/film/

first

File: TriX003009.jpg (684KB, 1350x900px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 1350x900px

>>2982355
end your life

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	Digital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2014:04:21 10:05:52
Exposure Time	0.7 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1350
Image Height	900
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Screen Shot 2014-04-21 at 20.51.06.png (291KB, 828x553px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 828x553px

>>2982353
I've got an old Voigtländer 6*9 Bessa which has an option to shoot 4,5*6 but I don't have the insert to do so.
Apparently it's just kind of a stencil that one puts inside the camera. Has anyone got an idea on how I could make one myself?

File: canon p.jpg (180KB, 1600x1069px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1600x1069px

postin again: yay or nay reee

>>2982371
it's a good camera, if the one in your pic is the one you're getting expect it to smell like mold

consider paying a little more for a cleaner example, the shutter dial and lever are going to feel much better

dont fuck with those shit russian lenses, pick up an old canon 1.8

File: RMKKB12 10.jpg (918KB, 1440x945px) Image search: [Google]

918KB, 1440x945px

New bread, new snaps.

File: RMKKB12 26.jpg (805KB, 852x1280px) Image search: [Google]

805KB, 852x1280px

And that's it. Delta 100, stand developed.

>>2982371
It's a very heavy camera. It also doesn't like to get knocked around, the RF needs recalibration for every time you give it a simple knock.

Searching for some good free focus point and shoot camera and some good rolls... recommendations?

>>2982353
anyone every use a Canon ae-1? ive only ever regularly used Olympus oms. i started with my girl friends dads om-1 and ive been a fanboi ever since. i want to try other cameras now.

File: 1 (6)-Recovered.jpg (568KB, 898x1347px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 898x1347px

Anyone knows the manufacturer for the lomofag 120 color film? Also looking for budget 120 color films

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2304
Image Height	3410
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2000 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:12:13 18:17:38
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	898
Image Height	1347

File: rollei_agfa_8104120_rollei_infrared_120_b_w_1152126.jpg (269KB, 2500x2500px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 2500x2500px

Does anyone know the reciprocity failure for Rollei IR 400? Was thinking of doing the same times as tri-x or hp5+.

http://www.foto-r3.com/files/Rollei_Infrared400_ING.pdf

Might just have one of the shittiest datasheets I've ever seen.

>>2982430
Ae-1 is such a meme camera. What about it is interesting to you? Imo invest into glass for the Olympus or get your hands on a nikon SLR.
Or invest into point n shoots or a rangefinder type camera.

>>298243if eurofag, try calling the guys from maco-direct. They know for sure

File: Rollei IR 400 reciprocity.png (11KB, 376x447px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 376x447px

>>2982436
Ah yes, forgot to check the german version of their site. Thanks, anon!

https://www.macodirect.de/media/pdf/b4/e7/80/RI4001_Datenblatt_d.pdf

>>2982431
nice shot anon! I'd love to know where to get cheap 120 film as well.

>>2982440
>>2982433

I extended the curve a little:

30 - 3:00
60 - 10:00
1:20 - 16:40
2:00 - 35:00
3:00 - 1:15:00

>>2982435
just wanted to try canon for no real reason and found a cheap ae-1. i have plenty of point and shoots. id like to try rangefinders but im not sure on how to use one properly to be honest

>>2982435
also how is it a meme camera?

File: unbenannt (1 von 1)-36 copy-sat.jpg (3MB, 2224x3337px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2224x3337px

>>2982464
Well seems to have been rising in popularity on insta and in general in the film community. However it probably has always been popular. I shoot a lot on multiple a1's and altough it being a decent camera I found very little special about them. I can assure you the canon glass is good and the s.s.c. glass is worth the extra buck however I found that nikon made certain focal lengths I was interested in that canon didn't i.e. a pancake lens. Also focal length might be cheaper for nikon or canon. So it really depends on what you what kind of a system you won't to build up. Generally I think Nikon made more bodies to upgrade to. Especially the fm2 or n8000 were bodies I always found amazing but never went for because I was invested in the FD glass.

Anyway if you say you found a well priced ae-1 then you might as well go for it. But I don't think the shooting experience will be much different to the OM.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2224
Image Height	3337
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:13 20:20:06
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2224
Image Height	3337

File: unbenannt (1 von 1)-36 copy-sat.jpg (544KB, 890x1335px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 890x1335px

>>2982484
fml... image too big

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2224
Image Height	3337
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:13 20:21:34
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	890
Image Height	1335

>>2982484
>I don't think the shooting experience will be much different to the OM
Well youre probably right but im just trying to get another solid slr while trying a new system at the same time. My om1 and om10 died and my favorite om2 is lonely. dont give a fuck about the 10 but RIP om1. but ya i just looked up nikons on ebay and couldnt find anything as cheap as the deal i found. The ae-1 is in decent condition and goes for 20 usd with two lenses oyvey

>>2982484
>>2982485
is this paint?

>>2982489
no, its photoshop.

>>2982492
looks like when you put salt on paint for texture or whatever

>>2982493
Its sea salt drying in a little puddle.

I have also scanned salt on film thats also really neat. If you want I can try to find for you.

>>2982487
Nice. sounds like a good deal. I just found the fd-system to not be fitting my needs and when buying a new system camera I think one should always look at the system at a whole before buying. Just my 2cents. If you have questions about the system though feel free to ask.

>>2982496
sure sounds interesting

>>2982500
im not too picky on needs. manual control is a must. cheap source of lenses would be nice.

File: 8bhk5dr.jpg (4MB, 4661x6992px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4661x6992px

>>2982502
here you go. I think most of the colors must be made up by the scanner.

File: img052.png (2MB, 795x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 795x1080px

>>2982353

File: skyline.png (4MB, 1756x1080px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1756x1080px

>>2982509

>>2982507
I guess than is the ae-1 just about right. What kinda focal lengths you like to shoot?

>>2982431
Where in Colombia is that?

