/film/

the analog

If you could have one fixed lens film camera what would it be? I like compacts but I'm not about to shell out 300 for a klasse/yashica/contax/hexar. Mju is nice but I like aperture priority.

Bonus disposable shot refilled with portra.

File: A185285_017A.jpg (574KB, 1080x730px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 1080x730px

>>2957548

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:30 13:34:18
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A185285_023A.jpg (347KB, 730x1080px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 730x1080px

>>2957550

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:25 22:59:46
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A184208_012A.jpg (390KB, 813x1080px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 813x1080px

>>2957552

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:13 23:50:19
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2957550
I like how the chromabs are so strong it basically creates a double image towards the edge of the frame...

>>2957531
just cross posting, update from earlier in the thread.

File: 2-1.jpg (88KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 667x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Epson
Camera Model	Perfection3200
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4728
Image Height	14447
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1600 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:31 19:10:34
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000

I'm in Berlin at the moment, where can I buy decently priced film?

>>2957761
Fotoimpex, Alte Schönhauser Str. 32, 10119

File: D3S_3067-1200.jpg (207KB, 1200x873px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1200x873px

So I just bought a Kodak Retina 1A for my gf's birthday and was surprised to see it's absolutely tiny, like pocket-sized. Are there any other super-compact cameras out there which look as good as this?

>>2957765
Thanks man, gonna look today.

>paying for film
>paying for development
>paying for photos that didnt turn out quite right
>limiting the amount of shots you can take
Boy you sure fell for that meme

File: DSC02282.jpg (542KB, 1202x800px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 1202x800px

>>2957779
Yeah, I sure got tricked...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:13 08:49:51
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1202
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2957779
>paying for photos that didnt turn out quite right
Not if you know how to use a camera

>>2957938
>pretending every photo hes ever taken has come out as expected

>>2957779
>paying for photos that didnt turn out quite right

Beats paying for photos I never took.

>>2957955
What did he mean by this?

>>2957553
Is this Genoa?

>>2957803
>>2957938
>>2957955
He probably can't get a decent photo out of his shitty p&s from Goodwill, so don't sweat it!

>>2957955
why

File: 73150011.jpg (1MB, 1261x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1261x1280px

Got my hands on a bunch of Provia and Velvia 16 years past the expiration date, so I went out with the potatomatic Nettar. Here are a few shots.
And yes,
>NORITSU KOKI
>kill me

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.18
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:28 19:23:15
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1261
Image Height	1280

File: 73160004.jpg (1MB, 1261x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1261x1280px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.18
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:02 16:15:46
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1261
Image Height	1280

File: 73160002.jpg (1MB, 1280x1262px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x1262px

I know, Novar vignettes as fuck when stopped down.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.18
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:02 16:23:47
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	1262

File: 73160003.jpg (1MB, 1262x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1262x1280px

Also lovely edge blur that seems to happen with some specific apertures.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.18
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:02 16:21:44
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1262
Image Height	1280

File: 73160001.jpg (1MB, 1268x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1268x1280px

Time to call it a day.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.18
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:02 16:26:07
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1268
Image Height	1280

File: His name is Bruno and he was nervous.jpg (125KB, 1000x560px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1000x560px

Fuji Superia 400, cropped and auto everything since I don't know what I'm doing, just playing around I guess.

>>2957977
>>2957979
hotness
When you say potatomatic do you mean automatic?
Or potato-tier?
Either way, you nailed the exposure, good work.
And no bellows leaks, doubleplusgood.

>>2958026
Thanks. Potato in the sense that Nettar was a cheap compact snapshitter of its day. Still fun as fuck to shoot, though. Seem to be tough little bastards too, I have two and neither one has leaks or any other defects aside from looking pretty beat up. Used a Fujica SLR to meter for these shots. I'm really surprised how the film apparently hasn't given a fuck about being way expired, it hadn't even been cold stored.

File: ROOFTOP SNOW_LR.jpg (571KB, 980x1000px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 980x1000px

Getting ready for winter. Found this from January 2015, my first apartment in Brooklyn.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:02 14:24:43
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	980
Image Height	1000

File: DUNES.jpg (1MB, 2000x1592px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1592px

>>2957548
The XA series is nice, I have two of the original XAs and a flash, good kit. The rollei 35 is neat but I somehow broke the shutter advance off mine and have never seen a "for parts" one.

