Road Trip

File: DSC04433-water2.jpg (469KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1500x1000px

Two Jack Lake, right outside of the town of Banff.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:22 15:44:42
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Brightness	7.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

File: DSC05461-water.jpg (580KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 1500x1000px

Grinnell Glacier Trail at Sunset. Freezing Cold, and the hike back in the dark through bear country wasn't my favorite, but damn if it wasn't a gorgeous evening.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:02 18:26:03
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	160
Brightness	-0.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

File: DSC03608-2.jpg (915KB, 1200x1500px) Image search: [Google]

915KB, 1200x1500px

On the drive up to Moraine Lake (which I'll post in a bit), I pulled over for this shot. Funny because Moraine Lake is one of the most photographed spots in the world, to the point where it's actually annoying, so I was stoked to find a shot that's a little more unique.

I'm off to work for now. I'll be back later, bye!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:12 18:17:42
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	5.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>2944595
This one is nice. I do wish the camera was pointed a little lower.

>>2944592
>>2944594
These photos are a victim of dynamic range squeezing. I suggest you give up on it, you won't squeeze the dynamic range into a photograph. Your post processing in making the sky darker is quite extreme, but the halos around mountains aren't the primary problem. The primary problem is that the foreground is just too dark. You are putting a lot of lipstick on a pig in both photographs.

Like it. I had the choice to go to Banff or Montreal this summer and went to Montreal. I chose poorly.

>>2944603
>These photos are a victim of dynamic range squeezing. I suggest you give up on it, you won't squeeze the dynamic range into a photograph. Your post processing in making the sky darker is quite extreme, but the halos around mountains aren't the primary problem. The primary problem is that the foreground is just too dark. You are putting a lot of lipstick on a pig in both photographs.

Bullshit
These both look absolutely fine, you can make out all the detail in the shadows and the halos are minimal.

The sky and peaks are clearly the focal points, and they are exposed just right to do so.

Great job OP, the set really shows off what a fantastic combo the new sony bodies and the oem sony lenses are.

>>2944592
Nice shots but I thing you've over-egged the processing a tad

>>2944605
>Great job OP, the set really shows off what a fantastic combo the new sony bodies and the oem sony lenses are.

lol wut

>>2944650
It is sad to see that even on a photography board the "Wow, what a nice picture! You must have a really great camera!" never gets old or dies. :/

>>2944605
>Great job OP, the set really shows off what a fantastic combo the new sony bodies and the oem sony lenses are.
5 rupees have been deposited in your account

>>2944592
>>2944593
>>2944594
>>2944595
These look great, OP. Well done. I just think your images might be a tad oversharpened. Other than that, I really do like what I am looking at. Did you process multiple RAWs and stack them to get more dynamic range/detail?

>>2944774
Curious about this too, since I'm studying luminosity mask stacking at the moment

Great photos, id love to learn more about your process of both finding the shots and the post

File: 72667958101e0fb68dbc9f71c91330bb.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>2944603
the first one has slight haloing, but I don't really think it's bad.
All of them are better landscapes than I've ever taken. I really need to go out west sometime.

>>2944605
>Great job OP, the set really shows off what a fantastic combo the new sony bodies and the oem sony lenses are.
I tip my sensor to you, m'irrorless c/:^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2014:12:31 11:36:57
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	-2.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: popoolariod 3.jpg (172KB, 665x1000px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 665x1000px

>>2944595
come on dude post your Moraines

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	Capture One 9 Macintosh
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:04 23:22:51
Image Created	2016:09:04 23:22:51
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Image Width	665
Image Height	1000
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: DSC03615-Water2.jpg (387KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1000x666px

>>2944774
>>2944778

No exposure stacking at all. I find bracketing to be tedious and unnecessary because of how good the DR on the Sony sensors is. Also for the record, I'm not that shill from earlier haha... don't get paid by them, but it is a really fun camera. Finding the shot is really the fun part for me, and arguably my only talent when it comes to photography. I'm weirdly good at wandering to random places with good views haha. I'll explain more in a bit.

>>2944789
>I tip my sensor to you, m'irrorless c/:^)

Holy fuck that made me laugh

>>2944809

Ok!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:12 18:17:09
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	5.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

Wow, OP, thanks for shooting these! That's one less place I don't have to go see in person!