>>2982513
Medellin

File: 14705838_10154676592762238_10119145495569732_n.jpg (27KB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 480x320px

>>2982431
>>2982447
http://www.ebay.com/sch/Film/4201/m.html?_nkw&_armrs=1&_ipg&_from&_ssn=filmsfestival-au&_dcat=4201&Film%2520Format=120%2520Print&rt=nc&_trksid=p2046732.m1684

Cheapest on ebay afaik. I use this seller a lot

>>2982514
I was in Colombia for a month over the summer, I wish I had gone out to shoot more, except I was shitting my brains out by the second week of my stay. I was also catching up on a shit ton of family there, so I had no opportunity to check out the film scene in Bogota. Do you know if there are any darkrooms or color labs down there?

>>2982518
hm, my local dealer is even slightly cheaper. Idk what I was expecting but I read stuff about "Shanghai" films idk. Anybody knows something?

>>2982528
Sorry to hear that. I was there too only for a month but I know in bogota was a really nice camera shop with good prices and really cheap film. I'd assume they still do their own developing. The shop was close to the university in the city center. Idk the name. but same goes for Medellin there also was a really nice film store right next to the university.

>>2982387
neat!

Why are slavs so fucking dumb?
Just lost my dream camera in an ebay auction because the autist sperg slav seller forgot to add attached files, then ,when he did, he did it in a trash slav site for file hosting that goes out every 5 minutes. Fucking garbage people.

>>2982538
I'm planning for another trip hopefully next year, I'll be staying in Normandia, not too far from the University there (i can't remember the name since it was a bit of a whirlwind for me).

What's the name of the shop, I'll make it a point to check it out.

>>2982508
cool thanks anon

>>2982511
ill shoot with anything i have but 50mm is always great to have.

>>29825887
Anon, Im sorry to tell you I don't really know but you can probably just google it. I don't know any spanish so it should be easier for you to find out.

>>2982518
thanks anon

File: 51t2vcVZJ9L._SY355_.jpg (31KB, 355x355px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 355x355px

>>2982590
Np

>>2982591
Imo the 50 1.4 really is worth the money its like 50 -70 bucks I believe. I was also using a macro focussing vivitar teleconverter. The Teleconverter basically gives you a 100mm 2.8 which is great for portraits and obviously even better for macro shots. I found it not taking away much of the sharp 50mm.

>>2982511
The FDn 35mm f2 and f2.8 are both absolutely stellar lenses. I find the 50mm a bit too tight for general carry around and the 35mm just right.

File: frogblackbig.jpg (144KB, 379x567px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 379x567px

>>2982591
a shot I took with this combo.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1622
Image Height	2433
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:14 00:13:36
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	379
Image Height	567

>>2982386
>>2982387
>>2982388
Looks nice.

>>2982643
I had the 35mm f2. And it is indeed amazing >>2982431
pic related

however I ended up selling it. I'm not much of a 35mm guy. If you get, try getting the radioactive lens.

>>2982583
You mean you didn't bid on your dream camera because you're a scared cuck?
And you use this racism to divert the blame?
And let me guess, your dream camera is some $200 pleb trash?

>>2982644 <<KEK APPROVES

File: EdGWawl.png (530KB, 668x504px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 668x504px

>>2982485
I'm not sure what I'm looking at but I like it.

I've seen it my /p/. How do I know what hue shift will occur with films? I've heard fuji is cool and Kodak warm, etc. say I take a picture of a Coca Cola can outside, what's gonna happen to the red?

Currently looking for a the best wide angle f mount lens I can get for under $150. Any suggestions? I am looking for anything wider than 50mm.

>>2982721
Steal an Ai-S 28/2.8, leave $150 in the owners' letterbox.

File: IMG_4355.jpg (320KB, 1205x800px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 1205x800px

Is it just me, or is there a shitload of film action on /p/ these days?
Is the tide turning?
Are we driving back the digital hordes?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2982729
I see it coming back. It seems like every day someone is asking me about film camera, where to find them and how to get into it. I know probably five people that are getting film and film cameras for Christmas this year.

>>2982733

its really on. this year i converted 3 close friends to film and currently converting a qt into getting a thrift store p&s.

we did it reddit.

>>2982747
My girl has been wanting one for a while and I've convinced her she wants a film camera. I'm thinking about getting her a Nikon slr. probably something small like an EM. I'm thinking maybe a point and shoot though. If I speak for me and my friends, we are all videographers and filmmakers so we are constantly looking at displays and pressing buttons and going through menus; it gets cynical pretty quickly. Film just makes me so much more in the moment. I spend most of my time outside of the camera, where with a digital I'm going through menus and chimping.

File: IMG_0818.jpg (282KB, 1024x819px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1024x819px

You guys ever shot with this cutie patootie

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	819
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2982793
I wish. It it any good?

>>2982729
Have we started the fire?
Also>>2982720

>>2982797
Idk I'm gonna find out soon hopefully.

Seems pretty ideal for your artsy creepshot.

>>2982720

tell your shitty brain to rephrase that nonsense. maybe theres an actual question there.

>>2982803
I have an Olympus XA for that. I haven't gotten my hands on it because its at my home in NC, but I can't wait.

>>2982847
Yeah the XA was definitely an option for me, but the Rolleis design (especially in black) full manual operation, meter on top and 40mm/2.8 lens won out.

File: oly xa white.jpg (163KB, 1600x1062px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1600x1062px

get a load of this kino.

>>2982810
Hue shift. What's up with it and how do I know what shift is going to happen with different films

Hey I'm new to (film) photography and I'm having some problem with understanding automatic exposure in aperture priority mode.
If I have an ISO 400 film in my camera but I set it to 800, the picture will be underexposed because of shorter exposure time, right?
And if I set ISO to 100 I guess it would be overexposed?
Then how do I make really long exposures (i.e. traffic light trails) without totally overexposing my picture? Even if I set aperture to 22 it's not long enough

is there a go to half frame camera that's got a sharp fixed lens? No meter necessary.