>>2957979
thats rad.

pic is somewhere north of Santa Barbara in 2014.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:02 15:10:36
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1592

>>2958135
That photo is nice af. Come to Japan, plenty of trashed Rollei 35s.

File: Japan148mini.jpg (538KB, 1180x800px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 1180x800px

Some real gay Fujicolor Industrial 100.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:03 15:25:55
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1180
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Partial
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Custom
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

>>2958184
>Canon EOS 550D
lol homo.

>>2958191
>rolls eyes

>>2958191
c'mon m8, you're going to have to step up if you really wanna give this guy some hate.
You're not even the full time DSLR scanfag hater. To become me, you're going to have to mention this gigantic faggot anytime someone mentions DSLR scanning and buy the guy who also fucking DSLR scans.
>>2957459
>I'm sure you're not alone, bb #butthurtnetwurk
I'm not, but most of it's me. Though I don't hate you for your photos or scans.

>>2958191
>What is DSLR scanning for $400 Pat.

>decide to go out to shoot Tri-X at 1600 for murky nightly city scenes and shiet
>accidentally picked a roll of TMax instead
Oh god.

>>2958184
God I love those fullframe tones.

>>2958200
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT1bp9ujQEE

File: IMG_3009.jpg (597KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 800x534px

Nice shots y'all

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.11.135096841
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	534
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_3010.jpg (562KB, 800x531px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 800x531px

>>2958222
One more

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.11.135096841
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	531
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Acros_001.jpg (405KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 1000x1000px

comfy Acros shot and developed today

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:03 21:30:23
Exposure Time	2.5 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-7.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_20161103_215625.jpg (202KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 750x1000px

>>2958328
And my ghetto scan setup that I said I would post in thr last /fgt/ thread but didn't.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	F-04G
Equipment Make	FUJITSU
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:11:03 21:56:26
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	2048
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	0.3 EV
ISO Speed Rating	310
Exposure Time	33333/1000000 sec

>>2958209
>fullframe tones

wut

>>2958335

new hot meme.

>>2957550
>>2957552
>>2957553
nice man love the feel of the images. how did you refill it and was it potra 200 ?

in my expierence with shitty dispoable cameras the film is pre-rolled onto a spoll and you wind into the canister how you manage that ?

>>2958200
That's no problem. TMY goes to EI1600 in HC-110 without issue, or even much grain.

Won't look like tri-x of course, but that's what you get for your fingers of butter.

File: Clipboard01.jpg (292KB, 1156x792px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1156x792px

ilford pan 400/diyrodinal stand

File: an actual march.jpg (488KB, 1600x722px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 1600x722px

women's protest against stricter abortion laws, HP5

>>2958135
this could be so good but the out-of-focus is more obnoxious than pleasant

I would either bring it in focus, or take it out of focus just a little bit more to make sure it looks intentional (if thats what you were going for)

File: 0q.jpg (510KB, 648x1000px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 648x1000px

Some recent photos, Neopan 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5695
Image Height	8789
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	6400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	6400 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:03 13:13:33
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	648
Image Height	1000

File: 1q.jpg (466KB, 1000x648px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 1000x648px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	8789
Image Height	5695
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	6400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	6400 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:03 13:13:55
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	648

>>2958392
>oh look, its that kurwa turboautist. go away faggot!

File: 2q.jpg (472KB, 1000x628px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 1000x628px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	8768
Image Height	5504
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	6400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	6400 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:03 13:14:13
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	628

File: 3q.jpg (169KB, 456x700px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 456x700px

TMax pushed to 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5674
Image Height	8704
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:03 13:17:58
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	456
Image Height	700

File: 94140009.jpg (534KB, 820x1236px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 820x1236px

Weird colors

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:23 16:19:47
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 94140011.jpg (634KB, 1236x820px) Image search: [Google]

634KB, 1236x820px

>>2958470

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:23 16:19:46
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2958474
>ПOЛИЦЯ riot kamaz, no license plates, dodgy old repurposed warehouse

well this doesnt look suspicious st all

>>2958470
>weird colours
>posts lab scan
I'm sorry, but this invalidates your comment completely.

>>2958570
how? it looks like you're arguing that it has weird colors because it's a lab scan, but that doesn't make the colors not weird?

>>2958577
Gimme a second to scan something from my archives wrong and on auto. Then we can go ahead and call the colours weird, okay?

