pay more get less -fuji

it's common knowledge dpreview edits their Fuji pics to look worse retard

>>3043725
Oh look it's this cancerous shit again.

Remember folks

Go to: Catalogue > left click + shift on this thread.

Congrats! It's hidden and ignored.

>>3043752
Nice conspiracy
>>>/x/
>>3043764
>Hiding the truth
Whats wrong with you?

>>3043764
fujifriend btfo

shut the fuck up. at least my xt2 doesn't overheat during NORMAL OPERATION. thread reported.

>>3043804
No camera does, yours is soft tho.

>>3043725
K-3 II isn't even the most recent Pentax body. KP has better ISO performance.

>>3043725
then buy the cheaper one
using your money well is your problem, not fuji's

>>3043781

It is the 4chan equivalent of covering your ears and yelling "Na! Na! Na! I can't hear your!"

>>3043752
>>3043764
>>3043804

Reminder, don't buy fuji unless this style of non stop jealous faggotry is your lifestyle of choice.

>>3043844
Also the older K-5 ii/iis had a far better sensor the the K-3 models

>>3044086
Same with the Nikon D7000 and D7100/7200. Exact same sensor.
The 16MP Toshiba one had around 67% QE while the new 24MP Sony ones have barely more than 50%. Talk about shitty business practices and market control.

Why are Sony fags so obsessed with Fuji? It's like the trumplets/stormfags are obsessed over black dick, sissies and cuckholdery.

Something to admit Sony? Inferiority complex?

Sony is starting, or is, the self-projecting cuckhold of the photography community.

>>3044112
>Why are Sony fags so obsessed with Fuji
moop is /p/'s biggest sony shill and isi shoots fuji, you do the math

>>3044115
But moop shoots sony and fuji? How does the math work out now?

>>3044112
And you're the only person here to mention sony, got something to admit?

>>3044112

>OP makes valid complaint about Fuji with evidence
>15 replies
>first mention of Sony is some butthurt fujifag complaining about them
>not even a legitimate rebutal to OPs argument

Seems to me that Fujifags are the ones with an inferiority complex.

>>3044142
>seems to me

Is this how sonyggers talk? Oh dear.

Fujibois btfo how can they even compete with sonyggers??

>>3044180
By comparing actual photos taken. Doppelganger is the only good Sony shooter.

>>3044183
>comparing actual photos
What do you think OP posted? Or are you under the impression that subject matter has an effect on resolving power?

>>3044207
This tells me all I need to know to know you're not capable of taking good photographs.

>>3044214
you didn't answer my question, how is op's post not actual photographs?

>>3043764
I actually didn't know that.
Now my /p/ is only photo threads
Can I remove exif viewing too?

>>3044215
They are photos, but how often do you take photos of just text?

Obviously fuji isn't optimised to render text, but it obviously has no problem with normal photos.


Some people here are crazy stupid.

>>3044215
because they're not prints

>fuji isn't optimised to render text,
>render text
>render
>text
Just made my day.

>>3044227
greentexting to imply you have something to say or what?

>>3044230
>>3044218
>Obviously fuji isn't optimised to render text

learn to read noob.

>>3044234
Yeah no I think you're just autistic and think there's something here.

>>3043725
fuji stopped baking their raws?
great.

>>3044115
It's pretty embarrassing that a shitty photog like isi uses Fuji

Fujicucks btfo the fuck out and on suicide watch. How will they ever recover from this painal devastation?

>>3044590

They could if Fuji would admit they fucked up and kill off their terrible x-trans sensor.

>https://petapixel.com/2017/01/27/x-trans-promise-problem/

>>3045168
Garbage article.

>>3045168
Is that why isi's photos always have weird, nasty colours?

>>3045199

That, and she's fucking awful with color.

>>3044218
> Obviously fuji isn't optimised to render text, but it obviously has no problem with normal photos.
This quote is golden