File: canon-af35m-review-2-e1470152280863.jpg (65KB, 1080x607px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1080x607px

how decent is the canon AF35M? picked one up for cheap recently

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Aperture 3.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:02:22 22:00:23
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1998
Image Height	1122

>>2982872
Look up exposure infographic on googie.
Iso 100 is 2x less light than iso 400, 400 is half as much as 800, assuming shutter speed/ aperture unchanged

>>2982883
Noisy motherfucker

>>2982883
You literally fucking own it. What difference does it make? Go take some pictures and U tell US u retard

File: 17278551021_eec4990088_b.jpg (345KB, 800x799px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 800x799px

>>2982872
You can't do it unless you get ND filters...and depending on how your camera meters itself those might not work.

Shoot when it's darker out or use slower film like (50 or 100).

>>2982883
Isn't it too late to be asking that question? What difference does it make to what anyone tells you as you've already bought the damn thing? Go shoot with it and tell US how it performs. Not sure why you insist on posting the same question multiple times...

>>2982889

looks comfy, what camera/lens?

File: s-l1600.jpg (192KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1200x1600px

>>2982353
Anyone here has any experience with 127 film?

First time messing with it, got a good deal on a decent camera for the format.
>Revere Eye-Matic EE 127
>4 element lens
>f/2.8 to f/22
>only one shutter speed (1/100th)
>tripod mount
>hot shoe
>rangefinder
>quite rare
>only for 30 bucks

Are there any do's n don't when it comes to 127 or is it pretty much the same as 120 just smaller.

what are some good c-41 kits? like, everything needed including developing cans (?), e v e r y t h i n g.

File: 17269962475_899f03247b_b.jpg (259KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 800x800px

>>2982890
Mamiya 6, 75mm, Portra NC. Anything shot on Portra NC looks comfy.

>>2982905
except dental offices, shits grim no matter what film you use.

>mamiya 6
being a poorfag is suffering.

Is there a way to make Pentacon 6 cameras better? like putting the lens elements correctly and stuff like that? they cant be THAT bad.

Colorperfect, do I need it and where can I get a copy? What's the best way of doing negative conversations without it?

File: 17602036718_2d8540fc21_b.jpg (132KB, 666x666px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 666x666px

>>2982910
Get a cheaper 6x6 camera. Bronica, Yashica, etc etc.

>>2982912
Why bother (unless you already have one)? Save another $100-$200 and get a good 6x6er (unless you live somewhere where the above cameras are hard to find).

>>2982920

whats the best yashica 6x6 available?

i have a Pentacon, and was wondering that, if there was a way to better the lenses, i mean, they give you soft shit (even stopping down) that even an ancient folder could rape them in the ass.

>>2982465
It is SUPER popular with the Tumblr and Reddit crowd. If they shoot 35mm it's likely on an AE-1, thus this place hates it. It's honestly a solid camera and FD glass is great. Check out Minolta though as most lenses and cameras seem to be cheaper than their canon and nikon counterparts.

File: 17269895095_4d0f39b0a6_b.jpg (223KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 800x600px

>>2982465
Pro-tip: if anyone on this site calls something a meme camera...odds are ts actually quite good and worth looking into.

>>2982921
Look into 124Gs. P sure they are ~$150 mark. If you want an SLR similar to your pentacon look into Bronica SQ-A.

Does your local Wal-mart and Walgreens still do film developing?

>>2982938
Mannnnn I remember when Walmart did 120 dev + cute lil 4"x4" prints for $4...

>>2982857
There's so much love for the XA2 but people barely acknowledge the Stylus Infinity despite simply being a full automatic version with the same lens.

>>2982946
People love the XA2?

>>2982946
I always liked the infinity lens over the epic lens. somehow the rendering seemed much nicer and sharper. Might be that the programming on the mju2 simply is shitty.

>>2982949
does anyone know how the mjus make their exposure decisions? like what does it prioritize?, aperture or shutter -- etc.
ive done some googling on it and never found an answer.

File: 16647353864_a61d66c00e_b.jpg (321KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 800x533px

>>2982960
It opens up the aperture before it starts reducing shutter speed. It would rather shoot 1/125th at f2.8 rather than 1/30 at f5.6.

File: Scanning.jpg (16KB, 300x242px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x242px

This might be a long shot asking /p/ a questions like this but I figured it's worth a shot, I've always gotten pleasant surprises from this board.

Does anyone here have any personal experience with drum scanners? I'm looking at a reasonably priced Tango that comes with everything including the mounting station, the old Mac computer to run it, the software and two drums. It's been a good year and I need a tax write-off, but I know these will certainly change my workflow and there may be more to the cost that I don't see.

My understanding is that these are fairly reliable machines, but of course service is only provided by one guy in the US. I also fully expect to spend a full day mounting, scanning, and cleaning just a drum full of film. But the results will be stellar. I've been getting more and more customers wanting prints over 72" and my flatbed scans from 4x5 aren't going to cut it, and labs charge upwards of $250 for a single scan. I can't throw money like that away, but I would be happy to invest in the machine myself so I can scan what I want when I want. I already am self sufficient with E6 developing and all and want to take it further.

I understand that quality fluid for mounting is about $80 for 160 4x5's, and I know I'll need to clear out a ton of space in my small condo, but are there more maintenance issues I need to be aware of?

>>2982988
im not professional and have never used a drum scanner or anything, but i can imagine having a drum scanner in a small linving space being an eternal warfare against dust. these things are usually done in lab like enviroments with little to no textiles lying around, and easy to clean surfaces? if youre a really ocd person thats not that big of a problem though..

>>2982991
Yes, it's even a nightmare with the flatbed. Bonus with wet scanning is that it should really help with dust. I will be making a dust cover for it if I go through with it.

>>2982510
Looks great. Which film did you use?

>>2982988
I have no answer to your question, only more questions. Where would you get the scanner juice in a way that makes it a savings over $250 per image? What kind of volumes are you dealing with here?

At the same time if you can write it off entirely and/or were looking for a new toy, I say go for it.

