New Sticky When?

Time to ban the digicucks, especially moop. All they do when they're not posting trashy unresized photos with no thought to them is argue over gear.
Ban them all and make /p/ great again.

File: 1479388162941.jpg (57KB, 401x363px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 401x363px

You have my vote

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:27 20:48:53
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	401
Image Height	363

>>3029242
id spare ricohbro, for he posts ironic high iso digishit. epson RD1 posters should have a pass too.

everyone else should bite the dust.

>>3029242
>sooc jpegs
sooc jpegs are the film of digital
you hate them because they represent your inverse equivalent.

what emulsion of grey-and-grey film is that anon?

File: hags.jpg (52KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x400px

>>3029269
>he thinks his opinion counts
>he thinks he is a person
everybody look at the digislug and laugh!

File: eJwVzNENhCAMANBdGIBCES1uQ5AgFxFC65e53S_3BniveualdnWKDN4Bjsqpz0Oz9BlL1qX3cuU4KuvUG0SRmM6Wb2FAEzbnV28JgyFCvwGSt4EC2oVWZxwuCLX9m88o6vsDwS4h1w.jpg (21KB, 645x430px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 645x430px

>>3029272
>he suffers severe cognitive dissonance over the comparability of digital jpegs to film slides
>he can't properly expose digital jpegs, ergo, cannot properly expose slides
>mfw anon shoots film to cover his mistakes and claim they were intentional

I do the same OP, but it's more because I'm most knowledgeable with film.

I also don't keep up with digital technology at all, so I don't even know wtf is being talked about in half the threads here. Nor do I care really, it's not photography at that point.

Now get off my lawn.

>shooting film snapshits and scanning them is more artistic than shooting digital jpegs
only retards could possibly believe this

>>3029269
you are braindead

What a nifty way of advertising VSCO film presets.

>>3029271
hp5 niqqa
>>3029269
get out
>>3029279
but it is tho

>>3029273
Soft af desu. Resizing won't save your image.

>>3029242
> horrid 35mm film
> absolute trash lenses
> absolute trash scanners
> analog color photos
> snake oil
Congratiulations, you found a way to produce something even worse than P&S SOOC JPEG.
Aren't you a very special boy/girl!?

We can talk about film here being equal or superior somehow once /p/ is all about MF/LF film and scanning it with Noritsu scanners or better.

File: DSC_5572-1200.jpg (334KB, 1200x1535px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 1200x1535px

>>3029347
The gear doesn't matter

>>3029361
For photography? Always has mattered, from the start. Same as for cinematography.

It's not even something you can do without gear.

>>3029363
> He didn't rent the gear and skill required for a vasctomy or IUD
As always, gear would have made an important difference.

>>3029242
Fuck off luddite. Film threads get hidden, along with gear and fuji/sony trolls, the moment I see them

>>3029464
>Film threads get hidden
>in the film board
o am i laff.

>>3029464
>hiding alex threads
Why do you even come here?!
>inb4 in needed to know what was better d3400/d5200/d7200/a6000/a6300/a6500/t6i/t6s/t7i/t77 but some come with memory cards idk

>>3029626
Alex hasn't made a thread in months.

>>3029308
Film snapshitting is literaly not any better than digital snapshitting. I don't care that your shit image was processed in a darkroom and anyone with any experience should know how to cull shots and only wet print/scan the best ones.

>>3029242

>trying to drum up some fake conflict and create a dichotomy when there isn't one

wew lad, very 2016 of you. i'm excited that you just got "into" film less than six months ago. best of luck. let me know when you get yet another epiphany that throws your identity into crisis and you want to let go of your film gear for cheap.

File: DSC05218.jpg (596KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 1200x800px

>>3029657
sure breh, you got room for 60 or so cams?
>>3029637
>Alex hasn't made a thread in months.
yeah, like 2 months.
>>3029637
>Film snapshitting is literaly not any better than digital snapshitting.
M8 what are you even talking about? On film every image is a masterpiece.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Digital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	800

>>3029679
>sure breh, you got room for 60 or so cams?

I do. Do you actually have 60 cameras? Or is it 3 cameras and 57 pieces of dusty hand-me-down garbage that should be relegated to the annals of history?