>>2958582
i genuinely don't know what you're on about or why

>>2958583
I wouldn't expect someone who's incapable of using a keyboard properly of understanding much. It's okay anon. I understand it can be tough.

>>2958474
fug i wwant a 6wd dakar truck with a cage for prisoners
>more like cumazz

>>2958587
so you were just looking for a chance to pretend to be superior to someone you will never have to meet

i'm sorry, but this invalidates your comments completely

File: 2image234.jpg (790KB, 1024x816px) Image search: [Google]

790KB, 1024x816px

It's nice that /p/ pretty much always has an FGT going on. Post more guys. I'll put a couple new ones in here just because I don't feel like making my own thread as I'm leaving town in a few days anyway.

Ektar handling insane highlights.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Alex Burke
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	11367
Image Height	8988
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:03 10:34:09
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	816

File: 2image191.jpg (874KB, 1024x811px) Image search: [Google]

874KB, 1024x811px

>>2958663
I've only got a few for now anyway, but i just developed some 50 sheets and 10 rolls this week so I've got some material that will take a few months to sort through when I get back.

Velvia 50 somehow handling the highlights better than expected.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Alex Burke
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	11411
Image Height	9258
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:31 10:36:43
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	811

File: 2image183.jpg (416KB, 1024x804px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 1024x804px

>>2958665
And some Provia.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Alex Burke
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	11411
Image Height	9258
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:31 08:09:37
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	804

>>2958663

wtf i love ektar now!

File: 1image511.jpg (633KB, 811x1024px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 811x1024px

>>2958670
You should always love Ektar!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Alex Burke
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:12 20:51:57
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	811
Image Height	1024

File: F1000013.jpg (835KB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

835KB, 1840x1232px

Oh for a higher resolution of this scan....


Even on 35mm film there's so much detail in there, where single grains have been flecked off by a tint of light that might never have flipped a bit on a sensor.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SLP1000SE
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER340-3.0-0E-518
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Bottom, Right-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:27 10:07:03
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1232

File: 4q.jpg (484KB, 639x1000px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 639x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5674
Image Height	8874
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	6400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	6400 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:03 21:11:47
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	639
Image Height	1000

>>2958666
I'm as moist as that leaf right now.

>>2958665
Is this a weird crop or something?
The bottom right seems a little distorted or soft for some reason. This light must have been phenomenal for rvp to come out like this. Did you use a colour filter?

>>2958686
That's pretty damn moist.

>>2958687
It's not cropped at all, just the wide 75mm lens which can get a little different looking with subjects that are close. I believe I used a warming filter and I recall waving the darkslide over the top of the image for about 3 seconds of the 12 second exposure to help with the sky just a tad without being obvious. Still, I expected the highlights to be blown out worse.

File: NK2-8.jpg (172KB, 1000x676px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1000x676px

fucked up and didnt get the top in frame

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D70
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	690
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:03 21:59:37
Exposure Time	1/6 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

Anyone here NOT develop & print their own film?

Where do you get it done? Just some local places?

>>2958704

here.

>Just some local places?

of coursh.

>>2958704
Colour I just get dev'd at the 1 hour place in town then (dlsr) scan them myself.

File: img444.jpg (520KB, 900x1100px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 900x1100px

Couple Acros snaps.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7016
Image Height	8738
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:03 22:59:43
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	900
Image Height	1100

File: img443.jpg (560KB, 900x1100px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 900x1100px

>>2958722

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7017
Image Height	8694
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:03 22:48:38
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	900
Image Height	1100

File: img442.jpg (615KB, 1100x900px) Image search: [Google]

615KB, 1100x900px

>>2958724

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	8754
Image Height	7000
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:03 22:52:31
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1100
Image Height	900

>>2958703
critiques other than the top being cut out?

>>2958753
Middle gold, a little head that subsides too quickly and leaves little lacing. Sweet grain and corn nose, Taste follows, fairly full flavors (considering) but the carbonation is too high for me to really enjoy, and there is also a metallic taste on the edge that I can't get past. Wet and a little messy, but not bad....decent bitterness on the back half, but that's about all the hops bring...very little in the way of flavor. It's been about 5 or 6 years since I've had one of these, and it's about what I remember. Is what it is.
Or if you were referring to the photo, what exactly do you expect us to see in an out of focus photo of a shitty beer bottle sitting on a counter? What are you trying to communicate with this?

>>2958755
Honestly not trying to communicate much here. Might have had a focus issue when scanning with the dslr as well, will check.