Renting a 503CW for 3 days at then end of the month, I'll be shooting two rolls of black and white and maybe one roll of colour.
Can't find Acros in my city, probably will go with Hp5+ or Tri X for black and white. Anyone recommend a decently priced 120 colour film?

Also tips for getting the most our of the Hasselblad? Shit to know or watch our for?

>>2983027
Both of those blacks and whites are fine, but consider t-max 400 as well for long exposures and what-not (unless zouthern or something). The cheapest 400 speed colour negative film is portra 400, funnily enough, because many say it's the best stuff around. Fuji charges out the bumhole for pro 400h, but if you're fine paying like 4/5 more for slightly fuller colours, go ahead.

>>2983026
Well the scanner itself is only $5k, so at $250 per scan the payoff is only in 20 sheets, of course not including the labor time to perform the scanning but I've already considered that to be a net benefit when it comes to home developing E6 so I'm not too concerned about the extra time of drum scanning.

I shoot a couple hundred 4x5's a year and would like to achieve the best possible scans out at least a dozen or more per year, plus I have the old backlog of at least a hundred images that sell on a regular basis and people have been asking for larger sizes on many of them.

Also another question in case anyone has used one, is the learning curve really insane to operate them properly? I'm no dunce with stuff like this but people make drum scanners sound like rocket science.

>>2983041
Then the question is, would you have paid to scan those 20 sheets? If so, you'll be saving money -- of course in proportion to how valuable you'd say your time spent is, unless it's hobby time of course. But like, if you're selling prints of those scans at a rate where doing it yourself is a money-making measure and not "saving money at hobby", heck go for it. The least you'll do is report back to /p/, right?

Also, living space: presumably these things are bigger than a b&w darkroom setup in a laundry room. "Computer workstation to drive it" sounds a bit like "four square feet just for that", which is a fraction of rent and other costs. But perhaps you'll be moving into a bigger apartment soon, hm?

>>2983041
>>2982988
>in case anyone has used one, is the learning curve really insane to operate them properly? I'm no dunce with stuff like this but people make drum scanners sound like rocket science.
I haven't but I've seen some stuff passively over time. I'd take the learning curve with a pinch of salt. If you're not thick as a brick you'll probably be fine. The physical scanning process isn't that hard.
If you're the type of person who struggles to use computers or old antiquated software you may have some issues, but I'm sure there's gotta be some good resources out there on the web for you.

Sorry I can't help you more with the drum scanning part particularly but you mentioned dust (which is my enemy)
Using a dedicated scanner like this, you've already said you're going to build a dust cover for it. My Pakon had issues a tonne with dust even when I was using a cover. I found a nice solution was to use cheap PVC tape on any opening before sealing then wiping down with a damp towel before scanning. Obviously in a clean room that's been hoovered/dusted etc.

>>2983045
So far I have yet to pay for a drum scan. A guy from Flickr offered to do a few for me at no charge several years ago and the results blew my mind. I also had him do a 645 frame and the detail was damn near what I get from 4x5 on my flatbed except the shadows were cleaner. Still, for all practical reasons I decided to ignore the idea of a drum scanner. However, in the last few years I've gotten the balls and finances to print BIG (48x60") and they sell, but I only have a handful of scans that I feel comfortable printing at that size. Ones with deep shadows or things the Epson couldn't deal with area a challenge and I would like to be able to print everything in my catalog at that size if requested. So, would I pay for 20 scans at $250? Shit no, but I would certainly do them if I had the tool. Unfortunately I won't be moving into a bigger space anytime soon as I own the place and enjoy it. It's not a small space but it's a two bedroom condo with no huge darkroom area. My current darkroom is in a walk-in closet attached to a bathroom and the Jobo processor lives in the spare bathroom, the spare bedroom is the "office" with framing table and print supplies which is where this thing would live. Somehow my lady doesn't complain about that arrangement.

>>2983046
That's what I figured. Years ago I had some shitty 35mm canonscan that needed SCSI and it was dumb but I could figure it out. I can imagine the Linocolor software that comes with the Tango drum scanner won't be awesome by today's standards but I can imagine that I'd be able to drive it with some practice.

File: 7.jpg (473KB, 1000x684px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 1000x684px

So I bought a Yashica T3 off eBay which came with a roll of Fujicolor 200. I've got it developed and did some quick scans myself and it looks pretty grainy and awful. It's got loads of weird white marks and hairline streaks. Is it a badly expired film?

I scanned in some recent Portra 400 and it looks perfectly fine. Could there be anything wrong with the camera perhaps or is it just a dodgy roll of film?

Not sure what the white spots/lines are as there's no dust or dirt on the negatives.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	VueScan 9 x64 (9.2.23)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200
Vertical Resolution	1200
Image Width	1000
Image Height	684

>>2983148
thats the light coming through tiny scratches during scan i think

I need a cheap point and shoot film camera to last me for an Intro to film photography class i'm taking this semester. I only need it for this semester and plan on buying a nicer film camera once I'm full time. (not a photography major)

What do you guys recommend? Budget is max like 150

File: IMG_9979.jpg (71KB, 470x556px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 470x556px

>>2983153
Yeah but none of my other scans have those faint lines/specks. Are expired films more susceptible to that sort of thing?

This photo shows more extreme grain.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	470
Image Height	556
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2983157
mju ii

if it doesn't have to be a point and shoot the oly xa is also top tier and in your budget

File: IMG_9980.jpg (932KB, 1600x1081px) Image search: [Google]

932KB, 1600x1081px

>>2983148
>>2983158
Expired film.

Film base breaks down after it expires which is why you're seeing white spots and hairlines all over your image. It can start to fuck with the colours and will ramp up the grain as well.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1081
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2982793
that's a ladys cam

>>2983159
Is the XA 2 better than the base? I'm assuming so

>>2983027
Composing square is different. Read into square composition.

Makes sure you don't jam the camera by doing things in the wrong order. A quick Google of "hasselblad jam" should teach you what not to do.

