Someone has a pic of the full moon moments ago? Took this 1h

File: super moon.jpg (318KB, 858x902px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 858x902px

Canada

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.18
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	17428
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	450 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:13 18:52:13
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	0
Image Height	0
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
ISO Speed Used	400
Image Quality	NORMAL
White Balance	AUTO1
Focus Mode	MANUAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
ISO Speed Requested	400
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	70.0 - 300.0 mm; f/4.5 - f/5.6
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	472

>>2964262


Wooooo thank you very much! It's kinda fun seeing the two shots with the only difference being a 90º tilt.

>>2964256
Its too cold outside. Staying in.

Friendly reminder that the full moon is the absolute worst time to shoot photos of the moon.

>>2964262
That's the moon you fucking retard.

>>2964280
Keked

Friendly reminder that the moon is visible every night to everyone on Earth,

It's literally the least unique subject you could find.

>>2964279
Then when is the best time? This is the closest the moon is ever going to be to the earth in a long time.

Also, does anybody have any shots of the moon that isn't just the moon? (I.E. trees that are lit up due to the brightness of the moon)

>>2964290
Actually Dec 14th it will be exactly the same distance.

>>2964301
Well crap then, why am I on /p/?

>>2964256
>>2964258

>>2964290
No, this is the closest the moon is ever going to be that coincides with a full moon.

The effect is very overrated. Unless you knew it was happening, you wouldn't realize it. It's just 16% bigger in diameter, which is barely noticeable in the sky when there's nothing close to reliably compare it to.

If you want to take photos of the moon, get a good ridiculously long telephoto lens and take a photo when the moon is closest to the horizon. Moon not big enough? Stand further back and get an ever longer telephoto.

>>2964302
bcuz thinking isn;t ur strong suit

>>2964290

Supermoons happen all the time. Every year you hear about how this is the closest the moon will be for the next twenty years blah blah blah. The truth is, the moon looks barely bigger, you won't be able to see details that you couldn't just resolve with a better lens (and there will still be details beyond your ability to resolve, regardless of how close the moon is), and it's a full moon.

The full moon is lit by frontal light. It's flat, bland and featureless, and it makes even the best lens seem kind of meh. Best to shoot when it's near crescent phase, or even half full. You get the beauty of the light raking across the surface, which leads to more contrast and high frequency detail. You also get a better sense of the actual shape of the moon, which makes it seem more like a real actual physical object and not a 2D decal on the skybox.

Super-resolution the moon.

Take like 50 shots, move it a little (just a tiny bit) each time since it'll be on a tripod, and then use the usual super-resolution method to make it big. Google that.

File: moon.jpg (48KB, 1333x1000px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1333x1000px

So, I'm trying to take a single long exposure of the moon like pic related, but my photos keep turning out blurred, smeared together, and over saturated. I am using 1600 ISO, is that too high?

>>2964317
I think the issue is that you're taking a long exposure of a moving object.

>>2964256
>>2964262
wtf is this garbage? fuck off

>>2964317
>moon
>long exposure

is this a troll thread. delet this

>>2964319
How would that effect the photo? I'm not doubting you, I'm just curious how this >>2964317 was taken? Is there a special type of film used?

>>2964330
Take a photo, take another photo, take another photo, merge them in post. For film you'd just quintuple expose for a split second each time.

File: FilmBag.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x360px

>>2964331
So, I need to take one of these with me to rewind the film multiple times and retake the shot over and over again? I will give it a shot (or five). Man, I wasted so much film over the last 3 months trying to get that shot lol. Thanks for the help.

>>2964330
you are a special kind of noob

gtfo

File: 1471863961594.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>2964317
>>2964330
>>2964335
Kill yourself

File: IMGP0009-2.jpg (168KB, 779x1000px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 779x1000px

>>2964256

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX Corporation
Camera Model	PENTAX K10D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.0 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:13 21:20:34
Exposure Time	0.8 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: IMG_7073-2.jpg (134KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1000x667px

Taken just now. It was overcast earlier so I didnt get a moonrise pic.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5i
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:14 00:18:10
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	250.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2964308
>stand further back
haha.

