εkδηλωση

File: FOTO8747.jpg (177KB, 654x954px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 654x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8750.jpg (283KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 954x655px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8753.jpg (219KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8869.jpg (323KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8889.jpg (304KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8762.jpg (345KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8785.jpg (360KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8819.jpg (348KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8859.jpg (360KB, 954x652px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 954x652px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8874.jpg (380KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8875.jpg (371KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8880.jpg (391KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8873.jpg (357KB, 954x652px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 954x652px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8879.jpg (297KB, 954x652px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 954x652px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8870.jpg (347KB, 954x652px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 954x652px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8871.jpg (379KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 954x655px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3033491
good

the rest can go in the recycle bin you fucking loser

File: FOTO8558.jpg (271KB, 655x954px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 655x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8616.jpg (297KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 954x654px

>>3033511
sophomoric taste

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8635.jpg (262KB, 654x954px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 654x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8621.jpg (298KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8638.jpg (426KB, 654x954px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 654x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8645.jpg (380KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8503.jpg (195KB, 654x954px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 654x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8602.jpg (310KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8631.jpg (387KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 954x655px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8636.jpg (403KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 954x655px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8651.jpg (348KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8656.jpg (422KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 954x655px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8892.jpg (314KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8900.jpg (300KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8901.jpg (363KB, 654x954px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 654x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: 02.jpg (632KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 954x654px

>>3033541

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:04 18:36:17
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	954
Image Height	654

>>3033545
>lacking subtlety
No ty

>it's another isa digishit thread

>>3033540
Underexposed, like the majority of these images.

Can't even be bothered shitposting beyond one reply, that's how bad these are. Learn exposure.

>>3033592
That's smoke, not a cloud. Flat, not underexposed.

>>3033491
Εkανα βόλτα.

>>3033599
> smoke
Not vapour?
I'd believe water vapour but smoke just seems like an excuse. But moving on, it's still underexposed.
Eg >>3033545
>>3033541

And Greek is a retarded language, learn another.

>>3033604
>But moving on, it's still underexposed.
No, you just like contrast. These look deliberately flat. It's smoke on the left, clouds on the right.

File: ase.jpg (63KB, 400x395px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 400x395px

>>3033604
>Greek is a retarded language

>>3033510
>>3033509
>>3033502
>>3033499
>>3033505
It sure is nice to live in a country where urban decay isn't a thing.

>>3033626
Comfort doesn't make good photos

>>3033609
no on the contrary i'm not a fan of high contrast. use the histogram. bumping exposure is not bumping contrast
not the best example i chose though

>>3033632
"Underexposed"
"Use the histogram"
All this and more in just 3 easy installments of £19.95 in "How to Pretend to Know How to Talk About Photography volume II, fourth edition"

>>3033627
NEITHER DOES ISI

>>3033638
Who is isi?
Nice thread op. Ta.

>>3033632
You can go off track all you want. It won't make you right.

You haven't given an explanation for the underexposure and/or importance the smoke/cloud on the sides. Without that your photos are irrelevant to any meaning outside of exposure.

>>3033638
This isn't isi, isi photos are far better

>ITT: another /p/ gives attention to loser tripfucker who posts one or two okay photos for every set of 30+ episode

>>3033641
Yes this is obviously isi, they're on her insta (capturious)

>>3033640
Isi is isi. The infamous shitposter.

>>3033643
I'm not that much of an oldfag to be following her on instagram and looking at her profile I'm not that autistic either.

>>3033645
You seem jellymad.

>>3033645
>i was wrong but its your fault anyway
lol?

>>3033643
>her insta

>photos of her cat
>photos of negroes that dont give a fuck about her
>photos of decaying crap

who the fuck is this and how old is she? that insta is depressing.

>>3033649
>still 7 posters
I think she's a photographer m80

>>3033491
Some of these are really nice. It's good to see you getting a few more people shots although I think the procession could have benefitted from a zoom or at least a longer focal length.

From what I've seen you shoot over the past couple of years I think you could curate an exhibition presenting an intriguing portrait of the corner of the world in which you live. Keep up the good work.

File: angry-must-resist.jpg (78KB, 1500x846px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1500x846px

Mfw isi keeps posting new threads

>>3033647
>>3033650
>>3033672
i dont see why you bump your own threads. It's sad really.