File: DSC03675.jpg (648KB, 1000x1250px) Image search: [Google]

648KB, 1000x1250px

More Moraine. More-Ain. Moreanal?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:29 15:24:31
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	6.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

File: DSC03987-2.jpg (221KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1000x666px

Some shitty lake

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:29 15:26:57
Exposure Time	1/3200 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	8.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

File: DSC05062-2.jpg (310KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1500x1000px

This was the gnarliest sunrise of my life. HOWLING wind, freezing temperatures, and small spats of hail. Suddenly as the sunrose, a rainbow formed over the continental divide.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:26 18:12:48
Exposure Time	1/45 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	50
Brightness	0.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

over-processed digi shit. looks fake and gay.

oh but you included a watermark with your instagram since you're so totally"out in the wild" as you walk along the tourist trails of banff.

The processing is disappointing. Just because you can doesn't mean you should. You've lifted shadows and flattened highlights to the point where there are no lights and no darks anymore thus believability is compromised.

I Know everyone gets an erection at the thought of "Muh dynamic range" but most people just abuse it and these pictures are an example of that.

>>2944592 the lower slopes of the mountain has way more detail than it should and is distracting, the trees in the middle distance have the same tonal weight as those in the foreground and the yellow leaves and matching clouds have the Rockwell seal of approval

>>2944593 the reflections in the water have too much colour and detail

>>2944594 foreground lifted clouds lowered rockwellian oranges

>>2944595 flat featureless swathe of trees across the middle diminished any notion of distance between foreground and back

File: DSC04587-2.jpg (374KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1000x666px

>>2944848

Oh someone is butthurt that their $9k Leica didn't make them a good photographer, and that nobody wants to buy their black and white pictures of old men in a park.

Just because there's good views from a road doesn't mean those views aren't worth seeing. It also doesn't mean that someone NEVER ventures off the road.

Just for you, a picture in the wild. Hiked 4 miles by headlamp in the dark through bear country to watch sunrise from a ridge covered in yellow Larch trees. Are you so impressed by how wild I am?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:29 15:44:35
Exposure Time	1/1000 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	8.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Shade
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>2944859
Why shoot this at f/2?

>>2944859
You're not exactly a good photographer either. They are "postcards". The compositions are boring. They are over-cooked.

I can even tell you what you've done
-100 Hightlights
-100 whites
+100 shadows
+100 blacks.

Then you adjusted the curve. It doesn't look believable.

Inb4 "butthurt"

>>2944864
I assume to get a nice defocus on the foreground. I don't mind it here at this size because the lens is obviously sharp enough to handle it. At full size, I dunno how the depth of field would look, but it's possible to get a shot like this fully in focus at f2 if you're careful at 28mm.

>>2944859

I'm more impressed with your amount of projecting:

>butthurt that his expensive gear still just takes the same generic images I could pull up on google
Check

>butthurt that nobody will EVER pay actual money for these prints in any form
Check

>butthurt over being to fat to hike
Check

PS I shoot with a 5d2

I like your photos and I want to take similar ones, to leave these /p/ streetplebs behind. Have you ever climbed a mountain and took photos up there?

>>2944868

Well you're wrong about the processing, but that's okay. I also never said I was a good photographer, I just said I went on a trip and wanted to share some pictures. Then I remembered why nobody good ever posts here, because it's just a shitty cesspool of hate.

>>2944864
Because the $200 manual rokinon lens I shot that with is honestly pretty terrible across all aperatures, so I just shoot wide open so I can keep the ISO low.

>>2944843
Whoa. That sure is a one of a kind shot. Glad you've taken the image in that very moment. Stunning.

>>2944842
So beautiful. These rich blues are amazing and the contrast looks just perfect.
Would use as Wallpaper.

Do you happen to have an online portfolio? I fucking love landscape shots like yours and would like to see (way) more of it!

>>2944848
>anon posts great landscape shots
>finally another nice image thread that's not about recent snapshits of dogs and cats
>hurr overprocessed digishit

oh, come on.

File: DSC03521-2.jpg (553KB, 1000x1250px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 1000x1250px

>>2944874

I do, my website is www.NateLuebbe.com

And thank you.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	99 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:29 15:25:31
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	8.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	99.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>2944873
He's not even that wrong about the processing.

Here's some excerpts from the EXIF of >>2944594 via http://regex.info/exif.cgi

>Vibrance +48
>Saturation +20
>Highlights 2012 -100
>Shadows 2012 +81
>Clarity 2012 +55

You basically edit like a hamfisted retard and just rely on your camera to just make it werk lolz

Don't blame /p/ for telling the truth for once. Bin your camera, take over 9000 shots with your phone, then come back. See you then faggot.

>>2944878
Thanks!
>checks gallery on site
Oh boy I am in love.

