I am trying to pick up a cheap DSLR camera because I want to

>>2945216

I was about to start a thread about advice for a D3300, but will monitor this one instead.

>I'm too inexperienced to really know exactly what I want

I second this. From the limited research that I have done, a lot of websites point to the D3300 as a good entry level DSLR, but I'm open to suggestions for alternatives.

Ultimately I would like to get into Macro Photography, but I'll leave that for when I'm more experienced.

Thanks.

you guys need to lurk more, and use the gear thread. (Protip buy used gear, a 2007 dslr will cover your needs for now)

>>2945389

>2007 dslr

Really? How much has the technology changed in nearly ten years? And how much roughly would a ten year old camera set me back?

>>2945400
You could get a D300 and a starter lens or two for probably around the same price as a D3200 kit. It'll be faster, tougher, and more functional, and since it has an internal AF motor unlike the D3200 you can use older lenses and save a lot of money that way. Honestly with a good body a lot of the old screw-drive lenses focus just as fast (if not faster) as the in-lens motor versions, at least for the cheaper lenses.

>>2945400
high iso performance and dynamic range got better, also resolution (overrated for most applications)
depending on the model and brand also the autofocus
but the built quality and functionality might be worth it

try to get something with a ccd sensor; good for low iso, nice colors but no high-iso

>>2945801

Just done a quick shop around and the D300 seems to be going for no less than £200 for just the body. That's £100 less than new with a lens...

>>2945814
Are you referring to a CCD sensor if I buy an older camera? I understand from what I've been reading that newer CMOS sensors are equal to or in some cases better than a CCD sensor.

This shit is so confusing.

>>2946462
>That's £100 less than new

£100 less than a D3300 I meant.

>>2945216
I bought a Nikon D 3100 for $199 plus free shipping.
Came with a 18-55mm lens 2 batteries a Nikon carrying bag and battery charger only had I think 7-8 shooter count's used.

>>2945216
>>2945383
I'll chime in, because I have a similar problem. Some of my friends suggested Canon's EOS 100d is a better option in similar price range due to greater compatibility with cheaper lenses, but I don't really see many recommendation of Canon here. Is there any particular reason for that?