>>3033707
I wrote the third one you blithering fuckwit

File: flippingboy.gif (4MB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1000x667px

>>3033707
ok but I think you might be overreacting

File: FOTO8922.jpg (270KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3033722
oh okay thanks anon for telling me you a different anonymous to any other anonymous here.

good try isi

>>3033738
no worries poopchute

>>3033834
4.30am? Lol, no, I have a normal, healthy sleep pattern.

>>3033732
Out of every angle, you chose the one that you can't read the window sticker, which is also the focal point. This lack of consideration is endemic amongst your work. Just because you have a snapshit aesthetic, doesn't mean you should lack care.

And this shit
>>3033541
>>3033540
Is underexposed, the "smoke" is irrelevant because 1. Theres no indication there's smoke in the air. 2. There's no information in the picture to indicate there's a fire anywhere. 3. If you can't tell it's smoke and you can't see fire AND the histogram is bunched up to the left, obviously the end impression is underexposure. Most of the board has picked you out for dodgy exposure at some point, maybe you're bad at judging exposure?

And your colours are whack still, how can you not see this is far too red
>>3033497
And this too green
>>3033502

I'm sure you're going to come back with some reply how you're right, because that's what you do, you ignore your weaknesses and downfalls and pretend that's the way you wanted it. You remind me of bible belters that give birth to horrifically inbred and deformed babies then claim they're perfect and just how god had planned.

>>3033840
>Out of every angle, you chose the one that you can't read the window sticker
Looks like she shot a Tele at a moving car, not a lot of angles to explore

>>3033497
This is fucking awesome. Wasted on this board though.

>>3033867
learn how reflections on curved surfaces work, camera only had to move a fraction vertically.

It's just unconsidered.

>>3033874
To avoid reflecting the son? Okay poopchute.

>>3033887
>son
I am disappoint.

>>3033869
What's so "fucking awesome" about it bisi?

>>3033840
>Out of every angle, you chose the one that you can't read the window sticker, which is also the focal point.
It clearly says "They'll do some"
If you can't figure that out wow.

>>3033953
It's Gordon Parks tier, not that you'd get him either.

I tend to like a lot of your shots Isi. I was curious though, which shots in this thread would you consider your weakest? What are you currently working on improving with your photography? Is there anything you wish you had done differently with any of these shots, if so what?

>>3033997
Well a lot of what I shoot I do in the rephoto frame of mind, i.e. it's meant to be presented with like works (same building, same expression, etc) and those often don't 100% enthuse without their proper partners. For example the original composition to which others might reference might have originally been to highlight a particular part of the photo that's not even there in later versions- here's where it's critical to know it's meant for comparison and contrasts sake.

So I find it easier to just say which I feel are strongest without mind to long term contexts or projects.

>>3033491
>>3033493
>>3033497
>>3033507
>>3033540
>>3033529
>>3033509

These are the ones I feel are strongest in their own regard but the anon that said something about a portrait of my chunk of the world really nailed my long term goals- and it's for that reason that I take a lot if shots I don't necessarily find aesthetically "worthy," gotta have blemishes to make beauty stand out I guess.

File: Screenshot_2017-03-05-11-25-32.png (3MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1080x1920px

>>3034004
Not the greatest example since these two framed do vary considerably but an example of two time-divorced frames of the same subject.
A lot of what interests me is the shorthand nature of things. Things change a lot in rural places, most of it is just horizontal and unnoticed.

>>3034004
>>3034008

Wow you are one deep ugly chick. Please continue sharing your meaningful shitty snaps.

File: IMG_20170222_210837_processed.jpg (297KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1080x1080px

>>3034016

isi just uninstall windows pls

File: FOTO8937.jpg (347KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 954x655px

>>3034045
why u haf to be mad, on this, the day of my snapshits threads posting

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8938.jpg (343KB, 654x954px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 654x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8939.jpg (313KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8940.jpg (325KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8945_crop.jpg (301KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8954_crop.jpg (247KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8962.jpg (300KB, 654x954px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 654x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8966.jpg (288KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8972.jpg (225KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8980.jpg (262KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8993.jpg (280KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 954x654px

Here's a wild Young Turk

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO8985_crop.jpg (255KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 954x654px

"READ ALL ABOUT IT RIGHT HERE!"

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9002.jpg (267KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 954x655px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9007.jpg (300KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9021.jpg (344KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9015_crop.jpg (263KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9039.jpg (386KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9040.jpg (319KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9043.jpg (244KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 954x655px

Meet troopers Dingus and Dweebus, keepers of the realm of the bridge against journalistic encroachment even if the journalists being misplaced is directly the result of the State Troopers lacking coordination with the City police who so placed the journalists.

