General Thread

File: velviagol.jpg (761KB, 1024x685px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 1024x685px

That image was shot on my Fuji GW690II and Velvia 50.

This one is also Velvia 50, but it's more thought out than the first shot. I had to take it in a rush, as the sun was setting fast.

>>2986599
gorgeous

File: golsnoo.jpg (679KB, 1024x715px) Image search: [Google]

679KB, 1024x715px

>>2986650
Thank you. This one is Portra 160. Awesome film for this kind of setting.

File: 1image490.jpg (534KB, 1024x810px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 1024x810px

A film general thread starting off with wonderful photos, I love it.

>>2986587
How does the slide look on the light table? I would love to see a drum scan to get the shadows out of it, you did a perfect job with not getting the sky to blow out.

>>2986599
>>2986668
Love em too, especially the snow scene. Wonderful use of Portra. Did you post on here some time ago with stuff from that location? Like several years ago, that mountain looks familiar.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Alex Burke
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:13 09:09:27
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	810

>>2986676
Thanks! I'll give more details when I'm home :)

>this FGT sponsored by boring landscape faggots
Velvia's shit and so are all your boring landscapes.
You people are the same as those who unironically like HP5

>>2986712

>chat shit about velvia and landscape
>not 4x5 or 8x10 Master race

go back to your plebeian 35mm format

>>2986714
>>2986712

6x7 is the true master format

>>2986587
The scene in the foreground with the light in the leaves of the tree looks way more interesting than the top third of the frame, you should have focused on that instead of going for some autopilot generic rule of thirds shit desu senpai
great exposure tho

File: 6159320826_d405d20192_o.jpg (913KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

913KB, 1024x683px

>>2986676
Thank you Alex.

This is actually a drumscanned slide with 100% shadow recovery in LR. The scan holds the same amount of detail as the slide imho. Unfortunately I shot this handheld as I didn't really plan shooting. It's from the deck at my parents house.

So the Portra and the other Velvia shot is from a location I've shot before, I'll attach the picture.

I much prefer the ones I posted to this.

>>2986737
This one makes me a little claustrophobic. I just want to move my head up a little and see a smidge more sky. A slightly wider lens would have worked well here, but that's probably my odd personal preference talking

File: n_hellsgate.jpg (448KB, 660x1000px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 660x1000px

might post a couple of snaps from a recent roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: datvelviacropped.jpg (636KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 1024x683px

>>2986724
What, like this?

>>2986721
this.

File: n (1 of 4).jpg (627KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 667x1000px

>>2986741
my photos are not good, but my shitposting cannot be contained

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: n (4 of 4).jpg (881KB, 1000x663px) Image search: [Google]

881KB, 1000x663px

>>2986744

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: velviagolflipped.jpg (752KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

752KB, 1024x683px

>>2986599
I forgot to flip this one. Sleep deprivation is a hell of a drug kids

File: n (2 of 4).jpg (671KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 667x1000px

>>2986746

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>2986714

>plebeian format

>more masterpieces and actual art shot on 35mm than all other formats combined

Medium format is school portrait tier and large format is all new age folk hymn album cover tier landscape photography.

File: golhost.jpg (1MB, 1024x725px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x725px

Last one from my autumn trip. It's shot on Fuji 160Pro NS. The sky is a bit fucked, I'll have a go at it tomorrow when I've slept better

recently bought a medium format camera, came with a 220 back. I've read you can use 120 in a 220 back, anyone done this?

>>2986783

220 is just 120 with twice as many exposures.

>>2986751
Oh boy, that is such a lovely shot!

File: Old_EDU_100_stitch-1.jpg (663KB, 1120x1400px) Image search: [Google]

663KB, 1120x1400px

Not enough tree stumps in this thread.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:20 21:18:17
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 6x17.jpg (63KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 800x800px

Should i get a 6x17 back and attach to a 4x5 LF camera

or should i get a 6x17 linhof or fuji gx617? I mean both might almost be at the same price range plus Lens but which one would be more practical?

or any great suggestion for a 6x17 camera?

no pinhole pls.

hey, what do you guys keep track of when developing your film?

im autistic as fuck and i wanna keep detailed development logs.