>>2983079
Just remember that the prices charged for drum scans are more a function of the time required than the cost of the machine that does it. You're paying a skilled operator for 2.5 hours of their time, and that person is now you.
It will be slooooowwww.

>>2983157
If its an intro to film class why would they want you to get a fully automatic point and shoot defeats the purpose of learning about exposure and photography.

Your teacher will ask you to buy something with manual controls.

>>2983148
more of a case of slight scratches and dust on the film. The scratches could be from the camera or from development. Nice shot anyway. Btw is this Berlin?

>>2982988
>>2983041
>>2983079
Is that you Alex??? If so, by all means you should have a drum scanner. Don't even hesitate....get it.

>>2982793
I want one so bad. Does it have a leaf shutter?

>>2983200
Alex who?

>>2983148
M8, the white specks are absolutely dust on the film.
The line is a scratch, either from your camera, or the processor, or a speck of dust being trapped in the felt light seal of the canister and scratching the film.
More importantly, none of these things are a big deal, 30 seconds with the healing brush.
>>2983158
>Yeah but none of my other scans have those faint lines/specks
I guarantee they do, honey.
You probably just shot them in better light, or their non-expiredness gave a better response to their relative exposures.
A denser negative will show less grain and less dust than a thin one like these.
The moral of the story is to scan your film as soon as practicable after processing, and work in a clean environment.

>>2983196
I've dealt with plenty of Photo 1 students. You'd be surprised how many are thick as a brick, even when they should know better. A point and shoot is going to be fine if you want to have them understand composition. Manual Cameras will only be plenty useful when in the hands of someone with more synapses firing than a baked potato. If they aren't yet interested in what aperture and shutter speed do for photos, then it'll only result in confusing them. Granted I'm talking about non-photo/art majors. It's like teaching kids to write in pencil before pens.

>>2983196
>>2983213
Yeah, I can only imagine the number of fucked rolls you'd see teaching this shit to modern students.
Especially if you're mainly going to show them developing and printing, you're much more likely to get usable negatives from a P&S than something they'd be expected to load, wind, focus, expose, and rewind successfully themselves.

>>2982353
Best place in canada to get film? I'm guessing I don't need that pro stuff cause I'm not making poster size prints. Right?

I heard London drugs sells half decent film at good price's.

>>2983196
Oh, I've been shooting for a year already I know all of the basics and how to operate a manual camera. I just took the class for easy credits, also the lectures are literally just going through various works which I love. Really only in it for the assignments to give me some sort of structure to what i'm shooting.

>>2982484
>Dem colours and Dat details

Drooling

>>2982729
You moron, Film is dead as fuck. People are way to buse to deal with films bs. More so with the pros they just spray and pray all day on digital.

Film has always been popular with /p/ and always will time film is no longer available.

>>2983227
There's the internet and yet people still buy newspapers, or watch TV.

>>2983229
Well fuck I better buy stock for canon cause the sales for film cameras and film is fucking SKYROCKETING.......

File: DSLRScanning.jpg (455KB, 2138x795px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 2138x795px

>>2983227
>>2983231
I remember my first shitpost...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	GR
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:28 08:08:19
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	320
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	1.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2138
Image Height	795
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>2983227
>What is Instax
>What are big name companies offering alternatives to discontinued films
>What are film cameras still going for over $100 on the internet

ignore that weak bait

>>2983234

this is madness

>>2983166
the xa2 differs in a number of ways
no apature priority mode, range focus rather than rangefinder, slightly slower lens
however they go for a lot cheaper. the lens and camera is still pretty damm good and having range focus makes it incredibly easy to shoot quickly. i think both cameras have a inflated price

File: 17083691629_9fea6b9341_b.jpg (356KB, 999x999px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 999x999px

>>2983217
Where in Canada? Beau Photo in Vancouver is the bomb. 10% student discount with a valid ID too.

>>2983243
Edmonton alberta I think Mc Brian and London drugs are my best bet.

Is there a crack of Colorperfect or a free alternative anywhere? Can't really warrant spending $70 on a plugin.

>>2983395
I don't think there's any torrent/crack. Everything I've tried to download was just an .exe file which is obviously a virus.

If you know what you're doing you can make adjustments layers and create an action for each film base you're using.

>>2983199
>Berlin
Nah it's Manchester on the Metrolink. Shots like this are fun to do with the NA Scope on the T3.

File: 17269443021_d3bf72e132_b.jpg (416KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 800x800px

>>2983429
>If you know what you're doing you can make adjustments layers and create an action for each film base you're using.

This is what I do. Takes some time to get it dialed, but once you do you never have to do it again for that particular film.

Just bought a Yashica Electro 35 GSN on ebay. How fucked am I?

>>2983509

thanks for reminding me i need to sell that piece of shit.

File: 17268113462_e3c730996c_b.jpg (153KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 800x533px

>>2983509
Unless it turns out to be a bomb or mailing anthrax has become a thing again, pretty much 0% chance of getting fucked.

>>2982793
Nice lens, but a little slow. Scale focus works fine. Light meter is okay but kind of sucks in low light. Very compact and nice to carry around. Will be broken if you carry it around in your coat pocket for year and go climbing with it a lot.

>>2983509
>>2983515

>>2983515
>>2983545

Is it really that bad? I paid £40 for it, I read some good things about it elsewhere and seemed like a decent first rangefinder.

>>2983548
It's a meme camera, prone to electrical problems and fuckhuge for a rangefinder. No manual control whatsoever. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for it. Get a Minolta or something if you want a decent rangefinder without paying yourself sick.

>>2983509
>>2983545

What the actual fuck are you guys talking about? The light meter is excellent on those. The lens is excellent on those.

Are you guys thinking about some other camera? The electro 35 is a top-notch machine.

>>2983553
That's good to hear. It should be turning up today so I'm looking forward to getting my hands on it.

>>2983489
>but once you do you never have to do it again for that particular film.
This is what shatbedders actually believe, children.

