How good are your photographs, /p/? https://everypixel.com/aesthetics

>>3040929
>98.6%
Not even good enough to be a 1%er, let alone a 0.01%er.

File: cap.jpg (99KB, 1408x570px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1408x570px

>>3040929
bullshit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: bike.jpg (150KB, 1398x503px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1398x503px

ahahahah

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:17 19:20:16
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1398
Image Height	503

File: asdasd.png (583KB, 1413x626px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 1413x626px

hmmm

File: 20170317_124908.png (357KB, 1440x788px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1440x788px

The other one was better

File: YeahBoi.png (811KB, 1363x859px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 1363x859px

Wow...

>>3041087
Savage

File: pottetplantaesthetics.jpg (304KB, 1600x797px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1600x797px

Not even kidding. Try it yourselves.

File: Alexaesthetics.jpg (469KB, 1600x797px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1600x797px

Well fuck me sideways. Even the algorithm thinks that Alex' images are godlike.

>>3041091
>99.9% chance of being awesome
>still fail to be awesome
Does it hurt much, friend?

>>3041094
they are more "nice" than "godlike", but still

File: looool.jpg (275KB, 1375x586px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 1375x586px

top this.

File: pls.jpg (252KB, 1405x593px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1405x593px

ernst haas is a 0%.

>n-no people
is this AI pleb as fuck?

>>3041111
>we asked designers, editors and experienced stock photographers help us generate a training dataset.
>is this AI pleb as fuck?
yes

>>3041082
>instagram borders
>this image probably sucks
that's surprisingly accurate, anon

>>3041126
the site adds that, you bedwetting twat

>>3041126
wow what a retard.

File: aesthetic1.jpg (157KB, 1444x640px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1444x640px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:17 20:39:04
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1444
Image Height	640

>>3041100
>making useless comments because insecure

>>3041144
>making pandering comments because never opened a photo book

>>3041133
>smug cunt
>white people
>brave wymyn doing nothing
>pierced millennial
1000%

File: screenshot-everypixel.com-2017-03-17-16-14-02.jpg (130KB, 1000x494px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1000x494px

Kek

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: Screenshot_20170317-200707.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

Dead birb ')

File: Screenshot_20170317-201037.png (954KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

954KB, 1920x1080px

Looks like film is dead

File: Aesthetic2.jpg (242KB, 1416x656px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1416x656px

>>3041162
nope,
Fuji Pro 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:17 21:19:55
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1416
Image Height	656

File: Untitled-1.jpg (303KB, 1402x778px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1402x778px

This tag AI is on fleek

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 3.03.12 PM.png (400KB, 1225x585px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 1225x585px

>>3041108

it took a while.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 4.08.14 PM.png (1MB, 2692x1342px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2692x1342px

neat.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 3.10.33 PM.png (443KB, 1251x511px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 1251x511px

Finally, someone who appreciates my college work

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 4.14.35 PM.png (2MB, 2654x1204px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2654x1204px

>>3041193
another try. I r Photo God praise my surrealism.

>>3041202
>real people

>>3041087
I mean it's not wrong.

File: 3015d24f56f9878bda709eaa390afa58.png (567KB, 1393x562px) Image search: [Google]

567KB, 1393x562px

>>3041202

File: Unbenannt.jpg (378KB, 2150x904px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 2150x904px

I'm really impressed how accurate it can tag the pictures

File: miki.png (274KB, 1367x558px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1367x558px

savage

File: Unbenannt.png (668KB, 2012x851px) Image search: [Google]

668KB, 2012x851px

nice nice

File: Capture.png (523KB, 1432x657px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 1432x657px

Good odds

landscape shit, no matter how awful, always gets over-90% rating

File: Untitled.png (302KB, 1272x646px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1272x646px

Ohhhh

File: Screenshot 2017-03-17 at 7.23.33 PM.png (316KB, 1294x581px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1294x581px

My highest rating was 60%

I'm more impressed that they know so accurately what the picture is of though.

File: Untitled.png (438KB, 1209x560px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 1209x560px

>Young Adult

File: Screenshot 2017-03-17 at 7.24.54 PM.png (332KB, 1225x568px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1225x568px

>>3041318

This is BLOWING MY MIND

File: Screenshot 2017-03-17 at 7.38.26 PM.png (206KB, 1287x577px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1287x577px

>>3041318
>>3041322

My highest one yet!!! :D

File: Screenshot 2017-03-17 at 7.40.31 PM.png (242KB, 1240x574px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1240x574px

>>3041332
>>3041322
>>3041318

This was my lowest rating. Sorry for the spam, I'm just really impressed by this.

