Let me deal with your harsh comments.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 600D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:07:02 19:34:23 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/6.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1800 Image Height 1440 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
I dont know how you sorted this all out, photoshopping the glass shard perhaps. But If i were you id move the eyes over so that the face of the girl facing you, her hair matches up in the line of her forehead to her nose, it would just look more smooth, then you could crop it so her eyes are still in the middle of the picture.
Because right now that shit is irking me and it doesnt have the right feeling. That line of her hair is super obvious. Overall right now Its just to basic and kitschy, gimmick shit. This is a 'trippy concept' but It needs werk
>>3040472
>visible watermark
neck yourself you fucking faggot.
>>3040492
>Being this easily trigger.
You ok there son?
>>3040472
A little too cliche, pretty much following a template for "I've had my rebel for a whole month now, I know how to take off the lens, okay?" tier photographers.
She's shirtless but the exposed parts of the body aren't presented in a flattering way.
Watermark is tasteless and implies you think your work is worth stealing.
3/10 read the sticky and use the RPT
Nothing but admiration. Great shot.
>>3040494
Put your name in the exif, not on the photo. It only makes you look like a douche.
>>3040508
Not even my photo, but have a word with yourself mate.
>>3040510
>have a word with yourself mate
Nah I'm fine. Just getting easily triggered by faggots using watermarks like their snapshits are worth anything.
>>3040496
don't listen to this talentless sjw and keep shooting
>>3040617
So what.