Post a photo more cliche than this, i dare you

>>2958963
this might be my first time seeing a photo like this

File: 13016672984_216f2975e3_k.jpg (794KB, 1460x2048px) Image search: [Google]

794KB, 1460x2048px

Anything by Jake Olson.

>>2958963
Dude, a girl on railways. THAT is cliche. Or better even a band.

>>2958963
If this is OC then it's not bad. The seated pose gives it a slightly random vibe - she should really be walking down the road for maximum clicheability.

>>2958992
>digital """"""""""""tones"""""""""""""""

>>2958999
no its not mine, im just being an ass and judging others work while simultaneously not improving mine

but yes you are right

Don't have any saved but the self-portrait with a camera in your face is definitely more cliché

>>2959005
Hehe - all work and no play is definitely to be avoided.

File: newborn-baby-holding-great-grandmothers-hand-20160511102646.jpg~q75,dx720y432u1r1gg,c--.jpg (32KB, 720x432px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 720x432px

challenge accepted

File: 14457413_1746337988966078_9189600565801337678_n.jpg (116KB, 639x960px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 639x960px

>Le HDR church

>>2959080
I'm usually pretty good at being able to consider ideas from other perspectives, but of all the awful things in photography, overcooked "HDR" is the one that I really can't comprehend how anyone thinks it looks good.

>>2959079
Not so much cliched as contrived.

>pointless Dutch angle
>utterly incongruous chair

Risible.

>>2959080
imaging actually making that and then being so frightened that someone would steal it you needed a watermark.

File: 86EA0C0C-4EFE-47BF-9FBA-53F0FBDFFE98-3706-0000051C9731420E_tmp.png (306KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 500x750px

Sun holding - all variants

Honourable mentions: frames, selective colour, fake flare

>>2959100
Believe it or not, people steal much shittier photos.

I knew I "photographer" at a small gallery in Texas took a lot of horse photos, bland shitty photos. She went to an art show in a town like 3 hours away and there was another "photographer" that had stole her photo of that horse off facebook (yes very low resolution) and framed it to sell at an art show.

I saw the photo, it was literally the same shitty photo. People will steal anything. I've even had my photos stolen and used as branding for companies

File: image.jpg (317KB, 850x566px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 850x566px

>>2958963
Here's a fun game,
Google "Senior Photos (your city)" and post results

File: 14716247_1184249148295350_4547927577865068853_n.jpg (17KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x640px

>The no foreground background

File: 14714828_701271755381_3680159968088722324_o.jpg (406KB, 2048x1367px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 2048x1367px

the same shot of the tetons ever taken

File: bad-hdr.jpg (478KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 800x533px

>wow!
>It looks like a painting!
>Beautiful photo steve

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Canon EOS 500D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2013:07:18 14:39:15
Exposure Time	1/8 sec
F-Number	f/9.9
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.9
Focal Length	10.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	800
Image Height	533

Oh guys, what are you even talking about? You can post ANY random photo and it's always cliche. Why? Because photography is overdone to no limit. EVERY photo is already taken. And not 1 time but hundret-thousands of times.
And that's how you define a cliche. Cliche is repetition.

flower bokeh

>>2959121
That's incredibly over-simplified because despite there being a lot of people taking a lot of photos, some are simply done more than others because it's what we tend to do first before we grow beyond them, or before we stop.

Cliche isn't just repetition in general, it's a phrase or opinion that is overused and betrays a lack of original thought, like the reductionist "All photos were already taken so every photo is cliche".

astrophotography is comprised exclusively of cliche photos.

File: 5336206238_8d1a2c75e0_o.jpg (160KB, 1500x477px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1500x477px

Checkmate

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Photographer
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2011:01:08 10:49:20
Exposure Time	1/180 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	Infinity
Metering Mode	Partial
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2959153
Rather like this. Probably means I should sell my camera and take up knitting.

>>2959155
Maybe it's just the Mona Lisa of cliche.

Nothing wrong with cliche!

the original is in the range of 30k px wide and the reflection was a bitch to make.

>>2959120
Stunning!!! I'm the moderator of the ~*~*HDR shooting stars*~*~ group and we would love to add your photo!