The reality is that every single roll of film you develop will have a different colour balance, as will most every frame, presuming one shot per motive.
You should be adjusting every frame individually.
Just like instagram filters are basic-bitch catch-alls, so are colour correction presets.

>>2983553
The lens and light meter seem to work wonderfully, but it's fuck huge and shit to use (In My Humble Opinion).
I'd rather use any other of my cameras, but if you like it then good for you. Do you want to buy mine to keep as a spare?

File: labscan.jpg (369KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 1000x1000px

I got a cheapo TLR (rolleicord) for fun but I got impatient and rushed the first roll, Superia 400 (expired, but only last year).

Noob mistake, the one I was confident had a nice composition and exposure got fucked because I wasn't thinking and made extra exposures on it (I forgot it doesn't crank advance when you set the shutter like an slr).

Labscan because I don't think it's worth to dslr scan this roll.

>>2982371
>yay
kill yourselve

File: 000051.jpg (580KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 1000x1000px

>>2983588
I forgot a roll of C200 in a camera and so I shot some snapshits to finish it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3649
Image Height	5362
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:15 13:46:21
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000

File: 000059.jpg (262KB, 681x1000px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 681x1000px

>>2983591
Those were with a nikkor 50mm 1.8 D.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3649
Image Height	5362
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:15 13:47:17
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	681
Image Height	1000

File: 000068.jpg (384KB, 1000x681px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 1000x681px

>>2983592
There's usually not this amount of wreaths here, I forgot why there's these many.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5362
Image Height	3649
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:15 13:48:46
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	681

File: 000053.jpg (358KB, 681x1000px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 681x1000px

>>2983593
All touristy photos because I took them while giving the girls a tour.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3649
Image Height	5362
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:15 13:46:51
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	681
Image Height	1000

>>2983588
yay for Berlin

>>2983588
>>2983599

which lab in Berlin are you using?

>>2983599
>>2983600
You both in Berlin? sup

Foto Kotti, you probably know it, if not: fotokotti.de

File: 000002web.jpg (346KB, 1000x673px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1000x673px

hello, I'm the anon from last thread who developed FilmWashi S with Ilfosol 3. Scans arrived and, as I said, I'm posting some pics from that roll

1/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	673

File: 000009web.jpg (114KB, 1000x673px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1000x673px

>>2983610

2/3 I like how purple the whole thing turned out

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	673

File: 000014web.jpg (311KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 1000x1000px

>>2983612

3/3

All the shitty marks and cuts are there because of my autism in the darkroom, but I think development worked.

So Ilfosol 3 (1+19) for 13 min confirmed.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000

>>2983613
Love em. Also dat definition.

I had no idea of this "company". Now I want some 120 but
>no darkroom

I'll try some S though, it looks great.

>>2983019
Fuji 400 extra the photo above it is Kodak porta 400

>>2983613
Are you using a squeegee? If so pick up some expired photoflo off b and h .. it costs almost nothing and lasts forever.

>>2983623
uhm no, I just use my fingers ;_;

but yes I'll get some of that stuff soon

>>2983610

well that looks pretty fucking cool. i thought washi looked like ass. there is only one company selling them right?

>>2983626
they have a list of retailers on their site http://filmwashi.com/order/

>>2983630

cut your hair, filthy hippie.

>>2983633
that's not a self portrait; My girlfriend and I took photos of one another.

File: Bronica_ETR-Si_system.jpg (2MB, 3872x2592px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3872x2592px

bought a bronica etrsi as a first MF camera.

thoughts?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D80
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	690
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2008:11:02 23:04:57
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Auto, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2983630
>PNG

Why? Resize your fucking photo.

>>2982365
3d printer

>>2983654
can you explain this comment?

>>2983679
>3.37mb for a shitty pic

Why does this need explaining?

>>2982644
Kek has blessed you anon, good shot!

>>2983692
what should i make it a 1mb jpeg? who the fuck cares? 3mb is not significant in terms of data on mobile or data on a home connection... or storage space... so what was the point of this comment? Is that a thing on this board? make the image as small and shitty as possible? I dont use 1mb jpegs for photos of literal shit. You enjoy your lossy compression format that doesn't need to exist anymore.

File: Pluto 8K.jpg (5MB, 7200x7200px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 7200x7200px

>>2983709
>open this
>count seconds

File: uploads_2016_12_7_norwaystereoviews_19.jpg (379KB, 1191x1440px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1191x1440px

>>2983709
>now open this
>count seconds

>>2983712
So you can't wait literally one second to look at a photo? Don't click on it then. And I know that photo was shitty but as a general rule i upload everything at a reasonable resolution and quality so if someone did want a photo they could actually use it. You choose to do things one way i choose to do them another.
>
Your way
>
Positives: Load speed
>
Negatives: everything else.


You want me to reopen a photo and re export it as a jpeg every time i think about posting on p because your network can't load 3mbs in an reasonable amount of time?

File: IMG_9456.jpg (586KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 960x640px

>>2983716
Read the rules.

Imagine if every website had full resolution images and didn't compress them and use the correct file type. It would be a terrible browsing experience.

Learn the compress and optimise images and stop being a lazy cunt. There's no need for it to be a PNG. It doesn't have transparency and it isn't flat/low colour artwork.

Stop being a fucking idiot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	960
Image Height	640
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2983716
Wait, why would save it as a png in the first place you faggot?

No camera or scanner I've ever used outputs as pngs.

>>2983668
Yeah but I don't know where to find the blueprint for it...

File: Film v Digi01.jpg (173KB, 693x960px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 693x960px

It's been a while since we've done some film vs. digital shitposting. By accident I shot 2 very similar snapshits with both film and digital, so I thought I'd share.

Digital: a6000, ISO100, Lens Turbo 2, Minolta MD 50/1.4 @ f5.6, Capture One 10.

Film: Minolta XD-11, Minolta MD 50/1.4@ f5.6, Kodak Ultramax 400, self developed in Kodak Flexicolor chems, scanned with a6000 and Micro-Nikkor 55/3.5 @ f8, hand inverted in Capture One 10.

