Need Advice

Just because I love that movie.

Take a look into Fuji x100t or f

I have the Fuji x100S and I love it. If you can afford the x100F I'd definitely go for that if you don't mind the fixed focal length. Great image quality from them, looks great.

Get the a6000 you will have an upgrade path. Also don't fuck your sister

>>3064913
>>3063996
These two, the x100 series is impeccable and I'm seriously having second thoughts about buying the x100f when the price drops.

>>3063992
The Canon G7x ii is the same as the Sony RX100 iii but with customer support and without the annoying little evf on a stalk, castrated raw, stupid menus and the irksome habit of switching itself off when you snap the evf shut because you just poked your eye out with it.

Go for one of the Fuji X100 series

>>3063992
just buy an rx1 already

>>3063992
Something cheap for the gullible American, because you'll be picked clean by gypsies within the first few months until you've learned your lesson.

>>3063992
Ignore all those dumb cunts and decide what you want from a camera.

If it's a fixed, slow, wide angle lens, very similar to your smartphone, look at the ricoh & fuji, if you want a slow zoom on a small sensor (more versatility, less image quality) look at the rx100 or canon.

If you want a slightly larger camera that's of a higher quality and infinitely more versatile but relies on the lens attached, get the a6000.

The a6000 and sigma 19mm is for all intents and purposes the same as the ricoh and fuji, just a little bulkier and with a MUCH sharper lens.

Don't get the G7X mkii, I did and I just finally sold it so I could buy a a6000. Buy an a6000. They're the shit. They're not pocketable but it's not as important as you think it is

>>3066135
*A little sharper in the middle and complete trash in the edges.

>>3066135
>Sigma 19mm MUCH sharper than ricoh
You have no idea what you're talking about.

Whichever one can give you the widest angle or allow you to use wide angle for the best price. Europe needs lots of wide angle for some amazing shots, also because lots of historical structures will need wide angle to isolate the buildings out with as little people in the frame.

I have the Sony a6000 + SEL50f18 + SEL28f20 + SEL16-50f3.5-5.6 (Kit) and the truth is that it is a good camera.

I have a better experience using it for street photography and photography in general than my previous reflex cameras, it is not so small and discreet as a GR but it is not uncomfortable to carry with you everywhere.

The EVF is quite useful although it is not the best, certainly not something that you notice a lot or cause a problem when shooting. The focus is quite fast and the quality of the photos is quite good compared to APS-C reflex cameras.

My old camera was a Canon 60D which I replaced with the a6000, I'm thinking of selling the 60D because I only have it on the shelf along with my Canon lenses (50mm, 18-135mm).

The only thing I would need to really be able to completely replace my 60D its a SEL55-210 MM F4.5-6.3 OSS.

If any of you have the a6000 with 55-210 I would love to hear your opinions, experiences and sample photos with it, also if someone considers that it is a bad idea to get rid of my 60D I would like to know why they consider it so.

>>3067822
Holy shit, how many times can you post about the same thing?
>I would love to hear your opinions, experiences and sample photos with it
There's around 4 years worth of that shit just a google's search away, plus you already have the damn thing so what does it matter?
>also if someone considers that it is a bad idea to get rid of my 60D I would like to know why they consider it so.
Why?

File: 8cc813f264d0c6c4bbf2a491c836d02cf4a41c0af9bcab2eb8bd34699d69f4b7.jpg (56KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1280x720px

>>3067828

>Holy shit, how many times can you post about the same thing?
Well actually, I made this post in another thread like a week, so literally this is only the second time..... I just want to contribute a bit my experience with the camera and the lenses i have, you really need to chill


>There's around 4 years worth of that shit just a google's search away, plus you already have the damn thing so what does it matter?
I have the camera but not the 55-210 lens, I would like to know a little more about the experiences of /p/ users that have that configuration of lens and camera. This is a photography forum where you can discuss and share experiences with equipment and photographic techniques, I don't see why I can't use it to get a bit of information. Also i used Google on this topic but you see, the thing is that I want more personal opinions

>Why?
Same, I just want to read opinions about the subject