File: NK2A-2.jpg (172KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1000x664px

>>2958756
Focus should be slightly better.
Still not a great picture, more of a snapshit desu.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D70
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	690
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:04 01:04:44
Exposure Time	1/6 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2958663
How'd you meter this?

>>2958704
I have local kodak shop and and another photo store to develop&scan film. Quite cheap and useful, but there is a huge gap in quality between them.

>>2958727
lovely
>>2958724
>>2958722
awful

>>2958793
I metered for the tree branches that were up and out of the frame, which made for a scene nearly two stops overexposed if I had just metered from where the camera was pointing. The important details were the leaves and the needed to be bright, I knew the film would handle the sky.

>>2958663
Wow! The contrast between the leaves and wood is incredible, and the golden light here and the wood is excellent.

File: FullSizeRender.jpg (754KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

754KB, 750x1000px

/fgt/, why are square/rectangle hoods so god tier?

Also, post your sweet hoods

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2448
Image Height	3264
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:04 11:46:28
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	32
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	4.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	1000
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2959017

they are manly af.

have you seen dslr petal hoods? LOL

>muhhhhh special snowflake elite super dooper im better than you muhhhh dark room muhhh film stock club
Just accept digital overtook film years ago and get over it

>>2959040

ever shot film, buddy? its super fun, you should try it some day.

>>2959044
The fun is superficial at best. Digital is way more fun and the achievable results are far more diverse

File: tumblr_lwudgwhIJv1qh87wbo1_1280.jpg (67KB, 680x473px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 680x473px

>>2959040
Bonus points for the strawman.

File: changing bag.jpg (64KB, 250x234px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 250x234px

Are the changing bags from ebay good? Anything i should be aware of to choose a good one?

>>2957768
Check out the later 6x6 models of the Zeiss Super Ikontas (and their russian Moskva clones).

Agfa Super Isolette is also a pretty spiffy and good quality folder in the same vein.

File: 5_super_ikonta_iv_53405_1[1].jpg (176KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1024x768px

>>2959103
forgot pic

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-G1
Camera Software	ACD Systems Digital Imaging
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2010:11:23 00:14:44
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	250
Exposure Bias	2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1024
Image Height	768
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard
Image Quality	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Focus Mode	Manual
Spot Mode	Unknown
Image Stabilizer	Off
Macro Mode	Normal
Shooting Mode	Aperture Priority
Audio	No
Flash Bias	0.00 EV
Color Effect	Off
Contrast	Unknown
Noise Reduction	Standard

File: agfaauto66[1].jpg (71KB, 598x599px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 598x599px

>>2959105

My Pentax K1000 has been sitting in a drawer for a few months. I took it out to use it and the light meter needle initially didn't seem to be working (stuck in the center), but after a little bit it started acting wonky. Now it appears to be working.

So, is this normal behavior if I haven't used it in a while? Should I change the battery or something?

>>2959050

The fun is superficial at best. Film is way more fun and the achievable results are far more diverse.

>>2959194
You should generally take the batteries out of any camera that's going to be shelved for more than a month. This way risks less corrosion and what-not, and the batteries will self-discharge less than they would attached to an (hopefully) open circuit.

File: Capture.jpg (247KB, 1220x936px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1220x936px

A couple threads back, someone asked about winding 2 rolls of 120 onto a single Patterson-type reel. I finally tried this tonight and I can confirm that it works perfectly. Load first roll normally, then feed it by hand until it hits the end of the reel. Load second roll normally. No issues, was easy, worked perfectly.

Also, pic related is the test of the day. Same shot, same camera, same exposure, two films, both rolls developed in the same tank at the same time. Left is Lomo400cn, right is Portra400. 100% crops. Only adjustments are slight white balance adjustments. What are your thoughts /fgt/'s???

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Jane
Image-Specific Properties:

File: sm161026_04.jpg (330KB, 1000x678px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1000x678px

superia 400

File: sm161104_24.jpg (319KB, 702x1000px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 702x1000px

portra 160

File: 1464026566722.jpg (35KB, 599x563px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 599x563px

>>2957779

I want a 35mm point and shoot, what should I look for? I was hoping to just pick up something really cheap but all the local thrift stores seem to never have anything good and everything on ebay has been hipster taxed to hell. All the common suggestions like the Mju II and XA and L35AF seem to be selling for like $100+ which seems outrageous.