File: Retro400S120001-7mini.jpg (186KB, 539x800px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 539x800px

>>2986802
tree stumps are bae

File: 13A_00062.jpg (3MB, 2400x1600px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x1600px

I just got 6 rolls color film developed and scanned by a local lab. Some of the film has been push processed, pushed from 400 to 800 iso.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Equipment Make	d-lab.1
Camera Software	DlabVersion:DLAB1_10.00D_123k
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:12:20 10:09:32
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	2400
Image Height	1600
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Image Width	2400
Image Height	1600

File: _20_00069.jpg (1MB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x1200px

>>2986835
Sorry, forgot to resize

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Software	DlabVersion:DLAB1_10.00D_123k
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	Unknown
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:20 10:09:54
White Point Chromaticity	0
Exposure Time	0 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	0
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Subject Distance	0.00 m
Metering Mode	Unknown
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	1200
Exposure Index	0

File: _24_00073.jpg (1MB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x800px

I have more, of different places, not exclusively in NYC or push processed, but I don't want to fill up the thread or anything like that, just want to show this cool yellow cast that pushed kodak 400 ultramax gave me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Equipment Make	d-lab.1
Camera Software	DlabVersion:DLAB1_10.00D_123k
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:12:20 10:10:07
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	2400
Image Height	1600
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Image Width	1200
Image Height	800

>>2986819
How come your white point is so low here? Surely the light in the background should be brighter.

Also, what'd you soup this 400s in?

Going to ask here again, I want to get into B&W 120 film and developing it on my own since developing it at a lab costs a fuckton (Australia) and scanning it costs something like $3 per frame, but I can't figure out scanning it myself. I dont have the money for a proper scanner and my only DSLR is an ancient Pentax *Ist D from 2003 so I dont think it would work for DSLR scanning, Anybody have any advice for me?

>>2986838
This is a good shot

>>2986898
>no money for a flatbed scanner
>so obviously no money for a new dslr
scan them with your eyes

what kind of answer do you expect? save up some money and get a new pentax :P

>>2986901
>new pentax
No chance. Only new dslr i'll buy is canon, speaking of that, should I go for a new 700D or a used 7D?

File: Retro400S120001-6mini.jpg (180KB, 541x800px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 541x800px

>>2986861
Rodinal, I believe. White point is a social construct, I put it that way because that's how I felt on the day.

File: Yokkaichi_015.jpg (943KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

943KB, 1000x1000px

>>2986751
>Fuji Pro 160NS
Man, can't wait to crack into the pro packs I bought of this stuff.

>>2986783
It will be totally fine. Anyone who talks about differences in film thickness is dumb.

>>2986898
1 Buy a new DSLR

2 Buy a flatbed to get the job done in the meantime

3 Don't shoot medium format until you can afford scanning

4 Say fuck it to scanning and just shoot without the digitization part (which can happen later when you can afford it).

Choose your own adventure.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:19 19:42:08
Exposure Time	10 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-7.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Tungsten
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: F1000017.jpg (657KB, 1818x1229px) Image search: [Google]

657KB, 1818x1229px

>>2986905
>Buy a flatbed to get the job done in the meantime
Any recommendations? guess i'll have to stick to colour film for now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM Corporation
Camera Model	Frontier SP-3000
Camera Software	FUJIFILM Corporation FEII software
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:01 11:02:14
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1818
Image Height	1229

>>2986912
canon 9000f is dirt cheap senpai

>>2986922
>9000f
Oh shit, this thing costs $200 less than what i was looking at before and has better resolution and lets me rep my brand, guess i'll be buying this one then

Any recommendations for a good medium format camera for not a retarded amount on money? Bronica?

>>2986785
220 does not have backing paper across the entire film. 120 does, making it slightly thicker.

>>2986813
I have a GX617. Like it a lot, but I often find that I'd like movements.

Get a 6x17 back if you really need movements.

The veiwfinders for the Fuji are a lot better than those of the Linhof. Atleast the first generation viewfinders.

>>2986931
pentax 645?

File: Film6040_10.jpg (789KB, 1000x984px) Image search: [Google]

789KB, 1000x984px

>>2986931
I have a Yashica-D and I am quite satisfied with it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: fixed1.jpg (1MB, 1025x726px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1025x726px

>>2986801
>>2986905
Thanks

I fixed the sky etc. Looks better now

Any opinions on Pentacks 645? I want to expand into MF and it seems to be in my price range. Only have a Nettar now.

>>2986979
>Any opinions on Pentacks 645?
If you're a poorfag or a pleb, it's great.

If you're not a poorfag, buy a Contax. If you're not a pleb, buy a Bronica ETRS/Mamiya 645.