Disclaimer: I'm not trying to make any claims as to which is superior. I shoot both film and digital and will continue to do so.

My takeaway: At web sized resolutions, the differences in detail are negligible. Ultramax 400 did better than I would have expected vs a6000 at ISO 100. When printing large or cropping heavily, the a6000 pulls ahead by a substantial margin. The film handles the specular highlights much more gracefully. The digital workflow is far easier. But I enjoy playing with chemicals and inverting/processing.

Questions?

100% crop to follow.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Insane
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Film v Digi02.jpg (268KB, 1421x960px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1421x960px

>>2983752

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Insane
Image-Specific Properties:

>>2983559
You dumbass, I'm talking about how to go from a dslr scanned neg to a mostly color corrected image. Obviously fine tuning is required, but getting actions dialed on for each emulsion gets your image 90% there with 1 click.

File: IMG_20161216_002105.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

developing rn :3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Exif Software Version 1.0.2.0
Camera Model	GT-I9300
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Width	3264
Image Created	2016:12:16 00:21:05
Image Height	2448
Unique Image ID	ZDFI02
Exposure Time	1/17 sec
ISO Speed Rating	500
F-Number	f/2.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Brightness	-0.6 EV
Color Space Information	sRGB
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	2448
Image Width	3264
Focal Length	3.70 mm
Flash	No Flash

>>2983753
much more comfy on film.

>>2983752
>>2983753
This is the opposite of shitposting.
Shows what skillful scanning can achieve even with basic bitch film.
Surprised at how sharp the menelta is through that chinese garbage adapter.
I'd be editing it for less red and magenta and more contrast, but that's just me.

>>2983613
>>2983612
>>2983610
What a fucking hero. How were they scanned? This looks completely different from every other example I've seen so far.
>>2983625
pls remove the sand from your fingers. I use my fingers too and never scratch. Is this something that only happened with this emulsion or is it common? You can always try some dish soap on regular film if you run out of photoflo
>>2983651
Return it and buy the superior SQ.
It's actually pretty gud for 645. You made a bretty gud choice senpai. Make sure to get that sexy as fuck speedgrip if you can.
>>2983709
Your photo isn't made better just because it's bigger m8, this isn't like shooting a larger film stock.
>>2983716
>i upload everything at a reasonable resolution and quality so if someone did want a photo they could actually use it.
Who the fuck wants to do what with your photos? Like seriously, who the fuck is demanding that they make a print as big as their wall?

>>2983752
>The film handles the specular highlights much more gracefully
yeye, about sums it up.
>>2983764
good luck senpai

>>2983766
>I'd be editing it for less red and magenta and more contrast, but that's just me.

>I'd be editing it for less red and magenta and more contrast, but that's just me.

I tried to leave things neutral for the sake of comparison. What you see is pretty much how Capture One rendered the digital shot, white balance set in camera to daylight. I processed the film shot to somewhat match. If it was to my taste the blacks would have been crushed.

File: IMG_20161216_004247.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

i fell for the mamiya meme

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Exif Software Version 1.0.2.0
Camera Model	GT-I9300
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Image Width	3264
Image Created	2016:12:16 00:42:48
Image Height	2448
Unique Image ID	ZDFI02
Exposure Time	1/17 sec
ISO Speed Rating	320
F-Number	f/2.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Brightness	0.1 EV
Color Space Information	sRGB
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Image Height	2448
Image Width	3264
Focal Length	3.70 mm
Flash	No Flash

>>2983775
I am about to fall for it. How is it going?

>>2983753
this doesnt really mean anything considering its obvious you forget to zero the digital picture. there is luminance reduction and standard sharpening applied which make a hell of a difference when you change that

super new question, what would be a convenient place to get my film developed?

CVS type places?

>>2983778
Both Images shot/scanned with a6000. Both ARW's processed with Capture One at the same default settings. The only adjustments are levels and color balance.

>>2983780
They all send it out now. Honestly do it yourself. If you are doing color 135 or 120 film just get a Paterson and a c-41 press kit to start off. If you are doing black and white photographers formulary has really great chemicals to get you started although the process is a little less straightforward.

>>2983777
i love shooting with it, photos look fantastic and the viewfinder is godly however my memeya is broken (I'm not sure if it's the body or the film back) and I get 4-5 pics instead of 16

>>2983786
are you shooting in aperture priority mode? do you have an rb or rz?

>>2983796
That's a 6x4.5 neg senpai.
>>2983786
If you're only using the one back and not removing it, this shouldn't really be happening. Especially if you're not fucking around with the MLU/Double exposure.

Have you checked to make sure the shutter is firing reliably? The cloth shutters are known to not be 100% reliable.

>>2983769
>how were they scanned
A lab did it, I don't know the exact model of the scanner they use, I just know that it's fuji and it's huge. I will investigate.

>fingers and scratches
I don't think fingers were the main problem with this roll, the film literally got stuck into the developing tank and I scratched and bent it while trying to fix it. I'll try not to fuck up next time. I'll try dish soap too, thank you for the advice.

>>2983796
645 super

>>2983798
I have only one film back. basically the shutter mechanism or whatever else blocks after six exposures but only if there's film inside the back. I have to open the film back to 'reset' it

Delta 3200 at EI3200 in HC-110. Dil. A or B? A takes less than 10 minutes, B more; also eats up twice as much syrup. Seems like a no-brainer, right... But what's the effect on contrast, grain, speed, etc.?

>>2982793
yeah it was terrible

>>2982895
>decent camera
dude that's a piece of shit
why would you want to shoot 127? no one devs it and you have to spool it yourself
if you actually wanted a good 127 get a baby rolleiflex

>>2983785
>a Paterson, what is?