If I'm going to spend that much I would rather get a Rollei 35 or something like that which at least looks like it's beautiful and high quality and not some cheap 90s plastic trash with a bunch of electronics and motors that break.

What should I do? I really just want something that fits in a jacket pocket and has a wide or normal prime lens which is reasonably good, doesn't have to be excellent but no lomo shit. I honestly don't really mind autofocus or manual focus or even scale focus, and I can guess exposure well enough without a meter too.

The Rollei 35 isn't really what I was originally looking for and they seem to go for like $100-$200 which is fine but I was looking for something cheaper. Any thoughts?

If not then there's a couple of random obscure Pentax or Canon autofocus point and shoots which aren't really hyped up much online so they're pretty cheap. They all seem to be bigger than what I wanted, though, and they have IR autofocus which sounds pretty primitive and possibly more annoying than just not having AF at all.

File: Nanaimo_020.jpg (352KB, 646x1000px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 646x1000px

>>2959403
The guys checking out the girl stretching outside

File: CNV000013.jpg (571KB, 1818x1228px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 1818x1228px

1/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:04 18:19:36
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1818
Image Height	1228

File: CNV000032.jpg (664KB, 1818x1228px) Image search: [Google]

664KB, 1818x1228px

2/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:04 18:20:14
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1818
Image Height	1228

File: CNV000027.jpg (677KB, 1228x1818px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 1228x1818px

3/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:04 18:20:03
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1228
Image Height	1818

>>2959442
>>2959443

Blue balance looks bad on these anon.

>>2958753
it's an under-exposed, out of focus snapshit of a beer bottle, with uninteresting framing?

What are you expecting/looking for here exactly?

>>2959017
Idk, but they do look very nice, maybe it has something to do with it looking like something out of the days when photography was still more of a respected art and people subconsciously recognise that, but that's just a guess

>>2959400
Just buy an Olympus OM-1 and use the 50mm kit lens, which are almost always included. It's barely larger than a compact anyways. They can be had for as little as €20 here (Netherlands), my guess is it won't be much more anywhere else. Enjoy a fully functioning mechanical SLR which only uses a small battery for the built-in TTL meter which you can turn off if you're guesstimating anyways.

If you really want a mechanical point and shit, go for the Olympus Trip-35, but do look for one which is offered with the small leather case, because then there's a good chance it's been mostly kept in said case, saving the selenium cell which has a chance of wearing out over the decades if kept in light. I have one with a basically pristine cell, it's a breeze to use and the lens is quite good for a compact.

File: IMG_20161105_123559.jpg (133KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 640x480px

>>2959017
Fuck, forgot pic

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	GT-I9505
Camera Software	I9505XXUHOJ2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	640
Image Height	480
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:05 12:35:59
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	-1.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.20 mm
Comment	METADATA-START
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	480
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	S13F0SAGK01

>>2959400
IR AF is based and they should still be putting it in cameras today.
The 35/2.8 Pentacks P&S's are also quite sharp and still cheap. Do recommend.

File: Groundzero.png (483KB, 559x910px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 559x910px

Hello /film/,
recently I restarted taking pictures with my old Voigtländer Bessa 120
Since the camera is in bad shape and quite antiquated I'm considering moving to another medium format camera.
I'm looking for something in the low price segment, maybe a rolleiflex replica?
What do you suggest?
Also I have no clue regarding which films to pick.
Lastly is medium format really superior or is this just some sort of meme?
pic related snapshit made with my camera

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1366x766px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1366x766px

Time for this month's shitpost on Ferrania.

>IVANO'S WORLD
>Running low on chemicals
>Realizing decades old chemical is not enough

So they figured out that photographic chemicals often don't rain from the sky? Or that they actually had to start PRODUCING them?

>>2958447
This looks like it's from an old Biology textbook

>>2959404
Love it!

File: hs.jpg (932KB, 2976x2385px) Image search: [Google]

932KB, 2976x2385px

going to be developing b/w film for the first time, local photo shop has a darkroom for rent. Are the plastic reels or the steel ones easier to use? Any gotchas I should know about?

>shitty print from last time I was in a darkroom ten years ago

>>2960075
They thought they'd be able to make a bunch of film with the chemicals because there were a lot of chemicals left over, but some key chemicals aren't in abundance.

Ivano has to recreate the old chemicals and he tastes the chemicals to check if it's the same.

>>2960075
Never coming out. Ever.

