Here's my work

File: davis_free-7.jpg (2MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1800x1200px

2/?
Forgot to mention it's a series in my first post sorry

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	420 dpi
Vertical Resolution	420 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:16 08:25:43
Exposure Time	6 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	21.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: davis_free-5.jpg (920KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

920KB, 1800x1200px

3/?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	420 dpi
Vertical Resolution	420 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:16 08:25:32
Exposure Time	10 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: davis_blurry-5.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

4/?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	420 dpi
Vertical Resolution	420 dpi
Image Created	2015:11:13 11:40:25
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: davis_blurry-1.jpg (1005KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1005KB, 1800x1200px

5/?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5i
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	420 dpi
Vertical Resolution	420 dpi
Image Created	2015:11:13 11:40:01
Exposure Time	10 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/22.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: davis_avedon-4.jpg (612KB, 1200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 1200x1800px

6/?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	420 dpi
Vertical Resolution	420 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:02 11:00:16
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	640
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	33.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: davis_portfolio-9.jpg (2MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1800x1200px

7/?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	420 dpi
Vertical Resolution	420 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:15 11:41:45
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	42.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: davis_stop_motion-2.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

8/8
My last one for now I'll upload some more recent ones from this year later

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	420 dpi
Vertical Resolution	420 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:24 11:41:13
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>wahwahwah i want to be a photofag for life
>posts literal garbage

Who the fuck would want to give you money for these photos you fucking moron. It's clear from the exif you have no fucking clue technically and it's clear from your photos you have no fucking clue artistically.

1. Identify target market
2. Study, instead of clicking the picture button at "neat" stuff, use resources, don't rely on classes
3. Get good, or at least better than a 12 year old on instagram.

Oh, and still in highscool, enjoy your ban.

>>2916903
>>1971605

i dont wanna tear your stuff apart cause you're still a kid

take yourself a little less seriously, study other successful photographers

Some interesting ideas I guess but I don't like any of these aside from the first image. Solely based on personal taste though because I'm too new to be in a position to critique technical stuff.

Calling these "work" is overly pretentious, but I suggest you keep shooting as there can be seen potential in some.

>>2916909
Is quite well executed, but all others are either uninteresting regarding the subject or you were experimenting with slow shutter speeds. While the latter is completely ok, the right situation to use such a slow speed without the additional use of a flash is pretty rare.

>>2916903
most of these are pretty bad. like people have already said, most of it is just bad technique or poor choice of subject the only decent on is 2916909. however the cropping is shit. you should have gotten all of his arms in the shot. it would have looked 10x better. keep in mind that slow shutter speed images are rarely as cool as you think they are. if youre gonna use motion blur in your images make it interesting. no more of this people standing up and sitting down crap.

This is to the Troll pick on someone your own size age whatever. Who died and made you king of the internet. Me im the one who picks on the Bully so ya the gloves are off

>>2916909
A good photo! Well exposed, well composed.

>>2916910
Seems like a high quality picture with a dSLR for the sake of it. If you're trying to capture detail, lay it down and take it against a white background, really do it proper.

>>2916912
Good idea but bad execution. Framing looks a bit weird, the shutter speed didn't properly freeze the spit. Would have been nice to see the guys face, closer to the centre, with faster shutter speed.

It looks like you have a decent grasp on exposure though, which is GREAT. Keep at it!!

>>2917997
continued

>>2916903
This looks ridiculously saturated and sharp, but it actually could work as a style if the subject was a bit more interesting / composed better.

>>2916904
>>2916905
>>2916906
The whole 'multiple exposure multiple faces' thing has been done to death, so stale idea but actually decent execution.

>>2916908
Way too saturated. You can give images a red tint without abusing them like this.

These are actually not horrific! Look at your own photos and judge them.

On composition, exposure, framing, colours, interest, focus, etc.

>>2917997
>>2918003
There is a need of more people like you on /p/