Film Point and Shoot

File: Scan_20160316.png (1MB, 1000x651px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x651px

another one, super shitty scan of a low quality print

olympus xa

File: img045.jpg (2MB, 926x1296px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 926x1296px

Contax T2
Portra 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	10200
Image Height	14039
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:04:03 21:48:30
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	926
Image Height	1296

File: Untitled-14.jpg (1MB, 728x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 728x1080px

Contax T2
Portra 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:30 19:33:52
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	728
Image Height	1080

>>2921162
cool stuff, how is the contax? is it as good as they say?

File: Scan-150609-0022.jpg (330KB, 720x472px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 720x472px

>>2921261

Thanks.

I've used various P&S and it's probably my favourite. The lens is great and pretty sharp and focus is quick and precise. You have aperture control which is rare for a P&S. Exposure compensation is nice too. It's kinda heavy, and not pocketable unless you have a jacket on. Feels pretty durable.

If you're interested in one, and have the money I'd say get one now, as they seem to be climbing in price. I would probably sell other cameras to fund a new one if mine broke.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Epson
Camera Model	PerfectionV600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2881
Image Height	4398
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:06:10 15:31:36
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	720
Image Height	472

>>2921307
i dont have a job right now and im looking at other cameras so i probably wont be able to get a contax for a long time, seems like a nice camera though

File: 013.jpg (865KB, 3688x2464px) Image search: [Google]

865KB, 3688x2464px

some pos olympus that i bought for 10 bucks

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.3.9600.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2015:02:25 15:57:02

File: 015.jpg (572KB, 2624x3664px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 2624x3664px

sorry for these terrible scans, too lazy to fix anything

shitty lolympus again

>>2921548
shit i should have resized lmao

>>2921787

Its fine, no one is going to click on it anyways.

File: runner.jpg (703KB, 1433x948px) Image search: [Google]

703KB, 1433x948px

>>2921396

Fair. If you can afford it/find one get an Olympus Stylus Epic. Or an Olympus XA.

Or just try your luck at random thriftshop P&S. Check out www.35mmc.com. There's a few posts on there with random P&S.


Stylus Epic | HP5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1100 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1100 dpi
Image Created	2011:06:16 20:34:00
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1433
Image Height	948

File: image.jpg (113KB, 640x432px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 640x432px

I took my Hexar out of its box where its been sitting for over 2 years. Before that i only took it out shooting maybe 3 times and put 4 rolls through it.

When i turned it on the aperture and shutter were being wonky. Ive read that when the battery is low (from just sitting around for literal years) it can cause the hexar to do some weird shit.

Havent had a chance to get a new battery for it yet, buut i really hope thats the only issue :(

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	432
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: image.jpg (87KB, 640x432px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 640x432px

>>2922646

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	432
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: image.jpg (85KB, 640x432px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 640x432px

>>2922648

I really needa start shooting again. Started hanging out with this grill again and were planning on shooting some more together.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	432
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2922549
Have an xa actually, didn't like it too much at first because I didn't like the focusing on it but I've been using it more lately and I remembered how great it is, it's an amazing camera

>>2922650
Good shit mane, don't stop shooting

File: image.jpg (192KB, 1703x1076px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1703x1076px

Op here, af35ml, it's another poopy scan

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1703
Image Height	1076
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2921407
is this bw film printed then scannned on ur home-nopro scan?they look seventeesh :D

>>2922650
I hope it's better than this shite..are you fucking blind?

File: image.jpg (89KB, 640x432px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 640x432px

>>2923325
Photos better if you tweak the white balance a bit

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.8.4228
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	640
Image Height	432
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_20160907_194628.jpg (1MB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1365px

Leica Minilux.

File: IMG_20160905_163526.jpg (878KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

878KB, 2048x1365px

Minilux

(2)

>>2923523
>>2923524
good colors, i can never find information on how this camera actually is, you like it?

>>2923743

I really enjoy the Minilux. The viewfinder is small but it really helps you converge verticals and compose big scenes, perfect for holidays. Lens is sharp and has a certain 'look' to it. Overall a lovely camera to own and use.