It's nice to get funded and it's nice to think of something coming back but it's all too obvious now that these guys sat around in some coffee shop in Italy enjoying their overpriced coffee paid for in disgusting euros and said
>well yeah man I totally liked ferrania it was the best slide film and colour film like this is just the export that Italy needs in this post-EU world we can bring the film back guys haha we can just buy up the plans and the factory and we can hire some guys to make it work we'll put out a kickstarter and we'll have the film out by next year

Instead of someone slapping Luigi and Nicola and telling them to get a real jerb, they went ahead with their plan and people gave them money, even eurosocialistbux to open a plant they have no idea how to run.
I'm looking forward to them missing 2016 entirely and I feel confident enough to make another £100 bet that they won't be up next year either.

>>2957779
>stop liking things I don't like!

Last roll I shot I got 36 keepers out of 38 shots I managed to squeeze out of the 36 exp roll somehow.

Digital can't even come close to how hard my peepee gets seeing film negs and positive transparencies.

File: 932542.jpg (28KB, 477x352px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 477x352px

>>2960258
>holding a fresh strip of medium format Velvia against a bright lamp to observe the orgastic colors

File: tmp_27382-1478196137682-1238276832.png (316KB, 503x443px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 503x443px

>>2960274
I just shot a roll of velvia a snapshots of me and my girlfriend at the beach.

So good. Timeless colors and look. Something I'd wish my grand grand kids looked at

>>2960180
When a plastic reel works properly, they're very easy to load.
A steel reel is always the same moderate degree of difficulty to load correctly.
An uncooperative plastic reel will make you want to murder puppies, babies, commit harajuku, etc.

>>2960400
Any reel no matter what it's made out of should be completely dry and not have any chemical residue on it or it'll be a bitch to load. Remember to rinse it off well and leave it out to dry fully when you're done developing so that you don't have a bad time next time. If the film touches even a drop of water on the reel it'll soak it up and swell up and be a bitch to spool on properly.

I've always been a fanboy for Hewes steel reels, they're high quality and they always work if you know how to load it correctly. Yeah plastic seems easier at first but then sometimes they just don't want to work right and they'll just chew up your film or fuck everything up for no reason. Cheap off-brand steel reels tend to be poorly made and have sharp edges and stuff that catch the film too.

>>2960420
don't you hate developing film? does it feel like a chore?

might be a stupid question.. how would a 400 film shot and developed at 800 act if some of the images was overexposed by two stops? would the images be more or less contrasty?

>>2960476
porta, specifically

>>2960438
Yeah it's a pain in the ass but I like the results and it's satisfying to process your photos every step of the way from taking the photo through hanging up the final print to dry.

The real pain in the ass isn't even developing though, nothing is more miserable than scanning.

>>2960483
>nothing is more miserable than scanning.

scanning is pretty comfy. there is nothing better than watching the preview strip and say "holy fuck that actually came out good!".

>>2960477
Porta's not a film
>>2960476
You'd probably get back a roll of worthless snapshits, because it had obviously been shot by a total fucking moron.
But the images metered at 200 would be the best ones on the roll.
>implying there's any lab in the fucking universe that would dutifully observe a 16yo's request that they push process portra 400 by one stop
Hot tip buddy, they took your money, and then once you'd left pointed to the pathetic little "+1" you'd scribbled on the canister and shared a good chuckle.

>>2960476
http://carmencitafilmlab.com/how-exposure-affects-film/

File: 0004_34copy.jpg (612KB, 1200x795px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 1200x795px

i have a question, i just bought an AE-1 Program, looks brand new, probably only been used once and there was still a 12 shot film inside, i might be curious enough to develop it.

i bought it 20 euro, i was wondering two things, first it's making that squeaking noise, should i really try to fix it or is it ok and it's just a noise, like is it like a major issues ?

and secondly the program mode, i'm very curious about it, i had an F1 which was full manual setting so it's a big change, i wanted to know if the program mode is good enough to just use it most of the time and not worry. and if not in which scenario should i switch to manual mode ?

also im growing tired of ektar, wanted to try provia, but i dont really know the sharpest the better.

here's some ektar 100 if i recall, will post 3 or 4 from my latest roll, snapshiting to the limit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3090
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:07 01:47:31
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	795

File: 0010_28 copy.jpg (343KB, 1200x795px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1200x795px

>>2960502
2

also any idea for a nice b&w film ? i always used illford made the job, any suggestion ?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3090
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:07 01:57:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	795

File: 0026_9 copy.jpg (432KB, 1200x795px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1200x795px

>>2960504
3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3090
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:07 01:58:09
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	795

>>2960506
4

just smoke volutes

Copped an MJU i 35-70 to snapshit a bit with, in great condition for $35AU
How'd I do?
Wanted an mju ii but they seem to go for a lot more on eBay.

