Why is the video on entry-to-prosumer DSLRs still god awful?

>>3049240
Nikon and Canon are similar to apple in the smartphone world. Intentionally limit features so you'll get their newest thing.

>In 10 years Sony will control all that is photography

>>3049247
oh look, moopco is masturbating again

>>3049240

>What's holding back DSLRs?

They aren't mirrorless. Also, you get what you pay for.

>>3049247
Because video was never something they were meant for. More like a added feature. Get a mirrorless if you want video, but until battery life gets better a DSLR is still the tank for stills

>>3049240
>implying moire isn't a feature

>>3049240
>Why is the video on entry-to-prosumer DSLRs still god awful?
Why are stills from video cameras so god awful?

>>3049240
DSLRs will never be as good for video as mirrorless, that's just a fact of life.

>>3049940
If I wanted to shoot video I'd buy a video camera not some jack of all trades, master of none mirrorless piece of shit

>>3049957
Said the guy who knew nothing about shooting video whatsoever.

>>3049240
just get panasonic g80

>>3049957
>implying gh5 is shit

>>3049972
Said the butthurt Sony faggot

>>3050255
>namecalling is a valid argument
I've never used Sony, I'm mainly talking about Panasonic.

>>3049957
>Master of none

Then why do you have a fucking DSLR? If you truly followed what you're saying, you wouldn't have a FF dslr, you'd have a medium format stills camera that costs 20k, then you'd go buy a 15k video camera.

Yeah, I'll take the mirrorless