How aesthetic are your pictures /p/?
https://everypixel.com/aesthetics
>>3056396
its retarded and i am too
>>3056400
Hey, that's pretty good
Woah
it got turned on its side though
2/2 This is clearly broken.
>>3056404
RVA Bro!
>>3061296
>Lawnmower Man, 2004
why though
Reposting since I accidentally deleted it.
Lawnmower Man, 2004.
by Paul Graham, one of the most renowned fine arts photographers in the world right now. This shot is considered the best one from the most famous sequence in his magnum opus collection, A Shimmer of Possibiity.
>>3061299
?
IRAQ. Rawah, 2006.
by Peter van Agtmael, taken from his collection Disco Night Sept 11.
Untitled, 2007.
by Phillip-Lorca diCorcia, from his collection A Storybook Life.
>>3061304
Obviously everyone is wrong and just pretentious faggots who champion shit photography because it's more ((((((artistic))))))). Algorithms don't lie
This shit is a sham. All you faggots who think your pics are good because they are "aesthetic" should give up photography, simple crooked and shitty iPhone picture got me a 92%
>>3061436
>https://everypixel.com/aesthetics
>>3061436
That was fun.
>>3056396
Ok OP I am really surprised how it can identify what is in the photos. Maybe someone
is testing a software for security with it.
Yeah...
>>3062138
>not a e s t h e t i c
so close
yee
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Unknown
I got into photography a week ago and already my instagram snapshots are near perfect.
>>3062140
DELETE THIS
>>3056396
This isn't my best shot ever or anything but damn - harsh critic is harsh.
>>3061347
So what does that say about my picture of a donkey?
>>3061436
But it's so aesthetically appealing!
Apparently Llamas rank slightly higher than donkeys. Well screw you - I really love this picture.
>>3056396
Well, it's wrong.
>>3061347
4Chan being 4Chan
Check more awesome shots on my Instagram profile. @swankyphotography