File: 1.jpg (180KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 667x1000px

Leica mini 1/2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2709
Image Height	4469
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:09:13 11:30:05
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000

File: 2.jpg (194KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1000x667px

>>2923859
2/2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4479
Image Height	2752
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:09:13 11:30:23
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

>>2923523
>>2923524
>>2923859
>>2923860
Beautiful. The Minilux is my 35mm P&S grail.

File: IMG_20160909_103931.jpg (1MB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1365px

>>2924013

I actually only paid £125 for this camera and a roll of Portra. It was great fun to take on holiday and have fun going on roller-coasters without worrying about smashing lenses or batteries. I would highly recommend any premium point and shoot film camera.

Just got a roll back from my stylus ebic before it quit on me, If anyone knows why it wont stop winding for eternity please let me know

File: Screen Shot 2016-09-13 at 1.27.24 PM.png (442KB, 396x598px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 396x598px

>>2924170
I fucked up

>>2924013
see
>>2923860
>>2923859
are leica mini, not minilux.

>>2924034
paid 25eur incl. shipping for my mini.

File: img047.jpg (2MB, 926x1296px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 926x1296px

Contax T2 | Fuji Superia 400

>>2924170

As in it sounds like a motor is spinning, but no film is being rewound?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	10200
Image Height	14039
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:04:03 20:38:05
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	926
Image Height	1296

File: A182089_003.jpg (485KB, 1080x724px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 1080x724px

canon sure shot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:11 14:09:52
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A182089_005.jpg (748KB, 1080x730px) Image search: [Google]

748KB, 1080x730px

>>2924404

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:11 14:09:44
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A182089_014.jpg (425KB, 1080x730px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1080x730px

>>2924406

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:11 14:09:24
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A182089_033.jpg (555KB, 1080x929px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 1080x929px

>>2924408

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:13 22:35:47
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A182089_006.jpg (373KB, 1080x730px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 1080x730px

>>2924409

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:13 22:36:24
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A182088_029.jpg (603KB, 1080x730px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 1080x730px

>>2924410

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:13 22:36:58
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A182088_004.jpg (532KB, 1080x759px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1080x759px

>>2924413

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:13 22:39:24
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A182088_015.jpg (443KB, 730x1080px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 730x1080px

>>2924414

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:13 22:38:14
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A182088_019.jpg (429KB, 1080x730px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 1080x730px

>>2924415

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:13 22:37:17
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A182089_015.jpg (346KB, 1080x823px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1080x823px

>>2924418
found it in a japanese thrift store for ~$1, did a sketch waterproofing job which killed it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:11 14:09:01
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2924404
>>2924406
>>2924408
>>2924409
>>2924410
>>2924413
>>2924414
>>2924415
>>2924418
>>2924423
Good shit mane, I got a sure shot owl, good camera but the only downside is the shitty lens on mine

>>2924406
What film did you use?

>>2924384
I believe so, yeah? it was at exposure 11 and then went to 9 and then wouldn't stop, I googled around and they it should be the battery. Lets hope (;-;)

>>2923400
>better
r u srs

>>2925024
Less shit

Chill

>>2923400
you're a dumbass, the streetlight was obviously yellow so making all lights white isn't doing the photo a favor

File: Haguro 13.jpg (765KB, 673x1000px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 673x1000px

When I still believed in the Contax T2 meme.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: Haguro 18.jpg (696KB, 1000x672px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 1000x672px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: Haguro 19.jpg (652KB, 670x1000px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 670x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: Akiba GH 10.jpg (673KB, 673x1000px) Image search: [Google]

673KB, 673x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: Tokyo C 14.jpg (516KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

516KB, 667x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2925872
Yes it does lol

>>2925878
Yeah I remember you from a few threads, honestly I've only ever seen your t2 photos with the terrible corner sharpness I think somethings up with your camera

>>2925916
Whatever at this point, I made good money from selling it. It was a horrible compact anyway since it wasn't actually compact at all. Also fuck autofocus without TTL. Could never trust it to focus on small objects and it couldn't focus through windows.