File: DSC05094final.jpg (337KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 1080x1080px

>>3029683
I feel you're getting a little triggered, bae..
Actually the only hand-me-downs were an F65 that doesn't work and a 620 Brownie that I've put several rolls through. Mostly I make opportunistic gumtree purchases.
>pic related

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:14 15:26:02
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-9.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1080
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3029679
>60 or so cams
TIL flim faggots are even bigger gear whores than their digital counterparts

>>3029697
>i have like 20 50mm lenses
>I like to have a sharp macro, an f/1.2 superspeed and a nice bokeh version in every lense mount

>>3029704
Just for shooting on flim?

File: Hp5Ae1028.jpg (294KB, 1657x700px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1657x700px

>>3029710
Yep. Think of it like pairing wine with a meal.
All styles of rieslings are rieslings, but they can't all do the same job.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.6
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2015:06:14 17:14:07
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1657
Image Height	700
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

>>3029714

clean your negs, dabbler.

>>3029363
Americans dress like perennials

File: 1478469029021.jpg (30KB, 540x523px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 540x523px

>>3029657
>projecting this hard

>>3029697
What a surprise that a platform allowing for different film formats, viewfinders and shutters has more interesting cameras than digital.

Let's list the digicuck options here:
>point and shoots
>compacts (the same shit with one premium feature)
>dslr's
>mirrorless
>phones
Oh wait, they almost all operate like the trash they are.

>>3029803
inb4 some autistic post where someone ignores 3/4 of the post.

>>3029804
>OP makes shitty shit ass fucking shitpost bait thread
>gets mad when people shitpost in it

Sometimes I forget what website I'm on, I guess.

>>3029714
your faggotry is truly abject

>>3029778

That's actually some pretty light projection on my part. You idiots sure have thin skin.

>>3029813
post proofs

>>3029817
>i was merely pretending!

bumpin for more digislug tears.

>>3030926

please post more dusty scratched negs so you can show us how a real serious master shoots film.

>>3030929

right on time

>>3030934

I was about ten minutes late, to be fair.

You should see my thirty pound box of negs. They're in far worse shape, but then nothing I shoot is worth keeping.

File: c19623365c9f5d4704ca8bef5c0abaea38a595f52b79d3d6fe6896e1b0836307.jpg (28KB, 439x400px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 439x400px

>>3030935

Digislugs, everybody

>>3029242
the fuck? i thought /p was for porn it's just a bunch of seething autists pretending kodak still makes film. get a high dollar digi you old cucks and put your bogus film cams into a museum for fucks sake

>>3030935
30lb box of nigs? you must mean ashes. how many gorillions is that though, it it at least 6 gorillion?

>>3029242
>tfw no film photo of any worth was posted in the thread
>tfw i have no face

File: RVP50120002-5mini.jpg (2MB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x800px

>>3030956
This is a thread to contemplate the digital /p/urge.
We don't need to post photos, the die is cast, film is the superior medium for fine art photography.

>>3030945

I'll wager that I've already shot a larger quantity and variety of film in more formats than you ever will.

But, you know, I'm a fucking cuck and you have a new niche with which to identify yourself so what do I know.

>>3030997

you sure are

>>3030999
that gay quote is posted by gay redditors and no filmbro with minimum self respect would post it.

go away digislug.

File: you.gif (68KB, 500x293px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x293px

>>3031005

>>3030956
>he doesn't know the difference between mfw and tfw
back to >>>/r/eddirt you go

>>3029242

how about an /an/alog board?

File: 3_CanyondeChelly._V401842102_.jpg (286KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1280x960px

>>3032198
That would be nice

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3032198

How about you retards just post film photos without acting like it's anything special like everyone else has already done on this board for the last twelve years?

You fucktards sound like you're 12 years old arguing about how digimon is way better than Pokémon.

>>3032198
/an/ is already taken, try /anal/

>>3032239
>arguing about how digimon is way better than Pokémon
Well that is a great analogy, because it's objectively false.
And do you know what's sort of the icing on the cake?
Pokemon is so wildly superior to that digi garbage that it has it's OWN FUCKING BOARD
>>>/vp/
/fp/ when??

>>3032239
>>3032282
ill be ok with a film photo board if the remaining board gets renamed to /digislugs/.

>>3032282

It was a containment board so that the autistic retard shitposters wouldn't ruin the rest of the website.

It's actually starting to sound like a great idea.

>>3032239
>fucking cuck drops his trip to cry some more

>>3035231
Wtf is this trailer trash nirvana analogy?

>>3035266
It's ok to kill digicucks, cos they don't have any feelings.

bampu

>>3035231
>mfw i read that and found it brilliant
>mfw recalled i wrote that