Thread dedicated to photos of recently (or perhaps not so much) deceased that are shot very well
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 612 Image Height 700
>>2983119
got you, senpai.
in fact, i have a whole metinides book scanned, it pretty fucking amazing, but guess what, that HD crashed and i need to reconstruct the index and what not. will do it and dump if im successful.
>>2983123
I'm intrigued
how old are we talking here?
>>2983119
>deceased that are shot very well
I assumed they are, that is why they are dead.
I'm game
Yeah some of those old Graflex corpse shots are great. I remember that one from I think it was a LIFE mag I was looking through about photographers.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Width 554 Image Height 598
>>2983123
please upload it somewhere so i can download it, if you get the chance
This is my favourite corpse. Utter peace.
rekt bread: /p/ edition
i like this already
>>2983689
Fake and gay
>>2983698
care to elaborate?
>>2983747
Not the same anon, but it's during the Spanish Civil War and has for a long time been reported to be staged. One give-away is that people clench their fingers when they get shot, not relax them.
i'm not even sure if this counts
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1000 Image Height 1373
>>2983257
this looks so fake
I've taken a few snaps of the dead and the dying but I don't think I should share them on /p/.
If I'm identified I will at the very least lose my job.
I'm waiting for selfie culture to become so ingrained in people that snapping the dead becomes socially acceptable. Then I can share my snaps.
How long do you think it'll be? 5 years? 10?
>>2984597
It's already happening, you faggot.
I understand your concerns. But my problem actually is to my name to become associated with 4chan...
>>2984553
I would classify it as on the way to dirt napping.
>>2984597
Are you a cop?
>>2984553
I posted it and I agree. They used to doctor photographs all the time back then.
>>2984597
It used to be totally normal back in the days though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 600 Image Height 450 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:10:28 14:42:27 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 700 Image Height 525
>>2984553
he didnt fly so good
>>2986029
>It used to be totally normal back in the days though.
Yeah it pretty much was. Photograph that dead one to have an image top remember them by. I would shoot the dead all day if I had my choice. They don't complain about anything.
Anyone have that isis picture of a guy being thrown to his death, with the already executed laying in a spiral below on the ground?
>>2986155
It's not a good picture, and you posted a censored version. Please pull yourself together anon.
Seriously though, who the fuck hired a turk to be a russian diplomats security guard.
Fucking idiots.
I would have been suspicious when he turned up not wearing a bulletproof vest that day...
>>2986152
bump for interest
>>2984968
No, I work in a hospital. All my shots carefully leave out any identifying details, faces included obviously, but I feel I'd still be in trouble for taking and sharing them. Which is fair enough really.
can we get some context?
i only know a few of these
>>2986698
Reverse image search them you 'tard