Dream Gears Thread

File: GF670_main.jpg (127KB, 549x439px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 549x439px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2010:07:13 10:11:14
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	549
Image Height	439

File: NSP2005 4.jpg (90KB, 740x544px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 740x544px

not gonna lie, i want this baby bad

File: SpiceFullnelson.png (743KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

743KB, 1024x768px

>>3041935

Damn BH being jews putting it up like $600 bucks more than they originally sold it for, thus making all the resellers mark it up to $2k+

>tfw Fuji will never offer a medium format film camera for sale ever again, foreverrrrr, foreverrrrr, foreverrrrrrrr

>>3041932
>>3041939
Why are these so expensive? Not memeing, genuinely curious.

>>3041935
..oh mama

>>3041944
Amazing lenses, invincible body, 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, 105mm and 135mm framelines.
option to focus on body or on lens and looks cooler than any rangefinder

File: 20141216_GW690III_0001.jpg (139KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1000x667px

>>3041947
this anon knows what he is talking about

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	898
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2014:12:17 14:39:42
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cloudy Weather
Flash	Flash, Compulsory, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3600
Image Height	2400
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3041944
>Why are these so expensive? Not memeing, genuinely curious.

>>3041947
incorrect

It's because they're modern remakes and limited editions, which makes them essentially brand new versions of 60's mechanical masterpieces.
All the style and quality with none of the wear and decay.

To compare, pls see the new reman'd Aston DB4GT's and Lightweight E-Types.

>>3041954
i more meant the line as a whole

>>3041953
man, these things are useless without 220 being made anymore. you have to reload every fucking what, 8 shots?

>>3041958
the only reason i shoot film is to take less photos. so thats okay for me

>>3041935
Bessa III is my dream camera. I almost blew my savings on one.

>>3041955
But the old ones aren't expensive, they're trash.

Consult the scriptures, my son:
>This Nikon SP is nice, but feels nowhere near as nice as it's intended competitor, the LEICA M3
>I wouldn't go out of my way to get one for photography
>For the same money, one can get genuine used LEICA cameras and lenses instead, whose optics are much better

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/rangefinder/sp.htm
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/rangefinder/s3.htm

File: 1465079879688.jpg (33KB, 500x372px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x372px

>>3041935
The GF670, G617, and X-Pan are totally grails for me.

>>3041964
Shouldn't you compare the Nikon SP to the Contax that it's copying, in the same way that you should compare a Canon copy of a Leica III?

>>3041978
What's up poorfag. I have two xpans

An FF 6x6 back for my V-series Hassy.

Also a nice set of battery-powered compact strobes (Profoto Air, Elinchrom Quadra, etc.) and more glass.

>>3041944

If 400 dollars is expensive you need to find another jorb.

>>3042170
they are at least 1k dollar except tax and postage. i'm not >>3041944 but it's like 3-4 months average salary in my country and i'm 20 years old uni student.

>>3042176

If 1000 dollars is expensive you need to find a better jorb.

And it appears I am an absolute dumb ass for not buying the 369 dollar one from the local camera shop FML. if it's still there next time I pass through i'll grab it

>>3042183
You're kind of stupid, huh? Don't quite grasp how global economics work?

>>3042182
very beautiful. i guess mf rangefinders are very appreciated here

File: 20150619_567443.jpg (73KB, 520x390px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 520x390px

>>3042183
I wouldn't spend 1000usd on pic related even though I really want to own one. Of course the TC-1 is a beautiful object and a nice camera to use but it just doesn't offer enough value to justify that high price tag when you can get similar results and user experience with a camera that costs like 1/5th of the price.

Also, the collectors go nuts for anything that is rare, weird and/or expensive, even though the camera in question itself wouldn't really even be that good. So this way a mediocre camera can become a cult item that costs way more than it should based on its performance. Because of this cult status, the people who would actually want to use that camera can't afford to buy it.

>>3042222
camera collectors need to be shot in the face.

>>3042227
But not those ones that only collect clapped-out broken gear. They can stay.