>>2925922
bummer, some people swear by this camera but i guess it just wasnt your thing, some of the photos are nice though

>>2924409
Damn she's cute

>>2925975
Truuuu

File: IMG_3781.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>2924917
Modified one of my sure shots to be "waterproof"

Superia 400 I think. The following photos are either very expired superia 400 or kodak gold 200. I forgot to overexpose sometimes and some are very grainy, but I tried to rescue with Lightroom dehaze.

Surprisingly it survived only to succumb to motor failure right after

File: 065.jpg (195KB, 1080x721px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1080x721px

>>2924948
Superia 400, forgot to reply

Autofocus was kinda borked but it survived submersion a couple of times

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 19:13:42
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 119.jpg (592KB, 1080x721px) Image search: [Google]

592KB, 1080x721px

>>2926678
pretty fun though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 19:13:21
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 064.jpg (448KB, 1080x721px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1080x721px

>>2926679

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 19:25:57
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 096.jpg (547KB, 721x1080px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 721x1080px

>>2926680

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 19:16:36
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 067.jpg (324KB, 1080x721px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 1080x721px

>>2926682

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 19:18:13
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 101.jpg (633KB, 1080x688px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 1080x688px

>>2926683

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 19:26:16
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2926682
Nice

File: 009.jpg (289KB, 1080x721px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1080x721px

>>2926685

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 19:15:15
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 107.jpg (499KB, 721x1080px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 721x1080px

>>2926689
I put the flash end of the camera underwater and submerged it to the middle of the lens but it didn't appear to work

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 19:41:32
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 102.jpg (527KB, 1080x721px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1080x721px

>>2926691
a fun little outing

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:16 19:41:45
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2924997

Sound like an issue I had. I could shoot a whole roll fine, but when the film was done and the camera wanted to rewind the film, it seemed to be skipping or something. Just heard a motor noise but nothing happened.

File: 20160916135903.jpg (670KB, 2304x1536px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 2304x1536px

can i get some advice/thoughts on this pic?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot G5 X
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Lens Size	8.80 - 36.80 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:17 22:27:01
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	23.36 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2304
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Full Auto
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	Unknown
Drive Mode	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	63.610 m
Sequence Number	1
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	192
Image Number	101-0086

>>2927142
>canon g5x

You're in the wrong thread m8

>>2927142
its no good.

File: image.jpg (81KB, 749x499px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 749x499px

Opinions on digitally editing your film photos? I personally feel like you should leave your film photos mostly untouched.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	749
Image Height	499

>>2928808
if you're shooting color negatives, you're always digitally editing your film photos, whether you let your software automatically correct the colors for you or you do it manually.

You don't just hit invert and get PURE UNTOUCHED FILM AESTHETIC COLORS IMPOSSIBLE BY DIGITAL SENSORS

Scanned film is just another digital image file I can work with. Sometimes all I do is correct the levels and adjust the blue cast, then fuck around with brightness and contrast if needed.

>>2928808
Impossible to leave them untouched because otherwise you'll be at the mercy of the scanner deciding what the correct color balance is. Unless you only do darkroom printing or project slides, there's no point talking about "untouched".

>>2928827
>>2928835
Yeah good points.
I never really thought about it that way with scans digitally altering the photos anyway.
Thanks

Yo is anyone interested in
>contax tvs
>fuji dl 500
Snapshits ?
Will post after taking a dump

File: fuji200_010.jpg (642KB, 657x1000px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 657x1000px

>>2930771
Contax g2 Fuji200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4458
Image Height	6785
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:43:16
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	657
Image Height	1000

File: fuji200_030_.jpg (712KB, 661x1000px) Image search: [Google]

712KB, 661x1000px

>>2930790
Contax g2 fuji 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4480
Image Height	6775
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:43:05
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	661
Image Height	1000

File: fuji200_023.jpg (837KB, 661x1000px) Image search: [Google]

837KB, 661x1000px

>>2930791
Contax g2 fuji 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4469
Image Height	6766
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:41:09
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	661
Image Height	1000

File: fuji200_025.jpg (681KB, 1000x659px) Image search: [Google]

