Say an old lens cant focus at infinity. It almost goes there, but not totally. Does it just need to get the rear element more protruding so the focal plane at infinity aligns with the end of the focusing barrel?
How can i do this in an helios lens, for example?
>>2960473
Unscrew it. Find a keyring that is the same size and put it below the back element.
Also, I was all about infinity with the 44-2. There isn't really a point for having it, because you buy the lens for the swirly bokeh but then again don't get to use that if you're shooting at infinity.
>>2960486
yeah saw that fix in a couple youtube videos. then found some chink/slav saying this fix deteriorates image quality, that the Real Fix (TM) involved moving all elements towards the camera body, not just the rear element. what do you think?
>>2960489
I wouldn't suggest it. I'm not entirely worried about IQ rather than what the image actually shows and displays. Hell, the look may add some good feelings if it's tasteful enough.
>>2960579
im worried about getting the damn infinite available, since this is the only lens i have for this camera. not an helios, but as old, may be a tessar type. i might do this simple surgery, doesnt seem too complicated.
>>2960627
Plus if you fuck up you'll have to fix it so it's not a question of if you can, but rather when. And you can do anything given enough time.
>>2960473
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggDbEG2_0dg
You are welcome
>>2960473
take your helios and remove the rear element.
then throw it in the god damn trash because that's where it belongs
>>2960648
>how to make the IQ of an already meh lens significantly worse