CC PLEASE

File: X1009345.jpg (477KB, 1000x542px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 1000x542px

2/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:29
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1009293.jpg (701KB, 783x1000px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 783x1000px

3/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:25
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1009289.jpg (408KB, 1000x551px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1000x551px

4/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:23
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1009275.jpg (254KB, 1000x519px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 1000x519px

5/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:21
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1009152.jpg (640KB, 704x1000px) Image search: [Google]

640KB, 704x1000px

6/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:07
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1009256.jpg (444KB, 674x1000px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 674x1000px

7/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:18
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1009201.jpg (393KB, 1000x620px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 1000x620px

8/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:10
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1008647.jpg (239KB, 1000x384px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1000x384px

9/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:18:22
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1009036.jpg (743KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

743KB, 1000x664px

10/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:18:54
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2981944
>>2981948
>>2981952
improperly exposed badly composed
garbage
>>2981963
underexposed but you might have been able to make it into something with careful exposure and postprocessing. it looks like your foreground is totally lost though
>>2981943
I kinda like this one, the colors are cool and it's got a flippant, funny attitude. probably my fave
>>2981946
>>2981954
>>2981960
these are cute in a new top kind of way. if you know what you're doing, great. if you were trying to make a conventional landscape, you failed miserably. I kinda like >>2981946. in >>2981960
the shadows are too dark. >>2981954 mostly feels unbalanced.
>>2981966
this one doesn't work for me. ending diagonals on corners doesn't usually look as good as you'd think.
>>2981956
see above. good pose but the composition is crummy, the overexposed sky looks awful. you might be able to crop it, like a square crop with him towards the bottom left ending right above the mountain would be kinda punk

>>2981979
I agree about the square crop of the one with the guy, I have another version of it with that crop

>>2981979
>I kinda like this one, the colors are cool and it's got a flippant, funny attitude. probably my fave
>flippant
>funny attitude

its literally someones back doing nothing, whats wrong with you.

>>2981943
two thing i hate with this photo;
1) the black thing in the sky, what is that a plane?
2) TUCK THE HOOD BACK IN

>>2981979
>>>2981944
>>>2981948
>>>2981952
>improperly exposed
do you think the use of a polarizing filter would help here?

meh

These are ok. I like the first one best.

>>2981979
>>2981990

>funny attitude
>would be kinda punk
>punk
>punk
>punk
>p
>u
>n
>k

when will you just stop?

>>2982398
he is the only one giving CC

Last bump on these. Shall i sell my camera or what?

>>2983089
Not sure what you want to hear. They are nothing special apart from the fact that you have increased to contrast so much that third of each image is flat black and the rest has unusually oversaturated colors. Composition could be worse but isn't good enough to save the photos.

>>2983091
yes, thanks.

And which is the least shit one?

>>2982005
No. You need hard / soft grad filters (depending on scene) to even out the exposure or ettr more if your sensor can handle it.

>>2983089

look, friendo, im gonna tell you whats one of your problems. its called "le lightroom faec XD", it comes when you see ALLLLL those options on the damn program and you want try them all. result: eye stabbing colors and aggresive contrast.

get photoshop and try a more minimal approach to pp, do just whats needed to emphasize stuff worth noting.

your other problem is you lack visual literacy, your composition is superbad. see good photogs, buy used photobooks, learn.

>>2983120
Fair to a point, totally agree ont he slider mania but I disagree about the composition. On the landscape ones, fair enough, that's not my interest really. But I think 1, 2, 4 have pretty good comp

>>2983124

are you the OP?

>>2981943
how did you edit the first one

>>2981943
What type of film did you use OP?

>>2983205
I assume you're being sarcastic?

>>2983197

Increased contrast, lowered blacks, not much else. It was a .jpg straight from the x100s.

>prepares for mountain of shit which happens every time i mention I shoot with an x100s