681KB, 1000x659px

>>2930792
Contax g2 fuji 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6782
Image Height	4471
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:40:37
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	659

File: kodakbw005.jpg (331KB, 600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 600x1000px

>>2930793
Contax TVS kodak bw400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4032
Image Height	6719
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:42:43
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	600
Image Height	1000

File: kodakbw015.jpg (308KB, 614x1000px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 614x1000px

>>2930794
Contax TVS kodak bw400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4127
Image Height	6719
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:42:32
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	614
Image Height	1000

File: kodakbw031.jpg (378KB, 619x1000px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 619x1000px

>>2930795
Contax TVS kodak bw400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4127
Image Height	6671
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:42:21
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	619
Image Height	1000

File: polaroid_061.jpg (374KB, 1000x585px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1000x585px

>>2930797
Contax TVS polaroid film converted

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6639
Image Height	3887
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:42:03
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	585

File: fuji200_030.jpg (651KB, 616x1000px) Image search: [Google]

651KB, 616x1000px

>>2930799
Contax TVS fuji 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4112
Image Height	6671
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:41:50
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	616
Image Height	1000

File: fuji200_028.jpg (603KB, 611x1000px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 611x1000px

>>2930800
Contax TVS fuji 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4128
Image Height	6751
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:40:22
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	611
Image Height	1000

File: fuji h200022.jpg (572KB, 595x1000px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 595x1000px

>>2930801
Contax TVS fuji 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4015
Image Height	6751
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:55:13
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	595
Image Height	1000

File: polaroid200_007.jpg (806KB, 607x1000px) Image search: [Google]

806KB, 607x1000px

>>2930801
Fuji DL 500 polaroid 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4079
Image Height	6720
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:41:38
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	607
Image Height	1000

>>2930793
I didn't know the g2 had such nice bork.

Your pics have the corners I'm used to seeing in g2 pics, a little bit of smear in the extreme edges and a touch of vignette. Definitely shouldn't look like this shit: >>2925882

File: polaroid200_014.jpg (832KB, 609x1000px) Image search: [Google]

832KB, 609x1000px

>>2930806
Fuji DL 500 polaroid 200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4016
Image Height	6591
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 22:41:26
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	609
Image Height	1000

>>2930790
>>2930791
>>2930792
>>2930793
Nice. Lens?

>>2930809
>>2930812
only lens i have on the G2
45mm f2

>>2930814
The 90's a cracker. Hell, they're all good. In fact, I think I'll head out right now with a roll of HP5+ for muh street.

File: fuji200_030 Kopie.jpg (615KB, 622x1000px) Image search: [Google]

615KB, 622x1000px

>>2930811
Contax TVS fuji h200

>>2930815
iam about to buy a 10 pack black n white film on ebay but not sure which desu...
i want it cheap as possible...
is foma 100 allright for muh street ?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4128
Image Height	6639
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:21 23:07:13
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	622
Image Height	1000

>>2930819
I tend to get expensive film, at least in part because I go through it very slowly. That said, I understand that Foma 100 is absolutely fine.

>>2930819
If you're new to b&w film, yeah, go with the cheap stuff. This'll make you pleasantly surprised when you've got good & finally try some more expensive film, as opposed to getting mopey about expensive film not covering for being new.

That being said, don't shoot grass or trees or leaves with foma 100 unless it's your main subject.

>>2930771
interested in both, just heard about the tvs and it seems great

>>2930790
>>2930791
>>2930792
>>2930793
>>2930794
>>2930795
>>2930797
>>2930799
>>2930800
>>2930801
>>2930805
>>2930806
good shit mane, hows the g2? everyone talks about its god tier lenses but nobody talks about how good the camera actually is

>>2930790
What the fuck? Why is Ted Bundy in a drag and who punched him?