>>3042242
>implying most "broken" cameras cant be fixed by a whack or light CLA
SHOT IN THE FUCKING FACE

>>3041953
This and a Ricoh GR and I'll pretty much be set for life

File: voigt_11_r3m_b.jpg (67KB, 459x401px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 459x401px

i just want one of these, and i know it's made by Cosina but i alrerady have a rebranded Cosina SLR and it's more than enough for me.
In fact my dream camera would be a film rangefinder with the K-mount.

>>3042183
i hate you plesae just kill yoruself already

A 200/2 would be nice. A Zeiss Ikon RF would also be nice.

>>3042268
I got the R4M back when Bessa where all the rage here on /p/. I almost never use mine, sadly.

File: CONTAX_T3.jpg (47KB, 800x572px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 800x572px

>>3042259

and this, for vanity.

>>3042341
t2 is better

>>3041939
>>3041932
When you look through the viewfinder of you won't want one anymore.

>>3042355
already have before at a second hand camera shop, whats wrong with it?

>>3042387
Gonna have to agree with you brohiem, the Pen F is something of a technological marvel, a half-frame SLR crammed into a range-finder sized body. Everything about is years ahead of it's time - and it's just fantastic.

Nice.

File: 6c203a8a736d2c6b5f4491352b01c14c.jpg (97KB, 801x800px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 801x800px

I'd love to do LF some day.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Photographer	Juergen H. Krause
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	814
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2008:07:22 21:53:05
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	801
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3041980
not when the nikon and the m3 cost about the same
youd have to be a fucking moron to get that nikon over a leica

>>3042639
Meh the M3 is a M3. It's a great range finder, but if I had the chance again I woulda got a Nikon Range finder

File: tmp_23560-D3S_0270-1200-1295569488.jpg (410KB, 1200x1297px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1200x1297px

This

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: Kodachrome_64[1].jpg (914KB, 1824x1216px) Image search: [Google]

914KB, 1824x1216px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K20D
Camera Software	K20D Ver 1.04
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2010:07:15 18:18:17
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1824
Image Height	1216
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>3042839
Overrated CA ridden trash.

>>3042848

this.

I got to play with one it's a one-trick pony. f1 is pretty much useless depending on how good the AF is on your body, and stopped down to f8 or f11 it's worse than the plastic fantastic. The 1.2 is better in every way and even the 1.4 gives it a run for its money in the IQ department.

That lens, like many lenses from the early EOS days,was Canon flexing their muscles at Nikon essentially saying, "hey look what we can do".

File: Minolta_X-700.jpg (67KB, 700x464px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 700x464px

+ability to shoot without batteries

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS OPTICAL CO.,LTD
Camera Model	E-10
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 7.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2005:05:21 21:13:14
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	80
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	36.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	700
Image Height	464

File: want.jpg (153KB, 1200x930px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1200x930px

surprised no one has posted this yet. everyone says its the best 35mm film camera

>>3042906
ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
film leicas arent bad they are just..
they are ok, not good, not bad.
just ok.

>>3042906
Don't get me wrong, I would love to own a Leica but for the same price I can get an extremely good kit for another system and still have money to spare.

File: IMG_2565.jpg (145KB, 1200x681px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1200x681px

>>3042906
Would be nice, but would probably go for one of these first.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	681
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3042927
hnnnng

>>3042906
i wouldnt say no to a free leica, but theyre not my grail or dream camera

File: Rollei-Rolleiflex-2.8-F.jpg (49KB, 400x568px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 400x568px

A 2.8 Rollei

File: phaggets.jpg (292KB, 1500x998px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1500x998px

>>3042927
tried G1 first, felt really sluggish, later got G2 in my hands, its like from another planet.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:11:02 17:13:40
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Brightness	6.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	27.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

noct meme nikkor + Nikon 13mm thingie,
wich has appeared on ebay for 25k... novelty lenses go for retard prices

>when I first started out with photography I dreamt of expensive cameras and lenses
>now I dream of having talent

>>3042934
as owner of nikon d60 I fart at your general direction

>>3042906
If I was some lucky bastard and a I got one passed down to me, I'd use it. Other wise I'd sell it in a heartbeat.

