Bellow Camera

File: 20161123_181929.jpg (2MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5312x2988px

>>2970442
another shot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G920F
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5312
Image Height	2988
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:23 18:27:46
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/1.9
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Brightness	1.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash
Focal Length	4.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5312
Image Height	2988
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	A16LLIC08SM A16LLIL02GM_

File: 20161123_181938.jpg (2MB, 2988x5312px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2988x5312px

>>2970442
the back.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G920F
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5312
Image Height	2988
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:23 18:27:44
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/1.9
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Brightness	1.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash
Focal Length	4.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2988
Image Height	5312
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	A16LLIC08SM A16LLIL02GM_

If you're asking these kind of questions you really shouldn't be using this kind of camera OP, with all due respect.

>Can I expect to take decent pictures with it ?
maybe ... if you are a decent photog
>Can I change the lens ?
not easily
>Is this one good ?
sure in 1920
>What should I search for ?
don't know what you mean here
>Can I build (or buy) an adapter for others lenses ?
probably but don't know why you would

>>2970456
I can't say if I'm decent photograph, but I like my analog pictures to be sharp and I had one time a 6x9 camera which was shit. But I think (and hope) this one would be ok.

Btw the lens can be change very easily, it's just a thread... like M39 or M42...

When I asked what should I search for, I meant for the lenses on ebay or else, do those kind of lens has a reference ? Also like m39/LTM , M42, EF-mount ? Those kind of reference ?

And I wonder if I can buy or build an adapter maybe to use others lenses on this camera, don't know if this is a good idea or impossible to do.

>>2970465
not implying that this camera is a 6x9, just saying that I know that size doesn't always mean quality/shap picture.

>>2970452
what do you mean ? I shouldn't want to know things about this camera ?

>>2970465
>I like my analog pictures to be sharp
this will not be the camera for you, you should probably try to find something made after 1970. about all those old cameras are good for are arty, ghostly, ephemeral shit.

>I meant for the lenses on ebay or else, do those kind of lens has a reference ?
no. the shutter mounts were not standard, you could measure it and compare to copal sizes and go from there. but you probably don't have enough bellows to do anything with the camera was designed for the lens it has.

lastly about the bellows, you probably want to fix the holes unless you are looking for that arty, ghostly, ephemeral shit.

>>2970473
Well, I still think that I will like the pictures. And hope/think the pictures will be sharp enough.

Also, What do you mean by fix the holes? the bellow doesn't have any holes, why did you assume there was any ?

File: 1479922162440.jpg (2MB, 2988x5312px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2988x5312px

>>2970477
one right here ... probably one in every corner fold too

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G920F
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5312
Image Height	2988
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:23 16:12:56
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/1.9
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/1.9
Brightness	1.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash
Focal Length	4.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2988
Image Height	5312
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	A16LLIC08SM A16LLIL02GM_

>>2970576
yeaaaah, that's not a hole. That's a thing fixed outside.
And not, already checked, no holes. Funny how you like REALLY assumed that's this cameras had holes. Did you have a problem with one in the past ?

That's a 4x5 folder, at least it appears to be, I need something on the back for reference but it appears to be 4x5. There's a backplate that attaches to the back of the camera that should have a huge piece of dull looking glass, that's how you focus and that's where the film holder goes. You have to load the film into a film holder in a darkroom. Once the film is in the film holder, emulsion side out, you then open the shutter on the B or T setting and hold it open with a shutter cord or the shutter's internal mechanism (T) focus the image through the ground glass under a dark cloth, once you're satisfied with the composition you then insert the film holder, close the shutter, set your exposure on the shutter and pull the darkslide and expose the film. Replace the darkslide but flip it so you know it has been exposed, one side of the darkslide handle will be dark for unexposed the other side light or unpainted for exposed.

That lens is not bad. Rodenstock 135, sharp when stopped down like most lenses of the time. Compur shutter should be good, all the parts are there for a good LF setup.

Look up how to use a large format camera. There's tutorials online and videos on Youtube The lenses are widely available and will set you back anywhere from 50 USD to 5000 USD or more. Your shutter and lens combo isn't easily removable at least I don't think it is. The lens screws off for cleaning and there's another element behind the shutter. Check the speeds for the shutter and register on Large Format Forum they have a lot more knowledgeable people there who have dealt with this type of camera, only a handful of us including myself have experience with these.

If the lens has fog in it you may want to get it cleaned those old elements usually just unscrew apart and they can be cleaned with isopropyl alcohol and a fine cloth.

Film, you will want to look up freestylephoto.biz they have the film for it if it's 4x5. I think they have 6x9 sheet film too if that's the size.

>>2971911
Thanks !

Actually it's a 9x12cm but it's really close to 4x5... :)
I think 9x12 is kind of our european 4x5...

I tried to remove the combo/shutter lens, but it appears to be quite difficult...
Like I really can turn it, but I can't remove it...

I found a combo Compur(shutter)/Carl Zeiss(lens) on catawiki, but since I don't know how to remove the shutter, maybe I won't but it...

Ok, so Rodenstock 135 isn't that bad. Good :) Can't wait to test it.

>>2971844
For good measure shine a light on the inside of the bellows to check for any pinholes, then patch them up.