what genres and tiers of photography would you place in this chart?
All of them.
>>3014378
everyone who posts online is above the water's surface
everyone who makes prints is shallow-tier
slide film is next
followed by negative film
raw datasets from electron-beam imaging are deep-tier
>>3014408
>raw datasets from electron-beam imaging are deep-tier
fug, you read my mind
prove me wrong.
protip: u cant.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:02:02 18:09:00 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2961 Image Height 3678
>>3014416
moop is 7 stops too deep
>>3014410
Fair.
the lower levels are hard to fill without going overly technical
>>3014416
shit
>no d
>moop is as good as isi
>catsby is not deeper than isi/moop/sugar
>alphon and ricohbro are deepest
Some oldfag should draw a Bourdieu's diagram for /p/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2017:02:02 23:13:49 Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
>>3014432
pretty nice and mostly accurate
>>3014447
>>no d
who cares
>>moop is as good as isi
hes better
>>catsby is not deeper than isi/moop/sugar
>
>>alphon and ricohbro are deepest
who are the deepest then?
>>3014416
Any link to alphon and ricohbro work?
>>3014410
wtf did you make this all now, this is legit accurate.
I know a guy who does slit-scan and he's a legit mad man but makes wonderful images
>>3014479
yea, been doing the chart for this evening. maybe here is the final version, typos and all.
>>3014488
Where is new topographics/urban landscapes? And why are panoramas separate from film panoramas?
>>3014507
it's not really separate, but more of a niche inside a genre of photography.
>>3014488
where is fucking documentary photo? art photo with its several branches?
your bottom half is useless tryhard bullshit. include relevant stuff please, you euphoric fedora.
>>3014511
sorry, no space for humanist bullshit, mr. tryhard edgelord.
>>3014488
You actually cared enough to do this shit?
>>3014455
>who are the deepest then?
anon ofc.
>>3014432
Move bird photography to enthusiast, that's a tried-and-true genre and nobody on Instagram cares about birds unless they're 10 different colors.
>>3014888
hear hear
>>3014408
>mediums
>not genres
fkn pleb
>>3014488
Where does your autism fall on this chart?
>>3014416
Needs Peruvian half-frame guy
>>3014432
i think war photography should be the deepest...
>>3014416
kys
>>3014488
I actually have never heard of most of that stuff, so this is very nice to have as a reference, thanks anon
>>3018730
I second this, thanks anon
>>3014488
Now all we need is an example of each
>>3014378
Where does urban exploring type photography belong.
>>3014410
i shoot wildlife without hide lol. deer don't walk away from me for whatever reason. i fear i may be mauled to death by one come some day but until then i'm just going to take pictures of them.
>>3014996
>implying medium isn't genre
fucking maximum plebabby, I bet you believe photography is an art form
>>3014416
I'm flattered, anon
>>3014416
>pantsuit
kek
>>3014432
put drawing/ painting on the lowest level for ez triggerings
>>3014378
Where does outdoor toy photography land?
>>3014432
>scanning tunneling micrography
>remote sensing
kek
>>3021552
i know you are ;)
chart needs more movements, like new topographics for instance
>>3014432
still life is overrated af as most photographers have stylist and majority of time theyre there just to oversee technical aspects