hi

>>3063043
Is that you?
Get out of here you talentless fat goof, these photos are shit.

File: IMG_0467.jpg (837KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

837KB, 1000x562px

>>3063046
lol no, and thanks ))

File: IMG_0488.jpg (312KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1000x562px

>>3063046
also hes cool anon, dont be a spazmonkey

>>3063050
>6 / 5 / 2 / 1
kys

File: IMG_0476.jpg (209KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1000x562px

>>3063051
i dont get this

File: IMG_0546.jpg (598KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 1000x562px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	562

File: IMG_0426.jpg (723KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

723KB, 1000x562px

>>3063062
fuck compression makes the shoop look gay.
also thank you come again

>>3063062
Love it. Would buy the print

>>3063062
fix this

>>3063059
this is shit, delet

>>3063057
Wrong eye in focus you tard


Rest are fucking great, seems like a fun time. 11/10 for colors. What gear and where is this?

>>3063063
>>3063062
>>3063059
>>3063057
>>3063049
good stuff
>>3063048
your processing is a bit rough and dark compared to the modern standard which is nice, but can get a little over the top, which is evident here, just imo (mostly the blown highs)

Photos are terrible, you fat fuck

>>3063087
i-im not fat anon

>>3063085
alright anon thanks i'll give it a re-do sooner or later.

I'm not a big fan of your photos (composition and subjects are quite boring), but I do like some, and expecially I really appreciate colors and tones.

What kind of processing technique do you use? How is this effect called?

>>3063092
thanks anon (for compliment and crit).

i have a bunch of palettes i made (look into colour theory). now made presets but still fixing some things for example what >>3063085 mentioned.

>>3063095
Looks like VSCO trash

File: IMG_1031.jpg (61KB, 729x410px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 729x410px

>>3063076
o shit didn't read. it's around and about, here n there. i use a 5d2 with a 40mm and a uniomat, usually have tri x but this trip i had hp5.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	729
Image Height	410
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_1032.jpg (85KB, 823x463px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 823x463px

>>3063098
i don't have a smartphone anon

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	823
Image Height	463
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3063076
Not OP, there's no rule about which eyes should be in focus

fucking trash as always, kill yourself already omi

>>3063538
;)