>>2986938

been looking at the GX617 too but like you say it be good to have movements.. but i heard about the lens issues that they're not well built. The cheapest 6x17 i saw was the G617 and the vanilla linhof technorama but cost wise im not sure if a 4x5 graflox with a 6x17 back might be a cheaper option.

>>2987044
>but i heard about the lens issues that they're not well built.

They're not poorly built. I'd say high end, but not leica/linhof quality. I only have the 90mm, but the guard rails protects it well and the optics very, very good.

File: __7_00009.jpg (1MB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x800px

>>2986900
Thank you anon.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Equipment Make	d-lab.1
Camera Software	DlabVersion:DLAB1_10.00D_123k
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:12:20 09:45:07
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	2400
Image Height	1600
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Image Width	1200
Image Height	800

>>2986979
645 is a waste of time. Shoot at least 6x6 if you want to experience the benefits of MF.

>>2987118
This. Used to have a Mamiya 645.

>larger than a hasselblad

>>2986712
What's wrong with HP5 you mong?

So I now suddenly have a Hassy on loan for at least a month. How the heck do I compose squares? What should I try shooting with it? I'm a zone focus rangefinder guy normally, and shooting a camera like this is completely foreign to me.

>>2987208
Pick subject. Frame subject. Set exposure. Focus. Release shutter. Shoot what you want. If you haven't tried a lot of centred shots, you may want to try that with 6x6.

You need to lift the blacks like Martin Luther King right now because they sufferin.

>>2987214
Who?

>>2987214
>everything needs to look like a tonemapped hdr mess

Beat it you broom pushing wash-up. When was the last time you even took a photo that wasn't objectively shit?

>>2987205
he probably is such an idiot that he is not able to use the most basic film ever

>>2987205
It never scanned well for me.
Prints fine, though.

>>2987214
>This is what digiplebs actually believe

File: 1456274093900.jpg (41KB, 369x557px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 369x557px

>Buy stock and weird film from this guy
>The next batch he's thinking about pushing is ISO 0.8 B&W positive film

File: 17922230936_1fb9483477_b.jpg (345KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 1000x1000px

>>2987208
It's all about symmetry and balance. With 35mm unbalanced compositions work well because the rectangular shaped frame assists in balancing out the composition. With square, the frame will give no further assistance in balancing things out. This is why centered shots generally work well. The overall goal is to create a balance that results in an image that isn't heavily biased to a particular side.

>>2987295

been considering super low iso shooting bw film.

but that would mean i need to learn to develop.

File: 17278550541_ce695caceb_b.jpg (217KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 800x800px

>>2987208 #
>>2987339 #
Another example. Putting your subject off center is totally do able. Try not to fall into the CENTER EVERYTHING trap with 6x6, as that happens easily.

In this shot the two people on the left are balanced out by the tankers on the right. Without the tankers I think the shit would be out of balance and awkward.

>>2987353
i see your point in the first one, but the bottom half on this one couldve been cut and it wouldve improved it tenfold.

>>2987353
>Try not to fall into the CENTER EVERYTHING trap with 6x6
Except that the camera centres everything for you, because the tight bastards designing lenses for them realised the square format was payday when they could get away with a bare minimum of image circle and still "cover" the frame.
What the fuck is this vignette? As if you're going to put anything outside the centre of the frame.

File: IMG_9450.jpg (824KB, 2400x1600px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 2400x1600px

What's /p/'s favorite B&W paper?

I usually print on Ilford RC papers in the satin finish, but I went shopping last week and they were out of stock so I decided I'll try some Foma papers for a change.
The base feels a little bit cheaper, the Fomaspeed Variant in matte finish kind of resembles Ilford papers in the pearl finish, except they feel a little bit lighter and curl more after drying. The base is also very slightly colder. But there is really something about the tonality... I guess Ilford papers must have some almost ideal linear density curve, but the midtones on the Foma papers really do have this elusive film look in the midtones. They also respond nicely to toning.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1000D
Camera Software	Zoner Photo Studio X
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2400
Image Height	1600
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:12:22 03:24:34
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	33.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2400
Image Height	1600
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2986904
Retro 400s on a cloudy day. Why didn't I think of that one? Dat sharpness + aviphot contrast increase.

Oh right, it's EV7 out there at noon. Nevermind.

