[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
I like the first 2 with the bikes. I like the colors personally.
O I can see what you're trying to do with the stairwell pictures but the lines aren't quite there.
The rest are boring snap shotty if you ask me. You should do a series on bikes and compose them a bit more carefully.
Also, Denmark.
>>2965926
>compose them a bit more carefully.
You're definitely not wrong.
I need to slow down but I'm one of "those people" who worry that others will stare at me so I take the snap real quick and move on.
It's pathetic and I should be working on it.
Thanks for taking the time to post.
>>2965919
I like this, then again I do think empty places at night>during the day
>>2965928
I've been shooting since I was 15, im 47 now, and what you say about being hasty is both good and bad in my experience.
As a teenager with a 16mm and a 50mm I found that I got better shots if I immediately shot whatever caught my attention, from where I saw it and immediately. Then I'd walk around it a few times and look at different heights by crouching etc, becasue ultrawide is all about dat perspective, and it changes a lot with minor difference in position and elevation.
Plus of course, the classic rookie bad habit is to listen to all the oldfags who need a tripod and 20 minutes to shoot anyhting.... Don't. Or rather do it after you have ripped off a quickie or two.
These days I shoot almost entirely telephoto, of people in motion, so being both subtle in my motion getting the camera up, and as immediate as possible to shoot after i see something is what gets my best shots. But I still always shoot first and reshoot later with any lens. It's almost always best to be quick first. Often I'm surprised that the first shot i ripped off is any good at all, never mind that it's the best shot. This happens a lot actually.
Do first, think later.
The habit will also prepare you for taking the shots that the 'thinkers' will never, ever take outside of a pre-planned shoot.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model PENTAX K-3 Camera Software darktable 1.4 Photographer Andrew Wade Eglington oh-hi.info Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 105 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016:07:16 18:55:20 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 2000 Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 70.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 480 Image Height 720 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation Low Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Distant View
>>2965917
Those tones...
>>2965918
Maybe I'm off my game but this looks a little green. Other than that: Those tones...
>>2965921
I know what you're going for here but it just seems too undefined to me. If it didn't have the railing shadow and if the left wall made by the shadow was straight I think it'd be a lot better but what can you do.
>>2965922
Photoshop's perspective distortion tool should get everything aligned well.
Elaborate on the process of the first two's tones, I need to absorb this.
>>2965940
so much philosophy, so unimposing results.
also, what's the deal with that bicycle-obsession?
>>2965948
The bicycles are an extended metaphor on masturbation. You rest your crotch on the seat and rub away at it, pumping and pumping your legs nonstop until you're worn out.
They all have a sexual undertone, but it's done tastefully enough to not be overbearing and instead adds a bit of depth. Like pouring some vodka in your morning orange juice instead of downing raw ethanol.
Not that I have anything against raw ethanol.
>>2965943
There's almost no processing done on these by me. Just tweaking saturation and contrast a little.
The rest is in-camera film emulation by the Fuji X70. I have it set to Velvia most of the time and certainly for those two bikes.
Sometimes I'll go cornier still and use the "advanced filters" the camera has available.
This one here is "pop color."
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2965984
And this one is "toy camera."
It's a really nice camera for carrying all the time and for general dicking around with.
>>2965940
Thanks for the reply. I get what you're saying but I still really need to slow down at least after that first instinctive shot is in the bag.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2965984
Damn Fuji, that's nuts.
Hey can you run those film emulation filters on any old image you put on your memory card or does it have to be Fuji's own raw format?
>>2965984
>>2965986
It also has a range of selective colouring filters.
I know you guys love those.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2965990
If you could just zoom in way more and use the door as the full frame that wouldn't be too bad.
I think it'd be better with full color but the solid red frame is nice.
>>2965987
I don't even bother shooting raw most of the time, just straight jpg with the Velvia preset applied.
In-camera raw editing lets you apply the various film imitations after shooting, though, yeah. It does not let me view let alone edit Nikon raws.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2965995
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/fuji-x70/X70hVFAI00100.HTM Can it take JPEGs?
>>2965995
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:07:20 20:42:11 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1904 Image Height 1077
Nice gear thread, faggots.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2966520
What the fuck was the point of this post, idiot?
>>2967137
same as yours :^)
>>2967312
Which one?
I posted the photos, cocksucker. Fuck off.
Sage for dead thread infested with retarded polacks