>>2931054
Not that guy but I have a g1. It's an incredibly fast and easy camera to use. The autofocus is decently snappy and I have no gripes with mine. I mainly use mine as a hands off aperture priority with exposure

>>2931054
it's a great tool, i love using it...
the metering is great.
the handlinh..
focus is actually fast but let's say every 37 shots ( 1 film ) you get 1 out of focus image..sometimes 2
it permanently shoots 37 exposures
iam not an expert on this but
beside my leica r4 or contax rts canon a1 etc
i always use the contax g2

File: tumblr_odv1moYbWe1vte48po1_r1_1280.jpg (131KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 960x640px

I've shot about 10 rolls through my Nikon L35AF. Not sure what to think about it. Sometimes it completely meters wrong/misses focus. Sometimes it's perfect.

I don't think I enjoy the lack of control with compacts, or maybe I'm just using the wrong ones? I normally shoot with a Nikon FE.

Here's a few recent snapshits.

File: tumblr_odv1jbvk1x1vte48po1_r1_1280.jpg (48KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 960x640px

>>2931283

File: tumblr_odv1h2ZqpL1vte48po1_r1_1280.jpg (159KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 960x640px

>>2931285
>these windows have the right to light which will be vigorously enforced

File: tumblr_odv1iyg3951vte48po1_r1_1280.jpg (108KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 960x640px

>>2931286
PC World before it gets demolished and made into apartments no one can afford

File: CNV00007.jpg (124KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 960x640px

>>2931290
Seem to get ones where everything looks a bit soft like this. Is it a keeper?

>>2931054
>>2931093

I have a G2. Very fun camera to use, and AF is a lot faster than the G1 (which, as Anon comments, is absolutely fine). You're effectively always shooting in aperture priority, but I don't think that's a downside.

>>2928827
>>2928835
Best scanner for 35mm? Can't decide between the Plustek OpticFilm8100 or the Epson Perfection V550. They're both around the £150 mark.

I know the Epson is a lot faster than the Plustek, but aren't Plustek higher resolution?

What are the pros/cons?

>>2930801
>>2930805
>>2930819
Really nice portraits. Are you just using the built-in flash on the TVS for these?

Did you ask permission or just shoot them Bruce Gilden style?

>>2931304
Plustek is a lot better for 35mm; the flatbeds are really for larger formats and struggle to get the resolution.

>>2931304
Plustek all day. They take a lot longer to scan with but the quality is brilliant. Ditch the software that comes with it and get Vuescan.

When I get my photos developed they always give me lo-res scans on a CD for like £1 more. I just use these as a reference to pick the best shots and then scan them in a hi-res on the Plustek.

The only reason to get an Epson is if you're archiving hundreds of old negatives and need to do lots at once. Or if you're scanning medium/large format.

>>2931304
what i like on a flatscann like epson is
that it gives you a preview of 24 images at once
then you do little adjustes and click scann...

>>2931376
Yeah but they're shit m8

>>2931323
What about the plustek 120? I plan to scan 35 and mf, is it any good?

>>2930806
>>2930811
Just a reminder these were taken with a
cheap plastic point n shoot
>fuji dl 500

>>2931419
Yeah it's great but it costs like £1500

i want to buy a cheap but good point and shoot. any reccs?

>>2931519
Mju-ii is pretty good for around 150, Olympus xa is fucking awesome but it's manual focus but it's cheap, just go to 35mmc.com and look through their reviews, you can get a pretty good unheard of af point and shoot the size of your palm for 10 bucks

>>2931308
Haha thx for comparing to gilden
İ asked for the portraits and yes, build in flash.
But i shoot spontaniously except i want a real portrait

>>2931817
>i ask for portraits
actually 95% say no or telling me to fuck off
that's what iam dealing with everyday actually lol
all i really want is to shoot many interesting looking people as possible but they either curse or nicely tell me to fuck off
>feels bad man

>>2932193

$100 say g2 anon is a tall and handsome white guy.

>>2932197
>g2 anon
man this makes me really feel special and i like this name, very much appreciated !

>>2932210

youre welcome!

