The first real digital Leica is coming soon!

>>2972530
>dat shooped label
>dat hilariously janky looking mockup
Fuck you fanboys are thirsty. It's some chinese forum member making shit up to grow his epeen, not a "leak".

I'm still waiting to find a used M8 under $1,000

I want one of those

Oh ya, this is what I was waiting for. They're going to price it sensibly right? They're not gonna fuck up and make the ISO dial the same as the shutter speed dial, right?
More importantly, is it going to push the limits of X sync?

>>2972535
The iso dial is the "film rewind" on the left shoulder of the camera.

>>2972530
Feels like this will be yet another overpriced, underwhelming digital Leica.

File: model.png (83KB, 275x191px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 275x191px

>>2972531

>>2972530
Leica can fuck off.

>24MP sensor

Only 5 years behind then.

Wait hold on.
>The first real digital Leica

Were the previous iterations not purely digital?

>>2972622
They weren't real cameras.

File: 1378075701079.jpg (48KB, 600x489px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 600x489px

>a THIN digital Leica(!)
>modern sensor noise (or lack thereof)
>ISO dial finally
This is basically a perfect Leica M.
With the way Leica seems to have been reorganizing and rethinking its strategy recently, it's not too crazy to expect a somewhat affordable price.too.

>>2972557
12 is enough, 24 is a shit ton, and anything more is just silly.

>>2972557
you do a lot of wall sized printing?

>>2972702
>>2972706
It's good for editing (finer edges, odd transitions in HSL / tonemapping / tone curve / selection get smoothed out when scaled down) and cropping and noise reduction (water color smear of a constant radius is less noticeable on a bigger image).

Rarely will you have a use for a massive image as an end result, but in the pipeline it's handy.

>>2972706
Do you shoot a lot of sports? Do you take thousands of photos of heron catching fish? Then you don't need a Leica M

>>2972630
U wot m8?

>>2972530
>no autofocus
>still costs more than an x-pro2

Must be Leica.

>>2972835
>Fuji
>autofocus

The real king of digital rangefinders was made by a printer and copier company.

File: 1321682378992.jpg (79KB, 555x557px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 555x557px

>>2972842
>fetishizing the rd-1

It's not as good as you think it is

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2011:10:05 18:43:02
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	555
Image Height	557

>>2972842
>>2972835

You'd be better off with a Sony.

At least you can autofocus Leica lenses on the Sony.

>>2972845
>At least you can autofocus Leica lenses on the Sony.
Wait, waht?

>>2972853

>http://techartpro.com/

It is not perfect, but it is damn good.

>>2972853
tl;dr -- M-mount lenses have a very short travel between infinity and half-ish meter, so it's possible to set the lens at infinity and then move the adapter back and forth. This works because Sony's native mount is really shallow.

File: Your_whore_mouth.gif (411KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 400x225px

>>2972843
The RD-1 is god and you know it

>>2972997
It's good and certainly unique but it's hardly god

If you build it up to be something it's not you'll just end up disappointing yourself

>>2972842
>The real king of digital rangefinders was made by a printer and copier company.
You mean Canon?

>>2973025
>I said no survivors!

File: rd11.jpg (175KB, 676x508px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 676x508px

>>2973008
granted the sensor is 12 years old now, a better digital rangefinder has never been made.
the Voigtlander Bessa was a great choice to base the camera on. Leica needs to understand that digital bodies are basically disposable now and don't need to be built to last for 50-100 years like the M3, M2, and MP.
If they released a FF RD2 with proper micro-lenses for wide (ie not the A7 sensor), it would be fucking awesome and a true Leica killer

>>2973791
the RD1 wasn't full frame you stupid posing faggot

>>2973793
He didn't say that you illiterate faggot. He said IF they would release a full frame version. For christ's sake everyone on this board is a shit posting buffoon.

File: reading-lessons.jpg (20KB, 300x199px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 300x199px

>>2973793
seriously, reading lessons

I really would like to see something innovative from Leica again. That's just kinda boring really. The Q is cool, more stuff like that.

>>2973793
Illiterates like you are the reason the orange guy from the celebrity apprentice has the nuke codes.

Fuck you.

Is this going to cost as much as a car again, just like the SL?

>>2973860
Trump is actually the one candidate who is endorsed by most of the generals in the army and admirals in the fleet. They are all great men who loves their country.

Don't let the leftist media scare you with their fear mongering.

50mm Q when?

>>2973860

>typing to an illiterate

Who's the idiot now?

>>2973983
42.1mp Apo-Summicron-Q

>>2974037
Price: 25000 USD.

>>2973791
I agree, I would buy that in a heartbeat, no matter the price

>>2972535
>Leica
>sensible pricing
What a world that would be.

>>2974002
>Who's the idiot now?
You typed to this idiot who was typing to illiterate therefore you?
/snaps photo.

>>2976013

You're lucky I can't read any of this shit.