Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 26567351153_A000260062980_A000251142500.jpg (2MB, 2500x1667px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2500x1667px
what lights were used for this image? got requested to shoot an identical thing this upcoming weekend for a client job. would my elinchrom octabox 135cm suffice as something hitting the model side-directional light and then retouch by the end..? im not too good in determing the light..would be thankful for some advice :)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5DS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 8510 Image Height 5674 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:09:05 15:36:31 Image Created 2016:08:16 21:20:25 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 0.00 m Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 57.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2500 Image Height 1667 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual
>>
It's available light actually.
>>
>>3064109
but something in his eye indicate a softbox, no? or that theres so much light coming from the side. maybe you mean available light as in the interior of the place available light (regular design etc, not photography lights) , you mean that would suffice for such an image? Considering having Canon 5DS with 2.8 70-200, it wouldnt be to complicated/come out as dark? Thanks
>>
>>3064109
Lol, no.
>>
>>3064125
thats what i thought.. what do you believe has been used? im rather lost and it would feel comforting knowing what i should bring for this kind of shoot. appreciate any help i can get
>>
>>3064127
u could pull it off with palsy buff alien bees
>>
>>3064130
never herad of that, dont know if they exist where i live.. elincrom have similar? which one of softbox or beutydish would you consider in this scenario? (thats what i currently have) .. i might need to rent.. i guess similar to your recomendation worst case scenario.. thanks
>>
>>3064125
lol yes. You can see the sunset right behind him.
>>
>>
>>3064226
You can still see motion blur.
>>
>>3064226
I believe this would be most appropriate.. and regarding >>3064228 its maybe probably 1/60 or 1/125 even.. that captures the basketball.. no? I think i will use Canon EOS 5DS, 2.8 70-200mm and softbox octabox 135cm from the diagonal sida of model, slightly above.. big windows in the background as on image (wil be shooting in a hotel suite, so similar conditions) .. and hope for the best :) thanks all for the thoughts.
>>
>>3064228
>>3064247
I'm thinking on generic terms, I know it's fast enough to capture a falling basketball, but not fast enough to avoid blur, so it's probably between 1/80th to 1/320th depending on how fast the ball is moving. I know this from people that insist on doing these stupid jumping shots, if I don't go faster than 1/320th I get blur, it's not as if a basketball would be moving much faster than them.
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1