Can we have an HDR hate thread? It literally makes everything

File: 373641D0-4D67-47B0-AFDB-ADDB34212810-3627-000004BD3FBD0CFE_tmp.jpg (306KB, 671x891px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 671x891px

>>3023454
Reminds me of Lucian Freud's work.

In other words shit.

>>3023454
looks fine to me

>>3023454
That's not HDR. That's tone mapping.

>>3023572
>>3023571
>>3023570
Looks great, but this is the wrong thread.

>>3023454
>when gramma a meatball

>>3023570
wtf i love hdr now

>>3023482
wut

>>3023454
>>3023670
This is called tonemapping you dumb niggers, not even remotely HDR

>>3023597
All of these are processed with HDR trchniques.

>>3023729
I have an HDR app (HDRtist) that makes stuff look like that when it is proper HDR though. If you really crank it up extreme. For multiple exposures it does HDR and Exposure Blending and for single exposures it does Tonemapping. Maybe the app's a shit but I have a hard time getting neato results.
>I don't do crazy sunsets and vivid colors, just sky/clouds and snow because HDR's supposed to be really good for that stuff
Is there another app I should check out?

File: geeps.png (10KB, 261x195px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 261x195px

>>3023789
But this is for shitty HDR anon

>>3023801
>anon
don't flatter the tripfag

>>3023813
Oh fuck I didn't even notice. Gross.

File: _DSC3352.jpg (225KB, 1001x668px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1001x668px

>>3023813
Sorry. Here. 1,001 pixels because my HDR are one better than the rules.

>>3023889
>that shit brown home depot logo
forget tonemapping, you can't even get white balance right

>>3023964
Ok, balance has been restored.

You have taken your swim spa experience to the next level.

>>3023570
sick shot

I got an entire flickr for you guys to hate.

Though very recently there's little HDR, but you'll see it. You'll see it alright.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/aigle_dore/

>>3024119
Those are nice

>>3024119
these are some very priddy photos anon. hey what filter do you use when you shoot directly into the sun like that? ND filter? Just a UV filter? No filter?

>>3024125

I'd love to play along anon but I can't even dare to pretend to claim this account. I just have it stuck on my browser recommendations cuz I spent waaay too much time looking through it and asking myself why.

Nikon D7000 is my filter.

>>3024119
you are doing god's work anon

Le HDR is bad meme

Wrong over-use by fucking normies with their phones is the only bad here

Does anyone have any good examples of pretty HDR? I've googled around a bit but only found overdone unrealistic stuff that aren't all that great to look at imo
However I do like the idea and I wanna try it myself but I don't know which situations would suit it

>>3024444
Turn your question on it's head, so to speak, and look for examples of when to use exposure bracketing. An HDR image is just a desired outcome when the scene has more DR than your camera can handle in a single exposure.

>>3023572
this one looks unnatural
i think it's the haloing on the trees and moon

File: 31813113373_38d8cf9592_z.jpg (123KB, 640x392px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 640x392px

>>3024119
And people think Ken is a meme.

>>3024119
your photos hurt my eyes

>>3024610
snot his togs m8 >>3024129

>>3023454
HDR doesn't actually do this crap though.

>>3024119

Lacking subtlety. Would get laughed out of a gallery.

>>3024573
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/aigle_dore/
You are right on that - the moon is obviously fake (it was taken that night, but enlarged like crazy). It was supposed to be stylized but I could have done better with my layers.

>>3024444
This is a good example. One exposure would either have made it impossible to get color from the glass AND have some detail in the shadows. IT's a clear case where HDR makes sense. >>3023570

>>3023532
>That's not RAM, that's memory.

>>3023532
What is the difference??

File: tumblr_oigwjuQrB21sv3c12o1_1280.jpg (239KB, 640x359px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 640x359px

One of mine.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4264
Image Height	2842

File: 2.jpg (35KB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 852x480px

>>3025815
my eyes

>>3023572
> that photoshoped as fucked moon

I HAAAATE shit like this.

>>3025864
It was a goof on the night of the "supermoon"

>>3026124
oh....your excused then.

but stop perpetuating the idea that you can photograph the moon like that!

>>3025814
there's tone apping and there's exposure compositing. tone mapping works with finer detail and is what causes the cartoonish look. exposure compositing when done right is more like a shaped GND filter

File: 1454534400571.png (1021KB, 1229x911px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 1229x911px

>this whole thread
I rarely find a time where I don't regret coming to /p/

>>3025815
love it

keep it up!

>>3023454
why hate? Look great love the colors

>>3023670
God damnit. Clean your fucking sensor.

>>3026467
Ikr
we're getting into reddit territory with all these "it doesn't look TOO bad" examples

File: 122.png (370KB, 600x463px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 600x463px

>>3023482