>>2983828
explain I just bought one lol

>>2982721
series e 28mm, 35mm f2.8 ai

File: s-l1600.jpg (148KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1200x1600px

>>2983830
Oh finally, an anon that cares kek
though no else would reply
Well Darkroom is the only place that can develop it
I already have many prepaid mailing slips from them
So getting the photos is super easy from them.
just gotta wait.
On Ebay there's a group called ezoxcrop that strictly makes 127 film. Both in color and monochrome
They sell for a reasonable price.
Aside that, the eye matic is of course not the golden arch of 127
However, its more of a bronze.
Think about.
There are 100s of 127 camera with one len, fixed shutter, and only one poor aperture.
The only best ones are the Baby and the Yashica 44
But then I saw this, rare, unique piece
yea it doesnt have many shutter speeds but hey
huge ass aperture setting
rangefinder, one a 127film camera, never seen that
and flash sync, only 30 bucks
fuck that, im taking it, thats a steal kek.

File: 20161216_002.jpg (956KB, 3264x1840px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 3264x1840px

What am I in for? Is this some rebranded stock or what?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Jolla
Camera Model	Jolla
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72
Vertical Resolution	72
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Exposure Time	2/25 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
ISO Speed Rating	640
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.22 mm
White Balance	Auto

>>2983981
There is not a single background info on this film. If that's the cast, enjoy being the first person to use it. Post it on here or Flick.

File: 1472084407925.gif (384KB, 474x354px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 474x354px

>>2983984
kek *case

>>2983984
>>2983986
https://www.lomography.com/films/871957330-wizen-xpro-400/photos
literally first result on google

>>2983990
Wasn't the first for me, but dam that's still a small set. There should be more pictures with this film.

>>2983990
As if puke-inducing photos taken on fundamentally broken cameras by Lomofags is any indication of film performance.

>>2983993
Thats a big assertion m8

>>2983710
Two seconds on my mobile device

>>2983999
Trips confirm

>>2983993
Ironically it usually is the best indication.
They usually straight up dump unedited lab scans (because what is post, what is editing, this is feelm xD after all!) whereas flickr samples although greatly tagged and high quality/resolution are way more often cropped/heavily edited in post. It makes for good photography but bad film characteristic sampling.

>>2983710
16s

How should I shoot Portra 800 on 35mm? I've heard some people say that they shoot it at 640 or lower.

I'm mostly gonna be shooting around Tokyo at night, if that's any help

>>2984009
Rating it at 640 is probabky a good idea, as all c41 gets grainer when underexposed. Grab some Natura 1600 once you're here to get a bit more speed. 3 packs are ~¥2400

>>2984012
Noted, I'll give that a shot.

I plan on stocking up on some japan only emulsions while I'm there. I shoot film pretty slowly so some 400h and Superia Premium and Natura 1600 should last me ages

>>2984014
400H is really underrated. Everyone totally overlooks it while jacking off to Portra.

>>2984017
Agreed, it's a lovely film. A bit expensive for most people though, B&H has it for $10.49 for a 35mm roll, vs $6.49 for a roll of Portra 400.

I hardly ever fuck with 'professional' emulsions since I feel like my photos don't really ever qualify for such a thing, but it'll be nice to shoot some better quality stuff after Japan

what happens if I don't shake while developing in r09

>>2984002
>implying lab scans aren't maxed out sharpness, grain removal, saturation and contrast
>implying lomofags don't shoot on garbage cameras with garbage lenses that expose incorrectly and deliver mangled colors and contrast

>>2984108
y u mad tho
>>2984107
you might have airbubbles stuck to the film.
if you don't agitate however, you'll have to increase dev time and you'll get a less contrasty negative with sharp object edges, boosted shadows and big ugly bromide drag smudges. Google "rodinal stand development

File: F1000032.jpg (527KB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1840x1232px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SLP1000SE
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER340-3.0-0E-518
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:15 11:00:51
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1232

File: F1010013.jpg (632KB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 1840x1232px

>>2984149

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SLP1000SE
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER340-3.0-0E-518
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:15 11:04:05
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1232

File: F1030025.jpg (592KB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

592KB, 1840x1232px

>>2984153
I love shooting cons

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SLP1000SE
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER340-3.0-0E-518
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:15 11:17:29
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1232

>>2984162
>>2984153
>>2984149
really need a sharp lens for that film. you obv did not

>>2984165
Was wide open at f1.8 and something like 1/60 on the shutterspeed.

It' as sharp as it'll go. And a shit bloody scan

>tfw developed rollei 400 in R09 fomadon
>pics look like covered in sand
kill me

>>2984210
post example

File: EIK400C11 10.jpg (752KB, 871x1280px) Image search: [Google]

752KB, 871x1280px

>>2984210
>tfw developing BW 400CN in Rodinal

File: image1.jpg (2MB, 1958x2648px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1958x2648px

>>2984230
help me kurwo

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1958
Image Height	2648

>>2984260
all I can see here is a bit of dust. it IS a photo of old concrete, honestly no clue where you got the covered in sand bit from.

>>2984234
>>2984260
>>2984162
>>2984153
>>2984149
you faggots are ironically the people who talk shit about digital noise

>>2984210
How was your temp?

>>2984260
Yeah, that's about expected from TX in r09. Looks fine to me. If the grain bothers you that much, shoot 100 speed, use T-grain film, or get you a modern developer like HC-110 or knock-off equivalent.

Don't mind the individual grains, by the way. They're still communicating detail, texture, and tonality.

>>2984153
this is very nice

>>2984299
I measured it with my finger because I broke the thermometer time ago... probably that's the cause

>>2984278
no I'm not

I used to get clear pictures also on rollei 400 dev in fomadon r09, using the same camera. maybe my dev tank is somewhat broken or I don't shake it properly.

File: 1.jpg (2MB, 1453x1024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1453x1024px

Snapshits taken on Agat 18k

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.50.008 (160222)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1453
Image Height	1024

File: 2.jpg (1MB, 1453x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1453x1024px

>>2984576

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.50.008 (160222)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1453
Image Height	1024

File: 3.jpg (1MB, 1453x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1453x1024px

>>2984577

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.50.008 (160222)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1453
Image Height	1024