Leicas are literally a currency, and devalue massively when they have micro nicks and scratches, thanks to the autists painstakingly examining every picometer surface area.

I pretty much have everything I need, but I would like;

- Nikon FM2
- Full darkroom set up
- Buckets of chemicals
- Boxes of film (fridge to put them in).

File: dsc09924.jpg (578KB, 900x687px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 900x687px

>>3042307
>>3042934
Nice meme

I have a Mamiya C330. It's a great camera but it's killing my neck.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	SLT-A77V
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2012:06:16 18:35:28
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Brightness	-1.4 EV
Exposure Bias	-2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Compulsory, Return Detected
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3042970

As someone who owned an FM2, I liked it but the FE is really the best 35mm Nikon of that era without paying the F3 tax. If you must have full mechanical yea get the FM2 but the FE does it for me. You literally point and shoot, it does aperture priority AND shutter speed priority.

>>3043067

> He is too poor to afford an FM3A
> He can't read a simple meter

File: Pentax_67.jpg (677KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 2000x1333px

They're not even all that expensive but still want one bad

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1333
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 600px-Mdn_01_1024_768.jpg (29KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x375px

I always feel guilty when I talk about gear, unless it's about an Olympus OM-X.

The sins I'd commit to get ahold of one of these would make me the Devil's right hand man.

Leica M6 & 35mm cron. I'm fine with My poorfag Bessa R2 & CV 35mm f2.5 kit too though.
For MF, a Mamiya 6.

Other than that, "would be nice but I probably won't get it":
- Olympus Pen F / FV
- Contax T3 (realistically I'd go for T2)
- Contax G2

I used to dream of a Pentax 6x7 and got one.

>>3043145
just get one m8, you won't regret it

>>3043431
cant contain this boner.

>>3042570
If you skip the hipster lens, it's not expensive.

>>3043431
are there cameras that look like this? (but arent a prototype)

>>3043116

>FM3 is 500 dollars
>FE does 99% of the same thing and can be had for 100 dollars tops
>FE has needle meter from the Nikkormat
>spend 500 on an FM3 or spend 500 on an FE and 50 1.2?

2/10 i replied.

>>3043540
But the entire LF infrastructure is expensive, I would basically have to revise my entire darkroom, with more expensive equipment. I only want to do that once I can spend that money without it hurting. Of course I could do contact prints but where's the fun in that.

>>3043454
Too poor to rn. I say they aren't that expensive because anyone with a shitty income could afford one saving up for a while but I'm currently out of work.

>>3043067
Ironically I own an FE, and I got one about a month ago - it's superb and with a pancake 50mm Nikkor, it's even sweeter.

Just lusting after the FM2 cos it's built like a tank and it is the purest and toughest camera in my opinion.

FE has also my love <3

>>3043544
>not spending 1k on fm3a and 58 1.4

poor in taste, poor in purse

>>3043542
Bronica ETRS or SQ.

>>3043542
not in 35mm

>>3043717
an absolute shame.

>>3043688
>58 1.4
The FM3A can't shoot that lense.
The new Milvus 50/1.4 is the best Ai-S fast 50 at the moment.

File: bwking.jpg (32KB, 300x282px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x282px

>>3043542
>are there cameras that look like this? (but arent a prototype)
>>3043717
>not in 35mm
bzzt, wrong.
https://www.cameraquest.com/rol3003.htm

>>3042975
Get the grip mate it's dank with the c330.

Oh yeah,

Forgot, Bronica SQ-A not B. This alongside the Mamiyas, Pentax and Fujis, are the only worthwhile medium formats, the Babblesads and other meme cameras are pawn-shop fodder.

>>3043743
pretty neat.

shame about the handycam ergonomics.

File: 1431695941315.jpg (110KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 400x400px

>>3043688

>58 1.4
>not the Noct-Nikkor 58 1.2
>mfw I can afford both right now

>>3043738
The superior Cosina Voigtlander lens

>>3043710
they're not even expensive bitch

File: 1346805634270.png (71KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 220x220px

>>3043822
read the post that dude quoted

Recommendations on a film camera to get? I'm a film student but, I have only been using digital. I want to setup a dark room in my bathroom and begin doing film photography.

