Misunderstood auteur or talentless degenerate?

cool guy who didnt do anything wrong.

>>3025002
the second one

An asshole who gets his models drunk but, despite being relatively talentless, did manage to find a niche in the photography market.

Straight cheap flash shot of famous people pulling funny faces/posing provocatively.

good photographer knew more by his shit hobby than his actual job.

>>3025002
Zat Lemmy?

He inspires me to get shredded as I head into old man status. He's not a particularly good looking dude with a shitty hairline and pervert facial hair, yet he gets his dick sucked on the reg by young, gullible models.

Is it his cachet? Probably a little, but he's also fucking cut.

He sticks his dick in everything that moves and has a hole.

Whale fucking wars

File: Uncle terry(2).png (67KB, 302x253px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 302x253px

A little bit of both.

>>3025002
talent-less degenerate

File: Terry.jpg (66KB, 600x381px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 600x381px

He was not bad when he tried to do good photography. I hate the style he nowdays does.

My favorite part about this thread is how we have this discussion every single month.

>>3025101
That's pretty shit tier, you think it's good only because of the model.

>>3025002
> Misunderstood auteur or talentless degenerate?
Nah, just what many photographers actually want to be.

>>3025002
talented degenerate

good example of how being a photographer (sometimes) has little to do with being good with cameras

>>3025002
>Misunderstood auteur or talentless degenerate?

Yes.

he's okay at taking flash photos to print on a t-shirt. nothing special aside from that

>>3025002
You have to give him a little credit for more or less singlehandedly reshaping fashion photography as we know it. Pretty much any modern magazine cover is at least partially influenced by his work

>>3026577
So, you're saying there weren't other people taking harsh flashlit pictures of people on a white background?

>>3025002
>Misunderstood auteur or talentless degenerate?
60:40

>>3025101
That pic is extremely boring though

>>3025002
Neither, just fairly mediocre.

>>3026624

I'm not bored with it so, you're wrong

>>3025002
>talentless degenerate?
he's not completely talentless... more like, slightly talented degenerate