File: ricohmilc.jpg (203KB, 1334x668px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1334x668px

>>3041111
>ernst haas
>b&w
>it's like you're setting the man up to fail
>try with several colour images from Creation
Holy shit, this is fucked. Everything except the stick in the ice got 0%

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:18 09:59:21
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1334
Image Height	668
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3041124
seems like they were just judging stock photography as well

File: awesome.jpg (152KB, 1384x520px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1384x520px

We were messing around with this on /a/ yesterday and figured out that it really prefers dark, contrasty images. B&W is a plus, too.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>3041173
>muscular build

File: Screenshot_2017-03-17-20-55-48-1.png (306KB, 1205x548px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1205x548px

>a program to r8 ur snapshits
the future truly is now

File: Screenshot_2017-03-17-21-09-05-1.png (225KB, 1061x502px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1061x502px

>England
>UK
>Sepia toned
sure thing bud

File: Screenshot_2017-03-17-21-15-55-1.png (165KB, 1104x527px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1104x527px

>Beautiful
>Beauty
t-thanks everypixel-sama <3

>>3041379
>we figured out that it really prefers dark, contrasty images. B&W is a plus, too.

This thread entirely negates that theory

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 11.52.15 PM.png (2MB, 3056x1886px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3056x1886px

lol

File: Untitled.jpg (175KB, 1454x658px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1454x658px

It overemphasizes the content/subject in the photograph

My favourite shots on my HK trip were between 20-93% while basic skyline shots are always over 95%

This shot in particular has too much sky and I forgot my tripod

File: Untitled.jpg (148KB, 1405x657px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1405x657px

Yeah this thing has pleb taste

File: monetary.png (387KB, 1409x591px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1409x591px

>US Coin
u fukken wot m8

>>3041262
me too

File: IMG_5905__dcrw_wW_b20__s__alamy2.png (691KB, 1339x1398px) Image search: [Google]

691KB, 1339x1398px

The same image -__-

File: 99.9% match.jpg (206KB, 1144x600px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1144x600px

A.I. has spoken, it is a match made in heaven.

File: Every country in the world belongs to America.jpg (108KB, 558x424px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 558x424px

>>3041811

File: p.jpg (90KB, 1417x571px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1417x571px

Thought so.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Bart Zoni
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-19 at 8.44.22 PM.png (584KB, 1178x562px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1178x562px

Well, fuck

This algorithm is retarded: almost all of these images are either <10% or >90%.

>>3042550
<1%*

>>3042550
It analyzes based on a stock photography perspective, not from something subjective like an artistic or aesthetic perspective.

File: Screenshot_1.jpg (112KB, 1482x600px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1482x600px

ayyy

It's really quite decent at picking out things to tag. If I had to guess the % rating was an afterthought that was tacked on to get people to use it so the neural network gets more images to work with to improve it

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-21 at 10.20.32 AM.png (475KB, 1402x590px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 1402x590px

True beauty

File: monocledrop.gif (388KB, 300x275px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 300x275px

>>3042637
>England
>Jews

File: Clipboard01111.jpg (79KB, 1370x567px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1370x567px

>b-but my friends on my FB liked it
Using an AI to rate photos, I fucking hate this world. I'd rather not feed this beast of a machine that will replace art based on what plebs on Instagram upvote.

File: Clipboard0109.jpg (67KB, 1398x575px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1398x575px

>>3046281
>Takes random object sitting on desk puts in front of monitor and photographs it with some nice creamy bokeh behind it.
I should just give up with photographing the night sky, taking pics of my flashlight with /p/ in the background is the way to go forward.

Making a picture black and white made one of my photos go from 28 to 50 percent.

