Sony dominate the market, it's over

File: IMG_0390.jpg (704KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

704KB, 1000x667px

>>2953137

>caring about market share and not whether a particular product will meet your individual needs

Well you're obviously autistic so you will fit in well with the Sony shills

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-T1
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	210 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:25 14:48:03
Exposure Time	1/4000 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	8.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	140.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2953143
>meet needs
>Ugly as fuck bokeh and eye rape saturation.
I'm glad fuji fulfilled your needs.

File: t r a s h .jpg (4MB, 2941x1960px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2941x1960px

>>2953147
>>2953143
HERE IT GOES BOIS.

Strap yourself in for another DPreview.com tier comment war. One that's going to last far longer than the comment war on rumour sites and is even less relevant.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Pakon, Inc
Camera Model	F135_PLUS
Camera Software	TLB 3, 1, 0, 28
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:08 00:26:21
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2941
Image Height	1960

>>2953147

Literally bait raped

That's an a7 photo with XT1 metadata attached.

Enjoy the Sony

>>2953155
i love you

>>2953137
Sony only has one advantage: Numbers.
All their cameras look good on paper.
Actual photographers notice after a few months what pieces of shit their cameras are.
This is a small surge and Sony will soon drop again.

>>2953201
OBLIGITARY SONY DEFENSE COMING THROUGH

HONK HONK

1. List your reasons
2. Those reasons are invalid because reasons
3. proofs
4. those proofs are invalid.
5. Firmware update coming out with new menus
6. it's only 21 pages xD

You may now move on with your life. There is no reason to respond to this post.

>>2953137
Good luck selling your kidneys to afford the lenses.

File: 1526_DF_left.png (533KB, 700x595px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 700x595px

>>2953137
Canikon stopped listening to what photographers want years ago and instead went for more wow megapikles, 10 bizillion ISO, and slow ass f4 "pro" lenses.

then we get abortions like this

>>2953213
I see this camera mentioned a lot here, what's the deal with it?

>>2953214
its pretty

>>2953155
No, it's not, that's my photo.

File: 6a00df351e888f8834019b00d0f432970d-800wi.jpg (85KB, 800x372px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 800x372px

>>2953214
what everyone wanted was a digital FM3a
what we got was a d700 with some fake plastic chrome shit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Width	800
Image Height	372

>>2953137
>canikon have had FF bodies for 15 years

Only Canon, Nikon for just 9 years.
And those were very expensive professional DSLR's, not something consumers would buy.

>>2953214
>what's the deal with it?

100% meme

>>2953155
>>2953143
>>2953179

Sony doesn't have a 210mm f2.8 lens
Sony doesn't use the IMG prefix
Sony doesn't have "subject distance range" in it's exif, they do have a field for saturation.

Get rekt faggot.

>>2953201
Aren't you the same faggot that was saying "no-one shoots sony, no-one shoots mirrorless"

The facts are, no other camera ecosystem has had such un unprecedented effect on the market, there are no brakes, you wait until next year when canikon go mirrorless but try to keep their antiquated mounts and everyone laughs at them.

>>2953137
>Full Frame
Who cares? Everyone else is moving to APS-C or smaller because general consumers don't want xbox hueg lenses

>>2953246
"general consumer" sales have fallen through the arse in the last 3 - 4 years.
full frame sales have been largely the same year in, year out.

>>2953246
Go read the cipa report, total sales of FF lenses is larger than crop lens sales, despite crop cameras outnumbering full frame by about 10 to 1.

>>2953257

Is that units sold or revenue generated?

Because, hey, news flash: full frame lenses are hella more expensive than crop.

>>2953225
A digital fm3a would've been a dream come true. Grip should've been left as an aftermarket option. Autofocus module should've been left out to keep the size as small as possible. Instead of a PSAM dial, an auto setting on the ISO and shutter dials, and a switch for 'auto aperture' that automatically engages the auto aperture when stopped down to f22 if it's switched on. And of course, aperture controlled through a rear dial for lenses without an aperture ring.