>>3043828
K1000 is the classic student camera. Should be cheap as balls. Fully mechanical except for meter. Well built too, I literally found one in a dumpster in full working condition.

>>3043803
cool story

I want a Ricoh GR. So badly. I bought a Canon G7X MK2 and I regret buying it over a Ricoh.

>>3043833
>k1000
>cheap as balls
lmao you musn't have checked what they sell for nowadays, they are overpriced out the ass

>>3043833
I don't know about european or american market very much but standart canon lenses are much cheaper than nikons. i'm a nikon user but i will suggest getting a canon just because of that. but if you have nikon lenses or just want to get a nikon, my suggestion is f90x it's cheap, works with manual lenses, matrix metering, 4 aa batteries. only problem is weight and double exposure. you can do double exp. with mf26 databack

>>3043828
Try the Yashica E-35 GSN. It's an aperture- priority, automatic rangefinder from the early 70's. It comes with a beautiful 45mm f1.7 fixed lens, and, because it's a rangefinder, they're incredibly fast and easy to focus.

A tested, well working unit will run you under $100. Rando copies that haven't had their battery adapted (5.6V mercury batteries are no longer sold), or have a worn rubber pad (leads to "Pad of Death") will run you around $50.

File: sonstige-hasselblad.jpg (31KB, 600x337px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x337px

>everything for 2200 usd


Why is the world so unfair?

>>3044693
i have an old 500c Body from the fifties, but no lens for it. I would love to shoot MF but i´m poorfag and can´t afford any lenses. All the lenses on ebay are at least 400€. Are there any cheaper alternatives

>>3044913
Sell your body and buy a mamiya. Hasselblad is a meme anyways.

>>3044928
This but Bronica SQ instead.

>>3044928
>>3044929
This but Kiev 88 instead. Spend difference on cabbage, Fomapan, and bulk paracetamol.

>>3044693
Babblesad, not even once.

I'll say it again - they are likely to be 99% the same as every other decent MF camera. Add the MOON MEME™ tax and you have a Hasselblad.

File: 1460693584297.jpg (383KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 667x1000px

>tfw about to buy dream gear
>mfw my photos will still suck

>>3043883
honestly you should regret it.

>>3044931
>shilling for slav trash
didnt know anon could be SO MEAN.

>>3044928
>>3044929
>>3044931
This but the Pentax 6x7 instead.

I've been borrowing a Hasselblad for a while and don't get me wrong, it's really good. Feels really great to use, lenses are very good. But with my own money, I'd go for a different system that doesn't cost more because of the meme - and I did, with the Pentax.

File: laughing slavs.jpg (92KB, 491x331px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 491x331px

>>3044931
>Even ironically suggesting a Kiev 88

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:03:22 22:20:27
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	491
Image Height	331

>>3042887
i have this camera and it's pretty much the tits got it for $35.00 mint.

File: s113469072356784560_p160_i1_w640.jpg (215KB, 828x640px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 828x640px

Ugh look at this piece of sex

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot A530
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 7.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2011:06:02 11:43:34
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/2.6
Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory, Red-Eye Reduce
Focal Length	5.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	700
Image Height	541
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: dsc09915.jpg (590KB, 900x752px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 900x752px

>>3048534
Or maybe this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	SLT-A77V
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2012:06:16 18:35:03
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Brightness	-1.5 EV
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Compulsory, Return Detected
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 3358800697_aba8e1c89a_o.jpg (25KB, 400x260px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x260px

Surprised I don't see this camera on /p/ more often.

>>3048541
Having used one, they're cool, but the lens is the only thing that makes them special. The camera functionality is similar to other point-and-shoots of the time, so AF is slow and often hit and miss.

