What exactly is wrong with this picture?

>>2988868

2 blue for kodachrome.

File: fd8d394692f295d74c66dfd01d4781a73a3a8a960a1c373e94b7feb869e0f1b2.jpg (98KB, 466x700px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 466x700px

Hitler approves merry christmas

>>2988868
before anyone argues, the OP pic features use of tilt-shift

>>2988892
Kek. No

>>2988894
It definitely does though, the field of focus is parrellel to the fence

>>2988897
I agree.
Also abour the photo, the whites are a bit too exposed for my tastes

>>2988900
atleast the blacks are crushed

>>2988868
They took a family photo at mid day. Notice the raccoon-like shadows over their eyes. Looks like shit.

Otherwise, nice family portrait.

>>2988868
There are 3 white people and 1 man-shaped sausage in it.

>>2988892
>>2988897
>>2988900
It does not use tilt shift. It is just stopped down enough so that the depth of field isn't as shallow.

>>2988868
Oy vey, not enough diversity. It's another shoah.

What a beautiful family.

>>2988904
the blacks arent crushed at all

>>2988892
Pretty sure this was taken with a 4x5 so that explains the background separation.

>>2988986
They're in the back where the plantation is.

>>2988894
You're wrong
>>2988970
So are you

It's shot on 10x8, which implies a field/view camera was used, probably with a 200mm+ lens. It would be impossible to get everyone in focus just by stopping down, they are too close, at too acute an angle. 12 feet away at f16 gets you about half a foot of sharp area, the photo clearly shows MUCH more than half a foot in focus, and as a field/view camera was most probably used, why wouldn't they use the movements?

Also, the white balance is off.

File: 198866C7-71DD-441C-A56A-27DEE3020058-16775-000010CDA46AB2AC_tmp.jpg (158KB, 760x965px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 760x965px

>>2988868
Needs straightening & colour cast is off.

I'm dreaming of a white Christmas.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	760
Image Height	965

>>2988986
Yeah youre right theyre hanging actually

Despite being out in the sun, the exposure time is so long that the adults are holding their children steady. Everyone's got a "holding a fake smile for the photo" face, especially the children.

>>2988888
wew

>>2988868
It features a white nuclear family in 2016

>>2988991
This faggot really thinks this is tilt shift.

What a fucking BAFOON. This is most definitely the work and magic of FOCUS STACK. Can't you see? This was shot on a Fuji system with their wonderful film sim. This is just some ugly white family cosplaying.

>>2988995
>even more blue
>lopsided

You made it worse

>>2989047
Nuts :/

Chopped the mans feet off

That weed at the base is distracting

>>2988868
People staring directly into the sun it seems. Makes them uncomfortable and has them making some really stupid faces.

>>2988888

Merry Christmas

File: 1452376989154.png (129KB, 324x310px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 324x310px

>>2988941
>racoon-like shadows
I'm stealing that. have an le upvote :DDDD

It looks fake as fuck, just like the entire 50's nuclear family fantasy. Makes it actually great in a way.

>>2989479

It only looks fake cause you were raised in a society where scenes like this are only seen in propaganda movies like the purge or fallout

>>2988868
THEYRE ALL WHITE

>>2988888
merry quintsmas

>>2988892
ya know i was gonna say; this appears to be shot fast and wide open. If i had to guess it was done with a 135 prime.

>>2988868
Something about it seems off, very uncanny valley

>>2988868

There's nothing wrong with this photo.

It looks great. Very nostalgic. Very comfy.