It don't need high speed burst shooting sports capability, hell they didn't even add video to maintain that "pure photography" philosophy, why not go all the way.

>>2953143
>you will fit in well with the Sony shills
He is the Sony shills, all of them

>>2953233

It's XT1 metadata attached to an a7 file, how fucking autistic are you bro?

Topkek, cuck

>>2953375
It does have that "lurid" quality I associate with Sony, but how can you be so sure?

Never seen oof quite like it tbqh.

>>2953238
>when canikon go mirrorless but try to keep their antiquated mounts

I honestly wonder what will happen with those companies. Mirrorless just makes more sense than mirrors at this point. As the technology improves those companies will surely switch, at which point do they keep their original mounts or create a new mount and offer adapters for their old mounts? There's no way they'd keep their old mounts. "Oh hey, we're doing mirrorless now too except are versions aren't as flexible and you still can only shoot our lenses."

>>2953137
> How did this happen?
Sony quickly iterated (possible probably in part because they're actually based on Android...) and opened up the lens standard.

>Is it time to pack up and migrate to Sony?
To the E-mount you mean?

Because you might already be using one or more Sony sensors. Most smartphones that /p/ might like & most better IL cameras use a Sony sensor anyhow.

>Canon stock chart
>Nikon stock chart
>Sony stock chart
How will canikon recover?

>>2953137
The paid viral marketers aren't even trying to hide it any more are they

>>2953201
>>2953238
Sony opened a new market niche and as of yet have no direct competition. If you want the combination of small mirrorless body and FF sensor, the A7 is the only game in town.

I'm about as far from a Sony fan as it gets, but that doesn't mean I don't see why they're selling so well, they're a marketing dream.

>>2953430
They don't need paid viral marketers when they have an army of autists that have been primed by a decade of /v/ console wars and who are desperate to justify the expensive thing they spent all of their NEETbux on.

>>2953143

wtf why is the bokeh like that and why do i like it so much? what lens was this shot with does anyone know?

>>2953448
>army of autist
There's only one of him, the other shills died of embarrasment

File: graph.jpg (78KB, 640x499px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x499px

>>2953137
More point-and-shoot have been sold in in the past year than dslr's. Does that mean point-and-shoot cameras are better?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2948
Image Height	2127
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	307 dpi
Vertical Resolution	307 dpi
Image Created	2014:12:15 09:07:45
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	499

>>2953225
>>2953232
>Being this mad

>>2953214
I actually own this camera. It's far from a D700, although the AF could be better in the Df.
Although it does use the D4 sensor in a smaller body without the ability to shoot video.

Honestly, the Df kicks ass, and it looks traditional, just like any Fuji camera. So I honestly don't get the whole meme bullshit behind it.

>>2953502
>the past year
>2013

>>2953509
there's retro (shit), then there's retro (cool)

Df falls in the former

>>2953410
Google fuji 50 140 bokeh, there's plenty of examples and plenty of forum posts about how fucking ugly it is. I nearly swapped to fuji, then saw how bad their lenses are,oof areas are disgusting.

>>2953488
Fuji 50 140 f2.8, it's ugly bokeh is well known.

File: TS560x560.jpg (61KB, 374x560px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 374x560px

>>2953375
That's not how metadata works

Here's further proof that it's fuji, nervous bokeh, sony don't do a telephoto lens with bokeh like that, but it's a trademark of fuji's, pic related, first image from "fuji 50 140 bokeh"

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-T1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time	1/340 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	140.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto

File: shaky_2.jpg (36KB, 464x480px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 464x480px

>>2953579
Great bokeh. A+ . Top award

File: 1061979.jpg (162KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1000x667px

>>2953579
From the same thread on FM

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-T1
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Steve Wylie
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	210 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2014:12:05 01:05:34
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	4000
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	-0.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Tungsten
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	140.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2953584
It's called perspective interest, i thought you were a little less visually illiterate bj, I'm not surprised you shoot sony.