File: 68750022.jpg (641KB, 1080x716px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 1080x716px

recents.

fuji 800z and nps 160

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 22:17:07
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 68750010.jpg (473KB, 1080x716px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 1080x716px

>>2987519

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 22:17:07
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 68730014.jpg (574KB, 929x1080px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 929x1080px

>>2987520

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 22:17:06
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 68750009.jpg (403KB, 1080x716px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 1080x716px

>>2987521

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 22:17:07
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 68730011.jpg (252KB, 1080x716px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1080x716px

>>2987522

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 22:17:06
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 68730010.jpg (228KB, 716x1080px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 716x1080px

>>2987523

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 22:14:43
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2986742
that guy is retarded, original is great

File: Street-4.jpg (2MB, 3000x1687px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x1687px

Yo, where the street shooters at!?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Lucas O'Neil
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:21 23:04:16

File: IT001084 4.jpg (1MB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x667px

digiman here. how much is done in post? some of these are real nice too btw

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 10.0 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

>>2987597
In general it's like this: scan, orient, rotate, crop, apply lens correction, invert if negative, exposure, black/white/grey point. Add whitebalance after exposure for colour film. Paste this stack (sans orient, crop, rotate) over all the images in the roll to get a good "contact sheet" style of overview.

Per image, do masked tone curves and what-not until your artistic vision is met. Some like to apply stuff like sharpening, local contrast, smoothing to continuous-tone areas, and whatever else that's not specific to digital that you want to use. (e.g. tonemapping and raw denoise will be unavailable.)

All of this wrt Darktable btw.

File: _IMG4893.jpg (310KB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1000x665px

it's a cat

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2987591
Shot some stuff on Acros and an XA2 yesterday on my commute. May dev tonight.

File: _IMG4918.jpg (319KB, 1000x591px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1000x591px

>>2987608
>shoot into the mirror lol!
>pentacks thug life

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2987519
>fuji 800z and nps 160
You know how I know your scans are trash? I can't tell which is which.

File: CargoShipsGrey.jpg (813KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

813KB, 800x800px

>>2987625
With the right settings those Noritsus give astoundingly superb images. Usually labs just run them at some standard setting and you get the weirdest looking scans.

>>2987422
Yeah, square polarizes people all the time with calls for horizontal crops. It's difficult to meaningfully fill the frame when shooting square. I personally like the texture in the bottom, but I can see the argument against it.

>>2987465
Not sure if it was just my copy or what, but the Mamiya 6's 75mm vignetted like crazy when shot wide open.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2491
Image Height	2504
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2011:02:22 19:50:06
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	800
Image Height	800

>>2987519
neato m80

File: _IMG4900.jpg (358KB, 655x1000px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 655x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

Words of wisdom from Dipshit.

When you know you are going to shoot in a dark area, it is unwise to think that purchasing the highest speed film you can find and pushing it beyond limits to avoid using a flash will yield decent results. Just use a fucking flash.

>>2987663
Aka the "fuck-all for light means shit light" rule-of-thumb. Aka the "there should be at least some light in the photo" rule-of-thumb.

Not to worry. Flash-shyness will go away after a hundred pops or so.

>>2987629
>those Noritsus give astoundingly superb images
[citation required]
I've literally never seen a minilab scan I would even consider "acceptable for web use" in 2016 except for that one anon who shoots the 50/2 Nikon and has AgfaPhoto in the exif.

>>2987501
Fiber paper is only paper! In all seriousness though when you learn how to work with it properly you will understand all the snobbery. I am lazy so I usually buy illford fiber multigrade in glossy and then ferrotype the print

>>2986931
That depends are you looking for a SLR or would you consider a TLR? I have a yashica mat124g that I got when I was sixteen and I love it still but my every day camera is a bronica S2A

File: ob03.jpg (675KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

675KB, 1024x683px

>>2987674
Most Costcos use Noritsu scanners and I've known a few photographers who swore by them. One guy in particular had the best 35mm scans I've seen done by them. Google "Costco film scanning" and read some of the discussions. To top it off it used to cost $3/roll for 3000px scans (not sure anymore).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3600
Image Height	2400
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2013:10:29 12:56:16
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1024
Image Height	683

>>2987674
>I've literally never seen a minilab scan I would even consider "acceptable for web use" in 2016 except for that one anon who shoots the 50/2 Nikon and has AgfaPhoto in the exif.
wow anon, it's rude to forget about me, pakon anon who never scans in EXIF mode.