File: 1490209064250.jpg (21KB, 424x559px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 424x559px

>>3041157
>arts and entertainment

File: IMG_20170326_144147.jpg (73KB, 1280x623px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1280x623px

Cute ;)

>>3042883
amazing

>>3041092
kek

>>3041157

And then Pewds does it with the same photo:

https://youtu.be/VAm27OdSplU?t=6m43s

File: Screenshot_20170326-120402.png (1MB, 1080x1539px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1539px

Huehuehue

File: Screenshot_20170326-123216.png (655KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 1080x1920px

Wait what

File: Screenshot_20170326-123328.png (396KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1080x1920px

This ai is bullshit

File: 2017-03-26_15-43-34.png (507KB, 1395x654px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 1395x654px

Heh

noice meme

>>3041354
this would make sense

they could make $$ off a tool like this, selling it to stock image sites

File: test.jpg (113KB, 1346x635px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1346x635px

>twf this photo (and another from this shoot) has won me $1.5k in awards. This really wouldn't make a good stock photo according to this thing?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	#bestestwamboltever
Image-Specific Properties:

File: _20170327_134953.jpg (201KB, 1080x1841px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1080x1841px

I'm honoured.

File: Screenshot_20170327-135308.png (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

>>3046774
It seems to like my pictures, maybe they just match what it looks for.

>>3046776
That means you make generic stock looking shit
Don't consider it a compliment. It means you basic.

>>3046750

>he got his feelings hurt by an algorithm

Lmao

File: Screenshot_20170327-135554.png (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

>>3046774
>>3046776
3rd time lucky.

>>3046777
Ye, probably.

>>3046777
Yeah, nothing is more basic than anything remotely resembling competent photography. He should just go shoot people's backs or abstract architecture instead amirite?

File: Capture.png (587KB, 1395x557px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 1395x557px

>>3041195
I was curious, didn't eventuate though.

>>3046750
That is a really shit photo, friend.

The colours are fucking ugly and the subject is boring.

And you haven't made a single cent off it.

>>3046750
Everything about that photo is bad, and you should feel bad.

File: ööööö.png (697KB, 1810x751px) Image search: [Google]

697KB, 1810x751px

Nice

>>3046779
>>3046776
>>3046774

That's fucking great. Can you post them in high-res ?

File: ss+(2017-03-26+at+09.58.24).jpg (293KB, 1368x775px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1368x775px

kek

>>3046583
that's a stock website

File: Screenshot_20170328-092522.png (965KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

965KB, 1080x1920px

>>3046779
>>3046776
>>3046774
Heh, shot from last night continues the streak.

File: _MG_0339-Edit_1080u.jpg (335KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1080x1080px

>>3046921
Highest res I have on me is 1080 on the short side, but sure.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 6D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1800
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:26 19:56:33
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1080
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto Bracket
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_8917-Edit_Final_1080.jpg (953KB, 1080x1620px) Image search: [Google]

953KB, 1080x1620px

>>3046921

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 6D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1800
Image Height	2700
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:23 00:15:54
Exposure Time	1 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	26.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1620
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto Bracket
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: _MG_0075-Edit_1080_2.jpg (972KB, 1080x1620px) Image search: [Google]

972KB, 1080x1620px

>>3046921

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 6D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1620
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:12 14:28:49
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	14.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1620
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3047199
>highway
>transportation
>no people
>crippling depression
>imminent suicide
Wow, it's really got you marked, Sugar.

File: Capture.jpg (118KB, 1789x737px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1789x737px

Here's a variety

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Ragnar Lochhead
Image-Specific Properties:

File: DSC07909-Pano.jpg (3MB, 1681x2500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1681x2500px

>>3047213

>It's fucking retarded

Big surprise

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:28 00:57:06
Exposure Time	0.6 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-5.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: Capture.jpg (158KB, 1839x739px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1839x739px

>>3047214

Fuck

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Ragnar Lochhead
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Capture.jpg (194KB, 1693x727px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1693x727px

>>3047217

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Ragnar Lochhead
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Capture.jpg (125KB, 1743x711px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1743x711px

>>3047218

Must be programmed by a blatant homosexual

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Ragnar Lochhead
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Capture.jpg (162KB, 1713x683px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1713x683px

>>3047220

I don't know who this tool is meant to be for

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Ragnar Lochhead
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Capture.jpg (144KB, 1759x717px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1759x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Ragnar Lochhead
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3046788
:]

File: neuralrate.png (618KB, 1295x582px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 1295x582px

JUST

File: ce1eb1c566ac0f93ac8295ffa8d11763d9a425195a329cbd8929251efb849fe6.png (563KB, 1440x948px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 1440x948px

>>3040929
get on my level plebs

File: lol.jpg (106KB, 1000x404px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1000x404px

lol

File: idkboys.jpg (1MB, 3872x1792px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3872x1792px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: crt.png (647KB, 1401x870px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 1401x870px

lel, this bot is based

>>3047199
That's a fucking awful photograph.