I found the 24mm focal length to be somewhat unusable for day to day shooting. It's a terrific lens don't get me wrong, but way, way too wide for me

>>3048534
that's ugly af

File: 33110433366_3c3beb4b19_o.jpg (22KB, 650x366px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 650x366px

>>3048534
>Ugh look at this piece of sex

>>3042064
I wish Hasselblad would make more square sensor digital backs. I'm debating buying the CFV-16 just for that sweet, sweet square CCD, resolution be damned

>>3042975
I just sold my C33 because I got a Hassie,

I don't think there is any other MF camera that is more of a pleasure to focus than the Mamiya TLR's, you can focus as close as you could ever possibly want and the parallax is only an issue when being handheld- easy fix on a tripod

File: 1489645394972.jpg (25KB, 250x201px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 250x201px

>>3048534
>A $20 hunk of ugly slavshit is your dream camera

File: minolta uniomat.jpg (304KB, 1200x802px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1200x802px

and im getting it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	SLT-A77V
Camera Software	SLT-A77V v1.05
Photographer	Picasa
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	135 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2014:08:17 22:39:30
Exposure Time	1/3 sec
F-Number	f/13.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	4.9 EV
Exposure Bias	1/2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	90.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	802
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Unique Image ID	da6496cf1695b5e764f4ef00e0e53092
GPS Status	Measurement Interoperability
Geodetic Survey Data	WGS-84
GPS Differential Correction	No Correction

File: Zeiss,-Carl-50mm-f0.7-Planar.jpg (24KB, 400x443px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x443px

Gotta be this beast, the most legendary lens of all time (and something to put it on of course)

File: 348082-1_300x300.jpg (22KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x300px

135mm f/3.5 Planar for 4x5

>>3042387
I still want one of this, specially with rising film prices
>>3042927
I literally dreamed with this last night, dunno' why
>>3043833
They were cheap as balls in 2008, the meme of them being what you should get as first year film student had already skyrocketed prices in 2011
Nowadays they're retarded expensive specially since they're a fucking basic SLR, you can get much better shit even from Canikon at lower prices
>>3048534
why

File: pentacks38.jpg (634KB, 1200x1028px) Image search: [Google]

634KB, 1200x1028px

I've got mine, but I'd like to eventually get the body and lenses in mint condition.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-5 II s
Camera Software	K-5 II s Ver 1.06
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017-03-08T17:31:30+10:00
Exposure Time	1/180 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1028
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: 2017-03-23 09.41.39.jpg (3MB, 1810x2674px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1810x2674px

dreams do come true

>>3048534
good man

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:03:23 09:41:17
Focal Length	3.40 mm
F-Number	f/2.4
White Balance	Auto

>>3044938
did you take this?

if you actually spent time on this, you should really reconsider your hobbies

>>3049548
What is the benefit of using a small shit rangefinder with a separate light meter? I can only begin to imagine how tedious it must be to shoot with it.

Also why write "fuck" on a tape and stick it to a notebook? You seem quite young and immature.

File: eJwNysENwyAMQNFdGAAMyGBnmQoRRFIlBYF7irp7-ad3-I_6jktt6hDpczNmP2duY9dT2ki16NpavUrq59S53SaJpHzc5SPTOODoMaAlx0DkMBrHSOQRgP1isAHWZSN4F1_Wr1i_e1W_PwUuIwM.jpg (154KB, 1568x882px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1568x882px

>>3049622
>What is the benefit of using a small shit rangefinder with a separate light meter?
Running a 72 shot testroll of tmax100 slides/reversal and learning how to accurately meter for it with the proprietary process I use, cue notes.

>I can only begin to imagine how tedious it must be to shoot with it.
Yes.

>Also why write "fuck" on a tape and stick it to a notebook?
Because it's funny.

>You seem quite young and immature.
Thank you.

>>3049548
Holy shit this reeks of tryhard...

>>3049630
>proprietary process I use

keked hard

>Because it's funny.

I'm going to agree with >>3049632

File: 20170402_133947.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

>>3049755
ok anon

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Camera Software	P605XXUCNF2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:02 13:39:47
Exposure Time	1/33 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	64
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	3.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	3.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	E08QSGG01OE

>>3049768
Waste of good film... What a shame.