>>2964476

At first I was going to call bullshit on that too, but it makes sense when you think about it. The moon is the same size no matter where you stand, but earthbound objects shrink the further you move away from them. Since the moon stays the same size but the objects shrink, it's as if the moon is relatively bigger. You need a longer lens to make the now-smaller foreground objects the same size as before, which also has the extra bonus of making the moon look bigger.

So, yeah. Actually super solid advice.

>>2964308

But a supermoon is always either a full moon or new moon.

>>2964391
negative space is sexy as fuck

File: sed cot.jpg (35KB, 567x437px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 567x437px

>>2964256
>best supermoon in almost 70 years
>it's cloudy as fuck for 100 miles where I live
>can't drive outta town and go spend the night somewhere else to capture it because work tomorrow

captcha: peace inward

>>2964990
It's just the moon dawg, you can see it almost every night

>>2964994

Plus supermoons happen every 14 months.

>"But this one was the biggest!"

It was something like .017% bigger than your usual supermoon. You literally could not tell, not that the casual observer can tell the difference between a regular moon and a supermoon. Would you be able to tell that an aspirin is 7% bigger than usual if you held it at arm's length? Same thing

When that fucker first popped up over the horizon you could tell it was a super moon. Once it got up in the sky it looked normal.

>>2965004

Nah, that's just the illusion of forced perspective.

File: luna 20-27-00.jpg (151KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 800x800px

Italy

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-GF3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	400 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:14 20:37:04
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	200.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

Scotland.
Best I could do with a £15 sigma 70 - 210mm. She doesn't like going to infinity.

File: PB143468.jpg (78KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1000x1000px

>>2965265
bastard

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:15 15:43:32
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: CRW_6934b.jpg (77KB, 1019x786px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1019x786px

>>2964256
Spain here.
I'm a newbie, and this was the first time I tried to photograph the moon.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 300D DIGITAL
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:14 23:01:22
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm

File: 1437343478571.jpg (27KB, 374x350px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 374x350px

>>2965266
>>2965265
aye, mebbe ye coulda tried focusing just a wee bit before infinity ya daft wee cunt

>>2965285
but the moon is infinity away from me

but I did accidently shoot with the aperture wide open, that might have had something to do with it

>>2965293
Aye, well ye see it's becuz some lenses focus past infinity pal, I dinnae ken why they dae but they just dae. It's a lot more bloody common wi' zoom lenses than it is wi primes but it's more noticable when yer shootin' wide open.

ma fuckin' bronica 40mm f4's a right cunt and focuses past infinity too, bloody loada bollocks if ye ask me.

File: DSCN2304.jpg (3MB, 3456x3456px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3456x3456px

VA here

>>2965294
i'll ging leter on inicht in see if ih kin dee ony be'er
But I still think it's not going to infinity because I'm mounting it on a m43 with a shite adapter.

File: _IGP5477.jpg (161KB, 795x530px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 795x530px

Germany on sunday

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX Corporation
Camera Model	PENTAX K200D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	450 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	795
Image Height	530
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

You guys should use AdobeRGB for taking the shots and then export to sRGB. You can take much more details out of the exposure.

>>2965538
Stop pushing a meme.
This is only viable if not shooting raw. sRGB is the web color-space. AdobeRGB the consumer print color-space, if not specified precisely.

File: IMG-20161115-WA0000.jpg (36KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1080x720px

Madrid, Spain. Yesterday night.

>>2965538
>>2965540
As the moon is monochrome would it even matter?

>>2965604
It wouldn't matter.
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/sRGB-AdobeRGB1998.htm

File: IMG_1511.jpg (202KB, 1370x769px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1370x769px

https://www.instagram.com/hosam.sam/

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 650D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Photographer	H.Sam
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:13 21:19:54
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 20160917-IMG_8235.jpg (154KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1000x750px

Took this about a month ago during the other large moon meme

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 60D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	120 dpi
Vertical Resolution	120 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:19 11:43:06
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	-3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	400.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: AA4A0314s.jpg (219KB, 1499x1000px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1499x1000px

Oman, Almost a month ago.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Photographer	Cybermtl
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/6.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:25 19:36:49
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	600.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard