Do scenes like this rustle /p/'s johnsons?

>>2979950
your portraits don't come out looking that good sooc? git gud, son

>>2979950
no?

why are you watching a movie with zac effron?

>>2979964
Zacs the man

What's wrong anon, why are you triggered?

>>2979971
>entry-level dx
>kit lens
>subject is like 3 feet away
>photo on lcd has post applied
>massive bokeh
>no closeup face distortion
WEW
E
W

>>2979950
nice bokeh for a kit lens.

>>2980268
So you get triggered when a car rolls and explodes in an action movie?
Cmon fambulance

>>2980268

so learn how to SOOC JPG before you cringe

>>2980308
yes because learning how to sooc jpeg will clearly transform my kit lens to a massive FF 85 1.4mm baby. Fuck off.

>>2980307
/o/ gets triggered though

>>2980268
>buy entry level body
>set camera to bokeh monster zoom setting (55mm/85mm eqv)
>stand really close to the subject to achieve minimum focus distance
>expose properly
>watch as background is blown out more than OP's ass is on a Saturday night
>set a nice subtle jpeg profile
W E W
E
W

I mean, there's other things you could get triggered over, but sure. screencap this scene, start a thread on /p/ and cry because you're le ebin studio photographer with a 500px page full of only naked women. Just because you can't use a kit lens, doesn't mean that others who know what they're doing can't get anything out of a kit lens ,';^)

>>2979950
>>2980268
>nigger never heared about fresnel lenses
wew

>>2979950
AdobeRGB? noice bruh

How did he get that bokeh with a kit lens?

He didnt, thats how.

File: outdoors3.jpg (341KB, 1339x836px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 1339x836px

>>2980572
when you're older and don't have so many hamfisted understandings of photography you'll realize 55mm 5.6 on crop has bokeh.

Was it taken with the kit lens? No, it was added to the camera in post, a video camera recording the back of the camera would produce visual artifacts.

Could it have been? Yes, it the photographer is competent and minds their background choice and distance from subject to background as well as subject to camera.

The photo was likely taken with a camera that had its batteries in and wasn't just from the prop department. But that doesn't mean the amount of bokeh is exceptional beyond what a kit lens could produce in the right settings. It just means you're a fucking gearfag that needs to lurk more.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Nora Tarvus
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	100 dpi
Vertical Resolution	100 dpi
Image Created	2015:02:08 13:32:08
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1339
Image Height	836
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2980373
>watch as background is blown out more than OP's ass is on a Saturday night

heh

>>2980579
>Could it have been?
>No

fixed that for you

File: 8412269_f496.jpg (36KB, 496x331px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 496x331px

>>2980584
the attached photo is 5.6 at 55mm on crop and has a similarly thin DOF.

You're probably too visually illiterate to realize that uniform leaves (op photo) simply blend into smoother OOF areas than do sticks.

>>2980589
doesn't really matter, the asshole still cropped her head.

Got so pissed he uses some cheap ass Nikon, not a Leica. Film of course, as digital is pleb as fuck.

Man if something as minor as that pisses you off, you probably have an aneurysm when they do that "zoom 10x, enhance by 5, print me a 8x10 of that" shit in crime shows.

>>2980773
>you probably have an aneurysm when they do that "zoom 10x, enhance by 5, print me a 8x10 of that" shit in crime shows.
I don't. An 8x10 is smaller than a 10x zoom of a 36x24mm negative ;^)
Enhance by 5 is just you undercooking the print a little.

>>2980773
I don't even know why you'd ask for a print of something when you can just view it on a tablet nowadays at the super secret detective base or crime scene

>>2979950
I'm just annoyed he's not using a SONY

>>2980782
>be detective on your last week on the job
>the presidents evil twin has stolen the nuclear launch codes
>you're standing in the same room as the launch console and the president and his brother are fighting it out while you take on the henchmen
>bad goon #4 whacks you with a baseball bat causing you to fall down
>screen breaks/device fails and now you can't confirm the image
>your alcohol addled detective brain desperately tries to remember which one's the real president
>They're identical twins but one of them has a unique identifiable feature
>stare down at your broken screen and scream while emptying your magazine into one of the twins
>you shot the president
>good fucking job
>the president's evil twin brother launches the nukes and your family is dead
IF ONLY YOU HAD A FUCKING PHOTO IN YOUR JACKET POCKET THEN YOU'D KNOW THE EVIL TWIN HAD A BEARD
Fucking millenials

>>2980790
Isn't sony trash that still hasn't come up to standards though? I mean I guess they're alright for scenic photos but you can't really use it to photograph people.

>>2980579
>the watermark phase

>>2980792
>noice

File: 20161015_233206_Richtone(HDR).jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

idk if it's ignorance or artful trolling.
(Archer, netflix)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Camera Software	P605XXUCNF2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:15 23:32:06
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Focal Length	3.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Unknown

>>2980776
fucking bladerunner

>>2980579
god damn it. if only that watermark wasn't on the photograph. i totally would've stolen that shit tier image as my own.

rats.

>>2984344
>being so insecure that you attack the watermark of a photo anon found on google to illustrate a point about shallow dof and kit lenses
Not even self-aware are you?

>>2984346
>goes onto 4chan and is surprised to find someone making fun of a watermark on the photography board

Relax, everyone goes through the watermark phase, it is nothing to be ashamed of.