File: sony-a7S-review-astrophotography-1.jpg (489KB, 1399x1399px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 1399x1399px

>>2959135
jesus fucking christ i know, how many times have we all seen a variation of pic related?

>>2958992
but the focus point is like 2 feet behind the lil bastard, how do you fuck up this badly?

File: 1137-400044.jpg (698KB, 1000x815px) Image search: [Google]

698KB, 1000x815px

>yfw I blew a whole entire roll of old-emulsion Velveeta 50 6x7 120 on this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2014:06:08 13:37:56

>>2959126
Fine. Then post one photo that isn't cliche.

>>2958992
Jesus christ. Just looked through his portfolio and he's got about 3 different photos, all shot over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

WTF

>>2959177
Never change a running system ..

File: 14716381_1209729219073408_4302051646986256384_n.jpg (63KB, 640x568px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 640x568px

>>2959175

>>2959174
M'KenRockwell

>>2958963
>stormy day photography
>it's taken out in the sun with no visible bad weather

Top lel

>>2958963
I don't have an example at hand but

>side light
>naked Bitch
>black and white

There you go pham.

File: Screenshot_2016-11-05-02-35-11.png (2MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1920px

>>2959186
you think an animal head would be something unique? what are you? a little simple?

>>2959239
>I don't have an example at hand but

Yeah, I can believe that ..

>>2959255
I'm on the phone and to lazy to go for that extra mile of downloading one but you know what I'm talking about.

>>2959253
fish aren't animals

>>2959264
>theyre sea kittens

>>2959259
low-key nudes?

>>2959186
looks like it would give a great blow job

>>2959264
Jesus Christ I laughed at this more than I should've

File: 1475800763401.gif (734KB, 460x345px) Image search: [Google]

734KB, 460x345px

>>2958992
>Jake Olson
This d-bag lives like 30 minutes north of me. He has photo tutorial for 310$, 7 hours, 310$.

I know where that road is.

soon.

>>2959114
yo, i live in seattle

File: Alberta 6.jpg (303KB, 997x1500px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 997x1500px

>>2959208
post your moraines

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	Capture One 9 Macintosh
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:04 23:22:51
Image Created	2016:09:04 23:22:51
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Image Width	997
Image Height	1500
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>2959172
Gay

File: file.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>2958992
>Jake Olson.

>fine art page same as the children page, same as the portraits page
>same fucking road in every image

File: 001-2.jpg (117KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1200x800px

>>2958963

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T3i
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 00:32:09
Exposure Time	1/4000 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2959135
It's no more cliche than literally any other form of photography, you only singled this one out cause you suck at it kek

>>2959281
There's a video of two guys mouth fucking a carp, they seemed to like it so I guess you're right

>>2959114
>>2961959
Me too

>>2958992
>>2959292
I remember that thread about him a while back showing how much of a pretentious, narcissistic cunt he is, pretty funny considering he's a one trick pony

>>2961970
This would be nice if you cut out the bottom quarter and brushed out the gaps in the clouds.

>implying all photography isn't cliché

>>2962101
I wonder if people like this guy questioned themselves even once if they could improve their photography in any way.

File: aportra.jpg (390KB, 900x659px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 900x659px

ye olde portra skintones against portra greens.
not saying its as cliche as that one.. but cliche it is.

File: 157640212.jpg (840KB, 1024x686px) Image search: [Google]

840KB, 1024x686px

I like the soft water steam during fall meme

>>2959125
I don't keep my lens clean enough to ever do this and I don't know how any one ever does

>>2962101
Close some tabs Jesus that's painful

File: Rachel-Brown-Train-Tracks-Lovely-Class-of-2015-Frisco-Square-Guitar-Rachel-Brown-Senior-Portraits-Suitcase-Train-Tracks.jpg (309KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 1000x667px

>>2958963
Are you kidding me? You can take those elements and go a lot more cliched.
>train tracks
>fucked up colors
>acoustic guitar

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS-1D X
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Photographer	Tyler R. Brown
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:05:19 10:02:11
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	73.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: FLO0627.jpg (109KB, 880x660px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 880x660px

>>2958963

>>2959120

Are there bodies with HDR that bad in-camera now, or do people actually go to the effort to shoot multiple exposures and combine the photos in pp just to make it look this terrible?