>>3049045
>99.5%
>Awful
Sure thing kiddo

>>3049045

It's not awful, but it isn't great either.

>>3049063

I hope this is a joke and not Sugar dropping his trip to actually brag about this result.

Might wanna take a look at the garbage it has been giving high grades.

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-02 at 12.04.39.png (2MB, 2484x1184px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2484x1184px

WHY DID WE EVER DOUBT HIM?

File: ohmurr.jpg (134KB, 1398x808px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1398x808px

I'm disappointed. It can't pick up my terrible fursuit pictures. Though amazingly, flickr is starting to be able to autotag it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Jamie
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3049804
Is that a frog? Who the fuck chooses a frog outfit to be a furry?

>Not purchasing the muscular anthropomorphic stag outfit with optional 12 inch penis attachment.

File: eggy_1.jpg (152KB, 1378x813px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1378x813px

>>3049812
I've seen at least one deer. But no stags around here, funnily enough. And likewise, anything native is rare anyway.

Seems it doesn't like the master though.
>Paparazzi Photographer
10/10 lit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Jamie
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3049812

>12 inch penis attachment
>optional

Please.

File: eggy_4.jpg (138KB, 1377x804px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1377x804px

But it thinks Eggy is handsome. Seems the camera is the source of evil powers.

>>3049851
Most of the amusing things happen at cons when transiting between room parties.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Jamie
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3049849
>Doublechin and weird expression
I'd have tossed it in the /meh pile during culling.
>>3049858
>Not-awful headshot and DAT BOKE
Evidently the algorithm is a bokefag normie too.

File: lol.jpg (359KB, 1766x1116px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 1766x1116px

moopco the sex symbol

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

upload my magnum opus
>0.0%

upload shitty family portrait
>99.8%

REEEEed like never before.

>>3050406
which one is moopco

File: 2534568.png (394KB, 1449x644px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 1449x644px

literally just a shitty phone pic of a crayfish

File: sony_fucks_moopco_again.jpg (403KB, 1766x551px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 1766x551px

>>3050478
Guess

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1766
Image Height	1116
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:03 16:53:05
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1766
Image Height	551

File: 6544564562.png (712KB, 1551x846px) Image search: [Google]

712KB, 1551x846px

site is so retarded

File: hurr.jpg (199KB, 1382x550px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1382x550px

literally what

File: FUCK YOU.jpg (215KB, 1450x816px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1450x816px

FUCK THIS THING.

File: Screenshot_2017-04-05-11-36-17.png (407KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1080x1920px

Fufu. It seems to like the gradients

File: chris-chan-awesome-beautiful-mother.png (445KB, 1460x673px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 1460x673px

>>3052220
>beautiful
>mother

File: IMG_3541.jpg (282KB, 1242x1738px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1242x1738px

The only thing that appreciates my shit photos.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1242
Image Height	1738

>>3041337
you're on a image board posting images. don't apologise faggot

>>3040929
captcha is dead
>algorithm for tagging photos
>accurate

welp

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-13 at 13.53.37.png (2MB, 2534x1264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2534x1264px

feelsgoodman

>put a picture of myself
>tags as sadness and loneliness

W-wow.

>>3051509
Bad photo
>>3051570
Bad photo
>>3051661
Nice photo

Seems spot on bruh.

>>3040947
I lold

File: 123.jpg (151KB, 1434x582px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1434x582px

Good enough for a phone pic

File: file.png (503KB, 1424x594px) Image search: [Google]

503KB, 1424x594px

>>3040929

>>3040947
lmao

>>3041133
Fuck me she has a face I want to punch.

>>3057507
A bit high desu

File: Untitled-1.jpg (300KB, 1920x666px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 1920x666px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:15 21:57:04
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1920
Image Height	666

File: 99.jpg (165KB, 1426x592px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1426x592px

>>3040929
lol

File: ;_;.png (422KB, 1473x586px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 1473x586px

dam son

>>3041087
good fuck these photos.

File: OK.jpg (98KB, 1267x562px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1267x562px

>>3040929
:(
Tho the the accuracy of some of thee tag is pretty mindblowing

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Mathieu
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3041457
Because boobs

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-18 at 12.50.23 AM.png (2MB, 2686x1168px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2686x1168px

drake is my favorite athlete

File: cap1.png (392KB, 1372x660px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1372x660px

took this in Yokohama, Japan. how accurate is this?