>>2960504
Most contemporary B&W film is real good. There are exceptions, of course: notably Fomapan, Kentmere, and the Chinese brands (Lucky and Shanghai, IIRC). Fomapan is expensive for what it is (in a hi-fi sense; if you want to shoot 70s halation-out-the-ass film, go right ahead; their RetroPan 320 is like doubly that), Kentmere is just about the right price, and the Chinese ones are mostly only acceptable in medium format because of the grain.

For a good sampler, buy three rolls each of Tri-X, T-Max 400, Ilford HP5+, Ilford Delta 400, and some weird-arse surprise films as well. Shoot them at box speed, develop them yourself, scan them in, and see what you like. Try slower films as well: FP4+, PanF+, T-Max 100, Delta 100. They're all different enough to be distinct products for their respective manufacturers.

But then there's specialty films, like super-panchromatic films (Retro 80s, Retro 400s, Superpan 200, Ilford SFX, and I forget the rest) that tend to have all of jack shit in terms of dynamic range, but some curious things like extended IR sensitivity which makes e.g. Superpan 200 rather nice for portraits of women. Mess with them at your leisure, but not for anything really important.

Also, get yourself a medium yellow (K2) filter. It's an easy way to make the skies something besides an uniform white.

>>2960502
Mine has also made the squeaking noise since I've had it, no issues to report.
There's a reason the Based God Kenneth calls it P for Professional mode. Nigga knows wassup.

File: 0033_2 copy.jpg (202KB, 1200x795px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1200x795px

>>2960509
thanks for all that man, i was blind and now i see.
also i actually had a yellow filter in my bag, just didnt thouth about using it this morning sadly.

>>2960512
niiice, cant wait for trying it out!

>>2960507
meant to post this, i love shooting those with my phones, then i apply some sort of mirror effect with an app, wanted to try it with an actual camera

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3090
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:07 01:59:30
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	795

>>2960508
Zoom lenses on point and shoots are absolutely fucking awful, literally anything with a prime lens would have been a lot better. Still, if it works and takes photos then you did ok I guess. I wouldn't pay $35 USD for a zoom point and shit, but maybe 35 kangaroos is a decent price.

>>2960509
I feel like I should mention Acros 100 since that's my favorite film, other than that I agree.

Also note which films are cubic grain and which ones are T-grain. T-grain films give more resolution with finer grain and can be a bit more finicky about your choice of developer and your processing technique. Cubic grain is the old-school look and the grain will look more like what you would expect from old black and white photos.

>>2960524
Mainly for the girlfriend because she dislikes primes.
Lens looks surprisingly good in some of the shots I've seen but I agree a 35mm prime would have been better.
$35AU is actually decent considering you won't find them for nothing on Craigslist like the states

File: 0033_2 ddcopy.jpg (516KB, 1884x2048px) Image search: [Google]

516KB, 1884x2048px

>>2960522

once iv applied the mirror, you get those dope palyndromic pattern, and some sick telephone wallpaper or wathever, these are not the best iv made.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3090
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:07 02:29:23
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1884
Image Height	2048

File: 0033_2 copy2.jpg (473KB, 1756x1960px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 1756x1960px

>>2960532

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3090
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:07 02:32:08
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1756
Image Height	1960

>>2960504
It looks like Paris.

>>2960509
>which makes e.g. Superpan 200 rather nice for portraits of women

Can you explain that?

>>2960550
Skin looks really smooth in IR. Usually portraits in black and white will be shot with some sort of yellow/orange/red filter because those hide freckles and imperfections.

You can take a color portrait and look at the individual color channels in black and white and you'll notice that the green and blue channels usually look awful and the red looks pale and smooth.

so uh

any of you guys ever developed with caffenol?

File: focus test.jpg (803KB, 1634x2000px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 1634x2000px

lool

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3548
Image Height	4348
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1600 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:07 02:31:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1634
Image Height	2000

>>2960495
woah, did someone pee in your cereal buddy?

>>2959096
Do you really not have a room with no windows (bathroom, walk-in closet, pantry) that you couldn't use to load film?

