Angry

>>2950290
Delete this thread, repost nowhere.

File: image.jpg (3MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5472x3648px

>>2950290
>shoot eltachrome for first time
>"LOL I ONLY SHOOT MANUALLL FUCK APERTURE PRIORITY, MY C41 COMES OUT GREAT"
>only 6 frames were exposed correctly, the rest were blown out from flash or under developed
>film lab developer tries to make me feel better by saying it was an expired roll
I like to collect slides from garage sales to scan, but I don't think shooting slides is my forté
Here's an underexposed example from the roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3648
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: image.jpg (56KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 960x640px

>>2950308
Wow I forgot to resize, here's an example of me fucking up the slides with the flash

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	960
Image Height	640

>>2950308
>I like to collect slides from garage sales to scan

Could you post a blurred under exposed 3 MB scan of a granny blowing out birthday candles please.

File: image.jpg (3MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5472x3648px

>>2950313
This is probably the closest I could find to that in my google drive.
Most of my slides are from upper middle class white folks in the 50s-80s.
Usually vacation photos or bird photos, sometimes I get lucky and find a good photographers work.
I feel obligated to scan every slide I get though, I hate the idea that people's memories can just disappear so easily.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3648
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2950308
Could probs pass off for hipster art

>>2950308
>shoots manual
>but clearly has a metering system
>still fucks up
you deserve it
>>2950290
>didn't look at the roll of film, or write on it
You also deserve it.

>>2950348
Meh. I just carelessly said a bit excited "let's develop!" And got ready without a second thought

>>2950308
Where is this?

>>2950309
>>2950308
Kek. I tried my first roll of slide this year but was so embarassed I cross processed it myself.
Turned out A-ok in the end.
>>2950290
How did you even do this? self-load E-6? Or do you just load your film into the tank and leave it for a few weeks before processing?

>>2950323
>I feel obligated to scan every slide I get though, I hate the idea that people's memories can just disappear so easily.

That's really beautiful anon

>>2950323
>I feel obligated to scan every slide I get though, I hate the idea that people's memories can just disappear so easily.
So are they going to archive.org or something?

>>2950325
I'd send myself to the gulag before I push my work onto a hipster audience
>>2950348
Yeah I set my exposure comp to +2 I think and didn't take it very seriously when the meter read that the frame was underexposed, it was a Nikon N2000 and I wasn't familiar with it yet. I was a dummy for thinking I was pro enough for it. I thought I had to comp for exposure because of it being expired, but it was only 10 years expired and I shouldn't have fucked with the exposure comp.
>>2950360
Seattle WA, shot it from some sky garden
>>2950490
Yeah I was reading once that c-41 film provides about 8 stops of dynamic range while slide film provides about 4, so I probably will only shoot slide film again with my MJU.
I don't particularly like the look of slide film, I just like looking at slides on my projector

File: en voi hyvin 2.jpg (361KB, 625x627px)

361KB, 625x627px

>>2950308
>shot two rolls of MF Velvia and one Provia with Nettar
>"Nah man, I can judge exposure well enough, fuck meters"
>get home and immediately regret what I just did
>mfw as I wait for the results from the lab

>>2950497
>>2950501
I was planning on making a tumblr to dump them all into.
I'm in the process of cataloging them all RN and dating.
I'll probably make a thread here once I have it up and going that will show some photos and have a link to the archival blog.

File: image.jpg (20KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 300x225px

>>2950504
I read that Bliss was shot on velvia, so maybe it'll look a little like this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	300
Image Height	225

>>2950490
Just carelessness on my part. I put it in quickly anxious to develop my slides and got carried away.

>>2950503
Meh. I put my trash and bad photos on Tumblr and they eat it up. I don't get hipsters.

>>2950504
I guess we both fucked up big time

>>2950508
Didn't know velvia had so much aliasing.

>>2950506
>I was planning on making a tumblr to dump them all into.
Please just make them downloadable as a zip too, sites like tumblr aren't usually very friendly about mass downloading.

>>2950614
Amen to that.