Gave it a go and scanned some of my negatives to see if it's

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 12

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM)
2016-09-19 23:23:38 Post No. 2928990
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: Delta 3200 3.9.2016-019.jpg (220KB, 1200x960px) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:23:38 Post No. 2928990 [Report]

Gave it a go and scanned some of my negatives to see if it's a viable alternative to regular film scanners.

Memeya 645, 45mm f/2.8

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:24:59 Post No.2928992
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:24:59 Post No.2928992 [Report]

File: Delta 3200 3.9.2016-018.jpg (281KB, 927x1200px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 927x1200px

Same camera, same place - Drnov air defence bunker.

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:26:14 Post No.2928994
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:26:14 Post No.2928994 [Report]

File: Delta 3200 3.9.2016-024.jpg (110KB, 857x1200px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 857x1200px

3/?

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:27:18 Post No.2928996
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:27:18 Post No.2928996 [Report]

File: Delta 3200 3.9.2016-017.jpg (211KB, 960x1200px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 960x1200px

4/?

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:30:53 Post No.2928998
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:30:53 Post No.2928998 [Report]

File: PAN F 50 3.9.2016-012.jpg (221KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1200x800px

5/?
Konica IIIa and my first attempt to get an even ilumination on the 35mm negative holder

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:33:02 Post No.2929000
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:33:02 Post No.2929000 [Report]

File: PAN100 3.9.2016-011.jpg (238KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1200x800px

6/?
Konica IIIa again
I just love this camera

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:34:30 Post No.2929001
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:34:30 Post No.2929001 [Report]

File: ACROS 100 3.9.2016-016.jpg (233KB, 1200x927px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1200x927px

7/?
Memeya 645 + 80mm f/2.8
Just outside the Prague castle

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:36:09 Post No.2929002
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:36:09 Post No.2929002 [Report]

File: HP5 Plus 3.9.2016-027.jpg (312KB, 1200x857px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1200x857px

8/?
M645 + 45mm f/2.8
Kinsky garden

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:38:06 Post No.2929005
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-19 23:38:06 Post No.2929005 [Report]

File: HP5 Plus 3.9.2016-025.jpg (256KB, 1200x857px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1200x857px

9/9
That's it for now. No bully pls.

Anonymous 2016-09-19 23:52:19 Post No.2929017
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-09-19 23:52:19 Post No.2929017 [Report]

You didn't mention what this alternative is.

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 00:12:35 Post No.2929030
[Report]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 00:12:35 Post No.2929030 [Report]

>>2929017
Right, sorry about that. DSLR scans, backlit by my light table and held in place with a negative holder from my enlarger.
It works fairly well with 6x4.5 because the negative covers the whole frame even though my closest focusing lens (which happens to be the Canon 18-55 kit lens) doesn't focus particularly close.

Anonymous 2016-09-20 00:44:19 Post No.2929067
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-09-20 00:44:19 Post No.2929067 [Report]

>>2929030
Not bad given the lens used. Grab a cheap used mirrorless body and a mf macro of your choice when you are ready to step up.

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 22:18:21 Post No.2930002
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 22:18:21 Post No.2930002 [Report]

File: PAN100 3.9.2016-003.jpg (895KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

895KB, 2000x1333px

A few more pictures. These are all from the Konica.

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 22:19:39 Post No.2930004
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 22:19:39 Post No.2930004 [Report]

File: PAN100 3.9.2016-006.jpg (598KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 2000x1333px

These are all practically unprocessed, just inverted in Lightroom.

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 22:21:00 Post No.2930005
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 22:21:00 Post No.2930005 [Report]

File: PAN100 3.9.2016-008.jpg (661KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 2000x1333px

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 22:22:12 Post No.2930008
[Report]

Anonymous (ID: !9UMMMMMMMM) 2016-09-20 22:22:12 Post No.2930008 [Report]

>>2930004
Hmph. Why did I not focus on the altar?

Anonymous 2016-09-20 23:09:52 Post No.2930043
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-09-20 23:09:52 Post No.2930043 [Report]

>>2928990
I love this image to shreds. To shreds, I say.

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/