>>2959080

Is that HDR or just clarity at 1000% ?

>>2962290

this is how you get your model run over by a train

>>2962480
yes

>>2962482
With any luck, the photographer too.

Wait, maybe we've been going about this all wrong. Maybe that's the solution to this cliche epidemic. Maybe we need to encourage more of this silliness and just let Darwin take its course.

>>2959080
I haven't ever seen a HDR photo that was even remotely pleasing to look at. Do they even exist?

>>2963303
>Do they even exist?
Yes. The reason you think you've never seen one is because when it's done right by someone who knows what they're doing, you won't be able to tell it's HDR.

Alot of people confuse tonemapping for HDR, which is a whole other thing. I'll agree that a "good" tonemapped image does not exist.

Also this >>2959080 picture isn't even HDR or tonemapped lol, it's just fucking god awful editing.

File: Screen Shot 2016-11-12 at 10.50.36 PM.png (3MB, 1582x1108px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1582x1108px

>>2958992
>>2958963
hahahaha this guys a fucking hack

File: fucking spiral staircases with a ultrawide lens.jpg (341KB, 712x950px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 712x950px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D800
Camera Software	RawTherapee 4.2.1234
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	15 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4916
Image Height	6555
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:13 17:46:34
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	15.00 mm
Comment	kallis kamera ja niin huonoja kuvia
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2959125
I don't get these at all. Yep...thats what a 50 1.4 looks like.

Bonus points for gril and being warmed to the oblivion.

>>2962101
>possible places to live

Whats on the menu Anon?

>>2962101
What really gets me is that he uses the same 30 feet of that fucking road for every shot.

>>2959092
I force myself to do it for real estate agents because thats what they pay me for. Never again

>>2962290
I am one of those people that has lived trains since childhood and likes taking pictures of them and I still don't get this trend. I never really feel compelled to shoot down train tracks unless there is actually a train on them. And putting people on there is just stupid. I once spotted a group of people who had a camera on a tripod along with flashes and an umbrella, right there on the God dann tracks with a huge intermodal freight train barelling in their direction. Seriously what the fuck?

>>2965900
maybe they thought the train was a regular huge train and not an intermodal freight train

>>2962395
Has anyone with a boner pose as if they are doing the same thing with the tower? I'd like to see that. Mostly the boner.

>>2962205
>Live in Tennessee

>All there is to photograph is this and hills

File: enhanced-buzz-2376-1356615836-2[1].jpg (79KB, 625x469px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 625x469px

>>2959104
I HAD to post this

>>2962101
if only my portfolio could one day approach this level of effortless genius. really pushing the bounds of the medium, guy.

>>2959292
what sort of fucking material does he even have that can stretch out to last 7 hours? "sit the stupid babbies in the road and put cute clothes on them, or maybe tell them to touch each others' noses or some shit. $300 please."

>>2962101
>jake olson
is that the arrogant dude that got some attention a while ago because he was a huge douchebag?

>>2966651
yes >>2962142

>>2966072
Not clichée but horribly pretentious
>Gonna take a pic
>of me taking a pic
>with my "professional" and special camera
>so everyone can see that I took a pic
>of my pic
>in my camera
>with my camera

>>2966072
Oh and forgot
>gorillapod
>with perfectly straight set spheres.

This Jake dude is a massive faggot.
http://resourcemagonline.com/2016/02/the-jake-olson-rabbit-hole-goes-much-deeper-than-that-facebook-comment/63808/

File: image.jpg (364KB, 707x1000px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 707x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Noritsu Koki
Camera Model	QSS
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:03 12:12:55
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	707
Image Height	1000
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2959076
I gotta say, this one is the winner. Only way it could be better is if it was two children's hands, one white and one black.

>>2959129
there it is

File: 1368566487659.jpg (156KB, 892x707px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 892x707px

>>2962395
if you visit there you can watch as literally dozens of people take this exact photo

>>2967916
The fact that people still do this to this extent, and probably will until that building collapses, is quite depressing.

>>2966072
>tfw tried to do this with my phone when hanging out with my friend for a laugh
>tfw this shit is fucking ridiculous to do
I learned to hate people that do this that day at least like a thousand times more than I hate people who walk in groups.