File: ob02.jpg (956KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 1024x683px

>>2987674
>>2987690
Here's one more Noritsu

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3600
Image Height	2400
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2013:10:29 13:01:12
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1024
Image Height	683

>>2987692
>>2987690
Adding a little white border to your Noritsu scans won't distract me from the horrible noise in frame not from the film but the scanner.
Sure, you're having trouble seeing it there because both frames are very limited in colour. Hey don't worry though, as long as people keep claiming that Noritsu is god in the hands of the skilled and trash in the hands of a pimpled 16 year old in Costco that just need the "right settings" it'lll be acceptable right?
>>2987629
>With the right settings those Noritsus give astoundingly superb images. Usually labs just run them at some standard setting and you get the weirdest looking scans.
Like this goyim who's shown up recently. I-it's just the lab I promise!!!

>>2987690
>>2987692
Lol.
>>2987694
>the horrible noise in frame not from the film but the scanner.
This guy gets it.

>>2987687
I am reluctant to try fiber paper because I fear that my already slow process is going to become even slower.

does anyone have the image of the ebay listing where the seller took a whole bulk roll of 35mm out for the product photo and exposed it all without realising?

File: IMG_2728.jpg (573KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

573KB, 1080x1920px

Well /p/ I went out to an op shop today and bought this piece of fuck Hanimex D35 for $5 aud with a busted rangefinder. Took it home, stripped it down and freed up the lever thingy that moves the rangefinder image. Sadly the image in the rangefinder window is a bit higher despite being able to line up sideways now and I have no idea how to fix this. It's a rebranded Royal 35P, japcrap camera from the late 1950s. Did I do good?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1920
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 000001.jpg (715KB, 1817x1228px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 1817x1228px

Just got my first roll of film ever back. This is the shot I was most happy with .Shooting on a pentax k1000. What do you guys think?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.7-0E-105
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 10:53:40
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1817
Image Height	1228

>>2987752
>K1000

How much did you spend on that thing?

>>2987745

you got cucked for $5, bro.

>>2987756
>you got cucked for $5
explain please. I know it's a piece of crap but i mainly bought it for the case to put my trip 35 into.

File: AcrosXA_001.jpg (313KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1000x667px

>>2987591
>>2987611
Here we go. Gotta get better at focusing.

anti-establishment black border

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:22 22:56:11
Exposure Time	10 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: AcrosXA_002.jpg (292KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:22 23:04:05
Exposure Time	10 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-5.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: AcrosXA_003.jpg (328KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1000x667px

Yay waterspots.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:22 23:17:00
Exposure Time	8 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2987764

lol. i like these pics. are you on vacation or do you live there?

File: AcrosXA_004.jpg (301KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1000x667px

>>2987766
Live here. These were all taken on my way to work yesterday morning. Last one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:22 23:21:30
Exposure Time	10 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2987764
This one is pretty cool

>>2987768
>Live here.
are you the mythical english teacher weeb? no memes.

>>2987762
Is this post subtle trolling, or is this actually a legitimate attempt to get people to want to join?

File: AcrosXA_005.jpg (355KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 1000x667px

>>2987774
I teach English at a high school (pic related).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:22 23:46:26
Exposure Time	13 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2987775
it's some discord inside joke tier bullshit. that invite is for the (mostly dead) original /p/ discord that everyone left for the main one: https://discord.gg/USNek8M

Splitting the community between two identical servers is counterproductive so if I may make any suggestion just stick to the new pee discord. Buncha swell peeps including some dedicated film people.

>>2987738
Not on this PC. It's in the archive under the last humour thread I'm sure. Even though it belongs in gore.
>>2987761
>>2987759
>>2987764
>>2987768
>>2987777
Neato. Got a 100%? only shot Acros in 120 so far so had to live with shatbed scans.
>I teach English at a high school (pic related).
Living the weeb dream.
>>2987850
If I barely enjoy talking to you faggots on /p/, why would I want to talk to you faggots on some other website?

>>2987852
I posted that to counter the malicious trollpost and stop it misinforming everyone, that's all. If anyone wants an extra serving of /film/ or /p/ in their system that's their biz and they might just as well be directed to the right place.

>>2987501
I like Foma Fomabrom 112 and 123 IV, haven't tried the glossy 111 yet.

>RC
It's ok for contact proofs.

>>2987861
so why is there a second discord then?

File: 000018.jpg (995KB, 1817x1228px) Image search: [Google]

995KB, 1817x1228px

>>2987754
I think just over 150 usd

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.7-0E-105
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 10:53:59
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1817
Image Height	1228

>>2987947
Don't sharpen pics taken on 35mm. You only introduce noise onto the image.

>>2987523
Union station Chicago?