Turns out that they can't really do shit if you disobey anyway. Hue.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9049.jpg (243KB, 654x954px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 654x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9056.jpg (255KB, 654x954px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 654x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9083.jpg (268KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9096.jpg (236KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 954x655px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9097.jpg (328KB, 954x655px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 954x655px

I'm posting this one for all you ironically-natured types

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9093.jpg (271KB, 954x652px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 954x652px

This one is an artistic self portrait of my face when I noticed the left side of the last frame.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9090.jpg (295KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 954x654px

Wish I'd been like a few inches further back for this one, but happy with it regardless.

See you cats next thread. :^)
happy fotoing!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3034341
Can't take even a good photo of kids.

>>3033491
why tf are you crushing the shit out of the blacks? half the content of the photos is missing

>>3034398
would you say they look crushed here?
>>3034385

no?
maybe it's an artistic choice then?

Why not address the other half of the content?

File: 1477367088722.jpg (44KB, 647x594px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 647x594px

>>3034398
>half the content of the photos is missing

Unless this is bait you really need to stop posting

>>3034314
please tell me thats not the last supper with Obama in the middle

>>3034385

i thought you were all about the digital bubble level. straighten this and you'll have a terrific photo.

>>3034414
I'll get around to it eventually, I think I actually lost balance while lining up that one, I was standing on the yellow divider spanning the bridge (so was the master mason in the hat)

who do you work for?

>>3034402
eat my shit

>>3034400
yeah, so are these
>>3033492
>>3033493
>>3033522
>>3033525
>>3033528

>>3034461
Those look great. I think you have bad taste.

>>3034343
>actually keeping all these shit photos on your computer
straight kekin on u nigga

Good to see a proper photojournalist on /p/!

>>3034474
stop posting bait like this, you're killing p

>>3034412
we don't need to tell you what you already know, anon

Thanks isi for being one of the few people on here to actually post photo threads anymore.

Tfw u bully isi into being one of the best togs on the chan

>>3034322
Why are so many of yours underexposed? Do you understand levels?

>>3034365
Is fuji still making racist products, or did you really goof your exposure this badly?

>>3034370
Many aren't even sharp

And why everyone so fat? If they ate half as much they would have a lot more money and be a lot more attractive.

>>3034521
>Why are so many of yours underexposed? Do you understand levels?
The image you linked is not underexposed at all. It's very flatly processed in flat light.

>Is fuji still making racist products, or did you really goof your exposure this badly?
I think she underexposed to hide their faces or make them look dark and evil, given the text

>Many aren't even sharp
Well, that's what happens when you use manual focus lenses, huh?

>And why everyone so fat?
Educate yourself on the food crisis in America with regards to packaged foods vs fresh produce. It's a symptom of the poverty of the area.

>>3034524
It is underexposed, as many have stated with reasoning, as opposed to you saying it isn't underexposed with an invalid excuse you still have yet to back up. You haven't improved at all, should've stuck with the xp1.

>>3034524
>it's flat
Learn2histogram, that takes the guesswork out from your uncalibrated monitor

>but manual focus
1. Get better, 2. Don't be poor, use af lenses.

>food crisis
So they consume twice as many calories because they can't get food? Maybe they should work on their education first eh.
Just because it comes pre-packed or from a drive thru window doesn't mean it will make you fat, only an excess of calories will do that.

>>3034531
>as many have stated with reasoning
poopco, are you awake early on this Monday morning?

Not bad

>>3034531
How is that underexposed?

>>3034532
>Learn2histogram, that takes the guesswork out from your uncalibrated monitor
>doesn't know histograms are based on jpegs

>>3034828

>doesn't know jpegs are based on histograms

>>3034521
>Why are so many of yours underexposed? Do you understand levels?

Jesus Christ you thick autistic retards, just because a photo is dark doesn't mean it's underexposed. Do you people never leave your house except on sunny days?

Look at that cloud coverage. It's overcast. Most of the subjects are also dark skinned. Of course the images are going to be dark. If it were exposed more, though, it would be overexposed, not properly exposed.

>>3033491
>>3033497
>>3033528
>>3033529
>>3034328
>>3034374
>>3034385
I don't much care for the drama inherent in your threads but these are some damn good photographs. You should seriously consider applying to a newspaper or something.

Why is this board so toxic to good photography

>>3034949
It's just a couple of individuals samefagging but mostly moopco. He has an isi obsession.

>>3034949
This is becoming the downfall of /p/.

