how to make photos look like this

>>2981554
Macro lens
Good lighting
Maybe a touch of HDR?

>>2981554
revv up that saturation slider

maybe selective saturation on yellows.
looks like a cheap macro extension based on the CA and edge flatness

I assume I cannot do such things with my smartphone 5mpx cam?

>Wide aperture so there's a small depth of field aka "bokeh"
>Fuck around with clarity/vibrancy/saturation

>>2981563
did you turn the camera on?

>>2981563
Hm. Maybe with proper digital post? But generally nah.

If you're actually interested, it's time to get a MILC/DSLR, macro lens and -also important- a flash. That shine comes from diffuse light.

>>2981572
a wide aperture is never gonna give up enough dof when going up close like that, senpai bro

File: watch-2.jpg (48KB, 288x192px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 288x192px

>>2981554
photo shop elements and lightroom can do it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:17:33
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2981563
yes you can, there's nothing special about the photos you posted except for the lighting

>>2981555
>>2981557
>>2981717
How can we tell apart a picture made with a macro lens from a picture made with a normal lens and an extension tube?

looks like shit, why would you want anything to look like that?

>>2983443
You probably can't. A macro lens would probably be sharper because using a lens on an extension tube usually doesn't as good results, but the difference wouldn't obvious unless you're using a total potato lens or really shitty extension tubes. Every other aspect of the photo like depth of field or whatever would be the same, though, if that's what you're asking.

But for actually taking the photo, the macro lens would be a lot less tedious to use since it would have all the conveniences of a lens designed for macro usage and you wouldn't need to fuck around with attaching tubes and finding the amount of extension that you want for your photo.

>>2983472
Thx senpai

>>2981554
That CA...