Changing bags are a pita and unnecessary for most people.

>>2960495
Of course a lab would respect that, as long as they paid extra for running a separate batch, or they delivered enough films that it made a whole batch.
It's not like it would cost the lab anything extra apart from an additional 30 seconds worth of time.

t. Someone who's developed customers C-41 at a push

>>2960400
Ive never met a plastic reel I couldn't load a roll onto in less than a minute, and I've used a lot of different brands.

I'm convinced some people are just retarded.

File: 1476576161981.jpg (322KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 1000x667px

>>2960509
I dunno, I found Lucky to be quite beautiful in 35mm. there's some grain, sure...but the lack of the anti-halation layer is kinda cool (pic related).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:15 22:58:32
Exposure Time	1 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2960661
>I'm convinced some people are just retarded.
They are, they're unaware that the film will catch on the side if you're too retarded to pull it.

File: smudge.jpg (308KB, 1000x668px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1000x668px

Speaking of reels, is something fucked with mine? For the last two rolls shot on different cameras I get this smudge that appears at around frame 20. Sometimes it's a thin scratch, sometimes a broad cloudy smudge. The weird thing is how it only appears towards the last third of the roll.

Any advice for a good workflow for DSLR-scanning film? What i have: D7000, bellows, 50mm 1.8, a crappy tripod and an android tablet i'm thinking of using as a light source. Also have stitching software and Lightroom.

>>2960550
Yeah, what >>2960561 said. Removing the blue channel, or de-emphasizing it by having a higher red response, tends to make skin look smoother and nicer. Similarly a green filter will make pockmarked working-class men look grittier where a yellow filter would do the opposite.

The IR thing only works under natural light though, infrared being mostly absent from e.g. LED and CFL light. Coloured filters work depending on the colour of the light; standard characterization is stated in terms of reflected sunlight (possibly thru cloud cover).

>>2960699
tell us more about your workflow in the lab
what sort of reels/tanks are you using? metal or plastic?
are you using standard temp chemistry (68 deg) or are you processing hotter than recommended?
do you use a wetting agent (e.g. photoflo)?
do these smudges/scratches appear immediately after you take the film out of the reel or have you only noticed them after the film has dried/been put into neg sleeves?

>>2960952
for instance if you aren't waiting long enough for your film to dry completely, the part of the roll hanging up top will be dry quicker than the bottom part.
if that's the case putting it into a negative sleeve prematurely could cause the emulsion to smudge on the bottom parts that are not yet completely dry, especially if you are developing at a hotter temp than 68 (since hotter temperatures can remove/loosen the emulsion from the film base)

>>2960952
I use a Kaiser tank with a plastic reel.

First roll was stand developed at +20C 1:200 dilution for 60 minutes. Second one (from which the pic is from) with Rodinal 1:25 for 11 minutes at +20C. I don't sleeve my negatives before scanning, I hang them to dry, cut and feed to the scanner, and sleeve after scanning. I don't want anything touching the emulsion before it has been scanned. Oh well, I haven't been doing developing a whole lot yet, so maybe it's just my reel-fu. I'll try a different method of unloading the spiral on the next run.

>>2957537
I'm completely new to Film Photography. Does anyone have some links or any helpful info on what I should know/how to get started? I love the quality that film photography produces.

>>2961018
>Step 1: Buy film camera
>Step 2: Buy film
>Step 3: Shoot
>Step 4: Develop film (at home or at lab)
>Step 5: ???
>Step 6: Shitposting in /fgt/!

>>2961020
How would I go about developing film at home?

>>2961030
depending on whether you want to do B&W or color you're going to need corresponding chemicals

For color you need C41 chemicals, which consist of a developer, a blix (bleach + fixer) and stabilizer (I use the Tetenal C41 kit). The C41 (color) process is fairly standardized so it's pretty much the same every time, but you have to be very careful with the temperature because even slight variation can fuck up the pictures. That said, I only ever fucked up 1 roll and that was as not in the beginning.

B&W is a lot easier and has a lot more margin of error + you can adjust the times/temperatures for different effects. Chemicals also only include a Developer and Bleach. Most popular Developer is Rodinal but there are better ones out there which can give you better results

That said, if you're just starting out, I would recommend finding a local lab and getting your film developed there at first until you get a feel for shooting film

File: image.jpg (140KB, 1001x1024px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1001x1024px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1001
Image Height	1024