CC please - pics at the beach

still shit

File: LON16640.jpg (267KB, 1075x704px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1075x704px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Martin Parr
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	8536
Image Height	5589
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2015:05:29 14:13:07
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	5000
Image Height	3274

Most of these are of whales that breached, and got stuck in the sand. What beach is that, so I can avoid it?

Ugly photos of ugly subjects. It's consistent though, and that makes me think it's deliberate, so it is art I guess.

I think they should all be pp-d like these
>>2986666
>>2986669

>posting photos by Parr
>asking for crit
miserable OP.

>>2986690
Looks like a few retards fell for it.

Life's a beach.

(L

>>2986690
assuming hes a pro

what makes these pictures "pro"? looks like something anyone could have taken, and probably have

>>2987198

It's just like any art - it's all subjective and ripe for pop art culture.

>>2986688 is accurate as far as critique but because this from a famous photographer it's elevated.

Though desu I don't know when these were shot but I'm guessing 70-80s maybe and that kind of set shooting of non beauty subjects might have been a very unique concept. Today it's far less unique a and interesting.