So people still use "real" cameras?

>>3064747
No, I prefer to use my imagination instead.

File: download (2).jpg (12KB, 259x195px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 259x195px

>>3064747
>real camera

>not using a potato camera

>>3064977
>5d3
>midrange

>645D
>top of the line

what the fuck

>>3064977
645D wasn't even top of the line when it came out, although the 645Z is within the class of 33x44 cameras.

>>3064987
Well, the 5D3 is kinda mid-range when you think of it within the context of 1-series being high-end, 5/7-series being mid-range, the double-digit cameras being the low-end, and triple-digit as entry level.

When digital cameras range in price from $1000 to $6,500, then $3,500 just about falls in the middle. For people who would never even consider a camera on the level of the 1DX, then of course a 5D3 would seem high-end, but in absolute terms it's not that expensive.

>>3064994
>80D
>Low-end
No.

>>3064994
Is /p/ full of the richest bigots by chance? I barely have any money to put into photography

>>3065018
>tfw you can't even start with a used DSLR of an obsolete kit lens that people ebay for less than 100 bucks

>>3064747
>not using fuji gfx.
get a real camera, kid.

>>3065018
/p/ mostly consist of adults who have jobs and mony to spare on a hobby. Or rich parents.

>>3064987
I suspect whoever made that chart meant full frame cameras in general, not the 5Dmk3 specifically.

But yeah, "top of the line", "high end" and "entry level" would be a better description for "MF", "FF" and "APS-C" respectively.

>>3064994
>the 5D3 is kinda mid-range when you think of it within the context of 1-series being high-end

It's still a serious professional level camera.
Just more orientated towards portraiture and less towards action.

And
>in absolute terms it's not that expensive.
Yes it is, it's objectively and in absolute terms expensive. - even when you have money to blow (like me).

The only way it's justifiable is when you consider it will last 10, 15, perhaps even 20 years.

>Mfw medium format film still beats top of the line digital and just stomps on phones

I shoot digital, phones have jaded my craft, and I don't care anymore.

Film #1

>At an art event last week
>guy asks if I'm one of the artists
>"I'm a photographer"
>"Aww, thats not art, thats not art. Everyones a photographer now that we have phones"

>>3065028
>implying everybody is amurican

>>3065277
REEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>3065288
>American
>Poor
Pick 1

>>3065352

>forgetting the state of michigan exists

Dude come on...

File: don-draper-shrug.jpg (52KB, 848x477px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 848x477px

>>3065094
Hmmm I know plenty of people with jobs and they still don't have the money to throw around on hobbies, I have to save up a lot to afford good equipment. That's one of those things in photography that will forever be a question, how the fuck are some people able to just get shit at the drop of a dime.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	848
Image Height	477