Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: IMGP0757.jpg (907KB, 1920x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
907KB, 1920x1280px
This is my first thunder!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software K-50 Ver. 1.02 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:11:26 00:38:04 Exposure Time 30 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1920 Image Height 1280 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Distant View
>>
maybe too soft...
>>
>>2976322
>What do you think?
Well I don't think that's thunder m8
>>
>>2976331
what do you think of this lightning bolt?
>>
>>2976322
It's pretty shitty in just about every regard. There's really no redeeming quality to this photo at all.
It's a shitty , uninteresting lightning bolt. The bolt is the key to these shots, and this one is boring as fuck.
80% of this shot is absolutely nothing. Literally, it's just black. It's fucking wasted space here. You don't have to fill up every corner of a frame, but this is just nothingness with no purpose.
Not a damn thing is in focus.
The foreground shit is fucking nothing. It's just a jumbled, poorly exposed, shiity colored corner of a building. It's not interesting in any way. It doesn't add anything to the photo.
There is no thought to composition or framing or anything like that.
That distortion is fucking garbage.
This is a fucking train wreck. That doesn't mean you can't learn, but don't kid yourself on this shot. It's garbage.
>>
>>2976322
Do you live near the Twilight Zone?
>>
>>2976393
what?
>>
>>2976322
Congratz on you lucky snap.
For starters, it's very badly exposed, blurry and the lightning is very uninteresting to begin with.
Now keep practicing.
Then come back.
>>
>>2976405
>Congratz on you lucky snap.
Lightning shots are anything but luck if you know what you're doing. It's more staged and methodical than most shit. As long as you've got a storm, any competent photographer should be able to get solid lightning shots.
>>
>>2976405
Thanks! :)
>>
>>2976322
set aperture to 11 iso 100 take two or three snaps to adjust exposure. Grab lawn chair and beer, enjoy the show, occasionally trigger shutter.
>>
>>2976347
jesus.
>>
File: cropped shitty lightning.jpg (176KB, 1751x917px) Image search:
[Google]
176KB, 1751x917px
If I can get this on my phone camera you have no excuse but to do better
>>
Lightning Thread i guess..
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 7D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Photographer Cybermtl Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:12:01 17:46:15 Exposure Time 2 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2976331
lol fuck i didnt com here for a lugh but damn
Thread posts: 16
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3