>>3034949
>wahhhh why isnt this board a safespace for mediocre photographers?
most of the criticism in this thread has been on point. why dont you go back to your safespace website? flickr or whatever hugbox you came from?

>>3034848
>You should seriously consider applying to a newspaper or something.
Why would a negro town newspaper hire a kid-less soccer mom doing poverty tourism?

>>3035038
>why dont you go back to your safespace website?
If you weren't a newfag you'd know how fucking stupid you sound.

>>3034834
This, holy shit there's some fucking goobers on this board

>>3035035
>>3035046
>>3035059
>mfw all this coordinated whiteknighting

Hmmm.

>>3035067
yeah it must be george soros

bump for the first photo thread I saw in 3 pages

>>3034468
>less information is better.

do yo struggle often, being such a retard?

>>3034949
compliments are useless you sperg.
if you want people sucking your dick when theres clear flaws that can be improved on you should go back to tumblr or facebook. claiming oldfaggotry just makes you seem stupider as it proves you have no argument.

kys

>>3035046
Yeh, everyone here knows that flickr/reddit/500px/insta all already told jamie her photos are shit. This is the only place people tell her her photos are shit anonymously, so she can bundle every anon into one mythical figure that's intent on trolling her.

Her delusional mind has made this a safe space for her.

>>3035215
>>3035217
>>3035224
lol moopco right on time with his samefagging

>>3035215
>silhouettes offend me
kys

File: Screenshot_2017-03-07-10-11-07.png (173KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1080x1920px

>>3035226
As I said, bundle every anon into one mythical figure.

>>3035256

Lol, get rekt isi.

>>3035260
>I have a phone

>>3035256
Nice try Arnold

>>3035194
>>3035226
>>3035232
>>3035262
>>3035267

Yet more samefag white knighting, get a life friend

>>3035270
Why are all of you brits autistic?

>>3035274
Lol, spot the guy that samefagged

>>3035286
Spot the samefag projecting guilt.

>>3035270
>22 posters

ITT: /p/ acknowledges isi was the puppetmaster all along

>>3035224
>Her delusional mind
>Her
Stop feeding her delusions, Charlie.

>>3035224

Dude you seriously need therapy. Im not kidding.

>>3035688
Fuck off Agnotologist.

this is all shit, move out of alabama already

>>3035688
he/she's shown no signs of needing therapy. You're trying too hard. Get off 4chan

>>3035224
>Yeh, everyone here knows that flickr/reddit/500px/insta all already told jamie her photos are shit.

I didn't know that, could you provide some evidence

>>3035852
>he/she's shown no signs of needing therapy
you must be new here

>>3035934
Isi never used those sites afaik

File: shadows.jpg (160KB, 999x376px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 999x376px

You need to calibrate your monitor's brightness and contrast. Color looks fine on most. You're losing your shadow detail in many shots.

>>3034385
I like the shots overall. I would go back and look at some Spider Martin books.

>>3036062
You've overexposed it and blown out the sky while making no meaningful change to the skintones.
The "I fixed it!" mentality on this board is mindblowingly stupid sometimes.

>You're losing your shadow detail in many shots
anon, you have no way of knowing whether shadow detail has been lost or not at 900 pixels on the long side, unless you're talking about the incredibly contrasty black and white shots that are clearly meant to be so.

>>3036064
First off, the sky isn't blown. Calibrate your monitor.

Second look at the jackets. The shadows on the jackets are crushed in the left image, and not in the second.

And, Yes it's totally possible to know if shadow detail has been lost on images this size, and I'm not saying they're lost I'm saying they're crushed. The size of the details in the shadow in this image are larger than 1px across, so they're visible...

>>3036064
Also, are you the OP? Don't be so defensive. If you post work, I assume you want critique.

You might disagree with some piece of critique, but you should take it as input that some people think something about your work.

And it's possible that those people are wrong, but it's still useful feedback. So again, don't get so defensive.

>>3036083

He's one of isi's 3 or 4 white knights. You must be new here if you haven't encountered one yet.

>>3036070
>Second look at the jackets. The shadows on the jackets are crushed in the left image, and not in the second.
It's you who needs to calibrate your monitor if you see crushed shadows in either of those.
Did you calibrate it once 6 months ago and decide you were done with it?

>>3036064
>>3036070
>>3036083
and so begins the endless cycle of calibration debate

>>3036111
Meanwhile isi laughs from behind her factory calibrated xpro2 screen while uploading another unprocessed jpeg

>>3036114
the entire thread is just so cringe, photos, comments, you, everything.