>>2923400

that looks shit

File: image.png (128KB, 500x745px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 500x745px

>>2932640

I need recommendations for a compact film camera. It needs to be as small as possible, and preferably weatherproof. And above all cheap, zoom is a plus but not necessary. I'm going to use it to take snapshits while on an airsoft field as a player. I had a Mju I got from a flea market for a few yuropoors, but it refused to work corrently and I only managed to take some 15 shots with it before evacuating the roll. It was handy for the purpose otherwise, but it was pretty appalling how much these things cost on Ebay, so I don't think another Mju is going to come into question.

Anything you guys would have in mind? My experience in point and shits is very limited.

What's the cheapest film point and shoot that still has manual controls?

File: img016.jpg (214KB, 1224x959px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1224x959px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2015:07:18 21:38:36

>>2934078
Not a lot of good weatherproof zooms out there, just buy something cheap

>>2934085
No film point and shoot has full manual control, or else they wouldn't be a point and shoot, you could go with the xa which has aperture and manual focus, or you could use the Rollie 35 which has full manual but it's zone focus and a bit pricy but the lens is God tier

i have the contax tvs which is surprsingly very good !!!
iam thinking of trading to a guy who owns the contax t2 but never uses it because he's old now and only shows his collection

>>2934078
Stop being poor and just schell out for another mju, even the zoom model isen't that horrible.

>>2934238
What even is this? Stop.

I got a Question about Film developing

let's say you have a film that has 22°
you check the List and it says for example :
>22° - 7 min
>24° - 6 min
your developer and the room you're in have 24°
do i go with 6 or 7 min even if the film says 22° but the developer, fixer and everything else are 24°

File: iso.jpg (24KB, 220x189px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 220x189px

>>2937063
Are you mixing up ISO and DIN (old film speed scale)?

Most charts give you the dev time at 20 degrees, and then you can compensate with shorter times for higher developer temperature. For home developing is usually easier to go with lower temperatures if you can, since you don't need to be quite as accurate.

Stop and fix is not very temperature dependent, as long as you keep it at room temperature it will be fine.

>>2937072
Ive seen a video where the teacher checks the chart and it says something like
24 degree 6 min
22 degree whatever ...all tmax
then he checks his dev temperature and follows by that order and so on

so lets say i have the fp4 film which says 22°
and my darkroom has 24....what do ? change dev time or cool down to 22 ??

File: Screen Shot 2016-09-30 at 22.50.39.png (139KB, 963x569px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 963x569px

>>2937095
The 22 degrees on the FP4 is just the film speed rating, equivalent to ISO 125.
Use Massive Dev Chart (use Mr. Google) to find the time for your specific developer and dilution of it. Check the chart, it will probably be listed for 20 degrees celsius. You can then find on the same website a tool to calculate the times at different temperatures.

Or you could cool your chemicals down to 20 degrees or whatever, but that might be more difficult for you, idk.

>>2937102
thanks !!

>>2937105
No worries. It wouldn't hurt to read up a bit more on this before you start either I guess.

File: tumblr_nlrlft2Vet1srxcu2o1_1280.jpg (369KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 1280x853px

probably gonna dump some snapshits

mju I first up, before it shit its self :(

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2592
Image Height	1800
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2015:03:25 21:37:24
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1333

File: tumblr_ngimi5jrh91srxcu2o1_1280.jpg (476KB, 1000x684px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 1000x684px

>>2937243

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2550
Image Height	1800
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2014:12:13 21:00:49
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	684

File: tumblr_ntgtzcz3PA1srxcu2o1_1280.jpg (393KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 1280x853px

>>2937244
these ones are pretty old

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4956
Image Height	3360
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3600 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2015:08:22 12:49:45
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1280

File: tumblr_noqhm0JpHi1srxcu2o1_1280.jpg (414KB, 1000x694px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 1000x694px

>>2937246

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2592
Image Height	1800
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2015:05:16 21:02:30
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	694

File: tumblr_ngimb6ecd91srxcu2o1_1280.jpg (349KB, 1000x1501px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1000x1501px

>>2937247

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1800
Image Height	2550
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2014:12:13 12:12:43
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1501

File: Untitled (2).jpg (251KB, 980x666px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 980x666px

>>2937249
some pretty recent ones

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3272
Image Height	2224
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:09:04 16:14:53
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	980
Image Height	666