>>2987915
You'd imagine because the first one stopped being a safe space.
It will just be tripfriends trying to grow their epeen and attentionwhoring across platforms, instead of just posting photos.
I mean if you want to talk to /p/tards, why would you do it anywhere other than /p/?

File: Bildschirmfoto 2016-11-05 um 22.19.23.png (1MB, 2530x1480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2530x1480px

>>2987738
I got this

kek

File: DSC02625.jpg (260KB, 1162x800px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 1162x800px

>>2987954
>Don't sharpen pics taken on 35mm. You only introduce noise onto the image.
What you mean is
>minilab scans are garbage, never pay for them
A decent scan can be sharpened in the same manner as any digital photo.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:01 15:15:34
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1162
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2987872
Foma 123 is discontinued bro. Shame, it was a great paper, fantastic texture. Worked well for lith too>>2987915

File: 000009.jpg (690KB, 1817x1228px) Image search: [Google]

690KB, 1817x1228px

>>2987970
Yeah I just got it done at the local camera shop since I'm pretty new to this. Would you reccomend dslr scanning them til I can afford a scanner?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.7-0E-105
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 10:53:40
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1817
Image Height	1228

>>2987985
>Would you reccomend dslr scanning
shiggy

gonna get some rollei 80s, also rollei rpx25.

any tips on both? ive seen lots of rpx25 shots on flickr and they are extremely contrasty and almost always highlights are blown to fuck, so what to use it on?

File: AcrosXA_006.jpg (204KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 667x1000px

>>2987852
>Neato. Got a 100%? only shot Acros in 120 so far so had to live with shatbed scans.
Nah, I have a shit scanning technique. Don't even think I nailed the focus on these.

>Living the weeb dream.
Must not be much of a weeb then, I dislike it here a fair bit. Was never really on my radar, just kinda wound up here.

Any XA2 users want to shed some light on focusing? It seems the middle of the focus scale is ~8ft focus distance, with the far side of the focus scale being infinity. Is it safe to say if anything is say, 10+ ft away I might as well set the scale focus to infinity (assuming enough light to let the camera select f5.6 or smaller)?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:23 11:42:29
Exposure Time	5 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-6.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2987738
There's a whole website of those film gore images. Forgot the URL though.

File: XRX3Retro80S20.jpg (211KB, 530x800px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 530x800px

>>2987999
Develop your Retro 80S in Rodinal 1:50.
Shoot it at 80 most of the time, shoot at 100 for portraits.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	530
Image Height	800

>>2987993
Choofin

I tried some printing again and it was pretty fun but I'm having some issues with very short exposure times using multigrade paper. I already have the lens on the enlarger stopped down as far as it will go but some exposures are very short 1 or 2 seconds so not enough time to dodge/burn.

This is the plebiest question but will using ND filters or a dimmer help me out in getting a longer print? Any tricks I may be missing?

>>2986

220 and 120 pressure plates differ

File: img052.jpg (2MB, 3451x4635px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3451x4635px

Recent 645 scan. This is delta 3200 shot at 1000 and devices in xtol 1:1.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Picasa
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3711
Image Height	4984
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Width	3451
Image Height	4635
Unique Image ID	bd70695f383489ef0000000000000000

File: img040.jpg (3MB, 3437x4655px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3437x4655px

>>2988050
Same film/dev combo

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Picasa
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3680
Image Height	4984
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Width	3437
Image Height	4655
Unique Image ID	18d633cdd43b9fec0000000000000000

File: img018.jpg (1MB, 1860x2492px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1860x2492px

>>2988051
Home souped ektar

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SEIKO EPSON CORP.
Camera Model	EPSON scanner
Camera Software	EPSON Scan
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:16 15:59:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1860
Image Height	2492
Unique Image ID	21e1e1a4ce22b1970000000000000000

File: img085-01-01-01.jpg (3MB, 2837x4416px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2837x4416px

>>2988053
>>2986712
Hp5plus you bitch ass roodypoo

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:14 10:04:11
Image Width	2837
Image Height	4416
Unique Image ID	d613f179048861c50000000000000000

120 backing paper is ~.10mm thick. Film base thickness varies between .098mm to .110mm depending on the film (or at least the ones I've bothered to look up). So really we're talking about a ~.090mm guaranteed difference in thickness between 120 and 220 film.

Also, it's been proven over on Apug that some cameras with rotating pressure plates don't change the film plane distance at all. The rotation changes the spacing of the film since thickness affects frame spacing as the film is wound from one spook to another.