>>2944882
Why can't you guys cut the gear/processfagging altogether and enjoy the images posted for once?

>>2944873
Alex Burke posts here, and he is quite accomplished. He's in fact the greatest landscape photographer to ever post on this board. You could learn a lot from reading his posts. It's just that you're not good, even though you like to think so.

Also don't lie about your PP. I had a D800E with a Sony sensor. I know what dynamic range squeezing looks like on Sony sensors.

>>2944883
http://www.alexburkephoto.com/

Take a look at him if you actually enjoy landscape photos.

>>2944883
Because I don't like looking at gis images with the clarity and sat cranked to 11?

>>2944884

You'll notice I never claimed to be good, that was all projection on your end. Literally what I said was that I was going to share some images. You guys just chose to shit all over me because you're sad people and I guess you get some fun out of that? Anyhow, lesson learned, see ya later I guess.

>>2944883
D-don't worry about them senpai, they're just mad nerds on the internet. I like your photos and I'm still waiting to hear about your adventures finding these shots in the wild

>this thread
>derailed by gearfags, again

This is why we can't have nice things.

>>2944897
more like the anti-postprocessing streetfags ruined it, they hate colour

>>2944892
• Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it

>>2944882
Yo how did you find the edited values? I can't see them on my pic on that site
>>2944809
Tell me those values I don't remember the edit

>>2944892
Also if your cool with your pictures you shouldn't be insecure with your processing or be threatened by anons lol. If your sharing (as most do) for appraisal or validation then here is definitely not the place. but taking criticism with a grain of salt it's not horrible. just saying harden up that skin little guy it's a rough world out there.

>>2944592
Consider a square crop and the haloing is somewhat of an issue. See if you can fix it by really pulling the graduation in a filtering much further down into the ground.

>>2944594
I enjoy this one. Ideally something more could be done with the trail on the right but you can't have everything.

>>2944595
This is great, especially for a cloudless shot.

>>2944930
This

>>2944892
Come back and share some more photos and stories, you faggot

>>2944859
>4 miles
>the wild
wewlad. Nice blown out shitfest.

solid 8/10 OP well done Sony sensor be damned.

fuck off trolls someone finally posted a decent non-shite photo thread and it wasn't d or Alex.

>>2944592
What is white balance, this is way too yellowish.

Dude. Seriously, lay off the sharpening. It really is to a point where it's detrimental. Nice colors overall. The compositions felt generic, but it's landscape photos so eh. A lot of them have a bit of a blue tint, and I say this from a print shop monitor, so take that as you will. Otherwise good thread, forget the haters, this board is just a troll machine now.

>>2944702
Or he just looked at the EXIF data and saw where it was taken with a Sony Alpha 7 II :/

>>2944848
piss off alex you fucking prick

File: 4_small.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

I was there too (last week)
I'll post in my own thread, but first i'm going to test 4chan's colour space.

I've been editing in ProPhoto colour space, and so lets see if the colours get butchered and i should convert to sRGB

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	906
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7360
Image Height	4912
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 22:27:11
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	27.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2944592
Good editing to make the clouds look so dynamic, but definitely at the expense of any realism (and a bit of tree masking / gradient fade out in the mountain). The two tall evergreens are good for framing but the out of focus branches on the bottom right are a bit of a pain. It makes a great thumbnail.

>>2944594
At first I like it, but the more I look at it the more little things annoy me. A bit heavily baked for sure. Top half of the pic is great, lake is nice of course, but the rest is busy / boring and really inconsistent.

>>2944595
The best shot, good layering, fairly clean editing and natural colour tint. The snow in the sun is a good white balance, and the cyan layer of trees isn't too cyan. Props to the layering again. Foreground is perfect height to balance the rest of the shot.

>>2944834
This is too cyan though. Calm lake and all, and i know it's pretty impossible to be original here, but abusing the colour isn't helping it stand out.

>>2944838
Better, I always think the boats make a good foreground, but in this case too scattered and random. The reflection at the bottom is an eye catcher. Might have been a different angle that exaggerated that and the boats that would work? Maybe lying right on the ground bottom left?

>>2944843
Why does the sharpness / contrast drop off to terrible near the right 10% of the picture? Shame there's no good foreground because that was a pretty amazing timed rainbow / sun spots on the mountains.

>>2944878
just bad.

>>2945392
see
>>2946961
Stop posting anytime Jesse.

>someone finally posted a decent non-shite photo thread
Thanks for contributing to /p/! You're welcome to post your best pictures anytime.