What about Pentax K20d?

what about gear thread and why not spend a bit of extra rupiah on K5?

File: too-old.jpg (23KB, 500x371px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x371px

>>2967363

Pentax is fucking garbage for children

get a proper camera like a Canon 60d or 5d mark IV

>>2967363
get k1 except there's no lenses. fml why does pentax even try? everything they do is halfassed.

>>2967448
My brain confused "Halfassed" with "Hassleblad"

what about it?

File: lens_lab_img.png (692KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

692KB, 1000x563px

>>2967431
(you)

>>2967448
>http://k-1-lab.com/en/
>no lenses
>not including the hundreds of excellent manual lenses
You're an idiot and a gearfag if you don't think their current lineup is enough

>>2967363
Get the K10 for delicious CCD colors

Or get something more modern like a K5, which should still go pretty cheap.

>>2967610
>using manual lenses
>ever

Get the fuck out of the last millenia grandpa

Fuck off and buy AF lenses made by canon like normal people

>>2967685
Canons lenses are just about as bad as they come when it comes to af and image quality.

>>2967363
K5 if you are a cheap fuck, should still be able to get one new from japan.
K3 if you want a slightly better camera...and one that can select which focus point you can use on old lenses instead of just being locked at centre.
Disregard the "pfpfpffptptpfpt no lenses" dumbshits. They will always be this self-entitled and stupid. (and canikon will pretend to make them a new series of lenses every time they release a new 'model', thereby adding millions of dollars to costs in general becaseu of all the unpurchased lenses flooding the consumer moron market.

TL;DR: they aren't all manual lenses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentax_K-mount#List_of_lenses_with_any_K-mount_variant

>>2967448
>>2967610
>>2967612
>>2967747

pantecks shills gtfo

>>2967685
>>2967431

canon shills gtfo

>>2967788
Stinking truckster gtfo

>>2967788
i don't think pentax can afford shills