File: img058-01.jpg (2MB, 1567x2244px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1567x2244px

>>2988055
Portra 400? Might be 160, toasting from fone

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SEIKO EPSON CORP.
Camera Model	EPSON scanner
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:13 20:47:46
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1567
Image Height	2244
Unique Image ID	d33b9afe3de13edd0000000000000000

File: Street-1.jpg (4MB, 2000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2000x3000px

>>2987761
This one is quite nice. Love the posture of the shadows and the foggy windows so you can't see the people's faces.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Lucas O'Neil
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:21 23:04:13

File: Street-6.jpg (4MB, 3000x1993px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3000x1993px

>>2986712
>>2986714
>>2986721
Wow, it's not like they all have their advantages and disadvantages and should be used accordingly to however one prefers to shoot.

That being said, I shoot 35mm like mad but love me some high quality negatives and I just kind of end up skipping 120 and go strait to 4x5.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Nikon
Camera Model	LS-9000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:21 23:04:17

>>2987968
ahahah

>>2988096
>kids outside playing in the dirt
>all on their phones
>oblivious to the pedo shooting them

>>2988096
I don't understand, what is street photography?
Is it urban setting photography, or is it secretly taking pictures of girls that you see?

File: Street-7.jpg (4MB, 3000x2250px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3000x2250px

>>2988110
I saw a ton of kids on their phones and a shadow looming over them, liked the composition and took it. Liked the picture enough to post it.
>>2988120
>See people doing interesting shit, shoot it
>eventually you get a usable negative out of the 10,000 rolls you shot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Nikon
Camera Model	LS-9000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:21 23:04:19

>>2988142
R u Boston?

File: Street-3.jpg (2MB, 3000x2011px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x2011px

>>2988145
I am

This one is around Kenmore

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Lucas O'Neil
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:21 23:04:15

File: _IMG4913_pexp.jpg (524KB, 765x1200px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 765x1200px

dont mind me, just posting catshits.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _IMG4909_pexp.jpg (457KB, 1200x1000px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 1200x1000px

>>2988149

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _IMG4908_pexp.jpg (436KB, 1200x821px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 1200x821px

>>2988151

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: _IMG4931_pexp.jpg (427KB, 1200x788px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 1200x788px

>>2988152
>when you get 39.75 exposures on a roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2988153
>dem oly xa 10% discount on film feels

>>2987734
I must admit you are right. I use an old fashioned ferrotyping dryer and it still takes ages and ages to finish a single print. But as I am a little bit of an insomniac( hence why I am on /p/ at 4 am California time) I will spend six or seven hours in my home darkroom churning out print after print. The only issue is that I can only ferrotype four prints at once in my two dryers and a backlog of prints starts building up in my print washer which also takes forever with fiber paper

File: think.jpg (12KB, 315x291px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 315x291px

Just what is it that gives film photographs this oil painting like quality?

>>2988219
Huh? Post/quote an example

File: 20161219-DSC06339.jpg (787KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

787KB, 2000x1333px

>>2988219
Shifted colors and different tonal response depending of the film and its exposure, and less highlights clipping and details than digital counterparts (inb4 muh MF film).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6.1 (Windows)
Photographer	David Mornet
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:23 14:21:15
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Brightness	-2.4 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>2988230
>Shifted colors and different tonal response depending on the scanning method and choices made in the inversion/post-processing stage, and less highlights clipping. No perceivable difference will be found in details on web sized shots with a properly scanned frame of 35mm vs digital.

FTFY

At least you were correct about the highlights.

>>2988230
Muh LF film

>>2988219
If you mean OP and his shots it's more than likely great exposures and drum scanning

>>2987947

I would've recommended saving a little more and had gotten an fm2. Hopefully that camera at least came with some decent lens.

File: 30985519724_d5ca52e4af_z.jpg (143KB, 631x640px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 631x640px

Sup /p/, I'm back.
Same anon from this post a while back.
>>2975905
finally got my roll of film back from the Darkroom.
plus a couple of Instax film I shot from the Holga.
Please critique my work, and tell me what you think.
Also, if you have any question about anything, please ask.
Going to be posting my first of 7 photos.
1/7

File: 31577258615_afb9cc954c_z.jpg (71KB, 640x401px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 640x401px

>>2988391

File: 31577039482_7cc5092ec5_z.jpg (43KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x400px

>>2988391
3/7

File: 31532541715_e8b8f11ed7_z.jpg (49KB, 397x640px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 397x640px

>>2988391
4/7

File: 31373528410_a60d332268_z.jpg (79KB, 640x394px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 640x394px

>>2988391
5/7

File: 30744621063_b771f88cf6_z.jpg (55KB, 640x398px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 640x398px

>>2988391
6/7

File: 31586844521_b6f475e25d_z.jpg (69KB, 640x406px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 640x406px

>>2988391
7/7

Which camera to bring along for christmas schnapps? Hassy with 80mm or Pentax 6x7 with 90mm. Going to soot Hp5.