>>3036117
Surething Moopco

>>3036087
>3 or 4 white knights
A white knight being anyone who disagrees with you eh, Poopchute?

>>3036150
Sure thing, isi.

>>3036150
Who's poopchute? Nickname for moop or something?

File: eesee.jpg (138KB, 478x469px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 478x469px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:08 16:15:38
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	478
Image Height	469

>>3036224
wtf how tall is isi

>>3036224

Taller'n'a Alabama Negro standing tall as can be in a parade

>>3036238
About three fiddy

>>3033505
>>3033507
These are good. >>3034385 is GOAT

Some of the people shots are really, really bad though. Definitely could have posted fewer photos for a cleaner set overall.

>>3036224
kek

>>3036208
yes, because he's an arsehole full of shit

>>3036279
trip on isi

>>3036279
I've not posted in this thread in over 3 days.

Glad to see I've not got under your skin ;)

Mc

>>3036283
I'm not isi you fucking plonker
>>3036327
Yeah, pull the other one

>>3036224
https://youtu.be/RGRxJI8BKHQ?t=6m5s
source of screengrab

>>3036360
Please let me know what posts you think are mine, ill start you off with my first in this thread
>>3033840

File: dog-in-bag1.jpg (61KB, 720x538px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 720x538px

>>3036375
Sorry poops, denial won't work. Too many people recognise your brand of vitriol

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	720
Image Height	538

>>3036384
You mean you're pussying out?
Lol, good game faggot.

>>3036384

That word again...

>liberal millennial detected

>>3036386
I mean I'm not going to dignify your shit by going through the whole thread to find it. You know where it is

>>3036391
So, you mean you couldn't find any that were mine, hmmm, what a coincidence.

>>3036423
Just fuck off moopco, take some photos or fuck your girlfriend instead of wasting anyone's time on your stupid narcissism.

>>3036424
>narcissism
you were the one that brought me up bro, sounds like someone has a crush XD

>>3036431
No I wasn't. This is literally my first post in this thread. I'm just one of many who think you and isi's bickering is cancerous.

Yeah she's a cunt, and so are you. Fuck off and make your own thread if you want this to be about you tho.

>>3036434
well, these people have a crush on me then

>>3036384
>>3036279
>>3036118
>>3035226
>>3034975
>>3034534

Thanks guys XD

>>3036436
JUST FUCK OFF

>>3036437
Ok hun :)

>>3036444
I swear to god if you keep shitting up the board with your retardedness I'll send some PCs your way to have a look at your weed farm and untaxed work m8

>>3036446
I could do with a new PC, thanks anon!

>>3036447
Test me m8

>>3036448
oh no we've got a real navy seal 300 confirmed kills motherfucker here

>>3036367
we've got ourselves a computer scientist, boys!

still the litecore drama in isi threads aye. not bad most of these, some are underexposed but it seems that someone already triggered isi about that.

all the new faggots pls stop shit posting here and refrain from namecalling. let's just have some peace.

have a bump for personal thread.

>>3036436
probably the only friends you have

>>3036548
as if isi has more? lol
shes practically a hermit and never goes around people

Do you have a website?

>>3036446
This

>>3036447
Are you autistic? No, you are a passive aggressive nincompoop. Get a job, you can ride there on your BMX. Disabled my arse.

>>3036658
Yes
jamiewilliams.22slides.com

File: 14728058281236.jpg (46KB, 200x219px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 200x219px

>>3036682
>poopco buys a BMX bike
>thinks he'll look young and cool
>maybe people will ignore my severe autism and talk to me now
lmao talk about a midlife crysis

>>3036728
Is this Bristol?

>>3036224
rareisi.jpg

>>3036434
I agree with this guy. Most of us can't be bothered picking a side. We're not rooting for Moop OR isi we just want them both to shut the fuck up. If I had to choose I'd go with isi simply because moop has literally no redeeming qualities. It's very much a choice between two very similar shits, though.
Maybe if we collectively reported the shitposts when we see them and avoid replying to them? Report away, anons and lets see if we can make /p/ just a little bit tidier.

File: vitrioles.jpg (34KB, 350x490px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 350x490px

>>3036389
You don't have your own brand of Vitriol?

That's problematic and can't be allowed.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017-03-10T00:47:46-05:00
Flash	No Flash Function
Image Width	350
Image Height	490

>>3036739
you are retarted

Why does this generic Christmas Cake chick have a cult of personality?, aren't there some new pretty photogs around on /p/?