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (383KB, 2000x1335px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 2000x1335px

oh look another sony shilling thread well what do you know

>>2953591
Where is this?

File: XPro1-Cam1.jpg (42KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 900x600px

>>2953509
I'm sorry about your loss

What Fuji got right and Nikon got wrong is size. The Fuji X-Pro_ is roughly the same size as a classic rangefinder, slightly thicker than a film body but about the same as a Leica digital. Fuji also created a clean design without to fucking many buttons and dials.
Had Nikon basically come out with an A7 with an F mount, and simple controls, they would have had a winner. Instead we got a fuckhuge monstrosity littered willy-nilly with buttons and dials.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: ff.png (1MB, 1670x521px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1670x521px

>>2953782
>fuckhuge monstrosity
You do realize that the Df is already among the smallest and lightest FF DSLR:s? Its roughly the same size as the Canon 6D.
>inb4 muh "digital FM3"
It's never going to happen as long as Nikon keeps using the traditional DSLR design. All that circuitry etc. must go somewhere and there simply isn't enough space for that in a FM3 -sized body.

>>2953819
holy shit you dumb cunt its the MIRROR, not the circuitry, THE FUCKING MIRROR
HOW can you talk so confidently without realizing this
fuck kill me now

File: 10692436833_53c17fe018_z.jpg (127KB, 640x424px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 640x424px

>>2953846
Uh FM3 has a mirror too. The point was that modern DSLRs (i.e. not mirrorless/MILC) will never be as small as a vintage film SLR.

>>2953856
>>2953846
I'm pretty sure it's the autofocus module that's responsible for the extra height, and the sensor is responsible for the extra thickness

>>2953856
>The point was that modern DSLRs (i.e. not mirrorless/MILC) will never be as small as a vintage film SLR.
a mirrorless in the shape of a DSLR with an optical viewfinder built into the mirrorbox instead with a superimposed liveview in the OVF akin to an xpro2 could easily fit the size profile.

Why are you so attached to a primitive workaround like a mirror mechanism? It's current year. Wisen up.

>>2953870
there are rumors of pentax released a mirrorless k-mount camera with vintage styling, using an EVF where the OVF/pentaprism would go

>>2953870
>people want a stripped down DSLR which matches the look and feel and ergonomics of using a manual film SLR.

>lol just buy a mirrorless instead, staring at a computer screen in a viewfinder is just like using an SLR

A big fat clunky pig like the DF didn't match what the target audience wanted, but neither would an EVF mirrorless camera. I guess Nikon finally caved and made the camera anyway just because so many people bitched about wanting a retro DSLR for so long that they figured the DF would sell well even if it was garbage. They probably shouldn't have bothered though if this was the closest they could manage.

File: current year.jpg (28KB, 367x390px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 367x390px

>>2953870
>It's current year

Seriously though, EVFs are OK and they're still improving but a large and bright OVF is just such a pleasure to use. The simplicity and directness of control are just unmatched even by the best EVFs.

>>2953870
idk, I personally like things as mechanical as possible, and for me, something that works so well as a pentaprism or a pentamirror is a sign of something that probably wont break, and will still work no matter how much does technology advance. Maybe thats why I like film as well, but it would be sad to see DSLRs completely replaced by mirrorless.

>>2953782
>Instead we got a fuckhuge monstrosity littered willy-nilly with buttons and dials.

The camera is actually quite compact and more lightweight than other FF dslrs. Not to mention, if you can't deal with assigning some buttons and using dials here and there, then you are not made for photography.

During many shoots, the only thing I often change is my shutterspeed/aperature. Which is controlled by two dials that are easily accessable. I preset my ISO based on location and lighting situations.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>2953870
looking at screens is tiring

>>2953502
What a great graph.
>dat cliff for film cames
Holy shit dudes, we need to innovate or die!
>bright pink coolpix's save the day
>>>>>>dat iphone clif
Where you gon run now, fat boi?

>>2954572
Meme

Just buy a D810 - it's better in every single way.