>>2988672
>Hassy
I hate it when people talk/write like this.
You're a grown man, ffs.

As for you question; you just wanted to tell us you own two MF cameras. Bring whichever one you want because nobody here has any reason to give a shit as long as you're not posting photos.
I'd take the "hassy" I suppose for the slightly wider lens.

File: 1460644969627.png (389KB, 406x488px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 406x488px

>>2988702
>lords over someone for using slang
>proceeds to use "ffs"
I get that it must be stressful raising someone elses children, especially on Christmas eve. The pressures of the modern family man or woman know no bounds. Your neighbours are posting notes through your door to stop listening to that "anime shit" in the middle of the night while developing prints in your darkroom. You're annoyed because you double exposed an image in your film holder by accident and ruined what could have been a great shot (it was no happy accident!). You are looking at your bank account and you see less money in your accountant than it costs to get potatoes for dinner tomorrow. Your wallet is aching at the festive time and you don't want to tell your partner that if they don't get a job you may have to move to a studio apartment, you sure as hell never wanted to be /that/ photographer and you don't want a child invading your personal space, never mind one that isn't your own.

That's no reason to go badmouthing a stupid question in the fgt though. It could be worse, the anon could have made his own thread just to ask the question. They could have left out which lens and film they were going to bring. It was a festive question allowing for some discussion in the dead season of religious holidays celebrated worldwide. Try and be a little more tolerant and maybe you may find some good fortune in the coming days. I believe in you!

>>2988672
THOUGH YOU COULD HAVE POSTED IF YOU WERE TAKING A FUCKING FLASH OR IF YOU WERE INDOORS OR OUTDOORS YOU BETA KEK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO BE A FUCKING MINDREADER
I'd probably take the 'blad (fuck off >>2988672 if you don't like it then filter it you triggered hypocritical warrior of justice). Shorter lens, wider depth of field, potentially less motion blur from mirror slap and 'dem leaf shutters mmmmmmmmmmm.

Gonna be taking a few point and shits for my cousins kids to use at Christmas dinner tomorrow, should be pretty fun.

>>2988702
Hahaha, sorry. I only asked just because I had trouble deciding.

>>2988713
Oh yeah, indoors, no flash, pushing Hp5 to 1600. I went with the Pentax in the end because I thought a prism finder would be easier to deal with.

>>2988785
Indoors, no flash, slow medium format lens that will be shot wide open at subjects that are at close focus, 400 speed film. Seriously m8, why bother? Every other person at this gathering with a cell phone is going to take better quality photos than you will with this setup, and they are going to be quick to point it out to you. Invest in some lighting and take quality photos with that gear.

>>2988713
Top KEK

did some darkroom printing for the first time, am I retarded or does it take everyone 30+ minutes to get a decent print dialed in?

any printing advice welcome

File: 78420352_1_585x461_skener-za-digitalizirane-na-negativi-nemski-gr-sofiya.jpg (19KB, 644x450px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 644x450px

Is pic related any good? I used to have a Plustek OpticFilm 7200 and it was pretty pretty pretty nice.

I recently got a couple of rolls of MF film for free. They haven't been stored in any special way, and are about 10 years expired judging from the ones that the text isn't worn out from. No problem, I've shot stuff like that and overexposing by a stop works just fine unless it's fast.

Among them was one roll of slide though. I don't know what it is because all the text is worn out from the pack, but since it's blue and yellow I'm quite sure it's Ektachrome. My question is though, what should I rate it as? Overexposing by one stop for slide sounds dangerous.

File: you know man.jpg (359KB, 520x1247px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 520x1247px

>>2988817
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohk7AHCDxxc

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2014:09:25 11:22:05
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	520
Image Height	1247

>>2988817
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVTfoUrMTmA

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware 1.0.2
Owner Name	unknown
Serial Number	0730570084
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2004:09:18 16:11:31
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Auto
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3456
Image Height	2304
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	High
Saturation	High
Contrast	High
Shooting Mode	Macro/Close-Up
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Auto
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	224
Camera Actuations	423624833
Color Matrix	0