>>2962395
winrar

>>2958999
it's really really bad tho

Why would you make her sit in the middle of a road in the desert ?
Composition is shit
Centered subjectbluergeergrerf
Framing is absolutely HHHUUUUERGgeregergegergerblelgehg

Casual american shitty photography

File: 3422007335_30c7dd15fd_b.jpg (250KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1024x683px

What do I win?

File: dscf0679.jpg (4MB, 3427x2285px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3427x2285px

>>2959186
nah, bro... I got one of those... cliche af.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-E2S
Camera Software	Digital Camera X-E2S Ver1.00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	53 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:18 15:29:16
Exposure Time	1/180 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	0.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4896
Image Height	3264
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Manual Exposure
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>2962140
2 guys 1 carp

File: 1307009035879.jpg (26KB, 301x434px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 301x434px

>>2962290
>Impressive
>Unique
>Extraordinary

my sides

>>2962101
Kevin ,close some tabs for god s sake

>>2959186
Dsl

>>2968476
>places to live

lol

File: IMG_0465.jpg (457KB, 1280x985px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 1280x985px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2010:12:15 23:27:10
Comment	originally uploaded @ http://melisaki.tumblr.com
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	985
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2962149
Portra skin (especially 160) always looks so texture-less and washed out....

>>2968476

I thought you knew me somehow but my name is on the top, and yes I found a nice apartment. Waiting for them to turn on my gas. Freezing af.

Closed some tabs tho!

>>2969132
It's not really cliché, it's just bland.

File: orange-county-senior-portraits-5-683x1024.jpg (165KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 683x1024px

>>2959114
I found my co worker on like the third row

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Cheryl Pellerin DBA Chertography
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:25 15:30:37
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	180.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2967916
Pushing the leaning tower has gone beyond the realms of cliché, it has now kindof become an tourist experience

>>2968261
Are you saying you wouldn't do it if you went? No one there is doing to unleash their photography skills, they're just making memories

>>2970699
>Are you saying you wouldn't do it if you went?
No shit I wouldn't do it

>they're just making memories
Congrats to them, they made memories of being unoriginal and uncreative sheep

>>2970713
You're depressing

>>2970827
people who lack the imagination to do anything else with their spare time but travel to designated tourist attractions and take pictures of themselves in front of them are depressing

File: THICC RIMMED.jpg (568KB, 1140x763px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 1140x763px

>>2958963

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:02:18 11:40:28

>>2959174
THIS IS THE END

>>2971025
>travel the world
>visit a famous interesting landmark like the tower of Pisa
>make a cute little memory photo to share with family when you get back
What's the issue, faggot? Nobody's uploading this shit on their artistic instagram page.

>>2971137
the issue is your "memories" are the same as everyone else's. do something worth remembering, you sure won't be wishing on your deathbed that you had taken more landmark selfies

>>2971138
So tell me anon, is literally every action you take an action worth remembering on your deathbed, a meaningful and fulfilling action that fills you with purpose?
Of course not, you shitpost on /p/, what the fuck are you on about

>>2959174
>uses a uv filter
What a clown m8.

File: cdb.jpg (17KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 499x499px

>>2959079
Wait...

Did that nigga need to slide his legs underneath the arm rests to sit like AC slater?

fucking KEK

>>2971138
I think you might be getting confused with taking pics of just landmarks and taking pictures of family with landmarks

I don't understand where you got the idea that memories should be creative

And in the case of the pushing the Pisa, anyone who takes the picture knows it's not original it's kinda like a vintage viral meme.

In my opinion if you go to the tower of Pisa for the first time and not do the push in purpose, you should be hanged

>>2962143
>brushed out
Would it make me a cunt if I don't belive in altering photos?

>>2971540
>Would it make me a cunt if I don't belive in altering photos?
Not him, but no, it just means you need to work on getting your shit right in camera. Highlights are BTFO, light is flat and boring due to shooting midday, your composition is weak and full of distractions.

Why are you against alterations in general? It's not like what the camera captured is true to real life anyway.

>>2971146
hard to tell but it appears that there are in fact two chairs, not one.