File: 2dd.jpg (37KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 600x600px

>>3049768
>b&w reversal

File: rsz_20170402_140942.jpg (924KB, 1836x3264px) Image search: [Google]

924KB, 1836x3264px

>>3049792
Any film works but the contrastier/slower it is the better it'll look. Precise metering is crucial to get a proper slide, cue half-frame testroll.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Camera Software	P605XXUCNF2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:02 14:09:41
Exposure Time	1/33 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	2.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	3.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	E08QSGG01OE

>>3049820

I've been wanting to try it for a while, particularly with Acros 100 since the contrast is already pretty strong when developed as a negative.

Once exposed to light, how do you get your film back on the reel for the subsequent chemical steps? Paterson reels are already impossible to load if they're even humid, can't imagine they would work at all with soaking wet film

File: 20160802_190353.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>3049821
Transparent plastic reel, I never take it off for re-exposure. Definitely try it, the results are very rewarding, especially on larger formats, plus the necessity to get it perfeftly right in-camera is a pleasant challenge.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Camera Software	P605XXUCNF2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:02 19:03:52
Exposure Time	1/17 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	1000
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	-1.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	3.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	E08QSGG01OE

>>3049825
Ah cool, that makes more sense. I've bucket developed 8mm and 16mm film motion picture film before so I'd imagine you could probably also do it like that for still formats, though it would obviously necessitate a darkroom

I think I'll probably give B&W reversal a go after E6

>>3049825
>>3049820

Wait... wait... So you're using a normal negative and transfering it onto a reverse film??

File: 20160802_174807.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>3049854
No, directly making positives on the film I shot. Every bw film is a "reverse film" if you develop it witha reversal process. They just arent optimised for that like dedicated reversal films are (more transparent base, for example).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Camera Software	P605XXUCNF2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:02 17:48:07
Exposure Time	1/18 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	40
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	3.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash
Focal Length	3.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	E08QSGG01OE

>>3049860
do you use sulphuric acid, or something else? how easy is it to get the chemicals you use?

>>3049860
I just googled it, and yes, holy shit, I did not know this.

http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/20114271220441194.pdf

What are the advantages of reversal film? Besides being able to use it in a projector?

File: 20160804_162405_Richtone(HDR).jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>3049862 #
Looking at your bw snapshits on a wall blown up to 1x1m? Higher boxspeed sometimes? Finer grain? Looks cool I guess?
>>3049861 #
>do you use sulphuric acid, or something else?
Yes, sulphuric acid and potassium dichromate, keeps forever, doesnt stain, kills the environment.
>how easy is it to get the chemicals you use?
It usually takes a couple months to get anything shipped to Pitcairn island, I'm afraid, and you have to know the right people.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Camera Software	P605XXUCNF2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:04 16:24:05
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	3.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Unknown

File: 0011531reg.jpg (35KB, 620x473px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 620x473px

Is there a decent 35mm compact that has a slowest shutter speed that's hand-holdable? I'd prefer to have underexposed shots over blurry ones.
You can kind of fake it with exposure compensation but that feature gets pricey

>>3049867
That's pretty awesome. Who the fuck just sells hexavalent chromium compounds and sulfuric acid to private customers, though? That's some nasty shit I hope you have some actual chemistry experience and you're not just playing with this shit in your kitchen sink.

>>3049903
If you find a Ricoh ff-90/70 they're cheap have a nice lens and have 2 stop exposure comp and flash hold down option which then selects the lowest shutter. It's a 28mm f/2.8. Nothing else really rings a bell, I'm assuming most have no feature like that cause it's assumed you'd use flash before getting an underexposed image or in low light situations be using a tripod. Who knows though I don't know much.

>>3049908
PhDfag here, I can literally order anything I want through our online ordering system. I bought all my stuff through Sigma Aldrich. So I guess if you know someone in a chemistry department that can hook you up, you're golden.

>>3049912
Well I'm in a chemistry department, but considering a grad student here got busted buying meth precursors recently I don't think they would be too open to me trying to buy stuff for home use. This reversal process sounds pretty complicated, but I have considered trying to mix up my own regular B&W developer since the HC-110 I like keeps getting harder to buy. Something like caffenol, but hopefully a bit more professional.

