Do i have a nak for this stuff or are they just lucky shots? Are they even good shots?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Microsoft Camera Model Lumia 535 Camera Software Windows Phone Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/2.4 ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/2.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2592 Image Height 1456 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
OP here.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Microsoft Camera Model Lumia 535 Camera Software Windows Phone Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/2.4 ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/2.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2592 Image Height 1456 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3044300
>Do i have da talent?
No. Kill yourself.
>>3044300
Shit tons of shake blur.
You're at least as good as some trips. Don't kill yourself just yet.
Acquire a trip and make your own threads with photos like this often. Before you know it you'll be circle jerking with the rest of the trips.
In terms of photography, if it were on a scale of 1-50, you are at roughly scale 1-2. You just need to go ahead and accept the fact generic nature photos are shit that nobody cares about, but that's where everyone starts. Take a photography class or learn some basic concepts of making a good photograph.
>>3044300
The pictures are pretty but blurry. Try using a tripod and shooting at a higher shutter speed. Great location btw I'd like to see more.
Fully expected this to be a Fujifag but cellphonefag instead.
>>3044791
Oh you're on a cellphone. Disregard that advice and get a slr or dslr
>>3044300
> Are they even good shots?
No. Get a much better camera for starters.
I imagine they might be pleasant shots using better gear - but that doesn't mean they are particularly good even then. They'll just be shots that might actually be worth looking at for the experience if doing so.
>>3044450
I actually started shooting people, and moved to landscapes, and nature. The fact is scapes, and the such make lots of cash.
Though I do agree with your ranking.
The examples are terrible, and are what you get with a phonera, or something that you scrape off your shoe when you step in it.
Composition:
All I see is the trail. It's not interesting. There are more interesting things within the view that I could see you getting shots of that would ultimately be much more interesting.
You're using a cellphone and a particular model that doesn't have a good camera. I had the 520 for a while and believe me, it's crap.
Don't worry about taking photography classes. Youtube it all! B&H Photography has a channel.
I started with this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksqfTapOk3o
>>3044300
/lit/ here. Do I have enough talent to warrant buying a real camera? Couple of snapshits I took from my daily walk.
1/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make LG Electronics Camera Model LG-K420 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:28 16:42:35 White Balance Auto Exposure Time 1/120 sec F-Number f/2.2 ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/2.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 3.75 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4160 Image Height 2340 Altitude 0.00 m
>>3045083
2/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make LG Electronics Camera Model LG-K420 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:28 16:42:08 White Balance Auto Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.2 ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/2.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 3.75 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4160 Image Height 2340 Altitude 0.00 m
>>3045085
4/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make LG Electronics Camera Model LG-K420 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:11:04 12:45:12 White Balance Auto Exposure Time 1/456 sec F-Number f/2.2 ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/2.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 3.75 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2340 Image Height 4160 Altitude 0.00 m
>>3045088
5/5
That's it boyos.
>>3044300
also i know this is shit but i love this photo for some reason.
>>3045093
lol is the the fucking petrocan on hastings and renfrew? you're making us all look stupid.
>>3044300
Most people were shit at photography when starting out, and most of their good shots in the beginning were an accident.
There's no secret to being good, you just have to be willing to buck up and learn how to do what it is what you want to do. Develop your 'vision' of the stories you want to tell and what you want to show people, then learn how to get better at it by studying whatever is relevant to that goal. I would generally recommend taking an interest in art in general, not just photography.
OP here
>>3044305
people like you are the bane of modern day society.
>>3045093
It's because you've never taken a nice photo, idiot.
>>3045314
Actually, it's talentless, lazy people who think they are owed praise or compensation for accomplishing nothing.
>>3045323
Asshole my photo is better than your mother you poopie
>>3045089
If you like taking photos, then get yourself a camera, if not then don't.
>>3044300
boring/10
If the picture isn't sharp, it's shit, unless you're one of the interpretive artfags. Blurry pic of nature trail doesn't scream artfag.