File: Untitled (4).jpg (533KB, 980x666px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 980x666px

>>2937251

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3296
Image Height	2240
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:09:04 16:14:54
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	980
Image Height	666

File: Untitled (20).jpg (179KB, 975x666px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 975x666px

>>2937252
these are very recent ones from a nikon af3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3304
Image Height	2256
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:09:26 15:50:00
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	975
Image Height	666

File: Untitled (8).jpg (203KB, 999x666px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 999x666px

>>2937253

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3208
Image Height	2248
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:09:26 15:49:47
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	999
Image Height	666

File: Untitled (5).jpg (236KB, 962x666px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 962x666px

>>2937254
thats probably a wrap folks

thanks for looking at my shitty pictures

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3248
Image Height	2248
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:09:26 15:50:01
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	962
Image Height	666

I want a P&S for snapshits with date imprint, built in flash and fixed focal length, what are my options? Already have a Mju I and II so maybe not one of those.

File: A184208_012A.jpg (395KB, 730x1080px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 730x1080px

mju ii

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:30 23:20:49
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A184208_001A.jpg (344KB, 1080x730px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1080x730px

>>2937871

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:30 23:19:51
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: A184208_000A.jpg (434KB, 710x1080px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 710x1080px

>>2937874

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:30 23:19:32
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 1475364949598.jpg (181KB, 1004x480px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1004x480px

Crossposting it from /film/
Got these for $4 total.
Running my first roll of Fuji CA135 through the minolta.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Photo Editor(dev.macgyver)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:10:01 19:33:40
Image Width	480
Image Height	1004

>>2937885
Nice, I've heard good things about the oly

File: image.jpg (2MB, 4416x2551px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4416x2551px

My lolympus xa, portra 800

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.9.4232
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Width	4416
Image Height	2551

>>2940008
I've been using the mino, and it's fun, can't wait to get the film developed (between an FM and the Mino, it's my first actual foray into film outside of disposables).
Haven't bought the batterys for the Oly yet.
Apparently there was a recall on them 10 years ago because they could smoke and shock the user.
>>2940010
pretty!

>G2 Anon here
just bought the Olympus xa2 for 10€
+ the xa also for 10 bucks
tought i'd post it here since i never had a chance finding p&s cameras this cheap...

btw...any advice on shooting with the xa2 ?

>>2940046
Damn, those are fantastic prices considering the fact that I spend 60 on my xa

>>2940046
advice for the xa2?
put it down and pick up the xa.

they're really not comparable, ones a full featured rangefinder, the others a P&S

>>2940053
>>2940057
I just read that the xa2 has an aperture of 3,5 and the xa 2,8.....
Is the xa the better one ?
I should call the seller and tell her to replace the xa2 with xa then ?!

>>2940115
Yeah both are great cameras but the xa is a bit better, focusing is hard on the xa but you get aperture control and the optics are better, I'd choose the xa if I were you

>>2940125
just called the nice asian lady and told her
to send 2x xa instead of xa2 and xa lol

she put pictures of the xa and xa2 as one product on the selling site and titled it olympus xa2 so i tought that the xa 2 has the f2,8 since it was on the pictures...
gladly i checked reviews on it while taking a dump !

>>2940135
they are a real joy to use, the shutter is light as a feather, the rangefinder patch works well enough and the tiny cog viewing window under the lens is cute as fuck.

The lens is sharp as heck in the centre and has quite a heavy vignette, can make for some surprisingly dramatic photos.

>>2940138
thanks mate i love postive news on cameras i purchased. actually i've seen many pics taken with those or mju, stylus etc. all i knew was
they're popular for some reasons.
nuffin will stop me with the xa and the tvs in my pockets yeahhh love shooting film MOTHERFUCKERS HAHAH

>>2940138
Vinette isn't even that bad on it, it actually looks good sometimes but if you don't like it it's super easy to take away in lightroom

File: image.jpg (3MB, 4416x2566px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4416x2566px

Olympus xa with portra 400, put the white borders for gits and shiggles

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.9.4232
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Width	4416
Image Height	2566