>>3036831
>Christmas Cake chick

I don't think the word means what you think it does

>>3036831
there has never been a femanon /p/hotographer

idc whether isi is a grill or not but disregarding isi, none.

>>3036682
He talks a lot on his reddit profile about his autism.
It's p shit to make fun of someone for a disability.

>>3036844
Don't worry about it, I'm perfectly content with having the time to pursue my interests.

I do talk a lot about my illnesses as I believe in raising awareness, and removing stigma.

>>3036844
>It's p shit to make fun of someone for a disability.
He asks for all he gets. If he didn't come here stirring up shit people wouldn't take the piss out of him.

>>3036862
Who's taken the piss out of him? All I see is a lot of people with a chip on their shoulder and a guy that gave decent critique.

>>3036877
t. poopco

>>3036877
We're not that stupid, poopco

>>3036850
There's nothing wrong with you though, I can tell.

You sure all these "illnesses" aren't just your way of dealing with some kind of identity crisis?

>>3037308
Bruh, his face falls off.

>>3037310
Know him well, do you?

>>3037325
He's on the discord now if you want to talk to him yourself.

>>3037327
>discord
lol, sounds like the perfect place for him

Bumpco.

File: me_myself_and_isi.png (16KB, 329x78px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 329x78px

I have never accused you of samefriending that I can remember,maybe I have. You certainly were not the motivation behind my samefaux you conceited cunt

I tried to like your photos itt, but they're shit like your last threads.
You have all the grace of a giraffe.

Best regards,
Horseface

>>3037583
Beginning to think someone cracked your trip. There's no way you'd actually be this stupid

>>3037583
Keep your detritus out of this thread horseteeth.

>>3037583
keep your tripfag drama to yourself. understand that no one but tripfags cares about this shit

>>3037583
Jesus you're sad. Kill yourself.

>>3036436
I.....I have a crush on you isi

>>3037586
>>3037599
>>3037602
>>3037627
Le samefag strikes again.

File: FOTO9239.jpg (308KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 954x654px

>>3037583
praying for you dear catsby

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9170.jpg (365KB, 954x652px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 954x652px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9162.jpg (373KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9166.jpg (371KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO9148.jpg (474KB, 954x654px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 954x654px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3037882
>when you love shooting decay so much you decide to live it to more fully immerse yourself
Your dedication is admirable, I hope for you it will start to pay off soon

>>3037887
That's not mine. I live in an Airstream, lad.
That's something else of similar vintage in the process of restoration it looked like.

File: tony.jpg (22KB, 371x425px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 371x425px

some of these photos are pretty great: it's clear what you wanna tell and the execution is nice.
the drama among some of the posters, on the other hand, makes me sick.

>>3037875
#PrayersForCatsby
#SchizophreniaAwareness

>>3037882
Hey. So I'm driving from Tuscaloosa down to Destin for spring break. Know any good places for an amature photographer to stop and take pictures on the way?

>>3038194
Cahawba outside of Selma is nice, you might be passing nearby Perry Lakes Park in Perry County too, which is a nice swamp park with an eagle tower.

If you want some rural decay, take virtually any backroad really. Perry, Dallas, Marengo, Wilcox, Clarke, and most of the surrounding counties have no shortage of abandoned things, just be careful not to get shot

>>3034282
I like this

>>3038212
Cahawba is a little out of my way, but I pass right by Perry lakes and that eagle tower looks cool. If I wanted rural decay tho I'd just go back home for the weekend lolol.

Isi, you really do pass as one of the most retarded photographers of all time. The fact that you ignore everybody laughing at your worrisome attempts of work you consider good shows just how retarded you really are. There is something seriously wrong with you and you need help.

>>3038350
lmao you obviously haven't seen these yet >>3037411, >>3036930

>>3038365
Catsbys are much better and commercially viable.

Put your trip back on jamie

File: 1471863961594.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>3038380

>>3038365
>>3038382
Catsby's are passable photographs, yours are not. That's the difference. Yours are completely and unquestionably the most thoughtless, braindead and shittest efforts possible.

>>3038382
>trying to imply your photos aren't a joke by saying negative comments are bait

Jamie, put the trip back on and own your shit photography, you'd look a lot more sincere if you accepted some people thought your photos were awful and you would have a lot more conviction if you didn't try to "prove" people wrong when they say your shit is shit.

File: 1489259516473.jpg (189KB, 727x351px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 727x351px

>>3038380
>>3038386
>>3038387
>cuntsby accuses others of tripdropping
hey at least you remembered to drop yours this time, well done bud

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand