edgy cameras

>>3063550
>rabal t3i or t5i
wew, don't. the only rabal worth buying right now is the 800d.
but noobs should really get the a6000.

>>3063552
haha they are out of my price range mate

>>3063550
>>3063559
used Pentax K-S2 or K-70
Or even a used K-5IIs

try and get a 70D

>>3063550
The image quality will be identical between those two. Just save money on the body, get the 600 and invest is decent glass.

>>3063550
i have the t3i, dont get one

>>3063984
Same. Loved the camera for years, bought a little better glass for it. For a beginner I'm sure it would suffice, but if you have money you could do better. I'm planning on switching to a fuji x-t2 soon, but I'm a poorfag and this is going to take a while. T3i iso noise and fps is holding me back a bit.

>>3064272
>The gear is holding me back
kek

>>3064350
Shooting a low light indoor sports event with the t3i even with a quality lens ends up being a pain in the ass. The buffer kicks in if you even look at the shutter. I still managed good shots at my last shoot, but my output would have been radically higher if i had a camera that could handle higher iso's let alone have a buffer that actually makes continuous shooting useful. Factor in the auto focus not being accurate half the time as well. That at least i can just do manually and be better off most of the time in that environment.

used 50d

>>3064350
I have the 70-200 f2.8 and the t3is auto focus really holds it back. Im going to get an 80d sometime soon