There's even an old darkroom in my lab from when the electron microscopes used to use sheets of X-ray film.

>>3049544
Can you post some shots you've taken with it? I'm wanting to get one and am having trouble finding photos taken with it

File: Untitled.png (1MB, 1409x882px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1409x882px

I would pull the trigger but I'm about to lose my job and have nothing lined up

>>3049918
What really makes me REEEEE is that I can't transport all of the chems I've bought. I finish in a few months and I'll have to leave this shit behind.

I think you can buy from SA but it costs significantly more expensive.

File: Rollei-35-Aperta.jpg (381KB, 3307x2126px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 3307x2126px

>>3042570
>>3042906
nice cameras, I have owned them for quite a while and love them both
>>3042937
I owned a 3.5 planar and now have a 3.5 tessar, actually like the tessar better, but would love the 2.8

>>3041932
I'll post the Rollei 35 as my dream camera not because it is a great camera, or expensive.
I have owned 3 of them, 2 Singapore 35s and 1 German 35.

It is my dream camera because I keep dreaming that it will the camera I want not the camera it is. I find it a great camera on paper but a cumbersome and disappointing camera to use

I dream that it had a coupled rangefinder, better advance lever, and less noisy shutter

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	NX1000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Elements 6.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2013:10:02 12:14:39
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3307
Image Height	2126
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: resize110.jpg (507KB, 1100x864px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 1100x864px

>>3049919
I've only had time to put a single roll through it sadly, here's some from that roll

File: resize108.jpg (861KB, 1100x864px) Image search: [Google]

861KB, 1100x864px

>>3049919
>>3049934

File: resize105.jpg (622KB, 864x1100px) Image search: [Google]

622KB, 864x1100px

>>3049919
>>3049935

>>3049929
I bought one of these a few month ago and didn't even finish the rest roll. Clunky piece of shit, I should've listened to the review.

>>3049924
Hey man I just sold a Crown Graphic for 350 CAD. They really aren't expensive if you know where to look. Go make a WTB ad on APUG.org or largeformatphotography.info. Go to the latter for information on buying and cutting x-ray film, which will make shooting the damn thing much more affordable until you get the hang of it. I would also recommend trying a monorail, which can be had for as little as 75$ or so if you look hard. The Crown and Speed Graphics allow pretty much zero movements. There are better compromises between movements (the main draw of LF photography besides a larger negative) and portability/hypothetical hand-hold-ability like the Toyo 45aii.

File: Fuji-G617_0006.jpg (259KB, 750x491px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 750x491px

>>3049938
yes

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Photographer	Darren Tierney
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2011:03:03 08:46:15
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	491
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3049938
Some dude on le reddits bought one for like $50 from a thrift store and didn't know what it was. It wasn't a Linhof, but similar, and it was found to be worth at least 1.5K.

Someone on youtube noted how fucking ridiculously difficult it is to focus and adjust the camera, and you basically need a film lab at your disposal to get usable pics. I'd avoid it.

>>3049929
Was in Korea and saw these in the camera shops, my gf wanted one cos it looks cute - but I held back saying that it could be a clunk little turdlet. And it is. What a surprise.

I'd even say the Canonet QL17 is not great either, cumbersome and tedious to use, need to shill it to some rubes.

File: ynvwy.jpg (34KB, 786x438px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 786x438px

>anyone wanting any of these meme cameras when there are a billion k1000s out there and lenses for them

File: D3S_0098-1200.jpg (197KB, 1200x861px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1200x861px

Love these, not the best of its kind, but still a great camera.

File: qsQJSiO.jpg (208KB, 900x810px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 900x810px

>>3050073
>k1000
>not mx, kx, super program, or me super

shiggy

>>3049949

Robert's Photo has one for sale in their Indy store downtown. Took all of my will power to not blow the tax fund on it.

Alex has one and swears by it for 6x17

>>3050090
Yeah, but Alex also takes good landscapes and understands 6x17 composition.

>>3050092

Good for him, you want a fucking cookie?

>>3050094
I want you to kill yourself my man.

