003
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	663

File: 42240028.jpg (162KB, 1000x663px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1000x663px

>>3070263

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-30
Camera Software	QSS-30 J003
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	663

File: 42240031.jpg (204KB, 663x1000px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 663x1000px

>>3070265

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-30
Camera Software	QSS-30 J003
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	663
Image Height	1000

File: 42240033.jpg (189KB, 1000x663px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1000x663px

>>3070266

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-30
Camera Software	QSS-30 J003
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	663

File: 42240038.jpg (151KB, 663x1000px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 663x1000px

>>3070267

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-30
Camera Software	QSS-30 J003
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	663
Image Height	1000