fell for the leica meme

>>3038352
Swap it in for a Sony, ditch that phoney.

>>3038352
>spend $1500 on a7ii and $350 on techart pro
>autofocuses m-mount lenses
>can shoot moving subjects with ease
>considerably tougher body than leica m9
>considerably better performing sensor

I don't see why anyone would buy an M9 except for brandfaggotry.

>>3038368
>PASM wheel

Argument over.

File: bait.jpg (189KB, 620x608px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 620x608px

>>3038352

>>3038352

At least you're not trying to justify it to yourself and make others fall for it

>>3038352
>Pay $4300
No you didn't.

Go back to the drawing board. Wait it out a month or so and try again.

>garbage sharpness
>garbage bokeh
>garbage dynamic range
>garbage focus

I might have to put a disclaimer when I list this piece of shit on eBay. I hope the next chump to own this thing is a hipster that can overlook the fact it belongs in the trash.

File: 1463705438065.jpg (65KB, 411x412px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 411x412px

I'll bite

>>3038352
>pay $4300 for a Leica M9
What kind of goy pays full price for an M9? Try $2500 for an M9, $1100 for an M8.

>doesnt have autofocus
Unless you're shooting sports where it's a necessity now, AF is just a labor saving gimmick.

>can't shoot moving subjects
Well, YOU can't. Not that's it's even that hard, takes 10 minutes of practice to get comfortable with the RF patch, and 30 minutes of practice to get a lens down in muscle memory.

>feels flimsy as fuck
Are you serious it's a neutron star density hunk of brass

lmaoing at babbies needing a camera that does literally everything for them besides holding the camera up and pushing the shutter release

leica is fucking garbage a fuckin sonygger a6000 is a better camera than the m9

>>3038477
kill yourself, my man

There's plenty stupider luxuries people are willing to burn cash on.

>>3038477
Where the fuck do you find Leicas at that price lolol. Maybe 1,500 for an M8 and 3k for an M9

>>3038352

http://3d-kraft.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=151

Fuck me. I had no idea how far behind their lenses are. That's fucking embarrassing.

>>3038671
>http://3d-kraft.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=151

Zeiss BTFOing every other brand the fuck out

Sony wins again, so much for lmao no lenses

>>3038368
>tougher body than m9

so youve never touched an m9?

>>3038352
worst bait ive ever seen

>>3038688
thats funny because it seems like every leica camera i pick up is the worst camera i've ever seen. each one disappoints me in new ways

>>3038457
Mo need lad if it's that bad I'll take it off your hands for £150 and a snickers - great deal that

>>3038671
It's a bit unfair, the sony and the otus are in a completely different class when it comes to sharpness.

File: 6fa.jpg (47KB, 600x602px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 600x602px

>>3038477
really?
you fell for the bait mate

>>3038352
You got memed. Should have bought a Sony a7ii and spent the savings on some amazing Sony and Zeiss lenses.