>>3050094
Someone didn't get their nap after a long haul :^)

>>3050094
lol someone is mad at alexs photo skills. i understand being jealous, but mad? youre a such a piece of shit.

why dont you kill yourself?

>>3050094
>be the large format shitposter with a large format human body
>take shit pics
>get mad that alex, isi, and others are better photographers than you
>pretend not to be mad on the internet while being clearly irate
>shiggidy

>>3050119
Real talk, I'm jealous of Alex. Like, he gets to see all these great landscapes and gets his e-peen sucked for just doing what he likes.

File: Terry-Richardson.jpg (65KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x400px

>>3049924
>I would pull the trigger but I'm about to lose my job and have nothing lined up
That's a pretty normal time to pull the trigger, anon.
Go for it!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	28 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	28 dpcm
Image Created	2014:08:12 16:10:54
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	600
Image Height	400

>>3050092
>>3050105
>>3050104
>>3050119
>>3050122
The raw savagery that pours out of this board towards Sugar really makes me smile.
I hope it hurts him.

>>3050263
No idea who Alex or Sugar is, but its pretty entertaining.

>>3050264
Alex is a landscape photographer from Colorado who has "made it" in the sense that he's moved on past /p/ and to better things. Sugar is a trucker from Florida.

>>3050265
Ahhh okay, i'm in Florida too. Id like to see his shit to get an idea of all this hate.

>>3050090
FUCK

Man I want it so bad.

>>3041958
If I remember correctly those cameras were supposedly designed for and used by tour group photographers. They would line up a tour group usually getting off a bus then snap a picture of each group, send it off for development and have prints by the time the tour was over.

With my 6x7 camera, 10 pictures is more than enough. With 35mm cameras and 36 exposure rolls I just sit on a roll for a while because I only took 10, 20, or 30 pictures. If I don't have the time to take pictures the roll just sits there until I finish it. With 10 exposure I usually finish one day of leisurely photography while walking around and I can get that roll developed and get those pictures right away. Worst case scenario I put another roll in.

This is very personal though. If you shoot a lot of pictures and changing rolls is not what you want to do then that camera is not for you.

>>3050089
>>>>>>>not LX

>>3050094
maybe you should take a nap, such long hauls must be tiring :-(

>>3043145
ditto. Also would love to own a Bolex super 16 one day.

>>3050268
He has a thread up now to check out.

>>3050365
LX is expensive/scarce enough to put it out of reach of someone who would be fine with a k1000

File: pentax-lx-image.jpg (268KB, 700x465px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 700x465px

grail tier

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX Corporation
Camera Model	PENTAX K10D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Elements 3.0 Windows
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	112 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2008:08:14 16:24:27
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
F-Number	f/6.7
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	75.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	700
Image Height	465
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>3050262
where the fuck is he looking at?

>>3050405
that looks mint.
don't use it.

>>3050511
it's obviously not anons ya goober

>>3050374

There's no Florida in that thread, but there's some here

http://www.500px.com/sugarysweet

>>3049903
Nikon af600 (lite Touch pano) is good, I think the slowest speed is 1/8 and it has a pretty good 28mm 3.5. Other than that it's a plastic brick, but it doesn't go for meme prices

EF-S 22mm weather sealed f1.0

File: Minolta_X_600.jpg (202KB, 530x411px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 530x411px

>>3041932

I want one so bad.

No clue how much it costs because I can't even FIND one for sale.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 20D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	530
Image Height	411
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:01:12 22:55:29
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	75.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	530
Image Height	411
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3042887

X-500 is a better choice.

You lose program auto mode, but you can view all settings inside of viewfinder.

File: om-1.jpg (237KB, 1600x1077px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1600x1077px

im very new to photogrophy so i dont know much but i heard this one is pretty good and i love the look of it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi
Serial Number	0420110240
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2010:02:06 17:01:28
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1077
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3051371
plastic everywhere.
go older.

>>3051833
hipster tax is high on this one.

>>3042927
I got a G1, its fucking grand. I'll probably pick up a G2 later this year.

>>3051851

>go older

What body prior to 1983 has focus confirmation?